Literature DB >> 33546275

A 3D Bioprinted Material That Recapitulates the Perivascular Bone Marrow Structure for Sustained Hematopoietic and Cancer Models.

Caitlyn A Moore1,2, Zain Siddiqui3, Griffin J Carney1, Yahaira Naaldijk1, Khadidiatou Guiro1, Alejandra I Ferrer1,2, Lauren S Sherman1,2, Murat Guvendiren3,4, Vivek A Kumar3,4,5, Pranela Rameshwar1.   

Abstract

Translational medicine requires facile experimental systems to replicate the dynamic biological systems of diseases. Drug approval continues to lag, partly due to incongruencies in the research pipeline that traditionally involve 2D models, which could be improved with 3D models. The bone marrow (BM) poses challenges to harvest as an intact organ, making it difficult to study disease processes such as breast cancer (BC) survival in BM, and to effective evaluation of drug response in BM. Furthermore, it is a challenge to develop 3D BM structures due to its weak physical properties, and complex hierarchical structure and cellular landscape. To address this, we leveraged 3D bioprinting to create a BM structure with varied methylcellulose (M): alginate (A) ratios. We selected hydrogels containing 4% (w/v) M and 2% (w/v) A, which recapitulates rheological and ultrastructural features of the BM while maintaining stability in culture. This hydrogel sustained the culture of two key primary BM microenvironmental cells found at the perivascular region, mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells. More importantly, the scaffold showed evidence of cell autonomous dedifferentiation of BC cells to cancer stem cell properties. This scaffold could be the platform to create BM models for various diseases and also for drug screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alginate; bioprinting; bone marrow; breast cancer; hydrogel; methylcellulose; stem cells

Year:  2021        PMID: 33546275      PMCID: PMC7913313          DOI: 10.3390/polym13040480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Polymers (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4360            Impact factor:   4.329


  85 in total

1.  Controlling Shear Stress in 3D Bioprinting is a Key Factor to Balance Printing Resolution and Stem Cell Integrity.

Authors:  Andreas Blaeser; Daniela Filipa Duarte Campos; Uta Puster; Walter Richtering; Molly M Stevens; Horst Fischer
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  The mechanical environment of bone marrow: a review.

Authors:  Umut Atakan Gurkan; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues.

Authors:  Brendon M Baker; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  The ultrastructure of the hemopoietic environment of the marrow: a review.

Authors:  M A Lichtman
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  The influence of poly(ester amide) on the structural and functional features of 3D additive manufactured poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds.

Authors:  Antonio Gloria; B Frydman; Miguel L Lamas; Armenio C Serra; Massimo Martorelli; Jorge F J Coelho; Ana C Fonseca; M Domingos
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.328

6.  Shear-thinning and self-healing hydrogels as injectable therapeutics and for 3D-printing.

Authors:  Claudia Loebel; Christopher B Rodell; Minna H Chen; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Dynamic Bonds between Boronic Acid and Alginate: Hydrogels with Stretchable, Self-Healing, Stimuli-Responsive, Remoldable, and Adhesive Properties.

Authors:  Sang Hyeon Hong; Sunjin Kim; Joseph P Park; Mikyung Shin; Keumyeon Kim; Ji Hyun Ryu; Haeshin Lee
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Failure of Investigational Drugs in Late-Stage Clinical Development and Publication of Trial Results.

Authors:  Thomas J Hwang; Daniel Carpenter; Julie C Lauffenburger; Bo Wang; Jessica M Franklin; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Bioprinting of a Cell-Laden Conductive Hydrogel Composite.

Authors:  Andrew R Spencer; Ehsan Shirzaei Sani; Jonathan R Soucy; Carolyn C Corbet; Asel Primbetova; Ryan A Koppes; Nasim Annabi
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 9.229

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on the application of 3D-bioprinting technology in orthoregeneration: current achievements and open challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Pan; Kari Martyniak; Makan Karimzadeh; David G Gelikman; Jonathan DeVries; Kelly Sutter; Melanie Coathup; Mehdi Razavi; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Thomas J Kean
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-19

Review 2.  Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Cancer Modeling and Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Nicolas Germain; Melanie Dhayer; Salim Dekiouk; Philippe Marchetti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Additive Manufactured Polymers in Dentistry, Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives-A Review.

Authors:  Codruta Victoria Tigmeanu; Lavinia Cosmina Ardelean; Laura-Cristina Rusu; Meda-Lavinia Negrutiu
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 4.967

4.  Leveraging the scientific findings to develop therapeutic strategies for dormant breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Alejandra Ferrer; Yannick Kenfack; Andrew Petryna; Wadih Arap; Renata Pasqualini; Pranela Rameshwar
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2022-09-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.