Literature DB >> 3221125

Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: comparison of bioassay systems for water quality.

J S Rinehart1, B D Bavister, M Gerrity.   

Abstract

Three mouse embryo bioassays [mouse one-cell and two-cell embryos and in vitro fertilization (IVF)] were tested for their ability to discriminate between three sources of water for medium preparation: tap water, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water, and Milli-Q purified water. No differences could be detected using these assays. The lack of sensitivity of the mouse bioassays could not be attributed to the protein source or medium type. The hamster sperm motility assay (HSMA) permitted quantitative discrimination between water sources (Milli-Q greater than HPLC greater than tap). Media prepared for use in human IVF using water that exceeded minimal HSMA quality standards resulted in pregnancy rates that were greater than those attained with a lot of HPLC water that did not meet these standards. The HSMA can serve as a basis for a quality-control program in the human IVF laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3221125     DOI: 10.1007/bf01129569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf        ISSN: 0740-7769


  21 in total

1.  A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality-control testing of water and culture media.

Authors:  B D Bavister; J C Andrews
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1988-04

2.  Mouse system quality control is necessary before the use of new material for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  J Parinaud; J M Reme; X Monrozies; S Favrin; M F Sarramon; G Pontonnier
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1987-02

3.  Hatching, attachment, and outgrowth of mouse blastocysts in vitro: fixed nitrogen requirements.

Authors:  A I Spindle; R A Pedersen
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1973-12

4.  Development of two-cell mouse embryos in the absence of a fixed-nitrogen source.

Authors:  J A Cholewa; W K Whitten
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1970-08

5.  Culture of mouse ova.

Authors:  D G Whittingham
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  1971-06

6.  Methods of water purification for the preparation of culture media in an IVF-ET programme.

Authors:  J L Yovich; W R Edirisinghe; J M Yovich; J D Stanger; P L Matson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Early embryonic mortality in women.

Authors:  D K Edmonds; K S Lindsay; J F Miller; E Williamson; P J Wood
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Culture factors in relation to the success of human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  P Quinn; G M Warnes; J F Kerin; C Kirby
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The use of mouse preimplantation embryos for quality control of culture reagents in human in vitro fertilization programs: a cautionary note.

Authors:  T P Fleming; H P Pratt; P R Braude
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Toxicity testing for human in vitro fertilization programs.

Authors:  S B Ackerman; G L Stokes; R J Swanson; S P Taylor; L Fenwick
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1985-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Updating quality control assays in the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory with a cryopreserved hamster oocyte DNA cytogenotoxic assay.

Authors:  P J Chan; J H Calinisan; J U Corselli; W C Patton; A King
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A comparative study on the diagnostic sensitivity of rodent sperm and embryos in the detection of endotoxin in Earle's balanced salt solution.

Authors:  A D Esterhuizen; E Bosman; A D Botes; O A Groenewald; M V Giesteira; G P Labuschagne; H W Lindeque; F A Rodriques; J J van Rensburg; J A van Schouwenburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  An evaluation of hamster, rat, and mouse sperm-cell motility in media formulated with water of different qualities.

Authors:  M L Reed; R M Petters
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1991-02

4.  Quality control in IVF with mouse bioassays: a four years' experience.

Authors:  M van den Bergh; I Baszó; J Biramane; E Bertrand; F Devreker; Y Englert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Human sperm bioassay for reprotoxicity testing in embryo culture media: some practical considerations in reducing the assay time.

Authors:  Amjad Hossain; Subhash Aryal; Collin Osuampke; John Phelps
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-12-19

6.  Genetic mouse embryo assay: improving performance and quality testing for assisted reproductive technology (ART) with a functional bioassay.

Authors:  Rebecca S Gilbert; Brandy Nunez; Kumi Sakurai; Thomas Fielder; Hsiao-Tzu Ni
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.211

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.