| Literature DB >> 32211379 |
Gayathri Rajeev1, Elizabeth Melville1, Allison J Cowin1, Beatriz Prieto-Simon1,2,3, Nicolas H Voelcker1,2,4,5,6.
Abstract
A label-free electrochemical detection platform for the sensitive and rapid detection of Flightless I (Flii) protein, a biomarker of wound chronicity, has been developed using nanoporous anodic alumina (NAA) membranes modified with Flii antibody recognition sites. The electrochemical detection is based on the nanochannel blockage experienced upon Flii capture by immobilized antibodies within the nanochannels. This capture impedes the diffusion of redox species [[Fe(CN)6]4-/3-] toward a gold electrode attached at the backside of the modified NAA membrane. Partial blockage causes a decrease in the oxidation current of the redox species at the electrode surface which is used as an analytical signal by the reported biosensor. The resulting biosensing system allows detection of Flii at the levels found in wounds. Two types of assays were tested, sandwich and direct, showing <3 and 2 h analysis time, respectively, a significant reduction in time from the nearly 48 h required for the conventional Western blot assay. Slightly higher sensitivity values were observed for the sandwich-based strategy. With faster analysis, lack of matrix effects, robustness, ease of use and cost-effectiveness, the developed sensing platform has the potential to be translated into a point-of-care (POC) device for chronic wound management and as a simple alternative characterization tool in Flii research.Entities:
Keywords: chronic wound; electrochemical biosensor; flightless detection; immunosensing; porous alumina
Year: 2020 PMID: 32211379 PMCID: PMC7067747 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Scheme 1Schematic representation of NAA electrochemical sensing based on pore blockage.
Figure 1SEM micrographs of top-view NAA membranes fabricated at 40 V using 0.3 M oxalic acid and pore opened for 90 min (a), 120 min (b), and commercial Anodisc membrane (c); and the respective cross-section images showing vertical pore channels (d–f) (in same order).
Figure 2FTIR spectra of NAA membrane at various surface modification steps, after hydroxylation (A), silanization (B), and antibody immobilization (C).
Figure 3(A) DPVs for increasing concentrations of KLH-conjugated Flii peptide in PBS for immunosensors prepared with FnAb-modified membranes of 65 nm pore diameter; (B) dose response curves for KLH-conjugated Flii peptide detection using Flii and control biosensors fabricated with membranes of average pore diameter of 45, 65, and 100 nm; (C) dose response curves obtained by using Flii and control biosensors fabricated with 65 nm-pore diameter membranes for KLH-conjugated Flii peptide detection in PBS and DMEM medium. Error bars were calculated from three independent experiments. Control sensors were prepared under the same conditions as the Flii biosensors but using non-specific antibodies.
Comparison of the sensing performance of different immunosensors for detection of Flii conjugate in PBS (calculated based on the response curve in Figure 3B).
| 45 | 24.19 | 1.64 | 5–20 | 0.9544 | |
| 65 | 52.89 | 1.01 | 5–50 | 0.9937 | |
| 100 | 33.69 | 1.04 | 5–50 | 0.9806 |
Figure 4Brightfield microscopy images of (a) unwounded and (b) wounded HaCat cells at confluency (lines without cells in (b) correspond to deliberately induced scratches in the confluent HaCat cells); (c) Western blot for three dilutions (from left: 1.0X, 0.6X, and 0.2X) of media collected from wounded and unwounded keratinocytes.
Figure 5Sensing response for concentrated wounded HaCat media containing Flii protein obtained using biosensors fabricated with NAA membranes of 65 nm pore diameter. Error bars were calculated from three separate experiments.