Andrea C Westerband1,2, Tiffany M Knight3,4,5, Kasey E Barton1. 1. Department of Botany, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 3190 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI, USA. 2. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia. 3. Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany. 4. Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. 5. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Displacement of native plant species by non-native invaders may result from differences in their carbon economy, yet little is known regarding how variation in leaf traits influences native-invader dynamics across climate gradients. In Hawaii, one of the most heavily invaded biodiversity hotspots in the world, strong spatial variation in climate results from the complex topography, which underlies variation in traits that probably drives shifts in species interactions. METHODS: Using one of the most comprehensive trait data sets for Hawaii to date (91 species and four islands), we determined the extent and sources of variation (climate, species and species origin) in leaf traits, and used mixed models to examine differences between natives and non-native invasives. KEY RESULTS: We detected significant differences in trait means, such that invasives were more resource acquisitive than natives over most of the climate gradients. However, we also detected trait convergence and a rank reversal (natives more resource acquisitive than invasives) in a sub-set of conditions. There was significant intraspecific trait variation (ITV) in leaf traits of natives and invasives, although invasives expressed significantly greater ITV than natives in water loss and photosynthesis. Species accounted for more trait variation than did climate for invasives, while the reverse was true for natives. Incorporating this climate-driven trait variation significantly improved the fit of models that compared natives and invasives. Lastly, in invasives, ITV was most strongly explained by spatial heterogeneity in moisture, whereas solar energy explains more ITV in natives. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that trait expression and ITV vary significantly between natives and invasives, and that this is mediated by climate. These findings suggest that although natives and invasives are functionally similar at the regional scale, invader success at local scales is contingent on climate.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Displacement of native plant species by non-native invaders may result from differences in their carbon economy, yet little is known regarding how variation in leaf traits influences native-invader dynamics across climate gradients. In Hawaii, one of the most heavily invaded biodiversity hotspots in the world, strong spatial variation in climate results from the complex topography, which underlies variation in traits that probably drives shifts in species interactions. METHODS: Using one of the most comprehensive trait data sets for Hawaii to date (91 species and four islands), we determined the extent and sources of variation (climate, species and species origin) in leaf traits, and used mixed models to examine differences between natives and non-native invasives. KEY RESULTS: We detected significant differences in trait means, such that invasives were more resource acquisitive than natives over most of the climate gradients. However, we also detected trait convergence and a rank reversal (natives more resource acquisitive than invasives) in a sub-set of conditions. There was significant intraspecific trait variation (ITV) in leaf traits of natives and invasives, although invasives expressed significantly greater ITV than natives in water loss and photosynthesis. Species accounted for more trait variation than did climate for invasives, while the reverse was true for natives. Incorporating this climate-driven trait variation significantly improved the fit of models that compared natives and invasives. Lastly, in invasives, ITV was most strongly explained by spatial heterogeneity in moisture, whereas solar energy explains more ITV in natives. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that trait expression and ITV vary significantly between natives and invasives, and that this is mediated by climate. These findings suggest that although natives and invasives are functionally similar at the regional scale, invader success at local scales is contingent on climate.
Authors: Jonathan M Levine; Montserrat Vilà; Carla M D'Antonio; Jeffrey S Dukes; Karl Grigulis; Sandra Lavorel Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2003-04-22 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Owen K Atkin; Keith J Bloomfield; Peter B Reich; Mark G Tjoelker; Gregory P Asner; Damien Bonal; Gerhard Bönisch; Matt G Bradford; Lucas A Cernusak; Eric G Cosio; Danielle Creek; Kristine Y Crous; Tomas F Domingues; Jeffrey S Dukes; John J G Egerton; John R Evans; Graham D Farquhar; Nikolaos M Fyllas; Paul P G Gauthier; Emanuel Gloor; Teresa E Gimeno; Kevin L Griffin; Rossella Guerrieri; Mary A Heskel; Chris Huntingford; Françoise Yoko Ishida; Jens Kattge; Hans Lambers; Michael J Liddell; Jon Lloyd; Christopher H Lusk; Roberta E Martin; Ayal P Maksimov; Trofim C Maximov; Yadvinder Malhi; Belinda E Medlyn; Patrick Meir; Lina M Mercado; Nicholas Mirotchnick; Desmond Ng; Ülo Niinemets; Odhran S O'Sullivan; Oliver L Phillips; Lourens Poorter; Pieter Poot; I Colin Prentice; Norma Salinas; Lucy M Rowland; Michael G Ryan; Stephen Sitch; Martijn Slot; Nicholas G Smith; Matthew H Turnbull; Mark C VanderWel; Fernando Valladares; Erik J Veneklaas; Lasantha K Weerasinghe; Christian Wirth; Ian J Wright; Kirk R Wythers; Jen Xiang; Shuang Xiang; Joana Zaragoza-Castells Journal: New Phytol Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Christina L Richards; Oliver Bossdorf; Norris Z Muth; Jessica Gurevitch; Massimo Pigliucci Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Diego Salazar-Tortosa; Jorge Castro; Pedro Villar-Salvador; Benjamín Viñegla; Luis Matías; Anders Michelsen; Rafael Rubio de Casas; José I Querejeta Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2018-06-03 Impact factor: 10.863
Authors: Hendrik Poorter; Andrzej M Jagodzinski; Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado; Shem Kuyah; Yunjian Luo; Jacek Oleksyn; Vladimir A Usoltsev; Thomas N Buckley; Peter B Reich; Lawren Sack Journal: New Phytol Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Jie Zheng; Ya Jiang; Hong Qian; Yanjiao Mao; Chao Zhang; Xiaoxin Tang; Yi Jin; Yin Yi Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 2.912