Marissa Boleij1, Hugo Kleikamp1, Martin Pabst1, Thomas R Neu2, Mark C M van Loosdrecht1, Yuemei Lin1. 1. Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft 2629 HZ, The Netherlands. 2. Department of River Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Brueckstrasse 3A, Magdeburg 39114, Germany.
Abstract
Anammox (anaerobic ammonium oxidation) bacteria are important for the nitrogen cycle in both natural environments and wastewater treatment plants. These bacteria have a strong tendency to grow in aggregates like biofilms and granular sludge. To understand the formation of anammox aggregates, it is required to unravel the composition of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which are produced by the bacteria to develop into aggregates and granules. Here, we investigated anionic polymers in anammox granular sludge, focussing on sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Quantification assays and fluorescent stains indicated that sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans were present in the anammox EPS (1.6% equivalents of sialic acids and 2.4% equivalents of sulfated glycosaminoglycans). Additionally, the potential genes for the biosynthesis of sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans were analyzed in the anammox draft genomes. The finding of these components in anammox granular sludge and previously in other nonpathogenic bacteria pointed out that sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans are worth investigating in the context of a broader function in microbial communities and biofilm systems in general.
Anammox (anaerobic ammonium oxidation) bacteria are important for the nitrogen cycle in both natural environments and wastewater treatment plants. These bacteria have a strong tendency to grow in aggregates like biofilms and granular sludge. To understand the formation of anammox aggregates, it is required to unravel the composition of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which are produced by the bacteria to develop into aggregates and granules. Here, we investigated anionic polymers in anammox granular sludge, focussing on sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Quantification assays and fluorescent stains indicated that sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans were present in the anammox EPS (1.6% equivalents of sialic acids and 2.4% equivalents of sulfated glycosaminoglycans). Additionally, the potential genes for the biosynthesis of sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans were analyzed in the anammox draft genomes. The finding of these components in anammox granular sludge and previously in other nonpathogenic bacteria pointed out that sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans are worth investigating in the context of a broader function in microbial communities and biofilm systems in general.
In the early 1990s, the anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox)
process in which ammonium and nitrite are converted into nitrogen
gas was discovered.[1] The bacteria that
were found to perform this process are referred to as anammox bacteria,
and they belong to a separate order named “Candidatus Brocadiales”, within the phylum Planctomycetes. They can perform the anammox process without the need of an organic
carbon source or oxygen. In natural environments, anammox bacteria
contribute significantly to the global nitrogen cycle.[2] Moreover, the anammox process is applied in wastewater
treatment to remove nitrogen from wastewater. Anammox bacteria have
a strong tendency to grow in an aggregated form.[3] This trait is exploited in anammox wastewater treatment
plants where the bacteria are grown in the granular sludge form. Granular
sludge systems provide high sludge settling velocities, ensuring a
high biomass retention and utilization of relatively small reactors,
costs, and footprint.Similar to other kinds of biofilms, in granular sludge, bacteria
are immobilized in a self-produced matrix. This matrix consists of
a complex mixture of components, which is referred to as extracellular
polymeric substances (EPS). In biofilm research, unravelling the EPS
composition and function is important to move toward a comprehensive
understanding and better control of biofilm formation. Due to limitations
in methodology for extraction and characterization, the EPS composition
is still far from fully characterized.[4] Great efforts have been taken along this research line in recent
years, and progress has been made with respect to solubilization of
the biofilm and the discovery of new components in EPS.[5−8]In our previous study, the presence of strongly anionic groups
in EPS of anammox granules was indicated by means of staining with
the cationic dye Alcian Blue.[6] Alcian Blue
stained two targets after gel electrophoresis of alkaline-extracted
EPS, which could be distinguished by the molecular weight and strength
of the negative charge: the high molecular-weight component (> 235
kDa) stained at pH 2.5, indicating acidic groups (i.e., carboxyl group
and/or sulfate group) and a component with an apparent molecular weight
of around 12 kDa stained at pH 1.0, indicating an even stronger negative
charge. Because of the strong acidic character, combined with the
high S-content (1.4%) measured in the extracted EPS, this strongly
negatively charged component was assumed to be a polymer with sulfate
groups. However, the nature and functions of these acidic components
remain unknown.Negatively charged groups are reported to play an important role
in the adhesion capacity of EPS[9] and protection
of bacteria against environmental stresses.[10] Moreover, negatively charged polysaccharides have been a target
of interest in a few biofilm studies, e.g., alginates and uronic acids.[11] However, the existence of polysaccharides with
other negatively charged groups is also possible.Sialic acids are a group of negatively charged nine-carbon monosaccharides,
which are mostly found as the terminal residue of glycoconjugates
in eukaryotes or pathogenic bacteria where they play important roles
in mediating cellular recognition, adhesion processes, and protecting
the underlying tissue.[12,13] There are different types of
sialic acids. The most known is N-acetyl neuraminic
acid among many other (more than 50) derivatives. Sialic acid types
were found in prokaryotes also. These are present in different isomeric
forms, named after pseudaminic acid and legionaminic acid. These sialic
acids are synthesized by bacteria via (partly) different pathways
in comparison to their eukaryotic counterpart.[14] They were also referred to as bacterial sialic acids in
literature.Sulfated polysaccharides are mostly known from the extracellular
matrix of animal as sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans
are complex linear polysaccharides that can be classified into three
major groups: (1) chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate, (2) heparin
and heparan sulfate, and (3) keratan sulfate. These molecules are
associated with functions in mediating adhesion and cell signalling
in mostly eukaryotes and pathogenic bacteria.[15] The presence of the strongly negatively charged components in combination
with the high sulfur content in our previous study, raised the question:
is the strong anionic component detected in the EPS of anammox granular
sludge due to the presence of components like sulfated glycosaminoglycans?Here, we present a study in which the previously revealed anionic
components in anammox EPS are further analyzed, focussing on identification,
quantification, and localization of sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans.
