Literature DB >> 32219612

Favorable Survival with Non-curative Treatments for Patients with Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplant Denial.

Andreas Zori1, Faith Villanueva2, Diana Hatamleh3, Media Ismael3, Justin Forde3, Manoela Mota1, Lindsey Johnson3, Roniel Cabrera1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients are not candidates for liver transplant for non-tumor-related reasons including medical comorbidities and non-adherence. The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not liver transplant candidates in the era of locoregional therapy (LRT) including y90 is not well defined. AIMS: This study seeks to evaluate outcomes and the natural history of early-stage HCC in patients who were denied liver transplant listing due to non-tumor reasons and instead were treated with LRT.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed for all patients who completed liver transplant evaluation with their tumor within Milan criteria but were denied due to non-tumor reasons and were treated with LRT at a single tertiary referral center.
RESULTS: The 61 patients included had a favorable overall survival, with a median survival 60.3 months (86.9% at 1 year and 52.7% at 5 years). Patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (n = 34) had significantly longer overall survival compared to those with Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis (median survival of 70.3 months versus 26.1 months, p = 0.005). Survival in patients with Child-Pugh A at 1, 3, and 5 years was 97%, 80%, and 73%, respectively, compared to 74%, 41%, and 31% in patients with Child-Pugh B/C.
CONCLUSIONS: In a small single-center cohort, patients with HCC who were denied liver transplant due to non-tumor reasons and underwent LRT and had Child-Pugh A cirrhosis had survival approaching the national average for patients who undergo liver transplantation. Patients with Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis had significantly worse outcomes than those with Child-Pugh A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastroenterology; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Interventional radiology; Liver cirrhosis; Liver transplantation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32219612     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06201-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of first-line radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection and transplantation for patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Onur C Kutlu; Jennifer A Chan; Thomas A Aloia; Yun S Chun; Ahmed O Kaseb; Guillaume Passot; Suguru Yamashita; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Claudius Conrad
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Radioembolization results in longer time-to-progression and reduced toxicity compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik; Edward Wang; Ahsun Riaz; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Ramona Gupta; Paul Nikolaidis; Frank H Miller; Vahid Yaghmai; Saad M Ibrahim; Seanthan Senthilnathan; Talia Baker; Vanessa L Gates; Bassel Atassi; Steven Newman; Khairuddin Memon; Richard Chen; Robert L Vogelzang; Albert A Nemcek; Scott A Resnick; Howard B Chrisman; James Carr; Reed A Omary; Michael Abecassis; Al B Benson; Mary F Mulcahy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Surgery and portal hypertension.

Authors:  C G Child; J G Turcotte
Journal:  Major Probl Clin Surg       Date:  1964

4.  OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Liver.

Authors:  W R Kim; J R Lake; J M Smith; D P Schladt; M A Skeans; A M Harper; J L Wainright; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 5.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an appraisal of current controversies.

Authors:  Yee Lee Cheah; Pierce K H Chow
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  Y90 Radioembolization Significantly Prolongs Time to Progression Compared With Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Riad Salem; Andrew C Gordon; Samdeep Mouli; Ryan Hickey; Joseph Kallini; Ahmed Gabr; Mary F Mulcahy; Talia Baker; Michael Abecassis; Frank H Miller; Vahid Yaghmai; Kent Sato; Kush Desai; Bartley Thornburg; Al B Benson; Alfred Rademaker; Daniel Ganger; Laura Kulik; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Recipient ineligibility after liver transplantation assessment: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Aman Arya; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Paul Marotta; Julia Uhanova; Natasha Chandok
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Patients with cirrhosis and denied liver transplants rarely receive adequate palliative care or appropriate management.

Authors:  Zafrina Poonja; Amanda Brisebois; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Puneeta Tandon; Glenda Meeberg; Constantine J Karvellas
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and treatment options for recurrence.

Authors:  Robert S Rahimi; James F Trotter
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

10.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  V Mazzaferro; E Regalia; R Doci; S Andreola; A Pulvirenti; F Bozzetti; F Montalto; M Ammatuna; A Morabito; L Gennari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 176.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.