| Literature DB >> 32210172 |
Juliana Lukša1, Iglė Vepštaitė-Monstavičė1, Violeta Apšegaitė2, Laima Blažytė-Čereškienė2, Ramunė Stanevičienė1, Živilė Strazdaitė-Žielienė1, Bazilė Ravoitytė1, Dominykas Aleknavičius2, Vincas Būda2, Raimondas Mozūraitis2, Elena Servienė1.
Abstract
Sea buckthorn, Hippophae rhamnoides L., has considerable potential for landscape reclamation, food, medicinal, and cosmetics industries. In this study, we analyzed fungal microorganism populations associated with carposphere of sea buckthorn harvested in Lithuania. An amplicon metagenomic approach based on the ITS2 region of fungal rDNA was used to reveal the ripening-affected fungal community alterations on sea buckthorn berries. According to alpha and beta diversity analyses, depending on the ripening stage, sea buckthorn displayed significantly different fungal communities. Unripe berries were shown to be prevalent by Aureobasidium, Taphrina, and Cladosporium, while ripe berries were dominated by Aureobasidium and Metschnikowia. The selected yeast strains from unripe and mature berries were applied for volatile organic compounds identification by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry techniques. It was demonstrated that the patterns of volatiles of four yeast species tested were distinct from each other. The current study for the first time revealed the alterations of fungal microorganism communities colonizing the surface of sea buckthorn berries at different ripening stages. The novel information on specific volatile profiles of cultivable sea buckthorn-associated yeasts with a potential role in biocontrol is important for the development of the strategies for plant cultivation and disease management, as well as for the improvement of the quality and preservation of the postharvest berries. Management of the fungal microorganisms present on the surface of berries might be a powerful instrument for control of phytopathogenic and potentially antagonistic microorganisms affecting development and quality of the berries.Entities:
Keywords: Hippophae rhamnoides; fungal communities; volatile organic compounds
Year: 2020 PMID: 32210172 PMCID: PMC7143951 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8030456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Total sequences obtained for eukaryotic microbial community for unripe (UB) and ripe (RB) sea buckthorn samples.
| Reads Obtained | High Quality Reads | ASV | Shanon Diversity | Pielou Eveness | Simpson Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 103,024 | 49,891 | 300 | 5.26 | 0.64 | 0.94 |
|
| 164,922 | 110,782 | 419 | 5.00 | 0.58 | 0.91 |
|
| 89,720 | 43,458 | 295 | 5.37 | 0.66 | 0.94 |
|
| 114,814 | 76,641 | 190 | 3.71 | 0.49 | 0.86 |
|
| 135,098 | 92,822 | 240 | 3.795 | 0.48 | 0.85 |
|
| 119,056 | 80,944 | 171 | 3.21 | 0.44 | 0.79 |
|
| 726,634 | 454,538 | 1615 |
Figure 1Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the relative abundance of fungal microorganism amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) associated with unripe (UB) and ripe (RB) sea buckthorn berries. PCoA plot is based on unweighted UniFrac distance metrics.
Figure 2Fungal microorganism community distribution on sea buckthorn unripe (UB) and ripe (RB) berries. Relative abundance of sequences classified at the phylum (A), class (B), family (C), and genus (D) level. The taxonomic groups comprising less than 1% of the total composition were assigned to “Other”.
Figure 3Venn diagram illustrating the number of unique and shared amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) among sea buckthorn samples at different ripening stages. UB – unripe sea buckthorn berries, RB – ripe berries.
Figure 4Heatmap of fungal microorganism’s unique amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) abundance on sea buckthorn. The color intensity is proportional to the relative abundance of fungal microorganism ASVs.
Figure 5Identification of yeasts isolated from sea buckthorn surface.
Odor blends of four yeast species and control sampled by SPME technique.