To this end, alkaline-extracted EPS was subjected to quantification
assays and to mass spectrometry. In addition, specific fluorescent
stains were applied to the intact anammox granules. Finally, genome
database searches were performed to find potential pathways that could
be involved in the formation of these anionic components by anammox
bacteria.
Materials and Methods
Anammox Granular Sludge and EPS Extraction
Anammox granular sludge was collected from the full-scale anammox
reactor in Sluisjesdijk, Rotterdam.[16] The
VSS (volatile suspended solids) content of the granules was 0.71 g/g
granules (determined in accordance with APHA, 2005).[17] The dominant anammox species in the granules was “Ca. Brocadia sapporoensis” (according to FISH, clone
library analysis, and protein analysis in Boleij et al.).[7] EPS extraction was performed as described in
Boleij et al.[6] The granules were solubilized
in 0.1 M NaOH for 5 h while being stirred with a magnetic stirrer
(IKA, C-MAG HS7), using a magnet with a diameter that covers the surface
of the bottle, at 400 rpm. After centrifugation at 3100 g for 20 min at 4 °C, the pellet was discarded. Polymers in the
supernatant were precipitated out by decreasing the pH to 5 using
1 M HCl. The precipitated polymers were collected by centrifugation
at 3100 g for 20 min at 4 °C and directly lyophilized.
Sialic Acid Quantification Assay
To measure sialic acids, the sialic acid quantitation kit (Sigma-Aldrich)
was used according to manufacturer instruction. The protocol was performed
as described by de Graaff et al.[18] The
assay was applied on crushed lyophilized granules, and N-acetylneuraminic acid was used as a standard. This assay measures N-acetylneuraminic acid (NeuAc) after its release by an
enzymatic cleavage using the neuraminidase. Therefore, it is suitable
to measure the amount of NeuAc in either free form or in glycoproteins,
cell surface glycoproteins, polysialic acids, and capsular polysaccharides.
Sialic Acid Measurement with Mass Spectrometry
The sialic acid analysis was performed following a recently established
approach by Kleikamp et al.[19] Mass spectrometric
sialic acid analysis was performed following physical disruption and
homogenization of a 2.5 mg freeze-dried granule material using a lab
mortar and pestle and hydrolysis using diluted (2 M) acetic acid solution.
Released sialic acids were further labeled directly from the speed
vac dried lysate using DMB (1,2-diamino-4,5-methylenedioxybenzene
dihydrochloride). Labeled sialic acid derivatives were further analyzed
by reverse phase chromatography Orbitrap mass spectrometry (QE plus
quadrupole Orbitrap, Thermo, Germany). Sialic acids were identified
by comparison to commercial standards and mass.
EPS Extraction for Sulfated Glycosaminoglycans
Measurement
In the previous study where anionic polymers
were discovered,[6] an alkaline extraction
using precipitation at pH 5 was applied. For the measurement of sulfated
glycosaminoglycans in this study, the same extraction method (as described
in section ) was
used as a reference. In addition, the alkaline extraction was applied
with precipitation at pH 2.5 to investigate if there are more sulfated
glycosaminoglycans extracted when the precipitation was performed
at a lower pH. As a control, the alkaline protocol was applied, using
dialysis to remove NaOH, instead of precipitation. In theory, this
would include all polymers that are solubilized, with a molecular
cut-off of 3 kDa. Samples were lyophilized directly after extraction
until further analysis. Hence, three extracted samples extract 1 (pH
5), extract 2 (pH 2,5), and extract 3 (dialyzed) were subjected to
the sulfated glycosaminoglycan assay and the preceding treatment.
