| Literature DB >> 30735826 |
Claudia Metzler-Baddeley1, Jilu P Mole2, Erika Leonaviciute2, Rebecca Sims3, Emma J Kidd4, Benyamin Ertefai4, Aurora Kelso-Mitchell2, Florence Gidney2, Fabrizio Fasano5, John Evans2, Derek K Jones6, Roland J Baddeley7.
Abstract
Midlife obesity is a risk factor of late onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) but why this is the case remains unknown. As systemic inflammation is involved in both conditions, obesity-related neuroinflammation may contribute to damage in limbic structures important in LOAD. Here, we investigated the hypothesis that systemic inflammation would mediate central obesity related effects on limbic tissue microstructure in 166 asymptomatic individuals (38-71 years old). We employed MRI indices sensitive to myelin and neuroinflammation [macromolecular proton fraction (MPF) and kf] from quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) together with indices from neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to investigate the effects of central adiposity on the fornix, parahippocampal cingulum, uncinate fasciculus (compared with whole brain white matter and corticospinal tract) and the hippocampus. Central obesity was assessed with the Waist Hip Ratio (WHR) and abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat area fractions (VFF, SFF), and systemic inflammation with blood plasma concentrations of leptin, adiponectin, C-reactive protein and interleukin 8. Men were significantly more centrally obese and had higher VFF than women. Individual differences in WHR and in VFF were negatively correlated with differences in fornix MPF and kf, but not with any differences in neurite microstructure. In women, age mediated the effects of VFF on fornix MPF and kf, whilst in men differences in the leptin and adiponectin ratio fully mediated the effect of WHR on fornix MPF. These results suggest that visceral fat related systemic inflammation may damage myelin-related properties of the fornix, a key limbic structure known to be involved in LOAD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30735826 PMCID: PMC6435101 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 7.400
Summary of demographic, cognitive, genetic and lifestyle-related health information for men and women.
| Mean (SD) | Men (n = 72) | Women (n = 94) | Statistic (p-value) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 56 (8.3) | 55.6 (8.2) | |
| Years of education | 16.6 (3.4) | 16.5 (3.3) | |
| NART | 116.9 (6.4) | 116.6 (6.9) | |
| MMSE | 29 (1.0) | 29.2 (0.9) | |
| Positive Family History dementia | 36.1 | 35.1% | |
| 44.4% ε4+, 55.6% ε4- | 34.4% ε4+, 65.6% ε4- | ||
| Central obesity (Waist Hip Ratio) | 84.7% | 44.7% | χ2(1) = 28.34 (<0.0001) |
| Overweight/Obese (BMI) | 50%/18% | 39.4%/21.3% | |
| Subcutaneous fat area fraction | 0.35 (0.1) | 0.41 (0.1) | t(128) = 3.5 (0.001) |
| Visceral fat area fraction | 0.22 (0.06) | 0.19 (0.06) | t(128) = 3.8 (0.002) |
| Systolic Hypertension | 36.1% | 22.3% | |
| Smokers | 4.2% | 6.4% | |
| Diabetes | 2.8% | 1.1% | |
| Statins | 13.9% | 3.3% | χ2(1) = 6.5 (0.01) |
| Alcohol units per week | 11.5 (11.9) | 4.3 (5.0) | t(156) = 5.2 (<0.0001) |
| Physical activities (Median hours per week) | 11.9 (12.7) | 9.2 (11.5) | |
| Adiponectin log10 ng/ml | 3.9 (0.26) | 4.1 (0.22) | t(146) = 4.64 (<0.0001) |
| Leptin log10 pg/ml | 3.7 (0.39) | 4.3 (0.37) | t(146) = 9.02 (<0.0001) |
| C-Reactive Protein log10 ng/ml | 3.0 (0.45) | 3.1 (0.49) | |
| Interleukin-8 log10 pg/ml | 0.7 (0.14) | 0.7 (0.16) |
Abbreviations: APOE = Apolipoprotein E, BMI = Body Mass Index, MMSE = Mini Mental State Examination, NART = National Adult Reading Test.
