Intramedullary spinal cord neoplasms represent 2–4 % of central nervous system tumors, of which astrocytic gliomas represent 80 %. Patients presenting with spinal cord astrocytomas span the traditional pediatric and adult age divisions, having an overall age-distribution that is younger than cohorts with supratentorial gliomas. WHO grade I and II astrocytomas have better outcomes that are largely dependent on extent of surgical resection [10], whereas Grade III and IV astrocytomas are less amenable to safe surgical resection, and typically require adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy for treatment. Given the premium on preserving neurologic function during spinal cord surgery, intraoperative frozen section histologic analysis has an important role in driving therapeutic decision-making. However, histologic grading can be challenging in spinal cord astrocytomas because of the often relatively small samples obtained at the time of the surgical procedure. Therefore, grade-defining molecular biomarkers would be particularly useful for the accurate diagnostic classification of these tumors [13]. Recent genome level sequencing studies of supratentorial gliomas revealed discrete genomic alterations that discriminate pilocytic astrocytomas, WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas, and WHO grade IV glioblastoma (GBM), with notable differences between pediatric [9, 14, 15, 20] and adult [2, 3, 6] patients. To address the hypothesis that genomic alterations could segregate spinal cord astrocytoma histologic grades, we performed sequencing of cancer-related genes in a cohort of 17 tumors.Spinal cord astrocytomas from children and adults were obtained as formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from Massachusetts General Hospital, the University of Toronto, and New York University. Central neuropathology review performed by a neuropathologist (DNL) and specimens with clear histologic diagnosis and grading were used for further analysis. The characteristics of the discovery cohort (n = 17 specimens) are listed in Table 1. Targeted sequencing of 560 cancer related genes and 39 translocation events was performed on DNA extracted from these specimens (Supplementary Table 1) [5]. Briefly, DNA was sonicated to achieve an average fragment size of 250 base pairs, size selected and barcoded. Multiplexed pools were hybridized with biotinylated baits (Agilent SureSelect) designed to capture exonic sequences. The captures were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 in Rapid Run Mode. Mutation analysis was performed by MuTect [4] and SomaticIndelDetector, copy number variant analysis was performed by ReCapSeg, and rearrangement analysis was performed by BreaKmer [1]. When applicable, statistical comparisons were performed by Chi squared test.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of discovery cohort
Specimen
Age (years)
WHO grade
Gender
SA-TL04
5.2
I
Female
SA-TL13
4.5
I
Male
SA-TL11
13.6
I
Female
SA-TL19
5.4
I
Female
SA-TL20
5.8
I
Male
SA-TL14
5.9
I
Male
SA-TH04
17.2
I
Female
SA-TL02
8.3
I
Male
SA-TL12
9.0
I
Male
SA-TL17
13.4
I
Female
SA-TL10
1.5
II
Male
SA-N101
82.0
II
Female
SA-TL07
2.2
II
Female
SA-TL03
14.6
III
Female
SA-N103
25.0
IV
Male
SA-TH01
2.9
IV
Male
SA-TH02
12.3
IV
Male
Baseline characteristics of discovery cohortThe most recurrent findings in Grade I spinal cord astrocytomas were a BRAF-KIAA1549 translocation (n = 3/10) and BRAF copy number gain (n = 5/10) (Fig. 1). Additionally, WHO grade I astrocytomas were found to have non-synonymous mutations in NF2, NTRK1, NTRK3, PDGFRA, and TP53 (Supplementary Table 2). WHO grade II astrocytomas were similarly characterized by alterations involved in the MAPK-ERK or PI3K pathways, including BRAF-KIAA1549 translocation (n = 1/3) and BRAF amplification (n = 2/3). For samples with sufficient material, low coverage whole genome sequencing (mean 1× depth) was performed revealing that the BRAF amplification resulted from a chromosome 7 arm level gain in three of these specimens (SA-N101, SA-TL07, and SA-TL17, Supplementary Figure 1). Notably, no specimen in the discovery cohort was characterized by the BRAFV600E mutation.
