| Literature DB >> 32218109 |
Sara Nunes1,2, André Alves1,2, Inês Preguiça1,2, Adelaide Barbosa1,2, Pedro Vieira1,2,3, Fernando Mendes2,3,4, Diana Martins3,5, Sofia D Viana1,2,3, Flávio Reis1,2.
Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes. Obesity and hyperlipidemia, fueled by unhealthy food habits, are risk factors to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline and DN progression. Several studies recommend that diabetic patients should be screened early (in prediabetes) for kidney disease, in order to prevent advanced stages, for whom the current interventions are clearly inefficient. This ambition greatly depends on the existence of accurate early biomarkers and novel molecular targets, which only may arise with a more thorough knowledge of disease pathophysiology. We used a rat model of prediabetes induced by 23 weeks of high-sugar/high-fat (HSuHF) diet to characterize the phenotype of early renal dysfunction and injury. When compared with the control animals, HSuHF-treated rats displayed a metabolic phenotype compatible with obese prediabetes, displaying impaired glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, along with hypertriglyceridemia, and lipid peroxidation. Despite unchanged creatinine levels, the prediabetic animals presented glomerular crescent-like lesions, accompanied by increased kidney Oil-Red-O staining, triglycerides content and mRNA expression of IL-6 and iNOS. This model of HSuHF-induced prediabetes can be a useful tool to study early features of DN, namely crescent-like lesions, an early signature that deserves in-depth elucidation.Entities:
Keywords: diet-induced; glomerular crescent-like lesions; nephropathy; prediabetes; rat model; renal lipidosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32218109 PMCID: PMC7230605 DOI: 10.3390/nu12040881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Primer sequence used for the RT-PCR analysis.
| Gene | Forward Primer Sequence | Reverse | T (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| iNOS | AGAGACAGAAGTGCGATC | AGATTCAGTAGTCCACAATAGTA | 60 |
| IL-6 | GGAGAAGTTAGAGTCACAGA | GCCGAGTAGACCTCATAG | 60 |
| TNF-α | CCCAATCTGTGTCCTTCT | TTCTGAGCATCGTAGTTGT | 60 |
| GAPDH | GACTTCAACAGCAACTCC | GCCATATTCATTGTCATACCA | 60 |
| HPRT | ATGGGAGGCCATCACATTGT | ATGTAATCCAGCAGGTCAGCAA | 58 |
Primary and secondary antibodies used for Western Blotting analysis.
| Antibody | Dilution | Catalog No.-Company |
|---|---|---|
| iNOS | 1:1000 | Ab178945-Abcam |
| TNF-α | 1:500 | Ab66579-Abcam |
| β-actin | 1:1000 | A5316-Sigma-Aldrich |
| Tubulin | 1:1000 | AB0046-200-SICGEN |
| Goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP | 1:10,000 | R-05071-Advansta |
| Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP | 1:10,000 | R-05072-Advansta |
Body weight, caloric intake and glycemic and insulinemic profile.
| Parameters | Control | HSuHF |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Initial (g) | 300.00 ± 10.88 | 297.11 ± 9.71 |
| Final (g) | 507.57 ± 18.15 | 578.62 ± 32.89 |
| Delta BW (g) | 228.50 ± 10.04 | 311.20 ± 21.11* |
|
| ||
| Food Intake (g/week) | 163.60 ± 2.20 | 77.11 ± 0.54 *** |
| Beverage Intake (mL/week) | 211.80 ± 3.69 | 326.70 ± 50.89 *** |
| Calories from Carbohydrates (kcal/rat/week) | 350.40 ± 3.89 | 574.50 ± 13.84 *** |
| Calories from Lipids (kcal/rat/week) | 44.22 ± 0.47 | 97.74 ± 8.71 |
| Calories from Proteins (kcal/rat/week) | 121.20 ± 1.29 | 51.68 ± 1.60 *** |
| ∑ Total calories (kcal/rat/week) | 515.80 ± 5.49 | 713.40 ± 10.17 *** |
|
| ||
| Fasting glucose(mg/dL) | 100.50 ± 1.37 | 115.77 ± 1.42 |
| Fed glucose (mg/dL) | 149.14 ± 7.95 | 273.14 ± 33.53 *** |
| GTT (AUC) | 31856 ± 2565 | 54974.2 ± 3413 *** |
| HbA1c (%) | 3.73 ± 0.05 | 4.00 ± 0.15 |
|
| ||
| Fasting insulin (µg/L) | 0.577 ± 0.082 | 1.454 ± 0.197 |
| Fed insulin (µg/L) | 0.899 ± 0.159 | 2.426 ± 0.535 * |
| ITT (AUC) | 8107 ± 299 | 11175 ± 587 ** |
Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 8 per group. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001.
