Literature DB >> 32238624

Morphological and molecular identification of Eimeria spp. in breeding chicken farms of Japan.

Makoto Matsubayashi1,2,3, Tomoyuki Shibahara1,4, Tomohide Matsuo5, Toshimitsu Hatabu6, Junya Yamagishi7,8, Kazumi Sasai1,2, Takashi Isobe9.   

Abstract

There have been no reports of the prevalence of Eimeria spp. in poultry breeding farms in Japan unlike those of broiler farms. From 2017 to 2018, we examined the prevalence of Eimeria spp. on breeding farms in Japan by oocyst morphology and PCR analyses. A total of 143 samples was collected from 37 breeding farms in 21 prefectures of Japan. We detected oocysts of seven species at 34 of 37 breeding farms by PCR, and we identified E. brunetti at 51.5% of farms found to be positive for Eimeria. The differences in the identification of Eimeria spp. between the morphology and PCR assay methods of oocysts were pronounced for E. maxima and E. necatrix. We confirmed that molecular tools were more suitable for accurately estimating prevalence of Eimeria spp., and these findings suggest that E. brunetti could be widespread in Japan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eimeria; Eimeria brunetti; PCR; breeding farm; chicken

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32238624      PMCID: PMC7273590          DOI: 10.1292/jvms.19-0661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Sci        ISSN: 0916-7250            Impact factor:   1.267


Members of genus Eimeria cause coccidiosis, which is characterized by watery or bloody diarrhea and the cause of death in livestock due to severe enteritis [2, 4]. Thus, infection by members of this genus has been recognized as a serious threat to the livestock industry worldwide. Although seven species of Eimeria have been reported in chickens, each species possesses different pathological potential [19]. Namely, E. necatrix and E. tenella, and, in some cases, E. brunetti cause lethal bloody diarrhea, while E. maxima, E. acervulina, and E. mitis are rather less pathogenic but affect weight gain, and E. praecox is regarded as being the least pathogenic [9, 14]. To date, anticoccidials such as polyether ionophore antibiotics or live anticoccidial vaccines with attenuated strains have been used to control disease. In Japan, several surveys on the prevalence of Eimeria spp. have been conducted on broiler farms [15,16,17]. In these reports from the 1970s, six Eimeria spp., not including E. brunetti, were identified based on morphology of the detected oocysts. Later, Nakamura et al. reported identification of E. brunetti on poultry farms (no detailed description of the farms was given) in 2 different areas of Japan by enzyme electrophoresis [12], and then, Kawahara et al. identified E. brunetti on 21 of 32 poultry farms (10 of 15 breeder farms for broilers, 4 of 4 of breeder farms for layers, 6 of 7 of layer farms, and 1 of 6 broiler farms) by real-time PCR for five Eimeria spp. [7]. Additionally, an isolate of E. brunetti from a breeder farm was found to cause clinical coccidiosis and show lethal pathogenicity by experimental infection [8]. These results suggest that E. brunetti, which had not been detected 4 decades ago, could be distributed in Japan, although further surveys have not been performed. However, live coccidial vaccines against E. brunetti are not available in Japan. Generally, breeder and layer chickens in Japan are kept for a long time (approximately 64–65 and 107–108 weeks, respectively), unlike broiler chickens, which are kept for approximately 7–8 weeks. These chickens are thought to acquire immunity against the infections of Eimeria spp. through previous infection with a lower dose of parasites or through commercially available live vaccinations. With this background, investigations of Eimeria spp. in poultry have mainly focused on broiler flocks because younger chicks are more susceptible to wild infections than older ones [1, 18]. To our knowledge, there have been no reports of the prevalence of all seven Eimeria spp. in breeder flocks in Japan to date. Thus, we cannot sufficiently evaluate the possibility that breeder farms might possess potential risks for occurrence of coccidiosis by the long rearing. Here, we surveyed prevalence of Eimeria spp. at breeder farms by two methods in order to assess the current distribution of parasites. One method was the detection of Eimeria oocysts from the feces of breeder stocks based on the morphological characteristics. Furthermore, we used a molecular tool by species-specific PCR to exactly identify oocysts of seven species. We examined 37 poultry farms (25 broiler breeders, 6 layer breeders, 1 broiler and layer breeder, and 5 breeders unknown for broiler or layer) in 21 prefectures of Japan. The mean number of chickens reared on the farms was 19,578.4 (range, 2,500–73,000), and the mean rearing density was 11.4 chickens/m2(range, 3.8–50.0 chickens/m2). The mean age of the chickens was 213.3 days old (range, 44–470 days old) except for one unknown farm. At 34 of the 37 farms studied, coccidiosis was very rarely or sometimes observed over several years, and 6 farms used an anti-coccidiostat like sulfamonomethoxine or salinomycin for the prevention. As for vaccination use, 17 farms used TAM™ (Nisseiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which contains precocious attenuated strains of E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. tenella, and Neca™ (Nisseiken Co., Ltd.), which contains a precocious attenuated strain of E. necatrix; 9 farms used Neca™ and pentavalent Paracox®-5 (MSD Animal Health, Milton Keynes, UK), which contains precocious attenuated strains of E. acervulina, E. maxima, E. mitis, and E. tenella; 4 farms used TAM™, Neca™, and Paracox®-5; 2 farms used only Paracox®-5; and 2 farms had unknown vaccine usage. Only 3 farms had no vaccination usage. From September 2017 to January 2018, 2–4 dropped feces were collected from the ground of 1–4 poultry houses in each farm and stored at 4°C until laboratory examination. All chickens were healthy without any clinical symptoms when fecal samples were collected. Each fecal sample was examined by the sugar flotation method [3] with the modification that the final flotation was conducted by settling for 30 min instead of centrifugation. Oocysts per gram (OPG) were determined using a plankton calculation slide (Matsunami Glass, Osaka, Japan). Briefly, 2 g feces were stirred with 38 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) water for 10 min. One hundred microliter solutions were put on the slide and covered by 36 × 24 mm cover glasses. More than 10 lanes with 0.5 mm wide or entire fields were examined, the number of oocysts were counted, and OPG were calculated. Species identification of Eimeria was conducted under a microscope based on oocyst morphology (size and shape) as previously reported [11]. Fecal examinations were conducted by the Research Institute for Animal Science in Biochemistry and Toxicology (Kanagawa, Japan). Oocysts purified by the sugar floatation method were diluted in 1–2 ml PBS, and DNA was extracted as previously reported [3]. For identification of seven chicken Eimeria spp., PCR targeting the internal transcribed spacer-1 (ITS-1) region of ribosomal RNA gene was carried out as reported previously [6]. PCR products were subjected to electrophoretic separation on an agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized on a UV transilluminator. As results, we identified oocysts of Eimeria spp. in samples from 33 of 37 breeding farms (91.9%) by the sugar flotation method. The maximum OPG at positive farms was <200 at 3 farms, 200 to 1,000 at 14 farms, >1,000 to 10,000 at 7 farms, and >10,000 to 100,000 at 9 farms. The OPG of each Eimeria spp. could not be determined. Based on morphology of the isolated oocysts, six Eimeria spp. were identified (Table 1). PCR assay of positive samples identified seven Eimeria spp., and E. acervulina and E. mitis were the most prevalent and E. brunetti was found in 17 among 33 positive farms. There were mismatches in identification between the two methods and low matched percentages were seen in E. necatrix (0%) and E. maxima (5.3%). Because these oocysts morphologically have similar characteristics between E. acervulina and E. mitis, and between E. maxima and E. brunetti, and among E. tenella, E. necatrix, and E. praecox, surveys were previously conducted as three type oocysts like smaller, middle, and larger size oocysts [13]. Thus, it is difficult to identify species only based on the morphologies, especially in similar types of the oocysts. Actually, in most cases of our study, E. necatrix confirmed by PCR was morphologically identified as E. tenella or E. praecox, and E. maxima tended to be misidentified as E. brunetti (data not shown). These differences in identification could be due to the coexistence of multiple species in samples as well being attributable to morphological similarities.
Table 1.