Fig. 1
Exomic characterization of spinal cord astrocytomas reveals that BRAF alterations and the H3F3A K27M mutation segregate histologic grade. Central neuropathology review was performed on the cohort of specimens used in this study (top row). Grade I and II astrocytomas were notable for genome alterations in genes involved in the MAPK-ERK and PI3K pathway, whereas H3F3A K27M mutation was detected exclusively in Grade III and IV astrocytomas. BRAF-KIAA1549 was observed in 4/10 Grade I and II astrocytomas. Copy number analysis revealed amplification of BRAF in 7/13 Grade I and II specimens
Exomic characterization of spinal cord astrocytomas reveals that BRAF alterations and the H3F3AK27M mutation segregate histologic grade. Central neuropathology review was performed on the cohort of specimens used in this study (top row). Grade I and II astrocytomas were notable for genome alterations in genes involved in the MAPK-ERK and PI3K pathway, whereas H3F3AK27M mutation was detected exclusively in Grade III and IV astrocytomas. BRAF-KIAA1549 was observed in 4/10 Grade I and II astrocytomas. Copy number analysis revealed amplification of BRAF in 7/13 Grade I and II specimensIn addition, we observed that all four Grade III and IV astrocytomas in the discovery cohort shared the H3F3AK27M mutation. Further targeted Sanger sequencing of H3F3A was performed in five additional specimens (validation cohort) and revealed the K27M mutation in 2/3 spinal Grade IV astrocytomas and 0/2 Grade I astrocytomas (Supplementary Figure 2). The age distribution of our findings are consistent with prior observations that H3F3AK27M primarily occurs in pediatric and young adult gliomas [11, 15, 19]. In the aggregate cohort of 22 specimens (discovery and validation cohorts), the presence of H3F3AK27M in Grade III and IV (85.7 %, n = 6/7 specimens) and absence in Grade I and II (n = 0/15 specimens) astrocytomas was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001, Chi squared test with Yates correction).Of note, while variants in IDH1 and IDH2 were noted in four specimens (Supplementary Table 2), none of these represented the recurrent mutations previously described in adult glioma. Loss of heterozygosity analysis of variant allele frequency [17] did not reveal co-deletion of chromosomes 1p and 19q (Supplementary Figure 3), further confirming that the tumors analyzed in the discovery cohort were astrocytic.The distribution of mutations observed may partially underlie the well-established demographic differences between patients with spinal cord gliomas compared to their supratentorial counterparts. For instance, whole genome analyses of pediatric intracranial gliomas have been reported recently with convergence of alterations in Grade I and II gliomas on MAPK-ERK and PI3K pathways [9]. Pediatric high grade gliomas, on the other hand, have been characterized by recurrent mutations in chromatin remodeling genes H3F3A, ATRX, and DAXX in 44 % of sequenced tumors [15]. Similarly, seminal work revealed that H3F3AK27M is found in 71 % of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, the presence of which correlated with worse outcomes [11]. Across pediatric and young adult GBM, H3F3AK27M mutations occur mutually exclusive of other category-defining recurrent mutations (such as mutations in IDH1 and TERT promoter) and are found predominantly in midline lesions bearing the transcriptomic profile of the proneural GBM subtype [18]. A recent report noted positive H3F3AK27M immunohistochemical staining in 11 spinal glioblastomas, 3 anaplastic astrocytomas, and 2 anaplastic gangliogliomas [7]. Together with our observation of H3F3AK27M occurring in 86 % of Grade III and IV spinal cord astrocytomas, this supports the concept of a shared teleology between aggressive astrocytic gliomas arising in midline structures of the craniospinal axis. Future transcriptional analysis of spinal cord astrocytomas can assess whether these lesions share similar changes noted in H3F3AK27M mutant supratentorial gliomas.The BRAF alterations in a high percentage of WHO grade I and II spinal cord astrocytomas point towards a potential therapeutic approach, as BRAF–MEK inhibitors have demonstrated success in BRAF-mutant cancer types. Accordingly, targeting the BRAF–MEK pathway in pediatric gliomas is under active evaluation [12]. Our findings suggest that patients with spinal cord astrocytomas could be considered