| Literature DB >> 32211172 |
Zefang Zhao1,2,3, Yanlong Guo4,5, Haiyan Wei1, Qiao Ran1,3, Jing Liu1,3,5, Quanzhong Zhang1,3,5, Wei Gu3,5,6.
Abstract
Notopterygium incisum Ting ex H. T. Chang is a rare and endangered traditional Chinese medicinal plant. In this research, we built a comprehensive habitat suitability (CHS) model to analyze the potential suitable habitat distribution of this species in the present and future in China. First, using nine different algorithms, we built an ensemble model to explore the possible impacts of climate change on the habitat distribution of this species. Then, based on this model, we built a CHS model to further identify the distribution characteristics of N. incisum-suitable habitats in three time periods (current, 2050s, and 2070s) while considering the effects of soil and vegetation conditions. The results indicated that the current suitable habitat for N. incisum covers approximately 83.76 × 103 km2, and these locations were concentrated in the Tibet Autonomous Region, Gansu Province, Qinghai Province, and Sichuan Province. In the future, the areas of suitable habitat for N. incisum would significantly decrease and would be 69.53 × 103 km2 and 60.21 × 103 km2 in the 2050s and 2070s, respectively. However, the area of marginally suitable habitat would remain relatively stable. This study provides a more reliable and comprehensive method for modelling the current and future distributions of N. incisum, and it provides valuable insights for highlighting priority areas for medicinal plant conservation and resource utilization.Entities:
Keywords: Notopterygium incisum Ting ex H. T. Chang; climate change; ensemble model; potential distribution; species distribution models
Year: 2020 PMID: 32211172 PMCID: PMC7083672 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Study area and geographic locations of Notopterygium incisum population distributions
Figure 2Modelling process in a flow diagram
Environmental element index used for predicting the potential geographic distribution of Notopterygium incisum
| Environmental index | Code | Name | Selection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climate variables | Bio1 | Annual mean air temperature | √ |
| Bio2 | Mean diurnal temperature range | ||
| Bio3 | Isothermality | ||
| Bio4 | Temperature seasonality | √ | |
| Bio5 | Max temperature of warmest month | ||
| Bio6 | Min temperature of coldest month | ||
| Bio7 | Temperature annual range | ||
| Bio8 | Mean temperature of wettest quarter | ||
| Bio9 | Mean temperature of driest quarter | ||
| Bio10 | Mean temperature of warmest quarter | √ | |
| Bio11 | Mean temperature of coldest quarter | √ | |
| Bio12 | Annual precipitation | √ | |
| Bio13 | Precipitation of wettest month | ||
| Bio14 | Precipitation of driest month | ||
| Bio15 | Precipitation seasonality | √ | |
| Bio16 | Precipitation of wettest quarter | ||
| Bio17 | Precipitation of driest quarter | ||
| Bio18 | Precipitation of warmest quarter | ||
| Bio19 | Precipitation of coldest quarter | √ | |
| Topographic variables | ASL | Elevation above sea level | |
| SLOP | Slope | √ | |
| ASPE | Aspect | √ | |
| Soil variable | ST | Soil type variables | √ |
| Vegetation variable | VT | Vegetation type variables. | √ |
√ means the variables were selected to build the model, for a total of 11 variables.
Figure 3Potential habitat distribution of Notopterygium incisum predicted by the ensemble model at present
Figure 4Potential spatial distribution of Notopterygium incisum based on the ensemble model in the 2050s
Figure 5Potential spatial distribution of Notopterygium incisum based on the ensemble model in the 2070s
Figure 6Boxplots of the predictive performance of the different techniques used for SDMs. (a) TSS and (b) AUC
Areas and percentages of habitat suitability distributions for Notopterygium incisum in different provinces and autonomous regions under the current environment
| Region | Percentage of area (%) | Area (103 km2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suitable habitat | Marginally suitable habitat | Unsuitable habitat | Suitable habitat | Marginally suitable habitat | Unsuitable habitat | |
| Gansu | 4.20 | 4.31 | 91.49 | 19.06 | 19.55 | 415.09 |
| Qinghai | 1.93 | 1.82 | 96.25 | 13.86 | 13.07 | 691.34 |
| Tibet | 1.01 | 2.23 | 96.76 | 11.69 | 25.82 | 1,120.17 |
| Sichuan | 8.02 | 7.85 | 84.13 | 38.71 | 37.89 | 406.12 |
| Shaanxi | 0.12 | 0.90 | 98.98 | 0.25 | 1.89 | 207.54 |
| Other area | 0.19 | 4.5 | ||||
Figure 7The dominant environmental index response curve. Annual mean temperature (bio1), temperature seasonality (bio4), mean temperature of warmest quarter (bio10), mean temperature of coldest quarter (bio11), annual precipitation (bio12), and precipitation seasonality (bio15)