Pretreatment for Sulfated Glycosaminoglycan
Assay
As a pretreatment for the glycosaminoglycan assay,
samples were denatured and treated with proteinase K (Sigma Aldrich,
30 units/mg protein). For denaturation, a 4 mg/mL lyophilized sample
was solubilized in a solution of 6 M urea, 25 mM NH4HCO3, and 10 mM DTT and incubated at 65 °C for 30 min. After
cooling to room temperature, iodoacetamide was added to a final concentration
of 40 mM, and samples were incubated for 30 min at room temperature.
For the enzyme treatment, the samples were diluted four times in TRIS
buffer (50 mM TRIS, 5 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM EDTA) to decrease
the urea concentration, avoiding inhibition of the enzyme treatment.
Proteinase K was added to a final concentration of 125 μg/mL,
and the samples were incubated overnight at 37 °C.
Sulfated Glycosaminoglycan Assay
The Blyscan sulfated glycosaminoglycan assay was used to quantify
sulfated glycosaminoglycans in the three extracts (described in section ), as well as
in the whole granules and the pellet remaining after alkaline solubilization.
The assay is based on binding of 1,9-dimethyl-methylene blue (DMMB)
to sulfated glycosaminoglycans at a low pH (measured pH in the DMMB
solution was 1.7). The DMMB–sulfated glycosaminoglycan complex
will precipitate, and subsequently, the nonbound soluble dye can be
removed. Then, the bound dye is released using a dissociation reagent,
and the absorbance is measured to indicate the amount of dye that
formed a complex with the sulfated glycosaminoglycans. The standard
that is included in the kit is bovine tracheal chondroitin 4-sulfate.
The protocol was performed according to manufacturer instructions
(Blyscan, Biocolor (UK)), after the pretreatment was applied as described
in the previous section.
SDS-PAGE (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide
Gel Electrophoresis) and Staining with Coomassie Blue and Alcian Blue
The extracted EPS was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, as described in Boleij
et al.[6] SDS-PAGE was performed using NuPage
Novex 4–12% bis–tris gels (Invitrogen). EPS samples
were prepared in NuPAGE LDS-buffer, and DTT (dithiothreitol) was added
to a final concentration of 10 mM. The proteins were denatured by
incubation at 70 °C for 10 min. Subsequently, 10 μL of
sample was loaded per well. The Thermo Scientific spectra multicolor
broad range protein ladder was used as a molecular-weight marker.
The gel electrophoresis was performed at 200 V for 35 min. The gels
were stained by three different staining procedures afterward.For visualization of proteins, the Colloidal Blue staining kit (Invitrogen)
was used according to manufacturer instructions. For staining of acidic
glycoconjugates, the cationic dye Alcian Blue 8GX (Fluka, Sigma Aldrich)
was used. To differentiate between the relatively weaker acidic groups
like carboxylate (R-COO–) and the stronger acidic
group like sulfate (R-OSO3–), staining with Alcian
Blue was performed at different pH values, namely, pHs 2.5 and 1.0.
An adapted protocol of Møller and Poulsen[20] was used. After electrophoresis, the gels were extensively
washed in solution I (25% (v/v) ethanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid,
pH 2.5) for 2.5 h while refreshing the solution four times. Subsequently,
the gel was stained in 0.125% (w/v) Alcian Blue in solution I (the
solution was stirred overnight to dissolve the Alcian Blue and centrifuged
before use) for 30 min and washed in solution I overnight. For staining
of sulfated groups at pH 1.0, the same protocol was performed except
that solution I was replaced by solution II (0.1 M HCl and 25% (v/v)
ethanol, pH 1.0) according to Tobisawa et al.[21]
Lectin Staining
The glycoconjugates
of the granules were studied after fluorescence lectin bar-coding
and subsequent fluorescence lectin-binding analysis.[22] Consequently all commercially available lectins (FITC,
Fluorescein, Alexa488) were screened for binding to granule structures.
Lectin staining was already described in several publications.[23,24] In short, the fully hydrated, intact granules were incubated with
a few droplets of lectins (0.1 mg/mL) for 20 min at room temperature
in the dark and washed three times to remove the unbound lectins.
The lectin-stained, hydrated, intact granules were mounted in coverwell
chambers (Thermofisher) with 1 mm spacers to avoid compression of
the granule. Samples were examined using a Leica SP5X instrument (Leica,
Germany) equipped with an upright microscope and a super continuum
light source (white laser). The setup was controlled by LAS AF software
version 2.4.1. Confocal images were recorded as serial scan and a
step size of 1 μm using a 25× NA 0.95 water immersion lens.
Laser excitation was at 490 nm, emission was from 485 to 495 nm (reflection)
and 505 to 600 nm (lectins). For improvement of resolution and contrast,
some image datasets were subjected to blind deconvolution with Huygens
version 18.10.0 (SVI, The Netherlands). Data were projected using
Imaris version 9.2.1 (Bitplane). All image data sets were finalized
in Photoshop (Adobe).