for enrollment in clinical trials targeting these pathways. From a surgical management standpoint, the hotspot H3F3AK27M mutation has the potential to be genotyped within an intraoperative timeframe, to guide the aggressiveness of surgical resection by balancing the neuromonitoring-based potential for postoperative neurologic deficit with the predicted natural history defined by H3F3AK27M mutation status [16]. Detection of this mutation could ultimately guide novel adjuvant treatment strategies, as inhibition of histone deacetylase and histone demethylase has demonstrated in vivo efficacy in xenografts of H3F3AK27M mutant gliomas [8].While our findings do not indicate alterations specific to spinal cord astrocytomas versus supratentorial disease, larger cohort studies performing deep coverage whole genome or transcriptome may reveal unique copy number alterations or translocations in these infiltrative tumors. In summary, the findings described here indicate that BRAF alterations and histone H3F3AK27M mutations are grade-related features of spinal cord astrocytomas that should enter routine initial evaluation of spinal cord gliomas, and provide a potential foundation for adjuvant therapeutic strategies.Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 11 kb)Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 65 kb)Supplementary material 3 (PDF 384 kb)
Authors: Dominik Sturm; Hendrik Witt; Volker Hovestadt; Dong-Anh Khuong-Quang; David T W Jones; Carolin Konermann; Elke Pfaff; Martje Tönjes; Martin Sill; Sebastian Bender; Marcel Kool; Marc Zapatka; Natalia Becker; Manuela Zucknick; Thomas Hielscher; Xiao-Yang Liu; Adam M Fontebasso; Marina Ryzhova; Steffen Albrecht; Karine Jacob; Marietta Wolter; Martin Ebinger; Martin U Schuhmann; Timothy van Meter; Michael C Frühwald; Holger Hauch; Arnulf Pekrun; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Tim Niehues; Gregor von Komorowski; Matthias Dürken; Andreas E Kulozik; Jenny Madden; Andrew Donson; Nicholas K Foreman; Rachid Drissi; Maryam Fouladi; Wolfram Scheurlen; Andreas von Deimling; Camelia Monoranu; Wolfgang Roggendorf; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; Christof M Kramm; Jörg Felsberg; Christian Hartmann; Benedikt Wiestler; Wolfgang Wick; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Anders M Lindroth; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Damien Faury; Adam Fleming; Magdalena Zakrzewska; Pawel P Liberski; Krzysztof Zakrzewski; Peter Hauser; Miklos Garami; Almos Klekner; Laszlo Bognar; Sorana Morrissy; Florence Cavalli; Michael D Taylor; Peter van Sluis; Jan Koster; Rogier Versteeg; Richard Volckmann; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Guido Reifenberger; V Peter Collins; Jacek Majewski; Andrey Korshunov; Peter Lichter; Christoph Plass; Nada Jabado; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: David T W Jones; Barbara Hutter; Natalie Jäger; Andrey Korshunov; Marcel Kool; Hans-Jörg Warnatz; Thomas Zichner; Sally R Lambert; Marina Ryzhova; Dong Anh Khuong Quang; Adam M Fontebasso; Adrian M Stütz; Sonja Hutter; Marc Zuckermann; Dominik Sturm; Jan Gronych; Bärbel Lasitschka; Sabine Schmidt; Huriye Seker-Cin; Hendrik Witt; Marc Sultan; Meryem Ralser; Paul A Northcott; Volker Hovestadt; Sebastian Bender; Elke Pfaff; Sebastian Stark; Damien Faury; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Jacek Majewski; Ursula D Weber; Marc Zapatka; Benjamin Raeder; Matthias Schlesner; Catherine L Worth; Cynthia C Bartholomae; Christof von Kalle; Charles D Imbusch; Sylwester Radomski; Chris Lawerenz; Peter van Sluis; Jan Koster; Richard Volckmann; Rogier Versteeg; Hans Lehrach; Camelia Monoranu; Beate Winkler; Andreas Unterberg; Christel Herold-Mende; Till Milde; Andreas E Kulozik; Martin Ebinger; Martin U Schuhmann; Yoon-Jae Cho; Scott L Pomeroy; Andreas von Deimling; Olaf Witt; Michael D Taylor; Stephan Wolf; Matthias A Karajannis; Charles G Eberhart; Wolfram Scheurlen; Martin Hasselblatt; Keith L Ligon; Mark W Kieran; Jan O Korbel; Marie-Laure Yaspo; Benedikt Brors; Jörg Felsberg; Guido Reifenberger; V Peter Collins; Nada Jabado; Roland Eils; Peter Lichter; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-06-30 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Lori A Ramkissoon; Peleg M Horowitz; Justin M Craig; Shakti H Ramkissoon; Benjamin E Rich; Steven E Schumacher; Aaron McKenna; Michael S Lawrence; Guillaume Bergthold; Priscilla