Prevalence of Eimeria spp. among oocysts detected from 33 positive farms and identified by morphological characteristics and PCR

SpeciesNumber of oocysts identified by method
MorphologyPCRBoth methodsa)(percent identical to both)
E. acervulina3130 30 (96.8%)
E. brunetti1417 13 (72.2%)
E. maxima416 1 (5.3%)
E. mitis1530 14 (45.2%)
E. necatrix023 0 (0%)
E. praecox2120 14 (51.9%)
E. tenella1612 6 (27.3%)

a) Number of farms of each Eimeria spp. identified by both morphological characteristic and PCR methods. Percentages identical to both methods are calculated as (number of farms identified by both methods)/ (number of farms identified by morphological characteristics + number of farms identified by PCR–number of farms identified by both methods).

a) Number of farms of each Eimeria spp. identified by both morphological characteristic and PCR methods. Percentages identical to both methods are calculated as (number of farms identified by both methods)/ (number of farms identified by morphological characteristics + number of farms identified by PCR–number of farms identified by both methods). We show vaccine usages on the examined farms and detection of Eimeria spp. (Table 2). Most of the farms used the vaccine against 4–9 Eimeria spp. Among the detected species, E. acervulina and E. mitis were found with high frequency. Although the reasons remain unknown because the tools to differentiate between vaccine and wild strains are not available, it might be due to oocyst numbers of inoculated vaccine strains, e.g., Paracox® and TAM contained E. mitis and E. acervulina with the highest dose according to the manufacture instructions.
Table 2.