Heparin Red Staining
The fluorescent
probe Heparin Red (RedProbes, Münster, Germany) was employed
for staining negatively charged macromolecules (such as Heparin) in
the granular matrix. For staining, the protocol of the supplier data
sheet was followed. In short, 8.8 μL of Heparin Red and 1 mL
of enhancer solution were mixed and added to the fully hydrated, intact
granules for 1 h. The Heparin Red-stained, fully hydrated, intact
granules were immediately examined by CLSM using the instrument described
above. Image data sets were recorded as single or serial scan (step
size 1, 0.5, or 0.17 μm) using a 63× NA 1.2 water or a
100× NA 1.4 oil immersion lens at various zoom settings. Laser
excitation was at 480 and 567 nm, emission was from 470 to 490 nm
(reflection) and 590 to 650 nm (Heparin Red). Image data handling
was already explained above. In addition, Heparin Red data sets were
loaded in Fiji (https://fiji.sc/) and color coded with the lookup table called “rainbow RGB”.
For the better color separation of pixel intensities, the contrast
was set to auto. By this treatment, three pixel intensities are color
coded as red = strong signal, green = intermediate signal, and blue
= weak signal.
BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool)
Analysis of Pathways for Syntheses of Sialic Acid Types and Sulfated
Glycosaminoglycans
BLAST analysis was applied to find homologous
biosynthesis pathways of sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans.
The BLAST tool at the NCBI website was used to BLAST reference proteins
against the draft genomes included in the database of “Candidatus Brocadiales” (taxid:1127829). Matches
were viewed as significantly similar when E-values
were below 1E-20.
Results
Sialic Acids in Anammox Granular Sludge
Previously, a high amount of proteins (∼60%) was measured
in the extracted EPS of anammox granules, and various glycoconjugates
were found.[6] Glycoconjugate modifications
with acidic groups such as sulfate (sulfation) and/or sialic acid
(sialylation) on the polysaccharide part are common phenomena in the
extracellular matrix of eukaryotes.[25] In
this previous study, the presence of polyanionic groups in glycoconjugates
was indicated by staining with a cationic dye (Alcian Blue). Here,
analysis is performed on strongly negatively charged polyanionic components
such as sulfates and sialic acids.Sialic acids were measured
in the anammox granules, using a sialic acid quantitation kit, which
is based on the release of N-acetylneuramic acid
(NeuAc) by an enzymatic treatment. According to this assay, the anammox
granules contain 1.6% sialic acids (weight % of gram of N-acetylneuraminic acid equivalents per gram VSS of granular sludge).
Hence, the quantification assay data indicates the presence of sialic
acids. To identify which kinds of sialic acids are present in anammox
granules, mass spectrometry (MS) was applied. With MS, sialic acids
were detected in the form of N-acetyl neuraminic
acid (NeuAc), deaminatedneuraminic acid (KDN), and pseudaminic acid/legionaminic
acid (Pse/Leg, which have the same molecular weights) (see Table S1). Hence, there are three different kinds
of sialic acids widely distributed in anammox granules.The draft genome of “Ca. Brocadiales”
was analyzed for genes that could code for the pathways for the biosynthesis
of sialic acids, reference pathways from known sialic acid producers
were taken (see Figure S1). The genes of
the required enzymes were aligned with the draft genomes of species
in the order “Ca. Brocadiales” that
are available in the database of NCBI. Because Campylobacter
jejuni has characterized pathways for biosyntheses
of NeuAc, Leg, and Pse, these pathways were used as reference genes.[26] Those pathways were partly matching with proteins
in the “Ca. Brocadiales” database (Tables S2 and S3). Many of the genes of Brocadiales
that matched the legionaminic acid synthase were in common with the
genes that matched with pseudamiminc acid synthase and the N-acetylneuraminic acid synthase. Even though these pathways
are distinct, the enzymes are homologous.In the halophile archaea Halorubrum sp. PV6, a
legionaminic acid was reported to be attached to its surface layer
(S-layer) glycoprotein.[27] Therefore, the
reported genes of Halorubrum sp. PV6 were also used
as a reference to BLAST the draft genome of “Ca. Brocadiales”. All enzymes for biosynthesis of legionaminic
acid were found to have a significant match with a database protein
in the order of “Ca. Brocadiales” (Table and Table S4). Hence, the biosynthesis pathway of Halorubrum matched better with anammox than the synthesis pathways in Campylobacter jejuni.