| No. | Compound | CAS No. | RI | GR |
|
|
|
| Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ethyl acetate | 141-78-6 | 898 | ES | 26.26 ± 4.63 | 8.98 ± 0.28 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
| 2 | Ethanol | 64-17-5 | 902 | OH | 4.58 ± 0.36 | 4.89 ± 0.42 | 6.26 ± 0.82 | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.02 |
| 3 | Ethyl propionate | 1105-37-3 | 915 | ES | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 ± 0.001 |
| 4 | 2-Methylprop-1-yl acetate | 110-19-0 | 985 | ES | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Ethyl butanoate | 105-54-4 | 1013 | ES | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Ethyl 2-methylbutanoate | 7452-79-1 | 1033 | ES | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Ethyl 3-methylbutanoate | 108-64-5 | 1050 | ES | 0 | 0 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | Butyl acetate | 123-86-4 | 1063 | ES | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.10 ± 0.02 |
| 9 | 2-Methylpropanol | 78-83-1 | 1095 | OH | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 1.70 ± 0.11 | 0 |
| 10 | 3-Methylbutyl acetate | 123-92-2 | 1105 | ES | 13.28 ± 0.5 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.05ns | 0.07 ± 0.01ns | 0.10 ± 0.07 |
| 11 | Butanol | 71-36-3 | 1149 | OH | 0 | 0 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0 |
| 12 | 2-Heptanone | 110-43-0 | 1170 | KT | 0 | 0 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0 |
| 13 | 3-Methylbutyl propionate | 105-68-0 | 1176 | ES | 0.62 ± 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 2-Methylbutanol | 137-32-6 | 1207 | OH | 1.63 ± 0.28 | 1.77 ± 0.24 | 0.84 ± 0.18 | 6.47 ± 1.21 | 0 |
| 15 | 3-Methylbutanol | 123-51-3 | 1213 | OH | 3.28 ± 0.37 | 5.95 ± 0.56 | 4.07 ± 0.51 | 10.39 ± 0.36 | 0.21 ± 0.11 |
| 16 | Ethyl hexanoate | 123-66-0 | 1224 | ES | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | Styrene* | 100-42-5 | 1238 | AR | 0.20 ± 0.04ns | 0.13 ± 0.03ns | 0.07 ± 0.01ns | 0.16 ± 0.01ns | 0.14 ± 0.06ns |
| 18 | 2-hydroxy-3-butanone | 513-86-0 | 1273 | KT | 0.15±0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0 |
| 19 | 2,5- Dimethyl pyrazine* | 123-32-0 | 1316 | PY | 0.02±0.01ns | 0.01 ± 0.001ns | 0.03 ± 0.01ns | 0.04 ± 0.01ns | 0.03 ± 0.02ns |
| 20 | 6-Methyl 5-hepten-2-one | 110-93-0 | 1327 | KT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.93 ± 0.10 | 0 |
| 21 | Ethyl octanoate | 106-32-1 | 1430 | ES | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | Acetic acid | 64-19-7 | 1449 | FA | 1.15 ±0.25 | 0 | 0.01 ± 0.008 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0 |
| 23 | 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-ol | 1569-60-4 | 1461 | OH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0 |
| 24 | 2-Ethylhexanol* | 104-76-7 | 1488 | OH | 0.02 ± 0.001ns | 0.02±0.01ns | 0.02±0.001ns | 0.02±0.004ns | 0.03±0.01ns |
| 25 | Propionic acid | 1979-09-04 | 1528 | FA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 0 |
| 26 | 2-Methylpropionic acid | 79-31-2 | 1562 | FA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0 |
| 27 | Butanoic acid | 107-92-6 | 1634 | FA | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0 |
| 28 | 3-Methylbutanoic acid | 503-74-2 | 1703 | FA | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.71 ± 0.25 | 0 |
| 29 | Methoxy-phenyl-oxime* | 1767 | IM | 0.03 ± 0.01ns | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 0.01 ± 0.004 | 0.03 ± 0.01ns | 0.03 ± 0.01ns | |
| 30 | 2-Phenylethyl acetate | 103-45-7 | 1795 | ES/AR | 3.52 ± 0.64 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2-Phenylethyl propionate | 122-70-3 | 1858 | ES/AR | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | Phenylmethanol | 1960-12-08 | 1856 | AR | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2-Phenylethanol | 1960-12-08 | 1894 | AR | 3.60 ± 0.26 | 3.45 ± 0.65 | 2.28 ± 0.45 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
Compounds indicated by * mark were excluded from PCA; CAS No—chemical abstract service number; RI—retention index (DB-Wax fused silica capillary column 30 m x 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness); GR—group of chemical compound; ES—ester; OH—alcohol; KT—ketone; AR—aromatic; PY—pyrazine; FA—fatty acid; IM—imine; all values in the columns headed by yeast names are the absolute amounts expressed as areas under the chromatographic peaks and have to be read as numbers times 100000 ± standard error of the mean followed by the “ns” are not significantly different compare to control (nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test, P < 0.05); control samples were obtained by collecting background volatiles from YPD-agar plates without yeast.
Figure 6Associations between blends and their components of four species of yeasts populating sea buckthorn berries. Associations are visualized by principal component analysis (PCA). (A) Distribution of odor blends released by C. wieringae (Cw, diamond shape), A. pullulans (Ap, triangle shape), M. pulcherrima (Mp, square shape), and H. uvarum (Hu, circle shape). n=5 for each species. (B) Distribution of volatile compounds composing the blends. Stars represent the volatile compounds indicated by numbers. Names of the compounds are listed in Table 2.