Literature DB >> 24357614

Loss attention in a dual-task setting.

Eldad Yechiam1, Guy Hochman.   

Abstract

The positive effect of losses on performance has been explained as stemming from the increased weighting of losses relative to gains. We examine an alternative possibility whereby this effect is mediated by attentional processes. Using the dual-task paradigm, we expected that positive effects of losses on performance would emerge under attentional scarcity and diffuse to a concurrently presented task. In Study 1, decision performance was compared for a task that involved either gains or losses and was performed either alone or as a secondary task. The results showed a significant 40% improvement in performance in the loss condition, but only under conditions of resource scarcity, when the task was a secondary one. In Study 2, the same task was presented as a primary task. Again, losses were associated with improved performance in the secondary task. Given that this secondary task did not include losses, these findings demonstrate an attentional spillover effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; decision making; learning; loss; performance; punishment; search behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24357614     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613510725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  15 in total

1.  To not settle for small losses: evidence for an ecological aspiration level of zero in dynamic decision-making.

Authors:  Bo Pang; Nathaniel J Blanco; W Todd Maddox; Darrell A Worthy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

2.  Differential modulation of cognitive control networks by monetary reward and punishment.

Authors:  Ana Cubillo; Aidan B Makwana; Todd A Hare
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  The Neural Mechanism of the Social Framing Effect: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS Studies.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Ruolei Gu; Chong Liao; Juanzhi Lu; Yuxing Fang; Pengfei Xu; Yue-Jia Luo; Fang Cui
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  DeFINE: Delayed feedback-based immersive navigation environment for studying goal-directed human navigation.

Authors:  Kshitij Tiwari; Ville Kyrki; Allen Cheung; Naohide Yamamoto
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-05-23

5.  Toward a general theoretical framework for judgment and decision-making.

Authors:  Davide Marchiori; Itzhak Aharon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-17

6.  On the relation between economic bubbles and effort gaps between sellers and buyers: An experimental study.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Amitay Kauffmann; Nathaniel J S Ashby; Gal Zahavi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Monty Hall problem revisited: Autonomic arousal in an inverted version of the game.

Authors:  Eduardo Massad; Paulo Cesar Costa Dos Santos; Armando Freitas da Rocha; Edward J N Stupple
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Decision-Making in Suicidal Behavior: The Protective Role of Loss Aversion.

Authors:  Gergö Hadlaczky; Sebastian Hökby; Anahit Mkrtchian; Danuta Wasserman; Judit Balazs; Núria Machín; Marco Sarchiapone; Merike Sisask; Vladimir Carli
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Negativity Bias in Media Multitasking: The Effects of Negative Social Media Messages on Attention to Television News Broadcasts.

Authors:  Jari Kätsyri; Teemu Kinnunen; Kenta Kusumoto; Pirkko Oittinen; Niklas Ravaja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  How the threat of losses makes people explore more than the promise of gains.

Authors:  Tomás Lejarraga; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.