| Literature DB >> 32231078 |
Sawar Khan1, Ayesha Nisar1, Jianqi Yuan1, Xiaoping Luo1,2, Xueqin Dou1, Fei Liu1, Xiaochao Zhao1, Junyan Li2, Habib Ahmad3, Sardar Azhar Mehmood4, Xingang Feng1.
Abstract
The most important and broad-spectrum drug used to control the parasitic worms to date is ivermectin (IVM). Resistance against IVM has emerged in parasites, and preserving its efficacy is now becoming a serious issue. The parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus (Rudolphi, 1803) is economically an important parasite of small ruminants across the globe, which has a successful track record in IVM resistance. There are growing evidences regarding the multigenic nature of IVM resistance, and although some genes have been proposed as candidates of IVM resistance using lower magnification of genome, the genetic basis of IVM resistance still remains poorly resolved. Using the full magnification of genome, we herein applied a population genomics approach to characterize genome-wide signatures of selection among pooled worms from two susceptible and six ivermectin-resistant isolates of H. contortus, and revealed candidate genes under selection in relation to IVM resistance. These candidates also included a previously known IVM-resistance-associated candidate gene HCON_00148840, glc-3. Finally, an RNA-interference-based functional validation assay revealed the HCON_00143950 as IVM-tolerance-associated gene in H. contortus. The possible role of this gene in IVM resistance could be detoxification of xenobiotic in phase I of xenobiotic metabolism. The results of this study further enhance our understanding on the IVM resistance and continue to provide further evidence in favor of multigenic nature of IVM resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Haemonchus contortus; RNAi; drug resistance; functional validation; ivermectin; larvae culture; population genomics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32231078 PMCID: PMC7230667 DOI: 10.3390/genes11040367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Details of samples.
| Pool | Strain Name | Code | IVM-Phenotype | Pool Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wu Meng-R | WMR | Resistant | 50 |
| 2 | Wu Shen-R1 | WSR1 | Resistant | 50 |
| 3 | Shan Xi-R | SXR | Resistant | 50 |
| 4 | Shan Xi-S | SXS | Sensitive | 50 |
| 5 | UK-R | UKR | Resistant | 50 |
| 6 | Wu Shen-R2.1 | WSR2.1 | Resistant | 50 |
| 7 | Wu Shen-R2.2 | WSR2.2 | Resistant | 50 |
| 8 | Australian-S | ASS | Sensitive | 50 |
Figure 1Summary of SNPs and InDel. (a) Total numbers of SNPs (transition + transversion) and InDel (deletion + insertion) in each population. (b) Distribution of SNPs (bottom panel) and InDel (top panel) across the genome.
Figure 2Estimates of genetic diversity. (a) Estimates of nucleotide diversity across the genome in all the populations of Haemonchus contortus analyzed in the present study. All values are the mean ± SD. (b) Genetic differentiation across the populations of Haemonchus contortus analyzed in the present study. Genome-wide average Fst scores (fixation index) were calculated in pairwise comparisons. Populations’ codes are according to Table 1. Abbreviation: WG, whole genome; Chr, chromosome.
Figure 3Mapping of within-strain genetic diversity across the genome in all the populations analyzed in the present study. The nucleotide diversity (pi) was calculated in 100 kb windows across the genome and mapped genome-wide in all the populations.
Figure 4Genome-wide pairwise Fst analysis between the IVM-sensitive (SXS) and IVM-resistant (SXR) strains. Both of these strains had a very close geographic background. Elevated points are the significantly differentiated genomic windows across the genome. Yellow line shows the genome-wide average Fst cut-off. Dotted line shows the top 5% cut-off value. (a) All the 5 kb windows spanning the genome. (b) Windows containing the 26 candidate genes of IVM resistance which were selected in the present study on the basis of their functional annotations in relation to IVM resistance.
Figure 5Genome-wide comparison of Tajima’s D across all the strains in the present study. Tajima’s D was calculated in 100 kb windows spanning the genome, and data was mapped chromosome wise. To emphasize the fluctuation in the allelic frequencies across the chromosomes, the variance in the mean value of Tajima’s D was calculated across the pooled data of all the populations, and mapped along with the respective chromosomal data (red line). A high variance is expected in the regions that are under the selection.
Figure 6RNAi assays for functional validations. (a,b) Larval feeding of FITC-labelled E. coli. (c) Results of qPCR. Transcription level was dropped in both the genes when blocked by RNAi in comparison to RNAi negative control. (d) Impact of RNAi-based silencing of candidate genes on IVM efficacy against H. contortus L2 larvae. In the control assay, no IVM was used. Silencing of GPCR gene (HCON_00155510) showed similar response as that of control. Silencing of Cyt-P450 gene (HCON_00143950) showed a clear drop in LFI-50 against the increasing concentration of IVM. Experiments were replicated in triplicates. Values represent mean ± SD. *** p < 0.0001.