| Literature DB >> 32232986 |
Qing-Xia Ma1, Hu Shan1, Hong-Liang Zhang1, Gui-Mei Li1, Rui-Mei Yang1, Ji-Ming Chen1.
Abstract
The surge of patients in the pandemic of COVID-19 caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 may overwhelm the medical systems of many countries. Mask-wearing and handwashing can slow the spread of the virus, but currently, masks are in shortage in many countries, and timely handwashing is often impossible. In this study, the efficacy of three types of masks and instant hand wiping was evaluated using the avian influenza virus to mock the coronavirus. Virus quantification was performed using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Previous studies on mask-wearing were reviewed. The results showed that instant hand wiping using a wet towel soaked in water containing 1.00% soap powder, 0.05% active chlorine, or 0.25% active chlorine from sodium hypochlorite removed 98.36%, 96.62%, and 99.98% of the virus from hands, respectively. N95 masks, medical masks, and homemade masks made of four-layer kitchen paper and one-layer cloth could block 99.98%, 97.14%, and 95.15% of the virus in aerosols. Medical mask-wearing which was supported by many studies was opposed by other studies possibly due to erroneous judgment. With these data, we propose the approach of mask-wearing plus instant hand hygiene (MIH) to slow the exponential spread of the virus. This MIH approach has been supported by the experiences of seven countries in fighting against COVID-19. Collectively, a simple approach to slow the exponential spread of SARS-CoV-2 was proposed with the support of experiments, literature review, and control experiences.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; hand hygiene; mask; pandemic; soap
Year: 2020 PMID: 32232986 PMCID: PMC7228401 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Virol ISSN: 0146-6615 Impact factor: 2.327
Figure 1The system mocking human breath for evaluation of the efficacy of masks
Percentage of AIV removed through instant wiping as compared without wiping
| Material for towel soaking |
| Percentage removed (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00% Soap powder | 5.93 ± 1.24 | 98.36% (96.11%‐99.31%) |
| 0.05% Active chlorine | 4.89 ± 0.74 | 96.62% (94.37%‐97.97%) |
| 0.25% Active chlorine | 12.01 ± 1.25 | 99.98% (99.94%‐99.99%) |
Abbreviations: AIV, avian influenza virus; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.
Percentage of AIV blocked by masks as compared with one layer of cloth
|
| Percentage blocked (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| N95 mask | 12.49 ± 0.33 | 99.98% (99.98%‐99.99%) |
| Medical mask | 5.13 ± 0.98 | 97.14% (94.36%‐98.55%) |
| Homemade mask | 4.37 ± 0.90 | 95.15% (90.97%‐97.39%) |
Abbreviations: AIV, avian influenza virus; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.