Table 1
Blast Search for the Pathway for Synthesis
of Legionaminic Acida
reference
gene/protein
accession
number best match
name protein
and species
identity
(%)
E-value
HrrPV6_1047 AYD49518.1 (LegB)
WP_070067840.1
NAD-dependent epimerase/dehydratase
family protein [Candidatus Brocadia sapporoensis]
38.0
1.8E-55
HrrPV6_1046 AYD49517.1 (LegC)
WP_070067943.1
DegT/DnrJ/EryC1/StrS family
aminotransferase [Candidatus Brocadia sapporoensis]
35.4
1.2E-66
HrrPV6_1014 AYD49510.1 (LegH)
WP_070066607.1
hypothetical protein [Candidatus Brocadia sapporoensis]
The reference pathway is from halophile Halorubrum sp. PV6.[27] The best match shown is the best match with “Ca. Brocadia sapporoensis”. *When there was no match
with “Ca. Brocadia sapporoensis”, the
best match of any “Ca. Brocadiales” is shown.
The reference pathway is from halophile Halorubrum sp. PV6.[27] The best match shown is the best match with “Ca. Brocadia sapporoensis”. *When there was no match
with “Ca. Brocadia sapporoensis”, the
best match of any “Ca. Brocadiales” is shown.
Quantification of Sulfated Glycosaminoglycans
To investigate the strongly anionic polymers, the presence of sulfated
glycosaminoglycans was investigated by using the Blyscan sulfatedglycosaminoglycan assay. This assay is based on a dye-binding method
in which 1,9-dimethylmetylene blue (DMMB) is used to estimate the
amount of sulfated glycosaminoglycans. DMMB can bind free sulfated
glycosaminoglycans or sulfated polysaccharides that are bound to a
protein backbone (proteoglycans).In the EPS extraction process,
the anammox granules were first solubilized in NaOH. Afterward, the
EPS was recovered from this alkaline solution by three methods in
parallel: precipitation with acid at pH 5 (extract 1), precipitation
with acid at pH 2.5 (extract 2), and with dialysis (extract 3). The
different recovery methods yielded 24, 22, and 31% of the initial
VSS amount, respectively (Table ). The recovered materials were subjected to the sulfated
glycosaminoglycan assay. In addition, the whole granules and the pellet
that remained undissolved after alkaline treatment were analyzed.
Table 2
Measured Amount of Sulfated Glycosaminoglycans
(GAG) (Chondroitin Sulfate Equivalents), Compared to the Amount that
Was Recovered from the Granular Sludgea
sample
extraction
yield (VSS EPS/granules)
sulfated
GAG equivalents measured (%)
sulfated
GAG in granules (calculated)
extract 1 (pH 5)
24%
5.4%
1.3%
extract 2 (pH 2.5)
22%
6.9%
1.5%
extract 3 (dialyzed)
31%
5.1%
1.6%
granules
2.4%
2.4%
pellet
0.9%
The percentages of sulfated GAG
equivalents are based on the measured amount of VSS in samples before
pretreatment.
The percentages of sulfated GAG
equivalents are based on the measured amount of VSS in samples before
pretreatment.For application of the glycosaminoglycan assay, the recovered EPS
was solubilized in TRIS buffer. When the solution of the extracted
EPS was directly applied to the assay, 1.2% of the VSS fraction was
measured as sulfated glycosaminoglycans. It was noticed that a huge
amount of precipitate formed once the EPS solution was mixed with
the dye solution presumably due to the high protein content in combination
with the low pH of the dye solution. Formation of protein precipitation
was suspected to hinder the binding of DMMB to the sulfated glycosaminoglycans.
To avoid the interference of proteins, a pretreatment was applied
in which the EPS was denatured and treated with proteinase K. After
pretreatment, most of the proteins were successfully removed (no more
binding of Coomassie blue in SDS-PAGE, see Figure S2). The 12 kDa band in the SDS-PAGE gel was still stained
by Alcian Blue after pretreatment.The pretreatment significantly increased the outcome of the quantification
assay. The sulfated glycosaminoglycans measured in extracts 1, 2,
and 3 were 5.4, 6.9, and 5.1% of the VSS fraction of the extracted
EPS, respectively (see Table ). When whole anammox granules were subjected to the pretreatment
and quantification assay, instead of the extracted EPS, 2.4% of the
VSS fraction was measured as sulfated glycosaminoglycans.Since the quantification assay is based on precipitation of the
DMMB–sulfated glycosaminoglycan complex, it also served as
a method for sulfated glycosaminoglycans isolation. The precipitated
DMMB–sulfated glycosaminoglycan complex was collected, resolubilized
in the NuPAGE LDS-buffer and DTT (dithiothreitol), and applied on
SDS-PAGE to check what components were precipitated in the DMMB complex.
The profiles are shown in Figure . The target component was the band at 12 kDa. In Figure , it can be seen
that the 12 kDa band is indeed present in the precipitated DMMB complex.
Hence, the DMMB assay targets the 12 kDa band.
