Literature DB >> 32237256

Reporting of health-related quality of life endpoints in National Cancer Institute-supported cancer treatment trials.

Diane St Germain1, Andrea Denicoff2, Andrea Torres3, Joseph Kelaghan1, Worta McCaskill-Stevens1, Grace Mishkin2, Ann O'Mara1, Lori M Minasian1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of capturing and reporting health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in clinical trials has been increasingly recognized in the oncology field. As a result, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) began to provide support for correlative HRQOL studies in cancer treatment trials. The current study was conducted to assess the publication rate of HRQOL correlative studies in NCI-supported treatment trials and to identify potential factors positively or negatively associated with publication rates.
METHODS: The NCI conducted a retrospective review of existing NCI databases to identify cancer treatment trials that had obtained additional NCI funding for the assessment of HRQOL and to determine the extent to which funded HRQOL studies have been completed and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
RESULTS: Of the 108 included trials, 58 (54%) had a parent trial (PT) publication; of these, 36 trials (62%) had a published HRQOL result: 20 as an independent publication and 16 that were included and/or reported in the PT publication. The length of time between trial activation and closure, as well as the specific cancer, appeared to be associated with the publication rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrated that approximately 45% of the PT publications were followed by a HRQOL publication within 1 year, to allow the knowledge to be used in patient treatment decision making. The authors believe the current analysis is an important first step toward a better understand of the challenges that researchers face when reporting HRQOL endpoints.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Cancer Institute; clinical trials; health-related quality of life (HRQOL); patient-reported outcome; publications

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32237256     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing the measurement of health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  John M Salsman; Suzanne C Danhauer; Justin B Moore; Mollie R Canzona; David E Victorson; Bradley J Zebrack; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  In our patient-centered era, it is time we gave patient-reported outcomes their due.

Authors:  David Cella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The PROTEUS-Trials Consortium: Optimizing the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials.

Authors:  Claire Snyder; Norah Crossnohere; Madeleine King; Bryce B Reeve; Andrew Bottomley; Melanie Calvert; Elissa Thorner; Albert W Wu; Michael Brundage
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.599

4.  Listening to the Patient Voice Adds Value to Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michael D Brundage; Norah L Crossnohere; Jennifer O'Donnell; Samantha Cruz Rivera; Roger Wilson; Albert W Wu; David Moher; Derek Kyte; Bryce B Reeve; Alexandra Gilbert; Ronald C Chen; Melanie J Calvert; Claire Snyder
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 11.816

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.