Literature DB >> 32232921

Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?

Daniël F Osses1,2, Frank-Jan H Drost1,2, Jan F M Verbeek2, Henk B Luiting2, Geert J L H van Leenders3, Chris H Bangma2, Gabriel P Krestin1, Monique J Roobol2, Ivo G Schoots1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may guide the utility of repeat targeted (TBx) and systematic biopsy (SBx) when monitoring men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) at 1-year of active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 111 consecutive men with low-risk (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade 1) PCa, who received protocolled repeat MRI with or without TBx and repeat SBx at 1-year of AS. TBx was performed in Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥3 lesions (MRI-positive men). Upgrading defined as ISUP Grade ≥2 PCa (I), Grade ≥2 with cribriform growth/intraductal carcinoma PCa (II), and Grade ≥3 PCa (III) was investigated. Upgrading detected by TBx only (not by SBx) and SBx only (not by TBx) was investigated in MRI-positive and -negative men, and related to radiological progression on MRI (Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation [PRECISE] score).
RESULTS: Overall upgrading (I) was 32% (35/111). Upgrading in MRI-positive and -negative men was 48% (30/63) and 10% (5/48) (P < 0.001), respectively. In MRI-positive men, there was upgrading in 23% (seven of 30) by TBx only and in 33% (10/30) by SBx only. Radiological progression (PRECISE score 4-5) in MRI-positive men was seen in 27% (17/63). Upgrading (I) occurred in 41% (seven of 17) of these MRI-positive men, while this was 50% (23/46) in MRI-positive men without radiological progression (PRECISE score 1-3) (P = 0.534). Overall upgrading (II) was 15% (17/111). Upgrading in MRI-positive and -negative men was 22% (14/63) and 6% (three of 48) (P = 0.021), respectively. In MRI-positive men, there was upgrading in three of 14 by TBx only and in seven of 14 by SBx only. Overall upgrading (III) occurred in 5% (five of 111). Upgrading in MRI-positive and -negative men was 6% (four of 63) and 2% (one of 48) (P = 0.283), respectively. In MRI-positive men, there was upgrading in one of four by TBx only and in two of four by SBx only.
CONCLUSION: Upgrading is significantly lower in MRI-negative compared to MRI-positive men with low-risk PCa at 1-year of AS. In serial MRI-negative men, the added value of repeat SBx at 1-year surveillance is limited and should be balanced individually against the harms. In serial MRI-positive men, the added value of repeat SBx is substantial. Based on this cohort, SBx is recommended to be performed in combination with TBx in all MRI-positive men at 1-year of AS, also when there is no radiological progression.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; PI-RADS; PRECISE; active surveillance; low-risk prostate cancer; prostate MRI; upgrading

Year:  2020        PMID: 32232921     DOI: 10.1111/bju.15065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  3 in total

Review 1.  The current role of MRI for guiding active surveillance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Olivier Rouvière; Morgan Rouprêt; Roderick van den Bergh; Raphaële Renard-Penna
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 16.430

2.  Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the Prostate Cancer Radiologic Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria to Detect Prostate Cancer Progression for Men on Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Luke P O'Connor; Alex Z Wang; Nitin K Yerram; Lori Long; Michael Ahdoot; Amir H Lebastchi; Sandeep Gurram; Johnathan Zeng; Stephanie A Harmon; Sherif Mehralivand; Maria J Merino; Howard L Parnes; Peter L Choyke; Joanna H Shih; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 3.  The utility of prostate MRI within active surveillance: description of the evidence.

Authors:  Georgina Dominique; Wayne G Brisbane; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.