Literature DB >> 32222119

Clinical analysis of pregnant women with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia.

Siyu Chen1, E Liao2, Dongmei Cao2, Ying Gao2, Guoqiang Sun2, Yong Shao1.   

Abstract

The aim is to evaluate pregnant women infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and provide help for clinical prevention and treatment. All five cases of pregnant women confirmed COVID-19 were collected among patients who admitted to the Maternal and Child Hospital of Hubei Province between January 20 and February 10, 2020. All patients, aging from 25 to 31 years old, had the gestational week from 38th weeks to 41st weeks. All pregnant women did not have an antepartum fever but developed a low-grade fever (37.5℃-38.5℃) within 24 hours after delivery. All patients had normal liver and renal function, two patients had elevated plasma levels of the myocardial enzyme. Unusual chest imaging manifestations, featured with ground-grass opacity, were frequently observed in bilateral (three cases) or unilateral lobe (two cases) by computed tomography (CT) scan. All labors smoothly processed, the Apgar scores were 10 points 1 and 5 minutes after delivery, no complications were observed in the newborn. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of patients with COVID-19 should receive more attention. It is probable that pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 have no fever before delivery. Their primary initial manifestations were merely low-grade postpartum fever or mild respiratory symptoms. Therefore, the protective measures are necessary on admission; the instant CT scan and real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction assay should be helpful in early diagnosis and avoid cross-infection on the occasion that patients have fever and other respiratory signs.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; clinical manifestations; labor; pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32222119      PMCID: PMC7228212          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   20.693


INTRODUCTION

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2)‐induced pneumonia, started in Wuhan and rapidly spread in China and other countries, is causing a global health problem. , As February 8, 2020, the National Health Commission announced 37 198 confirmed cases and 28 942 suspected cases in China. Pregnant women were also reported being infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), which possesses similarity with the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). As reported by the previous SARS‐related studies, pregnant women were more susceptible to coronavirus infection and at a high risk of poor perinatal outcomes. , Nevertheless, studies on COVID‐19 are still quite limited, leading to a great challenge for pregnant women care. Our study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of pregnant women infected with COVID‐19, and we hope this study could provide a guidance for clinical prevention and treatment of COVID‐19 in pregnant women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data sources

Our study collected a total of five pregnant women with COVID‐19, who were hospitalized for regular delivery in Maternal and Child Hospital of Hubei Province between January 20 and February 10, 2020 (Table 1). All patients were regularly given a prenatal routine examination that started from the first trimester. Ultrasound examination and fetal heart monitoring were offered regularly before delivery, no symptoms of viral pneumonia were observed. On latest admission, all patients received routine fetal heart monitoring and laboratory examinations including complete blood count, blood chemistry, coagulation test, liver and renal function, electrolytes, C‐reactive protein, procalcitonin, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase. The delivery strategy is determined according to the pregnant women's general situation. Apgar scoring and nursing was routinely given for the newborn after delivery. Once the patient had suspected symptoms, chest computed tomography (CT) scan and other blood analysis were instantly performed, antibiotics were empirically given in time to prevent bacterium‐related infection, patients were quarantined for an intensive treatment, and newborns were closely monitored with breastfeeding restriction. This study was approved by the ethical committee of Maternal and Child Hospital of Hubei Province, the work undertaken in this study conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Tokyo 2004). Informed consent was obtained from all pregnant women.
Table 1

Maternal characteristics and symptoms of pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)

Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Patient 5
Age, y2930253129
Date of admission23/01/202026/01/202025/01/202027/01/202026/01/2020
Date of delivery24/01/2020 17:5126/01/2020 22:5525/01/2020 09:1727/01/2020 21:3027/01/2020 09:00
Date of diagnosis27/01/2020 14:3027/01/2020 09:5025/01/2020 23:4328/01/2020 02:3628/01/2020 08:31
Place of residenceWuhan, HubeiWuhan, HubeiWuhan, HubeiWuhan, HubeiWuhan, Hubei
Obstetrical complicationsGestational diabetesPre‐eclampsiaNoneNoneGestational diabetes
Post‐partum fever, ℃38.537.537.437.437.8
Cough+
Sputum+
Coryza+
Myalgia
Malaise
Dyspnea
Other symptoms
Systolic blood Pressure, mm Hg12515310495119
Maternal characteristics and symptoms of pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)

