| Literature DB >> 32214313 |
Latifa Remadi1, Najla Chargui1, Maribel Jiménez2, Ricardo Molina2, Najoua Haouas1,3, Estela González2, Raja Chaabane-Banaouas1, Eya Ben Salah1, Mohsen Haddaji4, Yassine Chaabouni5, Hamouda Babba1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phlebotomus (Larroussius) perniciosus and Canis familiaris are respectively the only confirmed vector and reservoir for the transmission of Leishmania (L.) infantum MON-1 in Tunisia. However, the vector and reservoir hosts of the two other zymodemes, MON-24 and MON-80, are still unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the L. infantum life cycle in a Tunisian leishmaniasis focus. For this purpose, we have focused on: i) the detection, quantification and identification of Leishmania among this sand fly population, and ii) the analysis of the blood meal preferences of Larroussius (Lar.) subgenus sand flies to identify the potential reservoirs. METHODOLOGY ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32214313 PMCID: PMC7098558 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Geographical and ecological characteristics of sand flies collection sites.
| Region code | GPS reference | Year of collection | Total number of traps | Animals at proximity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35°23’49.6"N 10°03’00.1"E | ||||
| 35° 56′ N, 10° 01′ E | ||||
| 35°24’11.8"N 9°57’58.3"E | ||||
| 35° 37′ 07″ N, 9° 55′ 34″ E | ||||
| 35° 50′ N, 9° 35′ E | ||||
| 35° 21′ N, 9° 49′ E | ||||
| 35° 38′ N, 9° 40′ E |
Species identification of collected sand flies.
| Genus | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Nbre | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | ||||
| Collection site | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| <0,0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
F: female, M: male, Nbre: Number, and %: percentage.
*: P-value using the non-parametric statistical Kruskal-Wallis method and showing differences between the number of sand fly species in each site.
**: P-value using the Chi-square (Fisher’s exact) test and showing the differences between the abundance of sand flies in each region. Region E, F, and G: were excluded from the statistical analysis.
Fig 1ITS1 nested PCR-RFLP results.
The Leishmania species typing using RFLP was done for the 54 PCR-ITS1 positive samples. The specific molecular band sizes are: 127, 55, 52, and 20 bp for L. killicki; 126, 66, and 55 bp for L. infantum; 145 and 126 bp for L. major. Lanes 1, 2, and 3: L. infantum identified from infected Ph. perfiliewi, Lane 4: L. infantum identified from infected Ph. perniciosus, Lk: L. killicki control, Li: L. infantum control, and Lm: L. major control. MW: Molecular Weight marker (25-bp DNA ladder).
Leishmania typing DNA in infected sand flies.
| NI | Total infected | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdomen stage | E | G | UN | E | G | UN | E | G | UN | E | G | UN | ||
| Sand fly species | ||||||||||||||
| 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 32 (37.64%) | P* = 0.0452 | |
| 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 31 (36.47%) | ||
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 17 (20.00%) | ||
| 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 (5.88%) | ||
| 9 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 25 | 85 | ||
| 18 | 25 | 11 | 31 | |||||||||||
E: engorged, UN: unfed, G: gravid, and NI: non identified Leishmania species. P*: p-value using the one-way ANOVA test.
Fig 2Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method based on Leishmania ITS1 sequences.
The numbers above the branches indicate the bootstrap sampling percentages.
Blood meal typing in Ph. (Lar.) species.
| Blood meal typing | Cow | Human | Sheep | Chicken | Goat | Donkey | Turkey | Human/ Cow | Chicken/ Cow | Chicken/ Sheep | Human/ Sheep | Goat/ Human | Chicken/ Guineafowl | Sheep/ Goat | Human/ Black rat | Not assigned sequences | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sand flies species | |||||||||||||||||
| 18 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 69 | |
| 37 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 62 | |
| 5 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 20 | |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | |
| 66 (39.05%) | 42 (24.85%) | 10 (5.91%) | 8 (4.73%) | 7 (4.14%) | 2 (1.18%) | 1 (0.59%) | 3 (17.75%) | 2 (1.18%) | 2 (1.18%) | 2 (1.18%) | 1 (0.59%) | 1 (0.59%) | 1 (0.59%) | 1 (0.59%) | 20 (11.83%) | 169 |
Fig 3Blood meal identification results.
A: electropherogram of part of the sequence S 9 showing superposed peaks, B: part of the alignment of four cytochrome b sequences showing superposed peaks for S9, S 10: cytochrome b sequence of Bos taurus, S 3: cytochrome b sequence of Homo sapiens, S 9: cytochrome b sequence of mixed blood meal (Bos taurus/Homo sapiens), two peaks were detected peak 1 (S9P1 corresponding to Bos taurus sequence) and peak 2 (S9P2 corresponding to Homo sapiens sequence).
The blood meal origins in infected Ph. (Lar.) species.
| Blood meal origin | Cow | Chicken | Goat | Chicken/ Cow | Chicken/ Sheep | Chicken/ Guineafowl | Human/ Cow | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sand flies and | |||||||||
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| NI | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| NI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Unidentified | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Total (%) | 11 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 21 | |
NI: non identified Leishmania species.
Fig 4Real time PCR results.
A: Representative fluorescence acquisition graph showed comparison of each sand fly according to standards. NTC (non template control), NC (negative control corresponding to 30 ng of DNA from reared sand fly), and standards (106 and 103 promastigotes/ml). B: Graphic showing concentration results of each sample according to standards. Slope = -3.37, efficiency = 0.98. S1: Ph. perfiliewi infected with L. infantum, S2: Ph. perniciosus infected with L. major, S3: Ph. perniciosus infected with L. killicki, S4: Ph. perfiliewi infected with L. major, S5: Ph. (Lar.) spp. infected with L. major, S6: Ph. perniciosus infected with L. infantum, and S7: Ph. perniciosus infected with L. killicki.
Parasite loads and blood meal analysis in infected sand flies collected in human visceral leishmaniasis focus.
| Species | Abdomen states/ blood feed sources | Parasite loads estimation (NO. of parasites/ reaction) | Level of infection | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E/ | 100 | Moderate | ||
| E/ | 100 | Moderate | ||
| E/ | 199.5 | Moderate | ||
| E/ | 100 | Moderate | ||
| E/ ( | 50.1 | Moderate | ||
| E/ | 19.9 | Moderate | ||
| E/ ( | 50.1 | Moderate | ||
| UN | 10000 | Very high | ||
| UN | 100 | Moderate | ||
| UN | 316.2 | Moderate | ||
| UN | 3981 | High | ||
| UN | 316.2 | Moderate | ||
| UN | 1000 | High | ||
| UN | 50.1 | Moderate | ||
| UN | 794.3 | Moderate | ||
| UN | 3981 | High | ||
| UN | 199.5 | Moderate |
E: engorged, UN: unfed, and NI: non identified species.