| Literature DB >> 32218331 |
Menglu Chen1, Juliang Jin1, Shaowei Ning1,2, Yuliang Zhou1, Parmeshwar Udmale3.
Abstract
The sustainable utilization of water resources is a significant factor in the development of the national economy and society. Regional water resources carrying capacity (RWRCC) is an appropriate method for evaluating the balance in such utilization. In this paper, we combined time difference correlation analysis and set pair analysis firstly to identify the early warning sign index (EWSI) for RWRCC, and warning limits were determined using a logical curve. Analytic hierarchy process based on the accelerating genetic algorithm (AGA-AHP) method was used to improve the KLR model by determining weights objectively. We took advantage of the new improved model to build the aggregate warning index (AWI). Then, according to the corresponding relationship between EWSI and AWI, the early warning system for regional water resources carrying capacity (EWS-RWRCC) was established, and a case study was carried out in Anhui Province. The results showed there are eight effective EWSI obtained through the early warning analysis process of RWRCC in Anhui Province, among which the repetitive use rate of industrial water and average daily coefficient have a greater impact on AWI. Basically, the EWS-RWRCC can describe RWRCC changes in Anhui Province. From 2006 to 2014, more than half the signal lights in Anhui Province were yellow and orange, which indicated a poor state. It has been proved that the constraints of population, GDP growth and water supply capacity on the utilization of water resources in the future will be further tightened, which should be considered for future monitoring and early warning. The early warning method we used here can be widely applied into other fields; the results will enhance monitoring capacity and scientifically guide regional water resources management.Entities:
Keywords: AGA-AHP; Anhui Province; KLR model; early warning; logical curve; regional water resources carrying capacity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32218331 PMCID: PMC7177548 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Process of early warning method of regional water resources carrying capacity.
Performance criteria of early warning sign index (EWSI) for early warning system for regional water resources carrying capacity (EWS-RWRCC).
| Crisis Occurs in the Next Year | No Crisis Occurs in the Next Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Index sends out signal | A | B |
| Index does not send out signal | C | D |
Figure 2The location of Anhui province.
Figure 3Connection numbers and corresponding s values for evaluating regional water resources carrying capacity (RWRCC) from 2005 to 2015 in Anhui Province.
Candidate indices for EWS-RWRCC in Anhui Province.
| Classification | Mark | Index | Calculation Method or Data Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water quantity | X1 | Water supply per capita, m3 | Water supply/population |
| X2 | Surface water supply, 100 million m3 | Statistic yearbook | |
| Water quality | X3 | Compliance rate of national water function zone, % | Statistic yearbook |
| X4 | Compliance rate of drinking water source quality, % | Statistic yearbook | |
| X5 | Rate of better river water quality (≥Grade III), % | Statistic yearbook | |
| Economic development | X6 | GDP per capita, 10,000 yuan | GDP/total population |
| X7 | Population density, person·km-2 | Population/land area | |
| X8 | Percent of urban population, % | Urban population/total population | |
| X9 | Percent of agricultural water consumption, % | Agricultural water consumption/total water consumption | |
| Water utilization | X10 | Water consumption per capita, m3 | Water consumption/total population |
| X11 | Water consumption per 10,000 yuan of GDP, m3 | Industrial water consumption/GDP | |
| X12 | Water consumption of industrial added value, m3 | Statistic yearbook | |
| X13 | Water consumption of farmland irrigation, m3 | Statistic yearbook | |
| X14 | Ecological water consumption, % | Statistic yearbook | |
| Water efficiency | X15 | Percent of effective irrigation, % | Effective irrigation area/cultivated area |
| X16 | Repetitive use rate of industrial water, % | Statistic yearbook | |
| X17 | Water consumption rate, % | Statistic yearbook | |
| Resource matching | X18 | Water resources of farmland, m3/km2 | Total water resources/cultivated area |
| X19 | Water resources per capita, m3 | Total water resources/population | |
| Development degree | X20 | Annual water supply modulus, 104 m3/km2 | Annual water supply/land area |
| X21 | Control rate of surface water, % | Project water storage/surface water resources amount | |
| X22 | Percent of water-saving irrigation, % | Water-saving irrigation area /effective irrigation area | |
| Water supply level | X23 | Average daily coefficient, m3/day | Statistic yearbook |
| X24 | Groundwater supply capacity, % | Groundwater supply/total water supply | |
| X25 | Tap water use rate in rural areas, % | Statistic yearbook |
Identification and classification of early warning candidate indices in Anhui Province.
