Literature DB >> 32238480

The Neural Mechanism of the Social Framing Effect: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS Studies.

Jie Liu1,2, Ruolei Gu3,4, Chong Liao1, Juanzhi Lu1, Yuxing Fang5,6, Pengfei Xu1,2, Yue-Jia Luo1,2, Fang Cui7,2.   

Abstract

As an important cognitive bias, the framing effect shows that our decision preferences are sensitive to the verbal description (i.e., frame) of options. This study focuses on the neural underpinnings of the social framing effect, which is based on decision-making regarding other people. A novel paradigm was used in which participants made a trade-off between economic benefits and the feelings of others. This decision was described as either a "harm" to, or "not helping," other persons in two conditions (Harm frame vs Help frame). Both human males and females were recruited. Participants behaved more prosocially for Harm frame compared with Help frame, resulting in a significant social framing effect. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, Experiment 1 showed that the social framing effect was associated with stronger activation in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), especially its right part. The functional connectivity between the right TPJ (rTPJ) and medial prefrontal cortex predicted the social framing effect on the group level. In Experiment 2, we used transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate the activity of the rTPJ and found that the social framing effect became more prominent under anodal (excitatory) stimulation, while the nonsocial framing effect elicited by the economic gain/loss gambling frame remained unaffected. The rTPJ results might be associated with moral conflicts modulated by the social consequences of an action or different levels of mentalizing with others under different frame conditions, but alternative interpretations are also worth noting. These findings could help elucidate the psychological mechanisms of the social framing effect.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Previous studies have suggested that the framing effect is generated from an interaction between the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex. This opinion, however, is based on findings from nonsocial framing tasks. Recent research has highlighted the importance of distinguishing between the social and nonsocial framing effects. The current study focuses on the social framing effect and finds out that the temporoparietal junction and its functional connectivity with the medial prefrontal cortex play a significant role. Additionally, modulating the activity of this region leads to changes in social (but not nonsocial) framing effect. Broadly speaking, these findings help understand the difference in neural mechanisms between social and nonsocial decision-making. Meanwhile, they might be illuminating to promote helping behavior in society.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; functional magnetic resonance imaging; multivoxel pattern analysis; right temporoparietal junction; social framing effect; transcranial direct current stimulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32238480      PMCID: PMC7189763          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1385-19.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Loss attention in a dual-task setting.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Guy Hochman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-19

2.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1998-11

3.  Fidelity of neural reactivation reveals competition between memories.

Authors:  Brice A Kuhl; Jesse Rissman; Marvin M Chun; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selective increase of intention-based economic decisions by noninvasive brain stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nihonsugi; Aya Ihara; Masahiko Haruno
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction.

Authors:  Idalmis Santiesteban; Michael J Banissy; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Neural substrates of framing effects in social contexts: A meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  X T Wang; Li-Lin Rao; Hongming Zheng
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Rita Morais Tavares; Avi Mendelsohn; Yael Grossman; Christian Hamilton Williams; Matthew Shapiro; Yaacov Trope; Daniela Schiller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Reading hidden intentions in the human brain.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Katsuyuki Sakai; Geraint Rees; Sam Gilbert; Chris Frith; Richard E Passingham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Characterization of the temporo-parietal junction by combining data-driven parcellation, complementary connectivity analyses, and functional decoding.

Authors:  Danilo Bzdok; Robert Langner; Leonhard Schilbach; Oliver Jakobs; Christian Roski; Svenja Caspers; Angela R Laird; Peter T Fox; Karl Zilles; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis.

Authors:  S C Krall; C Rottschy; E Oberwelland; D Bzdok; P T Fox; S B Eickhoff; G R Fink; K Konrad
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.270

View more
  3 in total

1.  To Blame or Not? Modulating Third-Party Punishment with the Framing Effect.

Authors:  Jiamiao Yang; Ruolei Gu; Jie Liu; Kexin Deng; Xiaoxuan Huang; Yue-Jia Luo; Fang Cui
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.271

Review 2.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging research in China.

Authors:  Hongzan Sun; Yong He; Heqi Cao
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 5.243

3.  fMRI evidence reveals emotional biases in bilingual decision making.

Authors:  Yuying He; Francesco Margoni; Yanjing Wu; Huanhuan Liu
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.270

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.