| Literature DB >> 32231823 |
D Tsiptsios1, D Daud2, K Tsamakis3, E Rizos3, A Anastadiadis4, A Cassidy2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bilateral femoral neuropathy is an uncommon complication of various surgical and nonsurgical procedures, such as pelvic/abdominal surgery or vaginal delivery. Case Report. We report a case of a 41-year-old male who was found unresponsive against the wall in a "lithotomy-type" position with both knees flexed at approximately 90 degrees and both hips flexed and externally rotated at approximately 90 and 60 degrees, respectively, 24-48 hours after a drug overdose (combination of dihydrocodeine, paracetamol, diazepam, and amitriptyline). During his recovery, he complained of severe bilateral proximal lower limb weakness and bilateral distal lower limb pain and allodynia. His symptoms were initially attributed to critical illness myopathy/neuropathy (CIMN). However, thorough clinical and neurophysiological evaluation revealed that his symptoms were due to severe bilateral femoral neuropathies.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32231823 PMCID: PMC7086416 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2352850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Neurol Med ISSN: 2090-6676
Neurophysiological findings.
| Sensory nerve conduction studies | |||||||
| Nerve and site | Onset latency | Peak latency | Amplitude | Segment | Latency difference | Distance | Conduction velocity |
|
| |||||||
| Peroneal R | |||||||
| Ankle | 2.0 ms | 2.6 ms | 15 | Dorsum of foot-ankle | 2.0 ms | 100 mm | 49 m/s |
| Peroneal L | |||||||
| Ankle | 2.1 ms | 2.9 ms | 12 | Dorsum of foot-ankle | 2.1 ms | 95 mm | 45 m/s |
| Sural R | |||||||
| Lower leg | 1.7 ms | 2.6 ms | 12 | Ankle-lower leg | 1.7 ms | 95 mm | 55 m/s |
| Sural L | |||||||
| Lower leg | 1.7 ms | 2.6 ms | 12 | Ankle-lower leg | 1.7 ms | 95 mm | 55 m/s |
| Saphenous R | |||||||
| No recording | Lower leg-ankle | ||||||
| Saphenous L | |||||||
| No recording | Lower leg-ankle | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Motor nerve conduction studies | |||||||
| Nerve and site | Latency | Amplitude | Segment | Latency difference | Distance | Conduction velocity | F-latency |
|
| |||||||
| Peroneal R | |||||||
| Ankle | 5.9 ms | 2.7 mV | Extensor digitorum brevis-ankle | 5.9 ms | mm | m/s | |
| Fibula (head) | 13.0 ms | 1.9 mV | Ankle-fibula (head) | 7.1 ms | 320 mm | 45 m/s | |
| Tibial R | |||||||
| Ankle | 4.1 ms | 20.0 mV | Abductor hallucis-ankle | 4.1 ms | mm | m/s | 53.9 msec |
| Tibial L | |||||||
| Ankle | 3.9 ms | 20.7 mV | Abductor hallucis-ankle | 3.9 ms | mm | m/s | 53.3 msec |
|
| |||||||
| Electromyography | |||||||
| Spontaneous activity | MUAPs | Activation | Recruitment | ||||
| Fibrillations | PSWs | Amplitude | Duration | Phases | |||
|
| |||||||
| Right vastus lateralis | +3 | +3 | No MUAPs could be recruited | ||||
| Right vastus medialis | +3 | +3 | No MUAPs could be recruited | ||||
| Left vastus lateralis | +3 | +3 | No MUAPs could be recruited | ||||
| Left vastus medialis | +3 | +3 | No MUAPs could be recruited | ||||
| Right iliopsoas | 0 | 0 | N | N | N | N | N |
| Left iliopsoas | 0 | 0 | N | N | N | N | N |
| Right adductor longus | 0 | 0 | N | N | N | N | N |
| Left adductor longus | 0 | 0 | N | N | N | N | N |
PSWs, positive sharp waves; MUAPs, motor unit action potentials; N, normal.