Figure 1
Images of SDS-PAGE gels with extracts 1, 2, and 3; the pellet (P);
and the whole granules (G). Lane L contains the molecular-weight ladder.
Gels were stained with (A) Coomassie Blue, (B) Alcian Blue at pH 2.5,
and (C) Alcian Blue at pH 1.0. In all panels, the right part contains
the profile of the material after EPS extraction, and the left part
is the fraction that formed a complex with the DMMB dye in the glycosaminoglycan
assay. (Note that before pretreatment, the pellet and the whole granules
cannot be applied on a gel since they are not soluble.).
Images of SDS-PAGE gels with extracts 1, 2, and 3; the pellet (P);
and the whole granules (G). Lane L contains the molecular-weight ladder.
Gels were stained with (A) Coomassie Blue, (B) Alcian Blue at pH 2.5,
and (C) Alcian Blue at pH 1.0. In all panels, the right part contains
the profile of the material after EPS extraction, and the left part
is the fraction that formed a complex with the DMMB dye in the glycosaminoglycan
assay. (Note that before pretreatment, the pellet and the whole granules
cannot be applied on a gel since they are not soluble.).
Analysis of Anammox Genome for Synthesis of
Sulfated Glycosaminoglycans
Sulfotransferases are the enzymes
that transfer sulfo groups to polysaccharides.[28] For sulfated glycosaminoglycan sulfotransferases, there
is little literature available about the encoding genes in bacteria.
Searches in the NCBI database to chondroitin, heparan, and keratan
sulfotransferase resulted in bacterial genes only for the first two
types. Examples for known genes are the chondroitin 4-O-sulfotransferase gene in Pseudomonas fluorescensF113 and heparan sulfate glucosamine 3-O-sulfotransferase in bacteria Sinorhizobium
frediiNRG234.(29) The corresponding protein sequences were blasted against
the “Ca. Brocadiales” database. For
chondroitin 4-O-sulfotransferase (accession number
WP_014336261.1) no significant similarity was found (i.e., E-values
were higher than 2E-05). Interestingly, blasting against the heparan
sulfate glucosamine 3-O-sulfotransferase (accession
number YP_002823420.1) resulted in significant similarity with several
proteins, shown in Table , which means there is a higher chance for anammox bacteria
to produce heparan sulfate.
Table 3
List with Significant Matches (E-value
< 1E-20) of Blast Search against Heparan Sulfate Glucosamine 3-O-Sulfotransferase (Accession Number YP_002823420.1)
accession
number
name protein
and species
identity
(%)
E-value
RZV93996.1
hypothetical protein EX341_03835
[Candidatus Scalindua sp. SCAELEC01]
31.8
6.04E-33
RZV93978.1
hypothetical protein EX341_03745
[Candidatus Scalindua sp. SCAELEC01]
29.81
4.76E-31
GAN32649.1
hypothetical protein BROSI_A1164
[Candidatus Brocadia sinica JPN1]
hypothetical protein B6D35_00200
[Candidatus Brocadia sp. UTAMX2]
24.8
6.16E-20
KXK28277.1
sulfotransferase [Candidatus Brocadia sinica]
29.1
7.05E-20
Lectin Staining and Heparin Red Staining
To localize the distribution of sialic acids in granules, lectin
staining was applied. A screening with 70 lectins was performed, and
several that bind to sialic acid were found to bind to the matrix
of the anammox granules. In Figure , images with anammox granules stained by fluorescent
lectins Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) and Helix aspersa agglutinin (HAA), respectively, are shown. WGA binds sialic acids
(N-acetyl neuraminic acid) and N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc).[30] HAA binds
to O-linked glycans composed of GalNAc.[31] The visualization of the fluorescent signal
of these lectins provides the possible distribution of sialic acids
in the granules.
Figure 2
Confocal laser scanning microscopy of fully hydrated, intact anammox
granules stained with fluorescently labeled lectins shown as maximum
intensity projections. (A) WGA (Wheat germ agglutinin, 40 optical
sections) and (B) HAA (Helix aspersa agglutinin, 66 optical sections). Color allocation: grey: reflection
signal, green: lectin staining.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy of fully hydrated, intact anammox
granules stained with fluorescently labeled lectins shown as maximum
intensity projections. (A) WGA (Wheat germ agglutinin, 40 optical
sections) and (B) HAA (Helix aspersa agglutinin, 66 optical sections). Color allocation: grey: reflection
signal, green: lectin staining.Figure shows anammox
granules that were stained with Heparin Red, which is a fluorescent
molecular probe. It is used for direct detection of Heparins in blood
plasma. Heparin Red is polycationic. It forms complex aggregations
with polyanionic components and was used to localize polyanionic components.