| Index | | |
| Index | | |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.412 | 0 | X14 | 0.698 | 1 |
| X2 | 0.603 | −1 | X15 | 0.713 | 0 |
| X3 | 0.653 | 2 | X16 | 0.669 | −1 |
| X4 | 0.775 | 0 | X17 | 0.433 | 0 |
| X5 | 0.602 | 1 | X18 | 0.779 | 1 |
| X6 | 0.664 | −1 | X19 | 0.736 | 1 |
| X7 | 0.728 | 2 | X20 | 0.635 | 2 |
| X8 | 0.684 | 0 | X21 | 0.602 | 0 |
| X9 | 0.634 | 1 | X22 | 0.701 | 1 |
| X10 | 0.769 | 1 | X23 | 0.651 | −1 |
| X11 | 0.371 | 0 | X24 | 0.667 | 0 |
| X12 | 0.462 | 0 | X25 | 0.717 | 2 |
| X13 | 0.736 | 2 |
Early warning sign indices for EWS-RWRCC in Anhui Province.
| Classification | Mark | Type of Index |
|---|---|---|
| Water quantity | WS1 (X2) | Leading |
| Water quality | WS2 (X4) | Synchronous |
| Economic development | WS3 (X6) | Leading |
| Water efficiency | WS5 (X15) | Synchronous |
| Development degree | WS7 (X21) | Synchronous |
| Water supply level | WS8 (X23) | Leading |
Figure 4S-curves of r(s, t) and y for EWS-RWRCC in Anhui Province.
EWSI warning limits for EWS-RWRCC in Anhui Province.
| Index | R2 | Warning limits | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loadable | Critical | Overload | |||||
| WS1 | 0.947 | 0.048 | −0.186 | 0.283 | ≥0.09 | (0.09, 0.01] | <0.01 |
| WS2 | 0.963 | 0.004 | −0.034 | 0.082 | ≥0.04 | (0.04, −0.01] | <−0.01 |
| WS3 | 0.920 | 0.154 | −0.045 | 0.353 | <0.05 | [0.05, 0.25) | ≥0.25 |
| WS4 | 0.932 | 0.037 | 0.016 | 0.059 | <0.03 | [0.03, 0.05) | ≥0.05 |
| WS5 | 0.751 | 0.004 | −0.057 | 0.065 | ≥0.03 | (0.03, −0.06] | <−0.06 |
| WS6 | 0.932 | 0.150 | −0.089 | 0.450 | ≥0.25 | (0.25, 0.05] | <0.05 |
| WS7 | 0.941 | 0.041 | −0.379 | 0.461 | ≥0.25 | (0.25, −0.17] | <−0.17 |
| WS8 | 0.800 | 0.102 | −0.110 | 0.248 | ≥0.18 | (0.18, 0.02] | <0.02 |
| WS9 | 0.845 | 0.052 | −0.255 | 0.360 | ≥0.21 | (0.21, −0.10] | <−0.10 |
Analysis of single EWSI values in Anhui Province.
| Index | A | B | C | D | A/(A + B) | (A + C)/(A + B + C + D) | B/(B + D)/A/(A + C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WS1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 1.20 |
| WS2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 1.60 |
| WS3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.60 |
| WS4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 1.07 |
| WS5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 1.07 |
| WS6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.60 |
| WS7 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 1.07 |
| WS8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.60 |
| WS9 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 1.07 |
Weights w, warning signal values V(s, t), and AWI values from 2006 to 2014 in Anhui Province.
| Indexes | Weights | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WS1 | 0.0871 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| WS3 | 0.1739 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| WS4 | 0.0978 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| WS5 | 0.0978 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| WS6 | 0.1739 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| WS7 | 0.0978 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| WS8 | 0.1739 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| WS9 | 0.0978 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| AWI | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.5 | |
| Signal light |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Here, 1, 2, and 3 represent loadable status, critical status, and overloaded status, respectively.