Detection of Eimeria spp. by PCR and use of live vaccines in 37 examined farms

Vaccinationsa)
NoneUnknown
Paracox®Paracox® + NecaTAM + NecaTAM + Paracox® + Neca
No. of farms for Eimeria spp. detected332915412
(No. of examined farms)(37)(2)(9)(17)(4)(3)(2)

E. acervulina302912412
E. brunetti17237311
E. maxima16254212
E. mitis301913412
E. necatrix23279311
E. praecox20159212
E. tenella12223212

a) TAM™ vaccine includes strains of E. acervulina, E. maxima, E. tenella, Neca™ vaccine includes strain of E. necatrix, and Paracox®-5 includes strains of E. acervulina, E. maxima, E. mitis and E. tenella. Underlined numbers indicate the possibility that wild and vaccine strains are included.

a) TAM™ vaccine includes strains of E. acervulina, E. maxima, E. tenella, Neca™ vaccine includes strain of E. necatrix, and Paracox®-5 includes strains of E. acervulina, E. maxima, E. mitis and E. tenella. Underlined numbers indicate the possibility that wild and vaccine strains are included. To date, identification of Eimeria spp. has been conducted mainly on the basis of observing oocyst morphology as well as infection site(s). However, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish species due to the high degree of similarity among some oocysts with regard to morphological characteristics as described in other reports [5, 10]; thus, molecular techniques have recently been proven to be useful for the clear identification and classification of these parasites, overcoming limitations of traditional approaches [7, 10]. In this study, we had difficulties with the morphological identification of some species such as E. maxima or E. necatrix. Thus, our experience confirms that it is necessary to use molecular tools to achieve exact identification. The prevalence of Eimeria spp. was differed between countries, diagnostic methods, and situations of the hosts such as ages, treatments to control, and populations. In previous reports of Japan, the prevalence of Eimeria spp. were shown to range from 59.2% to 76.6% on broiler farms in 1973–1975 (mostly from 30 to 60 days old or 11 to 80 days old) [15,16,17], and 72.3% at broiler and 48.0% at layer farms in 2007 (unknown ages) [13]. Although fewer farms were surveyed in the present study, the detection rate (91.9%) was higher than those of previous reports in Japan [13, 15,16,17]. Because the mean age of the breeder birds was 213.3 days old, high detection rates of Eimeria spp. in this study could be due to the long-term rearing. Additionally, OPG for half of the examined farms was less than 103, and no birds showed any clinical symptoms, and thus, they may have been lightly infected. At least 86.5% of the farms in the present study used live vaccines including E. acervulina, E. maxima, E. mitis, E. necatrix, and/or E. tenella. Thus far, we are not able to differentiate strains originating from vaccines from wild strains based on morphological characterization or PCR assay, introducing the possibility that the detected parasites originated from vaccine strains of the species. However, E. brunetti and E. praecox are strictly wild strains, and more than 50% of eimerian detected farms were found to be positive for E. brunetti in the present study. E. brunetti was suggested to be the most pathogenic following E. tenella and E. necatrix in a previous report [8]. Thus, developing live vaccines against E. brunetti is desired.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Avian coccidiosis. A review of acquired intestinal immunity and vaccination strategies.

Authors:  H S Lillehoj; E P Lillehoj
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.577

2.  A simplified protocol for molecular identification of Eimeria species in field samples.

Authors:  Anita Haug; Per Thebo; Jens G Mattsson
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 3.  Diagnosis and control of chicken coccidiosis: a recent update.

Authors:  Abiodun Joseph Fatoba; Matthew Adekunle Adeleke
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2018-10-29

4.  Identification of Eimeria brunetti using glucose phosphate isomerase and lactate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  T Nakamura; H Kawaguchi; J Imose
Journal:  Nihon Juigaku Zasshi       Date:  1990-08

5.  Molecular characterization of highly pathogenic Eimeria species among beef cattle on Java Island, Indonesia.

Authors:  Fitrine Ekawasti; Wisnu Nurcahyo; April Hari Wardhana; Tomoyuki Shibahara; Masaharu Tokoro; Kazumi Sasai; Makoto Matsubayashi
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Field surveys on coccidial infection in broilers in Japan--results obtained in spring and summer in 1973.

Authors:  H Oikawa; H Kawaguchi; K Nakamoto; K Tsunoda
Journal:  Nihon Juigaku Zasshi       Date:  1974-08

Review 7.  Problems in the identification of species of Eimeria.

Authors:  P L Long; L P Joyner
Journal:  J Protozool       Date:  1984-11

8.  The influence of age of host on infection with Eimeria tenella.

Authors:  M E Rose
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 1.276

9.  Detection of five avian Eimeria species by species-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  Fumiya Kawahara; Kensuke Taira; Shinya Nagai; Hiroshi Onaga; Misao Onuma; Tetsuo Nunoya
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.577

10.  Characterization of Eimeria brunetti Isolated from a Poultry Farm in Japan.

Authors:  Fumiya Kawahara; Guohong Zhang; Takayuki Suzuki; Akira Iwata; Kisaburo Nagamune; Tetsuo Nunoya
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 1.267

View more
  1 in total

1.  ITS1-PCR based identification of chicken Eimeria species in poultry litter from Mymensingh district, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mohammad Zahangir Alam; Anita Rani Dey; Shanaz Parvin; Shirin Akter; Sharmin Aqter Rony
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2021-09-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.