When Heparin Red is bound to polyanionic components, which have a
charge density more negative than 0.81 per monosaccharide, it emits
a fluorescent signal. On top of that, the fluorescence intensity of
Heparin Red is quenched when it forms stable aggregates on the polyanionic
chains. The higher the charge density, the more quenched the fluorescent
signal is.[32] Since both heparin (1.8–2.4
sulfate per disaccharide) and heparan sulfate (0.8–1.8 sulfate
per disaccharide) are highly negatively charged macromolecules,[33,34] their binding to Heparin Red results to a quenched signal. Figure shows the cells
in the granules, after Heparin Red staining (Figure C,D shows higher magnifications). Figure A,C is in white and
black. In comparison, Figure B,D is the same image data set as Figure A,C, respectively, but using a look up table
in which the pixel intensities are color coded as: very low pixel
intensities in blue: no binding of Heparin Red, high pixel intensities
in red: binding of Heparin Red, and intermediate pixel intensities
in green: strong binding of Heparin Red due to quenching. In Figure S3, the same images, subjected to deconvolution,
are shown. The black and white images show that after staining the
measured signal looks like the shape of the cells. This suggests that
the polyanionic components are located around the cell wall or in
the capsule of the bacteria.
Figure 3
Confocal laser scanning microscopy of Heparin Red, bound to components
in the fully hydrated, intact anammox granule. (A) and (C) are greyscale
images of the fluorescent signal. (A) and (B) represent an image series
of 45 optical sections at 0.17 μm step size shown as maximum
intensity projection, (C) and (D) represent a single image. (B) and
(D) are the images of (A) and (C), respectively, converted to color
images with three pixel intensities: red = binding of Heparin Red,
green = quenched signal, implying high negative charge density, and
blue = no binding of Heparin Red (see detailed explanation in the Results section).
Confocal laser scanning microscopy of Heparin Red, bound to components
in the fully hydrated, intact anammox granule. (A) and (C) are greyscale
images of the fluorescent signal. (A) and (B) represent an image series
of 45 optical sections at 0.17 μm step size shown as maximum
intensity projection, (C) and (D) represent a single image. (B) and
(D) are the images of (A) and (C), respectively, converted to color
images with three pixel intensities: red = binding of Heparin Red,
green = quenched signal, implying high negative charge density, and
blue = no binding of Heparin Red (see detailed explanation in the Results section).
Discussion
In EPS of anammox and other biofilm forming bacteria, the presence
of proteins/glycoproteins and polyanionic groups are reported.[18,35] As both sulfate groups and sialic acids are anionic and both sulfation
and sialylation are common modifications of (glyco)proteins and polysaccharides
in the extracellular matrix of eukaryotes, the polyanionic components
of anammox EPS were studied, with a focus on these two acidic modifications.
Looking at the function of similar structures in known systems can
direct us in finding potential functionalities of sulfation and sialylation
in biofilm systems.With the colorimetric quantification assays, around 1.6% of the
VSS was measured as sialic acids (NeuAc equivalents) and 2.4% of the
VSS was measured as sulfated glycosaminoglycans (chondroitin equivalents).
Since the samples that we analyzed are not well-defined mixtures containing
possibly interfering components, and we do not have the information
to know the exact appropriate standard, these assays are not valid
for an absolute quantification in EPS of anammox granules. Possible
biases in these assays were not evaluated. In addition, the applied
treatments might not release all target components. The lectin and
heparin staining intensity appeared very intense in comparison with
the amount that was measured with the assays. However, the assays
did indicate the presence of sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans,
respectively, and therefore, they are worth to further look into.In anammox granules, the presence of sialic acids in the form of
NeuAc, KDN, and Pse/Leg was confirmed with MS measurements. The gene-encoding
enzymes for the synthesis of sialic acids are partly present in “Ca. Brocadia sapporoensis” genomes. The enzymes that
are necessary for sialic acids synthesis but could not be found particularly
in the “Ca. Brocadia sapporoensis”
genome were found in other “Ca. Brocadiales”
species. There are more than 50 different variants of sialic acids.
In animals, sialic acids are often found as terminal residue of (mucin-)glycoprotein,
which have a function in protection against proteases, cell signalling/recognition,
and adhesion processes.[36] In bacteria,
various nine-carbon sugars like NeuAc are known, e.g., Pse and Leg.