Fig. 1A) displays the MRI modalities and maps from dual-shell high angular resolution imaging (HARDI) and quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) imaging. HARDI data were modelled with neurite orientation dispersion and density (NODDI) yielding maps of intracellular signal fraction (ICSF), isotropic signal fraction (ISOSF) and orientation density index (ODI). qMT based maps were the macromolecular proton fraction (MPF) and the forward exchange rate kf. B) Mean indices of the metrics were extracted from the left hippocampus (LHC) (red), right hippocampus (RHC) (blue), whole brain white matter (WBWM) mask (yellow), fornix (red), parahippocampal cinguli (PHC) (yellow), uncinate fasciculi (UF) (green) and corticospinal tract (CST) (orange). Hippocampi and WBWM were segmented from T1-weighted images with FreeSurfer version 5.3 and fornix, PHC, UF and CST were reconstructed with damped-Richardson Lucy spherical deconvolution (dRL) based deterministic tractography on colour coded principal direction maps (RGBλ). C) Examples of abdominal images from a) a 51 years old male with larger visceral (VFF) than subcutaneous fat area fraction (SFF), b) a 52 years old female with larger SFF than VFF and c) a 60 years old female with low SFF and VFF. All abdominal images were acquired with the same field of view of 480 × 390 mm.
Overview of the quantitative microstructural indices and their interpretation in white matter.
| MRI modality | Index | Apparent white matter property | Hypothesised changes in central obesity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diffusion NODDI | ICSF | Axon density | Reduction |
| ODI | Axon dispersion | Increase | |
| ISOSF | Free water | Increase | |
| qMT | MPF | Myelin Neuroinflammation | Reduction |
| Neuroinflammation Mitochondrial metabolism | Increase in acute inflammation ( |
Abbreviations: ICSF = intracellular signal fraction, ISOSF = isotropic signal fraction, k = forward exchange rate, MPF = macromolecular proton fraction, NODDI = neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging, ODI = orientation dispersion index, qMT = quantitative magnetization transfer.
Rotated component matrix of the principal component analysis of the white matter microstructural indicesa.
| Components | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISOSF/ODI | MPF | ICSF | Fornix | |||
| Fornix | ICSF | −0.201 | −0.039 | −0.081 | 0.497 | 0.431 |
| ISOSF | −0.045 | 0.012 | −0.015 | 0.039 | ||
| ODI | −0.041 | −0.027 | −0.122 | −0.364 | ||
| MPF | −0.114 | 0.041 | 0.458 | 0.049 | ||
| kf | −0.09 | −0.014 | 0.008 | |||
| Left PHC | ICSF | 0.264 | 0.107 | 0.101 | −0.191 | |
| ISOSF | −0.045 | 0.01 | 0.11 | −0.042 | ||
| ODI | −0.251 | −0.091 | −0.287 | 0.123 | ||
| MPF | 0.124 | 0.276 | 0.347 | 0.005 | ||
| kf | 0.09 | −0.048 | 0.18 | −0.004 | ||
| Right PHC | ICSF | 0.116 | 0.054 | 0.225 | −0.233 | |
| ISOSF | −0.008 | 0.09 | −0.08 | −0.081 | ||
| ODI | −0.086 | −0.155 | −0.285 | 0.206 | ||
| MPF | 0.049 | 0.149 | 0.265 | −0.01 | ||
| kf | 0.007 | 0.026 | 0.156 | 0.107 | ||
| Left UF | ICSF | −0.043 | 0.075 | 0.377 | 0.007 | |
| ISOSF | −0.062 | 0.234 | −0.083 | −0.029 | ||
| ODI | −0.054 | −0.066 | −0.103 | 0.028 | ||
| MPF | 0.018 | 0.262 | 0.182 | 0.04 | ||
| kf | −0.154 | 0.178 | 0.108 | −0.054 | ||
| Right UF | ICSF | −0.039 | 0.09 | 0.427 | 0.089 | |
| ISOSF | −0.021 | 0.226 | −0.28 | 0.066 | ||
| ODI | −0.03 | −0.025 | −0.154 | 0.039 | ||
| MPF | −0.027 | 0.204 | 0.086 | 0.002 | ||
| kf | 0.04 | 0.351 | 0.005 | −0.043 | ||
| Left CST | ICSF | −0.222 | 0.02 | 0.031 | 0.085 | |