Diagnostic criteria

Cases were suspected based on the WHO interim guidance and the definition of COVID‐19 issued by the National Health Commission of China. (1) Severe acute respiratory infection that required hospitalized treatment, (2) with no other etiology that thoroughly explains the clinical presentation, and (3) a history of travel to or residence in the city of Wuhan, or contact with the environment of COVID‐19 as a healthcare worker. Abnormal results included the aforementioned imaging characteristics of pneumonia, decreased white blood cell (WBC) or lymphocyte counts in the early stage of the disease. The diagnostic criteria for COVID‐19 are based on the criteria for the suspected cases. Positive results from real‐time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) assay with samples like sputum, throat swabs, lower respiratory tract secretions or other specimens, or sequencing‐confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. All patients in this study were reported positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection through quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR tests.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics

According to the demographic data of five patients (Table 1), they were between the ages of 25 and 31 years old. None was a healthcare worker. All of them were physically fit and conceived naturally. The gestational weeks on admission were the third trimester (38th‐41st weeks). Patients 1 and 5 had gestational diabetes and patient 2 had pre‐eclampsia before delivery. All patients lived in Wuhan, Hubei province. On admission, all patients had no fever or cough before delivery. However, all patients’ low‐grade fever (37.5℃‐38.5℃), the most common onset symptom of COVID‐19, occurred after delivery within 24 hours, and the highest body temperature of patient 1 was 38.5°C. Patient 3 had a cough 1 day before giving birth, and patient 5 had the symptoms of coughing and nasal runny 10 days before delivery. All patients had no symptoms such as hemoptysis, dyspnea, shortness of breath, nausea, and vomiting. All oxygen saturation tests were normal.

Laboratory findings

Laboratory findings showed (Table 2) that in the early stage of the disease, the count of WBCs in all patients was normal, and two patients developed an increased WBC count 24 hours after the symptom onset. The WBC counts of patient 5 were always abnormally high during hospital admission. C‐reactive protein levels increased in all patients but except patient 4, particularly in patient 5 who had a substantial increase (40.98‐125.90 mg/L). There was no obvious abnormality of the procalcitonin levels observed in all patients. The levels of albumin were decreased in all patients, whereas the levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were normal. All patients except patient 1 presented with the elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase. CK was reduced in patient 1 (21 U/L) while increased in patient 3 (227 U/L), respectively.
Table 2

Laboratory characteristics of pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)

Laboratory characteristicsNormal rangePatient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Patient 5
White blood cell count (WBC), ×109/L3.5‐9.56.7710.78↑9.3116.27↑12.97↑
Lymphocyte count (LYMPH), ×109/L1.1‐3.21.05↓0.77↓0.91↓0.97↓2.48
Neutrophil cell count (NEUT), ×109/L1.8‐6.35.289.44↑7.91↑15.52↑9.54↑
Platelet count (PLT), ×109/L125‐350240167105194326
C‐reactive protein (CRP), mg/L<418.46↑19.56↑NA8.96↑82.14↑
Procalcitonin (PCT), ng/mL<0.050.0530.2120.0700.0480.122
Hemoglobin (HGB), g/L115‐150125119113103↓105↓
Prothrombin time (PT), s9.4‐12.510.39.911.111.412.1
Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), s25.1‐36.525.729.528.029.130.1
D‐dimer (D‐DI), μg/mL<0.50.54↑NANA1.90↑1.64↑
Albumin (ALB), g/L40‐5535.5↓31.3↓31.8↓29.4↓28.3↓
Total bilirubin (TBIL), μg/mL5‐215.54.06.27.38.1
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), U/L0‐3514.715.57.65.97.6
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), U/L0‐3513.830.326.114.516.4
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), U/L35‐100100.0145.0↑234.0↑266↑146.0↑
Creatinine (CREA), μmol/L41‐7362.058.038.4↓56.051.0
Sodium (Na), mmol/L137‐147143138.0133.0↓140.0143.0
Potassium (K), mmol/L3.5‐5.34.364.784.404.593.50
Calcium (Ca), mmol/L2.11‐2.522. 131.91↓1.97↓2.252.13
Chloride (Cl), mmol/L99‐110105.0100.0104.0104.0104.0
Lactose dehydrogenase (LDH), U/L120‐250245.0412.0↑247.0221.0194.0
Creatinine kinase (CK), U/L40‐20021.0↓105.0227.0↑69.0199.0
SARS‐CoV‐2 quantitative RT‐PCR+++++
Seven common respiratory pathogens