Figure 1In vivo glucose tolerance test (A) and insulin tolerance test (B) at the end of the study in the Control and HSuHF-treated rats. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 8 per group. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001.
Kidney weight and serum and urine measures of renal function.
| Parameters | Control | HSuHF |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Absolute (g) | 2.86 ± 0.13 | 2.90 ± 0.12 |
| KW/BW (g/kg) | 5.63 ± 0.22 | 4.92 ± 0.07 |
|
| ||
| Serum (mg/dL) | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.02 |
| Urine (mg/dL) | 100.40 ± 14.78 | 61.15 ± 7.84 |
| Clearance (mL/h) | 200.40 ± 18.55 | 184.4 ± 11.57 |
|
| ||
| Serum (mg/dL) | 14.19 ± 0.58 | 8.57 ± 0.60 *** |
| Urine (mg/dL) | 1554.00 ± 132.80 | 493.00 ± 82.90 *** |
| Clearance (mL/h) | 92.53 ± 7.24 | 35.59 ± 4.29 ** |
|
| ||
| Serum (mg/dL) | 1.79 ± 0.33 | 2.33 ± 0.52 |
| Urine (mg/dL) | 12.80 ± 1.74 | 9.86 ± 0.69 |
| Clearance (mL/h) | 6.50 ± 1.10 | 6.00 ± 1.02 |
Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 8 per group. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001.
Figure 2Representative images of glomerular (A–I) and tubulointerstitial (J–L) regions and lesions in the Control and HSuHF-treated rats (n = 8 per group) evaluate by H&E, PAS and Gomori staining (all with 40× amplification). Arrows represent the glomerular lesions better identified in the above description of results: 1) the presence of glomerular crescent-like structures; 2) mesangial expansion; 3) thickening of the GBM; 4) focal inflammatory infiltrate.
Figure 3Representative confocal images of immunolabelling for collagen IV (green: B and E), DAPI (blue: A and D), as well as merge (C and F) in the Control and HSuHF-treated rats (n = 8 per group).
Figure 4Representative images of Ki-67 immunostaining in the Control (B and E) and HSuHF-treated (C and F) rats (n = 8 per group). Huh7 cell line was used as a positive control (A and D). A–C: 10×; D–F: 100×). * Crescent-like structure in the HSuHF rats.
Figure 5Renal lipid deposition evaluated by Oil-Red O staining in the Control (A,B) and HSuHF-treated (C,D) rats; kidney TGs concentration (E) and MDA content (F); serum TGs concentration (G) and MDA/TAS ratio (H). Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 8 per group. * P < 0.05. A and C are 40× amplification and B and D 100×.
Figure 6Serum hs-CRP levels (A) and kidney expression of IL-6 mRN (B), iNOS mRNA (C) and protein (D), as well as TNF-α mRNA (E) and protein (F) expression in the Control and HSuHF-treated rats. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 8 per group (except for western blotting: n = 6 per group), and were expressed as relative expression (for mRNA) in relation to two housekeeping genes used (GAPDH and HPRT) and as % of control (for protein). * P < 0.05.