| Literature DB >> 32217938 |
Neil Mehta1, Prashant Bhangui2, Francis Y Yao1,3, Vincenzo Mazzaferro4, Christian Toso5, Nobuhisa Akamatsu6, Francois Durand7, Jan Ijzermans8, Wojciech Polak8, Shusen Zheng9, John P Roberts3, Gonzalo Sapisochin10, Taizo Hibi11, Nancy Man Kwan12, Mark Ghobrial13, Avi Soin2.
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) offers excellent long-term outcome for certain patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a push to not simply rely on tumor size and number. Selection criteria should also consider tumor biology (including alpha-fetoprotein), probability of waitlist and post-LT survival (ie, transplant benefit), organ availability, and waitlist composition. These criteria may be expanded for live donor LT (LDLT) compared to deceased donor LT though this should not adversely affect the double equipoise in LDLT, namely ensuring both acceptable recipient outcomes and donor safety. HCC patients with compensated liver disease and minimal tumor burden have low urgency for LT, especially after local-regional therapy with complete response, and do not appear to derive the same benefit from LT as other waitlist candidates. These guidelines were developed to assist in selecting appropriate HCC patients for both deceased donor LT and LDLT.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32217938 DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transplantation ISSN: 0041-1337 Impact factor: 4.939