OBJECTIVE: This study sought to understand the patients' perspective of what contributes to an absence of discussions of sexual orientation (SO), gender identity (GI), and sexual health in cancer care. METHODS: Patients were recruited from oncology, gynecology, and a gender transition clinic to participate in semistructured interviews, which were analyzed with qualitative methods. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were interviewed, shedding light on 2 themes. The first was that these conversations are important but infrequent. One patient explained, "…. we know people who have had sex changes…[they] would have appreciated that question." In response to whether sexual health was ever brought up, one patient responded, "No doctor ever has." Patients described unaddressed issues: "There have been times, you know, we've wondered if it was okay to make love." The second theme consisted of 4 pragmatic, patient-provided points to facilitate discussions: (1) implementation of a scale of 1 to 10 (with 10 being comfortable) to first gauge patients' comfort in talking about SO, GI, and sexual health; (2) having the health-care provider explore the topic again over-time; (3) making sure the health-care provider is comfortable, as such comfort appears to enhance the patient's comfort ("I have a doctor here, a female doctor, who just matter of fact will ask if I get erections and so on because of the medication she's giving me);" and (4) eliminating euphemisms (one patient stated, "I don't know what you mean by 'sexual health'."). CONCLUSION: Oncology health-care providers have a unique opportunity and responsibility to address SO, GI, and sexual health.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to understand the patients' perspective of what contributes to an absence of discussions of sexual orientation (SO), gender identity (GI), and sexual health in cancer care. METHODS: Patients were recruited from oncology, gynecology, and a gender transition clinic to participate in semistructured interviews, which were analyzed with qualitative methods. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were interviewed, shedding light on 2 themes. The first was that these conversations are important but infrequent. One patient explained, "…. we know people who have had sex changes…[they] would have appreciated that question." In response to whether sexual health was ever brought up, one patient responded, "No doctor ever has." Patients described unaddressed issues: "There have been times, you know, we've wondered if it was okay to make love." The second theme consisted of 4 pragmatic, patient-provided points to facilitate discussions: (1) implementation of a scale of 1 to 10 (with 10 being comfortable) to first gauge patients' comfort in talking about SO, GI, and sexual health; (2) having the health-care provider explore the topic again over-time; (3) making sure the health-care provider is comfortable, as such comfort appears to enhance the patient's comfort ("I have a doctor here, a female doctor, who just matter of fact will ask if I get erections and so on because of the medication she's giving me);" and (4) eliminating euphemisms (one patient stated, "I don't know what you mean by 'sexual health'."). CONCLUSION: Oncology health-care providers have a unique opportunity and responsibility to address SO, GI, and sexual health.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer; discussion; gender identity; qualitative; sexual health; sexual orientation
Authors: Danielle German; Lisa Kodadek; Ryan Shields; Susan Peterson; Claire Snyder; Eric Schneider; Laura Vail; Anju Ranjit; Maya Torain; Jeremiah Schuur; Brandyn Lau; Adil Haider Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Jeanne Carter; Christina Lacchetti; Barbara L Andersen; Debra L Barton; Sage Bolte; Shari Damast; Michael A Diefenbach; Katherine DuHamel; Judith Florendo; Patricia A Ganz; Shari Goldfarb; Sigrun Hallmeyer; David M Kushner; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sharon L Bober; Jennifer B Reese; Lisa Barbera; Andrea Bradford; Kristen M Carpenter; Shari Goldfarb; Jeanne Carter Journal: Curr Opin Support Palliat Care Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.302
Authors: Charles S Kamen; Marilyn Smith-Stoner; Charles E Heckler; Marie Flannery; Liz Margolies Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.172