Literature DB >> 8054286

Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters.

E J Junor1, D J Hole, C R Gillis.   

Abstract

Differences in survival outcome for patients with ovarian cancer in Scotland led to an investigation of whether these differences were due to variation in presenting prognostic features or to the organisation and delivery of cancer services. A retrospective study of all 533 cases of ovarian cancer registered in Scotland in 1987 was carried out. After adjustment for age, stage, pathology, degree of differentiation and presence of ascites, survival improved when patients (1) were first seen by a gynaecologist (P < 0.05); (2) were operated on by a gynaecologist (P < 0.05); (3) had residual disease of less than 2 cm post-operatively (P < 0.001); (4) were prescribed platinum chemotherapy (P < 0.05); and (5) were referred to a joint clinic (P < 0.001). When gynaecologists operated the likelihood of smaller residual disease increased (P < 0.001). The improved survival from management by a multidisciplinary team at a joint clinic was not solely due to the prescription of platinum chemotherapy. The results of this study support the contents of the 1991 Department of Health report on present acceptable practice in the management of ovarian cancer, circulated to gynaecologists and surgeons in Scotland in 1992. The new finding that in a common cancer management by a multidisciplinary team at a joint clinic directly affects survival requires urgent attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8054286      PMCID: PMC2033481          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  15 in total

1.  Medical audit, cancer registration, and survival in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C R Gillis; D J Hole; R M Still; J Davis; S B Kaye
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Histology of epithelial tumors of the ovary: clinical usefulness and prognostic significance of the histologic classification and grading.

Authors:  G D Malkasian; D G Decker; M J Webb
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  A meta-analysis of prognostic factors in advanced ovarian cancer with median survival and overall survival (measured with the log (relative risk)) as main objectives.

Authors:  E E Voest; J C van Houwelingen; J P Neijt
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-04

4.  Treatment results and prognostic factors in a population-based study of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  T Högberg; J Carstensen; E Simonsen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Treatment centre size, entry to trials, and survival in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  C A Stiller; G J Draper
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Geographical variation in cancer patient survival in Finland: chance, confounding, or effect of treatment?

Authors:  S Karjalainen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Participants in prospective, randomized clinical trials for resected non-small cell lung cancer have improved survival compared with nonparticipants in such trials.

Authors:  S Davis; P W Wright; S F Schulman; L D Hill; R D Pinkham; L P Johnson; T W Jones; H B Kellogg; H M Radke; W W Sikkema
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Do treatment protocols improve end results? A study of survival of patients with multiple myeloma in Finland.

Authors:  S Karjalainen; I Palva
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-28

9.  Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in advanced ovarian carcinoma: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience.

Authors:  G A Omura; M F Brady; H D Homesley; E Yordan; F J Major; H J Buchsbaum; R C Park
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Improved prognosis of ovarian cancer in The Netherlands during the period 1975-1985: a registry-based study.

Authors:  H R Balvert-Locht; J W Coebergh; W C Hop; H A Brölmann; M Crommelin; D J van Wijck; M T Verhagen-Teulings
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  Management of gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  A Melville; A Eastwood; J Kleijnen; H Kitchener; P Martin-Hirsch; L Nelson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

2.  Specialization and cancer: words with too many meanings should be handled with care.

Authors:  R Grilli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer enhances access to multimodal therapy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

Authors:  Rebecca A Levine; Bhani Chawla; Shelli Bergeron; Harry Wasvary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Recent advances: oncology.

Authors:  M H Tattersall; H Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-13

5.  Multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literature.

Authors:  J M Croke; S El-Sayed
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Current drug treatment guidelines for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  P C Lorigan; T Crosby; R E Coleman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The proliferation of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): how can radiology departments continue to support them all?

Authors:  Ravivarma Balasubramaniam; Manil Subesinghe; Jonathan T Smith
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Disparities in use of gynecologic oncologists for women with ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Shamly Austin; Michelle Y Martin; Yongin Kim; Ellen M Funkhouser; Edward E Partridge; Maria Pisu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery for stage III/IV ovarian cancer: contribution of diagnostic laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Brun; Roman Rouzier; Frédéric Selle; Sidney Houry; Serge Uzan; Emile Daraï
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Effects and feasibility of a multi-disciplinary orientation program for newly registered cancer patients: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Raymond Chan; Joan Webster; Linda Bennett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.