K Brastianos; Barbara Tabak; Matthew D Ducar; Paul Van Hummelen; Laura E MacConaill; Tina Pouissant-Young; Yoon-Jae Cho; Hala Taha; Madeha Mahmoud; Daniel C Bowers; Linda Margraf; Uri Tabori; Cynthia Hawkins; Roger J Packer; D Ashley Hill; Scott L Pomeroy; Charles G Eberhart; Ian F Dunn; Liliana Goumnerova; Gad Getz; Jennifer A Chan; Sandro Santagata; William C Hahn; Charles D Stiles; Azra H Ligon; Mark W Kieran; Rameen Beroukhim; Keith L Ligon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dong-Anh Khuong-Quang; Pawel Buczkowicz; Patricia Rakopoulos; Xiao-Yang Liu; Adam M Fontebasso; Eric Bouffet; Ute Bartels; Steffen Albrecht; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Louis Letourneau; Mathieu Bourgey; Guillaume Bourque; Alexandre Montpetit; Genevieve Bourret; Pierre Lepage; Adam Fleming; Peter Lichter; Marcel Kool; Andreas von Deimling; Dominik Sturm; Andrey Korshunov; Damien Faury; David T Jones; Jacek Majewski; Stefan M Pfister; Nada Jabado; Cynthia Hawkins Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2012-06-03 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Ganesh M Shankar; Amaro Taylor-Weiner; Nina Lelic; Robert T Jones; James C Kim; Joshua M Francis; Malak Abedalthagafi; Lawrence F Borges; Jean-Valery Coumans; William T Curry; Brian V Nahed; John H Shin; Sun Ha Paek; Sung-Hye Park; Chip Stewart; Michael S Lawrence; Kristian Cibulskis; Aaron R Thorner; Paul Van Hummelen; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; Tracy T Batchelor; Scott L Carter; Mai P Hoang; Sandro Santagata; David N Louis; Fred G Barker; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz; Priscilla K Brastianos; Daniel P Cahill Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: Ryan P Abo; Matthew Ducar; Elizabeth P Garcia; Aaron R Thorner; Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla; Ling Lin; Lynette M Sholl; William C Hahn; Matthew Meyerson; Neal I Lindeman; Paul Van Hummelen; Laura E MacConaill Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Jane B Cryan; Sam Haidar; Lori A Ramkissoon; Wenya Linda Bi; David S Knoff; Nikolaus Schultz; Malak Abedalthagafi; Loreal Brown; Patrick Y Wen; David A Reardon; Ian F Dunn; Rebecca D Folkerth; Sandro Santagata; Neal I Lindeman; Azra H Ligon; Rameen Beroukhim; Jason L Hornick; Brian M Alexander; Keith L Ligon; Shakti H Ramkissoon Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2014-09-30
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Peter Burger; David W Ellison; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Kenneth Aldape; Daniel Brat; V Peter Collins; Charles Eberhart; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Gregory N Fuller; Felice Giangaspero; Caterina Giannini; Cynthia Hawkins; Paul Kleihues; Andrey Korshunov; Johan M Kros; M Beatriz Lopes; Ho-Keung Ng; Hiroko Ohgaki; Werner Paulus; Torsten Pietsch; Marc Rosenblum; Elisabeth Rushing; Figen Soylemezoglu; Otmar Wiestler; Pieter Wesseling Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Jinghui Zhang; Gang Wu; Claudia P Miller; Ruth G Tatevossian; James D Dalton; Bo Tang; Wilda Orisme; Chandanamali Punchihewa; Matthew Parker; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Fredrick A Boop; Charles Lu; Cyriac Kandoth; Li Ding; Ryan Lee; Robert Huether; Xiang Chen; Erin Hedlund; Panduka Nagahawatte; Michael Rusch; Kristy Boggs; Jinjun Cheng; Jared Becksfort; Jing Ma; Guangchun Song; Yongjin Li; Lei Wei; Jianmin Wang; Sheila Shurtleff; John Easton; David Zhao; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; David J Dooling; Bhavin Vadodaria; Heather L Mulder; Chunlao Tang; Kerri Ochoa; Charles G Mullighan; Amar Gajjar; Richard Kriwacki; Denise Sheer; Richard J Gilbertson; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; James R Downing; Suzanne J Baker; David W Ellison Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-04-14 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Kristian Cibulskis; Michael S Lawrence; Scott L Carter; Andrey Sivachenko; David Jaffe; Carrie Sougnez; Stacey Gabriel; Matthew Meyerson; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-02-10 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; Kevin T Huang; Ziev B Moses; J Bryan Iorgulescu; John H Chi Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Grant L Lin; Surya Nagaraja; Mariella G Filbin; Mario L Suvà; Hannes Vogel; Michelle Monje Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 7.801