These are mostly reported in pathogenic bacteria and are thought to
mimic the host with the purpose of invading the host.[37] However, this image may be biased due to the increased
focus of studies on those species that are involved in host–microbe
interactions. Recent examples of nonpathogenic organisms carrying
sialic acid derivatives are, e.g., seawater-adapted aerobic granular
sludge, dominated by “Candidatus Accumulibacter”[18] or the surface layer (S-layer) glycoprotein
of haloarchaea Halorubrum sp. PV6, which has a sialic
acid as a terminal residue.[27]Anammox bacteria are known to produce S-layer glycoproteins also.[38] Specifically, the anammox granular sludge used
in this study contains a putative S-layer glycoprotein, visualized
with SDS-PAGE at 80 kDa.[6] The glycan structure
of this glycoprotein was determined to be composed of a methylated N-acetyl hexosamine (HexNAc) backbone, substituted with
a pentose, and a dideoxyhexose residue, and carrying an unknown terminal
residue of 350 Da. Hence, the S-layer glycoprotein is a possible source
of the measured sialic acids in anammox EPS. However, the band at
80 kDa was not stained by Alcian Blue. If the terminal residue would
be a derivative of sialic acid, the overall negative charge of the
molecule is not strong enough for it to be stained by Alcian Blue.The smear at >235 kDa was only stained by Alcian Blue at pH 2.5,
indicating carboxylic groups. The profile resembles high molecular-weight
polysaccharides or glycoproteins. It is also possible that both the
S-layer proteins and other high molecular-weight polysaccharides or
glycoproteins are differently sialylated. For example in Campylobacter jejuni, different NeuB genes were found
to be involved in biosynthesis of lipo-oligosaccharides and flagella.[39] Based on the results, sialic acids are confirmed
to be present, but the exact molecular location remains to be determined.
Determining the saccharide sequence that the sialic acids are attached
to would reveal more about the nature of these components. In known
eukaryotic systems, there are many biological roles for sialic acids
of which cellular recognition is a very important one.[12,40] In granular sludge and biofilms, sialic acids might also play a
role in masking bacterial cells to be protected against invaders.The other targeted components in this study were sulfated glycosaminoglycans.
To determine the exact type of sulfated polysaccharide (or glycoprotein),
the component should be isolated and the molecular structure should
be determined. From the analyses presented here, the staining with
Alcian Blue at pH 1.0, the complexing with DMMB, and the staining
with Heparin Red, the component resembles sulfated glycosaminoglycans.
Regarding the homology with the sulfotransferases in anammox genomes,
it fits best with heparan sulfate glucosamine 3-O-sulfotransferase. Heparin Red staining indicated that the strongly
polyanionic components, suggested to be sulfated glycosaminoglycans,
are located at the outside of the cell walls. In comparison, the sulfated
glycosaminoglycan content in aerobic granular sludge is around 3.1%
of the VSS. However, the negatively charged macromolecules, which
were stained by Heparin Red, seem to be differently distributed. While
in the aerobic granular sludge, the signal was observed in the space
in between capsules within the microcolony and also in the extracellular
matrix in between the colonies;[41] in the
anammox granules, it appears as the shape of the cells, indicating
the strongly polyanionic components are located around the cell walls
or in the capsules of the anammox cells.In the extracellular matrix of eukaryotes, heparan sulfates are
located at the outside of cell surfaces, with the function of cellular
recognition and adhesion to extracellular matrix components.[42] Interestingly, heparan sulfate is the most ancient
of all known glycosaminoglycans.[43] With
this in mind, it may be suggested that heparan sulfate might have
a similar function in anammox granules also. To confirm what kind
of sulfated polysaccharides are present, the monosaccharide sequence
should be determined. Knowing the exact structure would aid in predicting
the function of these molecules by comparing with known systems. In
addition, since bacteria do not have an endoplasmatic reticulum and
Golgi system as used to synthesize sulfated glycosaminoglycans in
eukaryotes, the machinery that is needed for the synthesis remains
to be determined.Currently, both sialic acids and sulfated glycosaminoglycans that
are found in prokaryotes are mostly related to the microbe–host
interaction in the context of mimicking host extracellular matrix
components to bypass its immune system.[15,44] However, recently,
they are also found in prokaryotic, nonpathogenic organisms,[19,35,45,46] as well as in this study. This indicates they could be more broadly
present, with a differential functionality in microbial communities
and biofilms in general. Proposed functions of these negatively charged
components include protecting the cells, cell–cell or cell–matrix
adhesion, scavenging of other components, and involvement in biomineralization.
Looking into the question if these polymers could also have similar
roles in the biofilm extracellular matrix as in the multicellular
eukaryotic cells will improve the understanding of the composition
and functioning of the biofilm matrix. In addition, analyzing the
more complex components of the biofilm matrix paves the way to the
production of biopolymers that currently need to be extracted from
higher organisms. (e.g., heparin, which is used as an anticoagulant,
is extracted from porcine mucosa.)
Authors: Amanda L Lewis; Nolan Desa; Elizabeth E Hansen; Yuriy A Knirel; Jeffrey I Gordon; Pascal Gagneux; Victor Nizet; Ajit Varki Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin Pabst; Denis S Grouzdev; Christopher E Lawson; Hugo B C Kleikamp; Carol de Ram; Rogier Louwen; Yue Mei Lin; Sebastian Lücker; Mark C M van Loosdrecht; Michele Laureni Journal: ISME J Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 10.302