| Literature DB >> 32228694 |
Rui-Chao Chai1,2,3, Yao-Wu Zhang4, Yu-Qing Liu1,3, Yu-Zhou Chang4, Bo Pang1,3, Tao Jiang1,2,3,4, Wen-Qing Jia5,6,7, Yong-Zhi Wang8,9,10,11.
Abstract
Due to the rare incidence of spinal cord astrocytomas, their molecular features remain unclear. Here, we characterized the landscapes of mutations in H3 K27M, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) R132H, BRAF V600E, and the TERT promoter in 83 diffuse spinal cord astrocytic tumors. Among these samples, thirty-five patients had the H3 K27M mutation; this mutant could be observed in histological grade II (40%), III (40%), and IV (20%) astrocytomas. IDH1 mutations were absent in 58 of 58 cases tested. The BRAF V600E mutation (7/57) was only observed in H3-wildtype astrocytomas, and was associated with a better prognosis in all histological grade II/III astrocytomas. TERT promoter mutations were observed in both H3 K27M-mutant (4/25) and -wildtype (9/33) astrocytomas, and were associated with a poor prognosis in H3-wildtype histological grade II/III astrocytomas. In the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors, H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline gliomas, including spinal cord astrocytomas, are categorized as WHO grade IV. Here, we noticed that the median overall survival of histological grade II/III H3 K27M-mutant cases (n = 28) was significantly longer than that of either the total histological grade IV cases (n = 12) or the H3 K27M-mutant histological grade IV cases (n = 7). We also directly compared H3 K27M-mutant astrocytomas to H3-wildtype astrocytomas of the same histological grade. In histological grade II astrocytomas, compared to H3-wildtype cases (n = 37), H3 K27M-mutant patients (n = 14) had showed a significantly higher Ki-67-positive rate and poorer survival rate. However, no significant differences in these parameters were observed in histological grade III and IV astrocytoma patients. In conclusion, these findings indicate that spinal cord astrocytomas are considerably different from hemispheric and brainstem astrocytomas in terms of their molecular profiles, and that the histological grade cannot be ignored when assessing the prognosis of H3 K27M-mutant spinal cord astrocytomas.Entities:
Keywords: BRAF V600E; Glioma; H3 K27M; Spinal cord; TERT promoter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32228694 PMCID: PMC7106747 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-020-00913-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Characteristics of patients with spinal cord astrocytoma in this study
| Total | Total (Grade II–IV) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H3 wildtype | H3 K27M-mutant | ||||
| Number | 83 | 48 | 35 | ||
| Age (year) | Median | 31(6–63) | 30(6–63) | 35(9–52) | n.s |
| Gender | n.s | ||||
| male | 49(59%) | 31(65%) | 18(51%) | ||
| female | 34(41%) | 17(35%) | 17(49%) | ||
| Histological grade | |||||
| II | 51(61%) | 37(77%) | 14(40%) | ||
| III | 20(24%) | 6(13%) | 14(40%) | ||
| IV | 12(14%) | 5(10%) | 7(20%) | ||
| Location | n.s | ||||
| C | 29(35%) | 19(40%) | 10(29%) | ||
| C-T | 13(16%) | 6(13%) | 7(20%) | ||
| T | 34(41%) | 19(40%) | 15(43%) | ||
| T-L | 7(8%) | 4(8%) | 3(9%) | ||
| Resection | |||||
| GTR | 50(60%) | 38(79%) | 12(34%) | ||
| STR | 16(19%) | 6(13%) | 10(29%) | ||
| OB | 17(20%) | 4(8%) | 13(37%) | ||
