| Literature DB >> 32219177 |
Bethany M Coad1,2, Emma Craig2, Rebecca Louch2, John P Aggleton2, Seralynne D Vann2, Claudia Metzler-Baddeley1,2.
Abstract
The fornix is a key tract of the hippocampal formation, whose status is presumed to contribute to age-related cognitive decline. The precommissural and postcommissural fornix subdivisions form respective basal forebrain/frontal and diencephalic networks that may differentially affect aging and cognition. We employed multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including neurite orientation density and dispersion imaging, quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT), and T1-relaxometry MRI to investigate the microstructural properties of these fornix subdivisions and their relationship with aging and cognition in 149 asymptomatic participants (38-71 years). Aging was associated with increased free water signal and reductions in myelin-sensitive R1 and qMT indices but no apparent axon density differences in both precommissural and postcommissural fibers. Precommissural relative to postcommissural fibers showed a distinct microstructural pattern characterised by larger free water signal and axon orientation dispersion, with lower apparent myelin and axon density. Furthermore, differences in postcommissural microstructure were related to performance differences in object-location paired-associate learning. These results provide novel in vivo neuroimaging evidence for distinct microstructural properties of precommissural and postcommissural fibers that are consistent with their anatomy as found in axonal tracer studies, as well as for a contribution of postcommissural fibers to the learning of spatial configurations.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; hippocampus; mammillary bodies; memory; myelin; quantitative magnetization transfer; white matter
Year: 2020 PMID: 32219177 PMCID: PMC7085915 DOI: 10.1177/2398212819899316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Neurosci Adv ISSN: 2398-2128
Figure 1.Example region of interest placements for tract extraction. (a) A depicts the whole fornix reconstruction, (b) depicts the precommissural fornix, and (c) depicts the postcommissural fornix. The location of the anterior commissure is indicated by the pink square in (b) and (c).
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) for the relationship between age and microstructural metrics of interest from reconstructions of the whole fornix.
| Metric |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| FA |
| <0.000001 |
| MD |
| 0.00023 |
| ICSF |
| 0.817 |
| ISOSF |
| 0.00001 |
| ODI |
| 0.006 |
| MPF |
| <0.000001 |
| R1 |
| <0.000001 |
|
|
| <0.000001 |
FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; ICSF: intracellular signal fraction; ISOSF: isotropic signal fraction; ODI: orientation dispersion index; MPF: macromolecular proton fraction; pB-Hadj: Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p-values; FDR: false discovery rate.
5% FDR corrected correlations are highlighted in italics.
Figure 2.Correlations (r) between microstructural indices in the precommissural and the postcommissural fornix and between-tract comparisons for each microstructural index.
FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; ICSF: intracellular signal fraction; ISOSF: isotropic signal fraction; ODI: orientation dispersion index; MPF: macromolecular proton fraction.
*pB-Hadj < 0.001; **pB-Hadj < 0.000001.
Interclass correlation coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals for precommissural and postcommissural fornix.
| Precommissural fornix (95% CI) | Postcommissural fornix (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| FA | 0.20 (–0.25–0.58) | 0.12 (–0.31–0.51) |
| MD | 0.42 (–0.02–0.73) | 0.71 (0.40–0.88) |
| ICSF | 0.75 (0.47–0.89) | 0.83 (0.63–0.93) |
| ISOSF | 0.58 (0.19–0.81) | 0.76 (0.49–0.90) |
| ODI | 0.78 (0.54–0.91) | 0.90 (0.76–0.96) |
| MPF | 0.73 (0.43–0.88) | 0.96 (0.90–0.98) |
| R1 | 0.85 (0.67–0.94) | 0.97 (0.91–0.99) |
|
| 0.76 (0.49–0.90) | 0.86 (0.68–0.94) |
CI: confidence interval; FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; ICSF: intracellular signal fraction; ISOSF: isotropic signal fraction; ODI: orientation dispersion index; MPF: macromolecular proton fraction.
Figure 3.Correlations (r) between metrics of interest and age, as well as a comparison of correlation coefficients across precommissural and postcommissural fornix (z).
FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; ICSF: intracellular signal fraction; ISOSF: isotropic signal fraction; ODI: orientation dispersion index; MPF: macromolecular proton fraction.
Rotated factor matrix of the exploratory factor analysis within the cognitive data (rotation methods: Varimax with Kaiser normalisation).
| Cognitive scores | Verbal recall | Motor speed and planning | Spatial navigation | Attention set | Visuospatial memory | Working memory | Paired associate learning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test | |||||||
| List A first IR | 0.73 | ||||||
| List A second IR | 0.87 | ||||||
| List A third IR | 0.83 | ||||||
| List A fourth IR | 0.81 | ||||||
| List A fifth IR | 0.73 | ||||||
| List A sixth IR | 0.83 | ||||||
| List A DR | 0.84 | ||||||
| Virtual Morris Water Maze Task | |||||||
| FM Block2 | 0.70 | ||||||
| FM Block3 | 0.66 | ||||||
| FM Block4 | 0.63 | ||||||
| FM Block5 | 0.61 | ||||||
| FM Block6 | 0.69 | ||||||
| TL Block2 | 0.56 | ||||||
| TL Block5 | 0.54 | ||||||
| TL Block6 | 0.72 | ||||||
| PL Block2 | 0.64 | ||||||
| PL Block3 | 0.51 | ||||||
| PL Block4 | 0.56 | ||||||
| PL Block5 | 0.67 | ||||||
| Rey complex figure | |||||||
| IR | 0.56 | ||||||
| DR | 0.63 | ||||||
| Spatial span | |||||||
| Maximum | 0.66 | ||||||
| Mean | 0.66 | ||||||
| Intra-dimensional and extra-dimensional attention shift | |||||||
| ID two dimensions | 0.57 | ||||||
| ID overlapping features | 0.63 | ||||||
| ID reversal | 0.61 | ||||||
| ID shift | 0.52 | ||||||
| Total duration | 0.82 | ||||||
| Digit span | |||||||
| Maximum | 0.74 | ||||||
| Mean | 0.73 | ||||||
| Spatial search | |||||||
| Maximum | 0.53 | ||||||
| Mean | 0.50 | ||||||
| Paired associate learning | |||||||
| Maximum | 0.90 | ||||||
| Mean | 0.95 | ||||||
DR: delayed recall; ED: extra-dimensional; FM: first move latencies; ID: intra-dimensional; IR: immediate recall; PL: path length; RT: reaction time; TL: total latency.
Loadings of >0.5 are displayed.