C Marc Samama1, Silvy Laporte1, Nadia Rosencher1, Philippe Girard1, Juan Llau1, Patrick Mouret1, William Fisher1, Javier Martínez-Martín1, Daniel Duverger1, Béatrice Deygas1, Emilie Presles1, Michel Cucherat1, Patrick Mismetti1. 1. From the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin (C.M.S., N.R.), Unité de Recherche Clinique, Innovation, Pharmacologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Sainboise INSERM Unité 1059, Université Jean Monnet, and INSERM CIE1408 (S.L., B.D., E.P., P. Mismetti), French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (F-CRIN), Investigation Network on Venous Thromboembolism (INNOVTE) (S.L., P.G., P. Mismetti), and Institut du Thorax Curie-Montsouris, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (P.G.), Paris, INSERM Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 5558, Université Claude Bernard, Université de Lyon, Lyon (M.C.), and the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Polyclinique du Parc, Saint Saulve (D.D.) - all in France; the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospital Doctor Peset, Valencia (J.L.), and the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid (J.M.-M.) - both in Spain; Sektionsleiter Endoprothetik, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach am Main, Germany (P. Mouret); and McGill University, Montreal (W.F.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Nonmajor orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs that results in transient reduced mobility places patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban may be noninferior to enoxaparin with regard to the prevention of major venous thromboembolism in these patients. METHODS: In this international, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned adult patients undergoing lower-limb nonmajor orthopedic surgery who were considered to be at risk for venous thromboembolism on the basis of the investigator's judgment to receive eitherrivaroxaban or enoxaparin. The primary efficacy outcome of major venous thromboembolism was a composite of symptomatic distal or proximal deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or venous thromboembolism-related death during the treatment period or asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis at the end of treatment. A test for superiority was planned if rivaroxaban proved to be noninferior to enoxaparin. For all outcomes, multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Prespecified safety outcomes included major bleeding (fatal, critical, or clinically overt bleeding or bleeding at the surgical site leading to intervention) and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 3604 patients underwent randomization; 1809 patients were assigned to receive rivaroxaban, and 1795 to receive enoxaparin. Major venous thromboembolism occurred in 4 of 1661 patients (0.2%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 18 of 1640 patients (1.1%) in the enoxaparin group (risk ratio with multiple imputation, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.75; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.01 for superiority). The incidence of bleeding did not differ significantly between the rivaroxaban group and the enoxaparin group (1.1% and 1.0%, respectively, for major bleeding or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding; 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively, for major bleeding). CONCLUSIONS:Rivaroxaban was more effective than enoxaparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolic events during a period of immobilization after nonmajor orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs. (Funded by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne and Bayer; PRONOMOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02401594.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Nonmajor orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs that results in transient reduced mobility places patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban may be noninferior to enoxaparin with regard to the prevention of major venous thromboembolism in these patients. METHODS: In this international, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned adult patients undergoing lower-limb nonmajor orthopedic surgery who were considered to be at risk for venous thromboembolism on the basis of the investigator's judgment to receive either rivaroxaban or enoxaparin. The primary efficacy outcome of major venous thromboembolism was a composite of symptomatic distal or proximal deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or venous thromboembolism-related death during the treatment period or asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis at the end of treatment. A test for superiority was planned if rivaroxaban proved to be noninferior to enoxaparin. For all outcomes, multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Prespecified safety outcomes included major bleeding (fatal, critical, or clinically overt bleeding or bleeding at the surgical site leading to intervention) and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 3604 patients underwent randomization; 1809 patients were assigned to receive rivaroxaban, and 1795 to receive enoxaparin. Major venous thromboembolism occurred in 4 of 1661 patients (0.2%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 18 of 1640 patients (1.1%) in the enoxaparin group (risk ratio with multiple imputation, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.75; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.01 for superiority). The incidence of bleeding did not differ significantly between the rivaroxaban group and the enoxaparin group (1.1% and 1.0%, respectively, for major bleeding or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding; 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively, for major bleeding). CONCLUSIONS:Rivaroxaban was more effective than enoxaparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolic events during a period of immobilization after nonmajor orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs. (Funded by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne and Bayer; PRONOMOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02401594.).
Authors: Vincent D Pellegrini; John William Eikelboom; C McCollister Evarts; Patricia D Franklin; Kevin L Garvin; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Richard Iorio; Carol Ann Lambourne; Jay Magaziner; Laurence Magder Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Paolo Prandoni; Anna Maria Cattelan; Laura Carrozzi; Lucia Leone; Lucia Filippi; Egidio De Gaudenzi; Sabina Villalta; Raffaele Pesavento Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.944