Literature DB >> 32218663

Patient and physician perceptions of lung cancer care in a multidisciplinary clinic model.

G Linford1, R Egan2, A Coderre-Ball3, N Dalgarno3, C J L Stone4, A Robinson1, D Robinson5, S Wakeham5, G C Digby1,4,6.   

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer (lc) is a complex disease requiring coordination of multiple health care professionals. A recently implemented lc multidisciplinary clinic (mdc) at Kingston Health Sciences Centre, an academic tertiary care hospital, improved timeliness of oncology assessment and treatment. This study describes patient, caregiver, and physician experiences in the mdc.
Methods: We qualitatively studied patient, caregiver, and physician experiences in a traditional siloed care model and in the mdc model. We used purposive sampling to conduct semi-structured interviews with patients and caregivers who received care in one of the models and with physicians who worked in both models. Thematic design by open coding in the ATLAS.ti software application (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development, Berlin, Germany) was used to analyze the data.
Results: Participation by 6 of 72 identified patients from the traditional model and 6 of 40 identified patients from the mdc model was obtained. Of 9 physicians who provided care in both models, 8 were interviewed (2 respirologists, 2 medical oncologists, 4 radiation oncologists). Four themes emerged: communication and collaboration, efficiency, quality of care, and effect on patient outcomes. Patients in both models had positive impressions of their care. Patients in the mdc frequently reported convenience and a positive effect of family presence at appointments. Physicians reported that the mdc improved communication and collegiality, clinic efficiency, patient outcomes and satisfaction, and consistency of information provided to patients. Physicians identified lack of clinic space as an area for mdc improvement. Conclusions: This qualitative study found that a lc mdc facilitated patient communication and physician collaboration, improved quality of care, and had a perceived positive effect on patient outcomes. 2020 Multimed Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality of care; lung cancer; multidisciplinary models; patient experiences; process improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32218663      PMCID: PMC7096197          DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  22 in total

1.  ASCO-ESMO consensus statement on quality cancer care.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions.

Authors:  C P West; L N Dyrbye; T D Shanafelt
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Multidisciplinary Influence on Care of Lung Cancer Patients at the Time of Diagnosis: a Patient Survey.

Authors:  K C Y Yiu; R A Juergens; A Swaminath
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Improving Timeliness of Oncology Assessment and Cancer Treatment Through Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Clinic.

Authors:  Christopher J L Stone; Andrew Robinson; Erin Brown; Mihaela Mates; Conrad B Falkson; Timothy Owen; Allison Ashworth; Christopher M Parker; Aamer Mahmud; Anna Tomiak; Sou Kishore Thain; Richard Gregg; Kenneth R Reid; Wiley Chung; Geneviève C Digby
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Lung cancer: clinical presentation and specialist referral time.

Authors:  G Buccheri; D Ferrigno
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  The impact of diagnostic imaging wait times on the prognosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne C Byrne; Brendan Barrett; Rick Bhatia
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  Distress in suspected lung cancer patients following rapid and standard diagnostic programs: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Pepijn Brocken; Erik H F M van der Heijden; Karen T M Oud; Gerben Bootsma; Harry J M Groen; A Rogier T Donders; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Judith B Prins
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Systematic review of multidisciplinary teams in the management of lung cancer.

Authors:  M Coory; P Gkolia; I A Yang; R V Bowman; K M Fong
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 9.  Timeliness of access to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment: A scoping literature review.

Authors:  Margo M Jacobsen; Sophie C Silverstein; Michael Quinn; Leo B Waterston; Christian A Thomas; James C Benneyan; Paul K J Han
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters.

Authors:  E J Junor; D J Hole; C R Gillis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Understanding the lived experience of lung cancer: a European social media listening study.

Authors:  Ana Rodrigues; Jyoti Chauhan; Alexandros Sagkriotis; Sathyaraj Aasaithambi; Michele Montrone
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Patient's treatment burden related to care coordination in the field of respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Paola Pierucci; Carla Santomasi; Nicolino Ambrosino; Andrea Portacci; Fabrizio Diaferia; Kjeld Hansen; Mikaela Odemyr; Steve Jones; Giovanna E Carpagnano
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2021-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.