Literature DB >> 32236265

Methylcellulose - a versatile printing material that enables biofabrication of tissue equivalents with high shape fidelity.

T Ahlfeld1, V Guduric1, S Duin1, A R Akkineni1, K Schütz1, D Kilian1, J Emmermacher1, N Cubo-Mateo1, S Dani1, M V Witzleben1, J Spangenberg1, R Abdelgaber1, R F Richter1, A Lode1, M Gelinsky1.   

Abstract

With the aid of biofabrication, cells can be spatially arranged in three dimensions, which offers the opportunity to guide tissue maturation in a better way compared to traditional tissue engineering approaches. A prominent technique allowing biofabrication of tissue equivalents is extrusion-based 3D (bio)printing, also called 3D (bio)plotting or robocasting, which comprises cells embedded in the biomaterial (bioink) during the fabrication process. First bioprinting studies introduced bioinks allowing either good cell viability or good shape fidelity. Concepts enabling printing of cell-laden constructs with high shape fidelity were developed only rarely. Recent studies showed the great potential of the polysaccharide methylcellulose (mc) as supportive biomaterial that can be utilized in various ways to enable biofabrication and especially extrusion-based bioprinting of bioinks. This minireview highlights the multiple applications of mc for biofabrication: it was successfully used as sacrificial ink to enable 3D shaping of cell sheets or biomaterial inks as well as as internal stabilizing component of various bioinks. Moreover, a brief overview about first bioprinted functional tissue equivalents is given, which have been fabricated by using mc. Based on these studies, future research should consider mc as an auxiliary material for bioinks and biofabricated constructs with high shape fidelity.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32236265     DOI: 10.1039/d0bm00027b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomater Sci        ISSN: 2047-4830            Impact factor:   6.843


  7 in total

1.  Norbornene-functionalized methylcellulose as a thermo- and photo-responsive bioink.

Authors:  Min Hee Kim; Chien-Chi Lin
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.061

2.  A 3D Bioprinted Material That Recapitulates the Perivascular Bone Marrow Structure for Sustained Hematopoietic and Cancer Models.

Authors:  Caitlyn A Moore; Zain Siddiqui; Griffin J Carney; Yahaira Naaldijk; Khadidiatou Guiro; Alejandra I Ferrer; Lauren S Sherman; Murat Guvendiren; Vivek A Kumar; Pranela Rameshwar
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 3.  Regenerative Medicine Technologies to Treat Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Defects.

Authors:  Jessica M Latimer; Shogo Maekawa; Yao Yao; David T Wu; Michael Chen; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-08-06

4.  Composite Bioinks With Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses-A Critical Evaluation of Results Obtained by In Vitro Experiments.

Authors:  Vera Guduric; Johannes Wieckhusen; Anne Bernhardt; Tilman Ahlfeld; Anja Lode; Chengtie Wu; Michael Gelinsky
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 5.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting for Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Insights into Naturally-Derived Bioinks from Land and Marine Sources.

Authors:  Marta Anna Szychlinska; Fabio Bucchieri; Alberto Fucarino; Alfredo Ronca; Ugo D'Amora
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-08-12

6.  Tailorable Zinc-Substituted Mesoporous Bioactive Glass/Alginate-Methylcellulose Composite Bioinks.

Authors:  Vera Guduric; Niall Belton; Richard Frank Richter; Anne Bernhardt; Janina Spangenberg; Chengtie Wu; Anja Lode; Michael Gelinsky
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Multiparametric Material Functionality of Microtissue-Based In Vitro Models as Alternatives to Animal Testing.

Authors:  Elena Stengelin; Julian Thiele; Sebastian Seiffert
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 16.806

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.