Note: Positive, —; negative, +; NA, not available.

Laboratory characteristics of pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) Note: Positive, —; negative, +; NA, not available. All the serum samples of patients were tested for seven common respiratory pathogens (Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, adenovirus, parainfluenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza a virus, and influenza b virus) and N7 subtype avian influenza virus antigen. All the tests were negative except for the positive results of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in patients 3 and 5. Unusual chest imaging manifestations, featured with ground‐grass opacity, were frequently observed in bilateral (three cases) or unilateral lobe (two cases) by CT scan (Figure 1). All COVID‐19 were laboratory‐confirmed by the RT‐PCR method.
Figure 1

Chest computed tomography (CT) image of the pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Chest CT images of patient1 showed ground‐glass opacity in left lung on day 1 after symptom onset. Chest CT images of patient 2 showed ground‐glass opacity in both lungs on day 1 after symptom onset. Chest CT images of patient 3 showed ground‐glass opacity in the right lung on day 1 after symptom onset. Chest CT images of patient 4 showed ground‐glass opacity in the right lung on day 1 after symptom onset. Chest CT images of patient 5 showed ground‐glass opacity in both lungs on day 1 after symptom onset

Chest computed tomography (CT) image of the pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Chest CT images of patient1 showed ground‐glass opacity in left lung on day 1 after symptom onset. Chest CT images of patient 2 showed ground‐glass opacity in both lungs on day 1 after symptom onset. Chest CT images of patient 3 showed ground‐glass opacity in the right lung on day 1 after symptom onset. Chest CT images of patient 4 showed ground‐glass opacity in the right lung on day 1 after symptom onset. Chest CT images of patient 5 showed ground‐glass opacity in both lungs on day 1 after symptom onset

Perinatal outcomes

The perinatal outcomes and newborns are described in Table 3. Patient 2 underwent an emergent cesarean section due to the fetal tachycardia during pregnancy, patient 5 underwent elective cesarean section due to gestational diabetes. Patients 1, 3, and 4 had a natural delivery. All patients had a smooth labor process, and no partial complications occurred. The weights of newborns ranged from 3235 and 4050 g. Apgar scores were 10 points 1 and 5 minutes after delivery. No newborns showed the signs of perinatal COVID‐19 infection, umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid were not applied for virus detection due to the lack of reagent. No complications of placenta infarction and chorionic amniotic inflammation were reported. All patients were advised to stop breastfeeding and empirically given oseltamivir and azithromycin for treatment.
Table 3

Perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19

Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Patient 5
Gestational age on delivery, wk40+4 39+1 38+6 39+6 39
Gravidity (n) Parity (n)G1P0G1P0G3P1G3P0G1P0
Fetal heart rate traceNormalFetal tachycardiaNormalNormalNormal
Mode of deliveryNatural birthC‐sectionNatural birthNatural birthC‐section
Complications after deliveryNoNoNoNoNo
Weighs of newborns, g32353800367037004050
Apgar scores (5 min/10 min)10/1010/1010/1010/1010/10
Neonatal symptoms infected with COVID‐19NoNoNoNoNo
Neonatal SARS‐CoV‐2 quantitative RT‐PCRNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative

Abbreviations: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; RT‐PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID‐19 Abbreviations: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; RT‐PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome.