| Radio | n.s | ||||
| yes | 53(64%) | 30(63%) | 23(66%) | ||
| no | 18(22%) | 12(25%) | 6(17%) | ||
| unknown | 12(14%) | 6(13%) | 6(17%) | ||
| Chemo | |||||
| yes | 23(28%) | 10(21%) | 13(37%) | ||
| no | 47(57%) | 32(67%) | 15(43%) | ||
| unknown | 13(16%) | 6(13%) | 7(20%) | ||
| IDH | n.s | ||||
| wildtype | 58(70%) | 33(69%) | 25(71%) | ||
| mutant | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | ||
| unknown | 25(30%) | 15(31%) | 10(29%) | ||
| TERT promoter | n.s | ||||
| wildtype | 45(54%) | 24(50%) | 21(60%) | ||
| mutant | 13(16%) | 9(19%) | 4(11%) | ||
| unknown | 25(30%) | 15(31%) | 10(29%) | ||
| BRAF V600E | |||||
| wildtype | 50(60%) | 26(54%) | 24(69%) | ||
| mutant | 7(8%) | 7(15%) | 0(0%) | ||
| unknown | 26(31%) | 15(31%) | 11(31%) | ||
| Ki-67 | |||||
| < 10% | 44(53%) | 37(63%) | 7(20%) | ||
| ≥10% | 46(55%) | 18(33%) | 28(80%) | ||
| unknown | 3(4%) | 3(4%) | 0(0%) | ||
| Survival (Median OS, months) | 40.13 | Und | 20.7 | ||
C cervical vertebrae, C-T cervicothoracic vertebrae, T thoracic vertebrae, T-L thoracolumbar vertebrae, GTR gross total resection, STR subtotal resection, OB open biopsy, Radio Radiotherapy, Chemo Chemotherapy
Significant P-values are indicated in bold text
Fig. 1Histological features, the H3 K27M-mutant status, and Ki-67 staining images of spinal cord astrocytomas. Representative images of spinal cord glioma samples with different histological grades and the H3 K27M-mutant status. Histological grade was determined based on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The presence of the H3 K27M mutation and Ki-67 expression were identified by immunohistochemical staining. Scale bar = 50 μm
Fig. 2Characteristics and survival rates of spinal cord glioma patients. a The landscape of clinicopathological features of spinal cord glioma patients. GTR: gross total resection, ≥ 90%; STR: subtotal resection, ≥ 50% and < 90%; OB: Open biopsy, < 50%. b–c Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients stratified by BRAF V600E mutation status and TERT promoter mutation status in (b) all histological grade II/III astrocytomas and (c) grade II/III astrocytomas without the H3 K27M mutation
Fig. 3MGMT promoter methylation status and chemotherapy responses of spinal cord astrocytomas. a The methylation levels of MGMT promoter CpGs 76–79 and the clinicopathological features of spinal cord gliomas. b The impact of TMZ treatment on the survival of patients with WHO 2016 grade IV gliomas
Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis of clinicopathological features in spinal cord gliomas with WHO 2016 grade II–IV
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | Confidence interval | HR | Confidence interval | |||||
| Low 90% | High 95% | Low 90% | High 95% | |||||
| 2.894 | 1.941 | 4.315 | 1.844 | 1.130 | 3.009 | |||
| 1.031 | 1.008 | 1.054 | 1.024 | 0.999 | 1.051 | 0.060 | ||
| 0.546 | 0.293 | 1.016 | 0.056 | – | – | – | – | |
| 6.004 | 3.009 | 11.980 | 2.527 | 1.130 | 5.652 | |||
| 5.660 | 2.659 | 12.044 | 2.253 | 0.933 | 5.444 | 0.071 | ||
| 1.901 | 1.336 | 2.707 | 1.331 | 0.886 | 2.001 | 0.168 | ||
HR hazard ratio
Significant P-values are indicated in bold text
