Literature DB >> 11411426

Updating quality control assays in the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory with a cryopreserved hamster oocyte DNA cytogenotoxic assay.

P J Chan1, J H Calinisan, J U Corselli, W C Patton, A King.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite advances in assisted reproduction, there is no progress in quality control bioassays. The objectives were to develop a comet assay to measure DNA fragmentation in thawed cryopreserved oocytes and compare this assay with one-cell mouse embryo bioassay.
METHODS: Thawed hamster oocytes from a commercial source were incubated in culture media with either 0-, 50-, or 100-microM hydrogen peroxide, or, in media exposed to different contact materials and unknown proficiency analytes. Incubation time was 1.5 h at 37 degrees C. The oocytes were dried, fixed, stained with acridine orange, embedded in a mini-agarose layer and electrophoresis was carried out. Fluorescent images were analyzed. The results were compared with standard one-cell mouse assay data.
RESULTS: The 100-microM hydrogen peroxide treatment caused greatest DNA fragmentation in the hamster oocytes at Hours 1 and 2. A dose response was observed. Intraassay coefficient of variation was 5.7%. Only one of the five materials tested passed both assays. The data for the unknown proficiency analytes were similar for both assays.
CONCLUSIONS: The oocyte comet assay demonstrated DNA fragmentation in the presence of toxic substances. The detection of toxicity in two materials that passed the mouse bioassay suggested increased sensitivity in the new assay. The oocyte comet assay and the mouse bioassay results matched in the proficiency test. However, more studies are still needed to determine optimal sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11411426      PMCID: PMC3455593          DOI: 10.1023/a:1009472323011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  21 in total

1.  A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality-control testing of water and culture media.

Authors:  B D Bavister; J C Andrews
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1988-04

2.  Mouse system quality control is necessary before the use of new material for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  J Parinaud; J M Reme; X Monrozies; S Favrin; M F Sarramon; G Pontonnier
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1987-02

3.  Ham's F-10 constituted with tap water supports mouse conceptus development in vitro.

Authors:  I H Silverman; C L Cook; J S Sanfilippo; M A Yussman; G S Schultz; F H Hilton
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1987-06

4.  Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: comparison of bioassay systems for water quality.

Authors:  J S Rinehart; B D Bavister; M Gerrity
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1988-12

Review 5.  The comet assay: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  D W Fairbairn; P L Olive; K L O'Neill
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Evaluation of human fetal cord sera, Ham's F-10 medium, and in vitro culture materials with a mouse in vivo fertilization system.

Authors:  M Condon-Mahony; J W Wortham; J C Bundren; J Witmyer; B Shirley
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The use of mouse preimplantation embryos for quality control of culture reagents in human in vitro fertilization programs: a cautionary note.

Authors:  T P Fleming; H P Pratt; P R Braude
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Influence of water quality on in vitro fertilization and embryo development for the mouse.

Authors:  A Fukuda; Y Noda; S Tsukui; H Matsumoto; J Yano; T Mori
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1987-02

9.  The comet moment as a measure of DNA damage in the comet assay.

Authors:  C R Kent; J J Eady; G M Ross; G G Steel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model.

Authors:  A Davidson; M Vermesh; R A Lobo; R J Paulson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Oocyte comet assay of luteal phase sera from nonpregnant patients after assisted reproductive procedures.

Authors:  B Jebelli; P J Chan; J Corselli; W C Patton; A King
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.