Literature DB >> 32221854

The Relationship Between Follow-up Appointments and Access to Primary Care.

Megan E Price1, Nicolae Done2,3,4, Steven D Pizer2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care operations managers need to balance scheduling frequent follow-ups for patients with chronic conditions and fitting in patients requiring care for new complaints.
OBJECTIVE: We quantify how frequency of follow-up visits corresponds with access to care for patients receiving care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
DESIGN: We use patient data collected between October 2013 and June 2016 by the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP). Our sample is comprised of 94,496 patients. We estimate logistic models with 1-month lagged facility-level predictors. MAIN MEASURES: We calculate monthly measures characterizing facility-level service provision, including the average time between successive primary care visits, the average primary care visit length, the percentage of primary care appointments that are overbooked, the percent of visits that are unscheduled (i.e., walk-ins), and the ratio of patients to providers. We control for economic factors that are associated with health care supply and demand, including median household income, veteran priority status, the Zillow Housing Price Index, and veteran unemployment rates. We also control for patient demographics. PATIENTS: We restrict the data to patients with at least one in-person primary care visit who have provided information on their ability to access urgent and routine care. KEY
RESULTS: We find that shorter average follow-up times are associated with better access for patients needing urgent or routine care. A 1-month increase in the average time between successive primary care visits is associated with 10% (p < 0.001) lower odds of reporting being able to access urgent care within 1 day and 13% (p < 0.001) lower odds of reporting usually or always being able to access routine care when needed.
CONCLUSION: Facilities with higher average follow-up times are more likely to have patients report that they are unable to quickly access urgent or routine primary care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to care; wait times

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32221854      PMCID: PMC7280427          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05785-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  9 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Patient Satisfaction With Geriatric Psychiatry Services via Video Teleconference.

Authors:  Nathan Hantke; M Lajoy; Christine E Gould; Elena M Magwene; J Sordahl; R Hirst; R O'Hara
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.105

3.  Commitment to a regular physician: how long will patients wait to see their own physician for acute illness?

Authors:  M M Love; A G Mainous
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  The influence of gatekeeping and utilization review on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  E A Kerr; R D Hays; A Mitchinson; M Lee; A L Siu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Satisfaction with ambulatory care and compliance in older patients.

Authors:  M W Linn; B S Linn; S R Stein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Delayed access to health care and mortality.

Authors:  Julia C Prentice; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Which outpatient wait-time measures are related to patient satisfaction?

Authors:  Julia C Prentice; Michael L Davies; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Effect on VA Patient Satisfaction of Provider's Use of an Integrated Viewer of Multiple Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Aaron Legler; Megan Price; Megha Parikh; Jonathan R Nebeker; Merry C Ward; Linda Wedemeyer; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Agreement Between HEDIS Performance Assessments in the VA and Medicare Advantage: Is Quality in the Eye of the Beholder?

Authors:  Amal N Trivedi; Ira B Wilson; Mary E Charlton; Kenneth W Kizer
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.730

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.