DISCUSSION

A study that analyzed 12 cases of pregnant women with SARS in 2004, Hong Kong, found that pregnant women with SARS were associated with high morbidity and mortality. Alfaraj et al reported that the neonatal mortality rate was up to 27% for pregnant women with Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Pregnant women infected with influenza showed a higher risk of hospitalizing than healthy pregnant women. Therefore, during the outbreak of COVID‐19, a disease that still lacks a specific and effective treatment, the prevention and management of pregnant women and newborns should be emphasized during the peripartal period. The data in our study showed that all pregnant women had no fever before delivery, but after delivery two patients developed coughing and low‐grade fever. Their CT scan results demonstrated the typical images of viral pneumonia. All five patients were confirmed with COVID‐19 by the test of nucleic acid examination. The fetal tachycardia was observed in one pregnant woman who subsequently received an emergent cesarean section. Chen et al reported that pregnancy with pneumonia would have a higher risk of cesarean section, premature delivery, decreased Apgar score of the newborn, and low birth weight of the newborn, etc. Even patients with COVID‐19 may only have the mild respiratory symptoms during pregnancy, they are still at a high risk of severe pneumonia and adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially for patients who have pre‐eclampsia or other complications, as pneumonia may aggravate pulmonary edema and oxygen saturation reduction. Our study showed that the strategy of delivery was not affected by the coexistence of COVID‐19, the choice of cesarean section was mainly determined by obstetric factors. According to the previous research on SARS, the peritoneal fluid and faeces could be positive for virus detection, and the virus might be transmitted during vaginal and cesarean delivery. As reported by a recent newspaper, a newborn was diagnosed as COVID‐19 30 hours after delivery, which suggested that there may be a risk of virus intrauterine vertical transmission or infection through contact with the maternal secretion. However, another research including nine pregnant women showed no direct evidence of intrauterine infection, which was consistent with the research on pregnant women with SARS, therefore, we need to be alert to take preventive and treatment measures for newborns in such period. According to China experts’ consensus, it is recommended to quarantine the infants whose mother is suspected or diagnosed with COVID‐19 for 14 days. Currently, there is not enough evidence supporting the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 in breast milk, however, breastfeeding is not recommended according to the experience from SARS. Owing to the absence of symptoms before delivery, all patients neglected CT scan and nucleic acid screening on admission, like most Chinese pregnant women usually do. It is probable to miss the diagnosis of COVID‐19, which could delay the diagnosis and treatment of patients, and increase the risk of transmission for surrounding people, containing healthcare workers. The pregnant women's exposure to CT radiation barely reaches the dose that causes harm to the fetus, so it is plausible to perform a COVID‐19 screening during early pregnancy. In terms of treatment, pregnant women with MERS were not recommended to use ribavirin because of its risk to lead to fetal deformities. New drugs for the treatment of COVID‐19 are still being tested in clinical trials, and the effects for pregnant women are still not definitive and require further study.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women infected with COVID‐19 need to receive more intensive attention. COVID‐19 could asymptotically occur during gestation but get diagnosed after delivery. The manifestations include postpartum fever, mild respiratory symptoms, and typical CT images. Therefore, the protective measures for COVID‐19 are necessary on admission; The CT scan and real‐time RT‐PCR assay could be helpful for the prevention of cross‐transmission and early treatment of pregnant women with COVID‐19.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

The corresponding author GS and YS developed the study concept and design, critically reviewed the data and decided the content of the manuscript. All other authors acquired and/or analyzed data, performed the statistical analysis and/or provided technical or material support and/or wrote and/or critically reviewed the manuscript. Authors SC, EL and DC contributed equally to this study. All authors finally decided on the content of the manuscript.
  16 in total

1.  Committee Opinion No. 656: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Infants born to mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Chi C Shek; Pak C Ng; Genevieve P G Fung; Frankie W T Cheng; Paul K S Chan; Malik J S Peiris; Kim H Lee; Shell F Wong; Hon M Cheung; Albert M Li; Ellis K L Hon; Chung K Yeung; Chun B Chow; John S Tam; Man C Chiu; Tai F Fok
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of patients with severe pneumonia complicating pregnancy: a retrospective study of 12 cases and a literature review.