Fig. 4The prognostic value of the H3 K27M mutation in 2016 WHO grade IV astrocytomas (a–b) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for patients stratified by (a) traditional histological grade and (b) the integrated diagnosis 2016 WHO grade. c–d Kaplan–Meier survival curves for patients with all 2016 WHO grade IV astrocytomas stratified by histological grade. e–f Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients with H3 K27M-mutant astrocytomas stratified by histological grade
Comparison of the characteristics and prognoses of histological grade II–IV spinal cord glioma patients with or without the H3 K27M mutation
| Histological Grade II | Histological Grade III | Histological Grade IV | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H3 wildtype | H3 K27M-mutant | H3 wildtype | H3 K27M-mutant | H3 wildtype | H3 K27M-mutant | ||||
| Number | 37 | 14 | 6 | 14 | 5 | 7 | |||
| Age (year) | 29 | 36 | n.s | 30 | 35 | n.s | 51 | 20 | |
| (6–54) | (10–51) | (13–63) | (9–52) | (30–63) | (13–36) | ||||
| Gender | n.s | n.s | n.s | ||||||
| male | 25(68%) | 7(50%) | 4(67%) | 9(64%) | 2(40%) | 2(29%) | |||
| female | 12(32%) | 7(50%) | 2(33%) | 5(36%) | 3(60%) | 5(71%) | |||
| Location | n.s | n.s | n.s | ||||||
| C | 16(43%) | 5(36%) | 1(17%) | 3(21%) | 2(40%) | 2(29%) | |||
| C-T | 5(14%) | 1(7%) | 0(0%) | 3(21%) | 1(20%) | 3(43%) | |||
| T | 13(35%) | 7(50%) | 4(67%) | 6(43%) | 2(40%) | 2(29%) | |||
| T-L | 3(8%) | 1(7%) | 1(17%) | 2(14%) | 0(0%) | 0 | |||
| Resection | n.s | n.s | |||||||
| GTR | 30(81%) | 3(21%) | 5(83%) | 7(50%) | 3(60%) | 2(29%) | |||
| STR | 3(8%) | 3(21%) | 1(17%) | 3(21%) | 2(40%) | 4(57%) | |||
| OB | 4(11%) | 8(57%) | 0(0%) | 4(29%) | 0(0%) | 1(14%) | |||
| Radio | n.s | n.s | n.s | ||||||
| yes | 25(68%) | 9(64%) | 4(67%) | 10(71%) | 1(20%) | 4(57%) | |||
| no | 8(22%) | 3(21%) | 1(17%) | 3(21%) | 3(60%) | 0(0%) | |||
| unknown | 4(11%) | 2(14%) | 1(17%) | 1(7%) | 1(20%) | 3(43%) | |||
| Chemo | n.s | n.s | n.s | ||||||
| yes | 6(16%) | 4(29%) | 3(50%) | 7(50%) | 1(20%) | 2(29%) | |||
| no | 27(73%) | 8(57%) | 2(33%) | 5(36%) | 3(60%) | 2(29%) | |||
| unknown | 4(11%) | 2(14%) | 1(17%) | 2(14%) | 1(20%) | 3(43%) | |||
| IDH1 | n.s | n.s | n.s | ||||||
| wildtype | 26(70%) | 11(79%) | 4(67%) | 10(71%) | 3(60%) | 4(57%) | |||
| mutant | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | |||
| unknown | 11(30%) | 3(21%) | 2(33%) | 4(29%) | 2(40%) | 3(43%) | |||
| TERT promoter | n.s | n.s | n.s | ||||||
| wildtype | 17(46%) | 10(71%) | 4(67%) | 8(57%) | 3(60%) | 3(43%) | |||
| mutant | 9(24%) | 1(7%) | 0(0%) | 2(14%) | 0(0%) | 1(14%) | |||
| unknown | 11(30%) | 3(21%) | 2(33%) | 4(29%) | 2(40%) | 3(43%) | |||
| BRAF V600E | n.s | n.s | |||||||
| wildtype | 23(62%) | 10(71%) | 1(17%) | 10(71%) | 2(40%) | 4(57%) | |||
| mutant | 3(8%) | 0(0%) | 3(50%) | 0(0%) | 1(20%) | 0(0%) | |||
| unknown | 11(30%) | 4(29%) | 2(33%) | 4(29%) | 2(40%) | 3(43%) | |||
| Ki-67 | n.s | n.s | |||||||
| < 10% | 28(76%) | 6(43%) | 2(33%) | 1(7%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | |||
| ≥10% | 7(19%) | 8(57%) | 4(67%) | 13(93%) | 5(100%) | 7(100%) | |||
| unknown | 2(5%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | |||
| Median OS (months) | Und | 24.23 | Und | 24.47 | n.s | 10.83 | 12.10 | n.s | |
C cervical vertebrae, C-T cervicothoracic vertebrae, T thoracic vertebrae, T-L thoracolumbar vertebrae, GTR gross total resection, STR subtotal resection, OB open biopsy, Radio Radiotherapy, Chemo Chemotherapy
Significant P-values are indicated in bold text