| Literature DB >> 32230836 |
Nor Azila Muhammad Azami1, Tomohiko Takasaki2, Ichiro Kurane3, Meng Ling Moi4.
Abstract
Due to the global burden of dengue disease, a vaccine is urgently needed. Onpan>e of the key points in vaccine development is the development of a robust and reliable animal model of dengue virus infection. Characteristics including the ability to sustain viral replication, demonstration of clinical signs, and immune response that resemble those of human dengue virus infection are vital in animal models. Preclinical studies in vaccine development usually include parameters such as safety evaluation, induction of viremia and antigenemia, immunogenicity, and vaccine effectiveness. Although mice have been used as a model, non-human primates have an advantage over mice because of their relative similarity to humans in their genetic composition and immune responses. This review compares the viremia kinetics and antibody responses of cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis), common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), and tamarins (Saguinus midas and Saguinus labitus) and summarize the perspectives and the usefulness along with challenges in dengue vaccine development.Entities:
Keywords: animal model; common marmoset; cynomolgus macaque; dengue virus; non-human primate; secondary infection; tamarin; vaccine study
Year: 2020 PMID: 32230836 PMCID: PMC7238212 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9040247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Summary of the benefits and limitations of animal models of dengue infection.
| Type of Animal Model | Benefits of Use This Model | Limitations | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunocompetent mice |
Provide insight on the mechanistic contribution of host immune response to immunopathogenesis |
Limited data on infection by natural route of infection (i.e., mosquito bite) Less sensitive to challenge with clinical DENV strains Low/ undetectable systemic infective viremia Lack of clinical manifestations | [ |
| Interferon alpha/beta/gamma receptor knock-out mice) |
Help to understand the disease pathogenesis due to the ability to demonstrate disease pathology and viral replication following DENV injection Provide insight on the efficacy of the vaccine due to the ability to demonstrate protective effects and induction of neutralizing antibody in DENV vaccine candidate study |
Immune system response may not faithfully reflect those of natural hosts Limited utility in studies on interaction between humoral and cell-mediated immune response in vivo. Lack of clinical manifestations Severe disease development is age-dependent, thus the animal’s limited lifespan is a limitation | [ |
| IFN -/- mice |
Allows the investigation of T-cell responses relevant to DENV vaccine design and better modeling the T-cell response during DENV infection |
Limited capability in mounting full immune response due to the lack of IFN-αβ and γ receptor Lack of clinical manifestations | [ |
| Humanized mice |
Allows the investigation of antibody response and cytokines following DENV infection Ideal to study disease pathogenesis due to the presence of clinical manifestation and viremia |
The viremic period is not consistent with human DENV infection Requires highly technical process including the cells used for engraftment and consistently high levels of engraftment | [ |
| Non-human primates |
Natural hosts in sylvatic DENV cycle Allows the investigation of immune response because it has been shown to be similar to human DENV infection Provides insights on correlation between protection and disease pathogenesis Demonstrates measurable viremia Useful to measure protection conferred by vaccination or passively acquired antibody |
High cost of maintenance Lack of clinical manifestations | [ |
| Dengue human infection model (DHIM) |
Most biologically relevant model Provides relevant insights into immune response to dengue virus Cost-effective avenue for testing drug efficacy before large scale clinical trials |
Limited accessibility, ethical issues and regulatory restrictions No licensed specific therapy for dengue virus, potential risk for severe disease development Long-term risk of severe dengue development in participants after study (natural infection) End-point is potentially unethical or difficult to measure Variances in immunology and genetic background | [ |
Comparison of dengue viral RNA levels (log10 genome copies/mL) in plasma of cynomolgus macaques, common marmosets, and tamarins during primary and secondary dengue virus infection.