Authors:  Pingping Tang; Jiangshan Wang; Yingna Song
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nanshan Chen; Min Zhou; Xuan Dong; Jieming Qu; Fengyun Gong; Yang Han; Yang Qiu; Jingli Wang; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Jia'an Xia; Ting Yu; Xinxin Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  SARS and pregnancy: a case report.

Authors:  Corwin A Robertson; Sara A Lowther; Thomas Birch; Christina Tan; Faye Sorhage; Lauren Stockman; Clifford McDonald; Jairam R Lingappa; Eddy Bresnitz
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  SARS-associated coronavirus transmission, United States.

Authors:  Elmira T Isakbaeva; Nino Khetsuriani; R Suzanne Beard; Angela Peck; Dean Erdman; Stephan S Monroe; Suxiang Tong; Thomas G Ksiazek; Sara Lowther; Indra Pandya-Smith; Larry J Anderson; Jairam Lingappa; Marc-Alain Widdowson
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Management guidelines for obstetric patients and neonates born to mothers with suspected or probable severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).

Authors:  Cynthia Maxwell; Alison McGeer; Kin Fan Young Tai; Mathew Sermer
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2009-04

9.  Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records.

Authors:  Huijun Chen; Juanjuan Guo; Chen Wang; Fan Luo; Xuechen Yu; Wei Zhang; Jiafu Li; Dongchi Zhao; Dan Xu; Qing Gong; Jing Liao; Huixia Yang; Wei Hou; Yuanzhen Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Shell F Wong; Kam M Chow; Tse N Leung; Wai F Ng; Tak K Ng; Chi C Shek; Pak C Ng; Pansy W Y Lam; Lau C Ho; William W K To; Sik T Lai; Wing W Yan; Peggy Y H Tan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  80 in total

Review 1.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancy associated with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zekiye Karaçam; Damla Kizilca-Çakaloz; Gizem Güneş-Öztürk; Ayden Çoban
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 2.  Relationship of COVID-19 with pregnancy.

Authors:  Umme Salma
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 3.  COVID-19 and immunomodulation in IBD.

Authors:  Markus F Neurath
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Anaesthesia and intensive care in obstetrics during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Estelle Morau; Lionel Bouvet; Hawa Keita; Florence Vial; Marie Pierre Bonnet; Martine Bonnin; Agnès Le Gouez; Dominique Chassard; Frédéric J Mercier; Dan Benhamou
Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Considerations for Obstetric Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Brenna L Hughes
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  SARS-CoV-2-Morphology, Transmission and Diagnosis during Pandemic, Review with Element of Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katarzyna Grudlewska-Buda; Natalia Wiktorczyk-Kapischke; Ewa Wałecka-Zacharska; Joanna Kwiecińska-Piróg; Katarzyna Buszko; Kamil Leis; Klaudia Juszczuk; Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowska; Krzysztof Skowron
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Pregnancy Consequences and Vertical Transmission Potential of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Seeking Answers From a Preliminary Observation.

Authors:  Kalpana Kumari; Ramakant Yadav; Sangh Mittra; Arushi Kumar; Jigyasa Singh; Prashant Kumar Bajpai; Dhiraj Kumar Srivastava; Raj Kumar
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun

8.  Severe Coronavirus Infections in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Romeo R Galang; Karen Chang; Penelope Strid; Margaret Christine Snead; Kate R Woodworth; Lawrence D House; Mirna Perez; Wanda D Barfield; Dana Meaney-Delman; Denise J Jamieson; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Sascha R Ellington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 9.  Obstetrics and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnant Women with COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mojdeh Banaei; Vida Ghasemi; Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz; Zahra Kiani; Farzaneh Rashidi-Fakari; Sedigheh Banaei; Behzad Mohammad Souri; Mohsen Rokni
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Clinical analysis of pregnant women with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia.

Authors:  Siyu Chen; E Liao; Dongmei Cao; Ying Gao; Guoqiang Sun; Yong Shao
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 20.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.