| ISOSF | −0.087 | −0.032 | 0.077 | −0.088 | ||
| ODI | 0.029 | 0.022 | 0.036 | 0.097 | ||
| MPF | −0.067 | −0.045 | 0.132 | 0.042 | ||
| kf | −0.155 | 0.107 | −0.088 | 0.073 | ||
| Right CST | ICSF | −0.271 | 0.049 | 0.147 | 0.079 | |
| ISOSF | −0.116 | −0.127 | 0.115 | −0.132 | ||
| ODI | 0.026 | −0.053 | 0.064 | 0.065 | ||
| MPF | −0.114 | −0.024 | 0.077 | −0.015 | ||
| kf | −0.167 | 0.169 | −0.067 | 0.069 | ||
| Total WM | ICSF | −0.298 | 0.001 | 0.267 | −0.333 | |
| ISOSF | −0.037 | −0.105 | −0.147 | 0.201 | ||
| ODI | 0.06 | −0.186 | 0.005 | −0.195 | ||
| MPF | −0.065 | 0.1 | 0.196 | 0.235 | ||
| kf | −0.095 | 0.051 | 0.047 | 0.062 | ||
Loadings >0.5 are highlighted in bold. Abbreviations: CST = corticospinal tract, ICSF = intracellular signal fraction, ISOSF = isotropic signal fraction, kf = forward exchange rate, MPF = macromolecular proton fraction, ODI = orientation dispersion index, PHC = parahippocampal cingulum, ROI = region of interest, UF = uncinate fasciculus, WM = white matter.
Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization.
Rotated component matrix of the principal component analysis of the hippocampal microstructural indices.a.
| Components | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODI/MPF | ICSF | ||||
| Left HC | ICSF | 0.047 | −0.058 | 0.066 | |
| ISOSF | 0.104 | −0.015 | −0.174 | ||
| ODI | 0.106 | 0.005 | −0.246 | ||
| MPF | −0.378 | 0.236 | −0.195 | ||
| kf | −0.044 | −0.118 | −0.02 | ||
| Right HC | ICSF | −0.191 | −0.078 | −0.033 | |
| ISOSF | 0.153 | −0.077 | −0.262 | ||
| ODI | 0.025 | 0.005 | −0.217 | ||
| MPF | −0.437 | 0.218 | −0.115 | ||
| kf | −0.194 | −0.189 | 0.05 | ||
Loadings >0.5 are highlighted in bold. Abbreviations: GM = grey matter, HC = hippocampus, ICSF = intracellular signal fraction, ISOSF = isotropic signal fraction, kf = forward exchange rate, MPF = macromolecular proton fraction, ODI = orientation dispersion index, ROI = region of interest.
Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization.
Fig. 3Women showed negative correlations between differences in visceral fat area fraction (VFF) and differences in the fornix macromolecular proton fraction (MPF) (A) and k (B). C) Men showed a negative correlation between differences in waist hip ratio (WHR) and fornix MPF. D) For women, mediation analysis revealed that age fully mediated the correlation between VFF and fornix MPF (highlighted in bold) and also contributed to the correlation between VFF and fornix k (E). For men differences in the leptin/adiponectin ratio (LAR) fully mediated the correlation between WHR and fornix MPF. There was also a trend for a mediating effect of age (p = 0.05). 95% confidence interval in brackets were based on bootstrapping with 5000 replacements. ES = Effect size, b = unstandardized coefficients.
Fig. 2Plots the following obesity-brain correlations for the whole group of participants. A) Fornix macromolecular proton fraction (MPF) was negatively correlated with Waist-to-Hip Ration (WHR) and visceral area fraction (VFF). B) Fornix forward exchange rate k was negatively associated with WHR and VFF. C) Fornix isotropic signal fraction (ISOSF) was positively correlated with WHR and VFF. D) Positive correlations between WHR and the hippocampal ISOSF component. All p-values were 5% false discovery rate (FDR) corrected. Note that three extreme outliers in the WHR variable, that deviated more than three standard deviations from the regression slope, were removed from the scatterplot for display purposes, but their removal did not alter the results.