| Type of Infection | Animal ID | Inoculated Virus | Dengue Viral RNA Copy Numbers (log10 Genome copies/mL) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days after Inoculation | |||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 14 | |||
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| CM1 | DENV1 01-27 | NT | NT | NT | 2.8 | NT | - | - | - | - | |
| CM2 | NT | NT | NT | - | NT | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| CM3 | DENV2 DHF0663 | NT | NT | NT | 6.5 | NT | - | - | - | - | |
| CM4 | NT | NT | NT | 3.1 | NT | - | - | - | - | ||
| CM5 | NT | NT | NT | 4.1 | NT | - | - | - | - | ||
| CM6 | NT | NT | NT | 7.2 | NT | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| CM7 | DENV3 DSS1403 | NT | NT | NT | 2.5 | NT | - | - | - | - | |
| CM8 | NT | NT | NT | 3.6 | NT | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| M1 | DENV1 02-17 | - | NT | NT | 5.6 | NT | 5.7 | - | - | - | |
| M2 | - | NT | 7.0 | NT | NT | 6.5 | 7.7 | 6.0 | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| M3 | DENV2 DHF0663 | - | NT | NT | 7.2 | NT | 5.0 | - | NT | - | |
| M4 | - | NT | NT | 7.5 | NT | 6.8 | 5.4 | NT | - | ||
| M5 | - | NT | 4.5 | NT | 6.0 | NT | 4.0 | NT | - | ||
| M6 | - | NT | 5.0 | NT | 6.3 | NT | 4.2 | NT | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| M7 | DENV3 DSS1403 | - | NT | NT | - | NT | 4.7 | - | - | - | |
| M8 | - | NT | 4.9 | NT | 5.6 | NT | - | NT | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| T1 | DENV2 DHF0663 | - | 6.4 | NT | 6.1 | NT | 4.2 | - | NT | NT | |
| T2 | - | 7.3 | NT | 7.5 | NT | 6.3 | 4.2 | NT | NT | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| T3 | DENV2 DHF0663 | - | 5.3 | NT | 6.2 | NT | NT | 4.5 | - | - | |
| T4 | - | 4.7 | NT | 4.6 | NT | NT | 5.4 | - | - | ||
| T5 | - | 5.3 | NT | 6.3 | NT | NT | 6.2 | - | - | ||
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| CM1 | DENV2 DHF0663 | NT | NT | NT | 6.2 | NT | - | - | - | - | |
| CM2 | NT | NT | NT | 6.2 | NT | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| CM3 | DENV3 DSS1403 | NT | NT | NT | 3.0 | NT | - | - | - | - | |
| CM4 | NT | NT | NT | 2.8 | NT | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| M9 | DENV2 DHF0663 | - | - | NT | 6.7 | NT | NT | 4.5 | NT | - | |
| M10 | - | - | NT | 6.2 | NT | NT | - | NT | - | ||
| M11 | - | - | NT | 6.4 | NT | NT | 3.9 | NT | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| M12 | DENV3 DSS1403 | - | - | 7.0 | NT | NT | 6.5 | 5.2 | 4.7 | - | |
| M13 | - | - | 7.5 | NT | NT | 7.7 | 6.0 | 4.2 | - | ||
(-) indicates below detection levels; NT indicates not tested or samples were not collected. 1 DENV genome levels in marmosets M1 to M8 and tamarins T3, T4, and T5 were previously reported [12,13]. 2 DENV genome levels in marmosets M9 to M13 were previously reported [20,21]. Cynomologous macaques (CM) were infected as previously reported [97,98].
Figure 1Levels of dengue virus specific IgM and IgG antibody in cynomolgus macaques, common marmosets, and tamarins: (A) Levels of DENV-specific IgM antibody during primary infection; (B) Levels of DENV-specific IgG antibody during primary infection; (C) Levels of DENV-specific IgM antibody during secondary infection; (D) levels of DENV-specific IgG antibody during secondary infection. Levels of antibody in cynomolgus macaques (○), common marmosets (●), and tamarins (×) were determined from day 0 to 14 after primary and secondary DENV infection. The P/N ratio indicates the positive: negative ratio. The P/N ratio was calculated by using the formula: absorbance of the test sample/absorbance of the negative control. The P/N ratioday0 is defined as the level of DENV-specific IgM or IgG antibody on the day of virus inoculation. DENV, dengue virus; Ig G, immunoglobulin G; Ig M, immunoglobulin M.