Literature DB >> 28836040

Two Gut-Associated Yeasts in a Tephritid Fruit Fly have Contrasting Effects on Adult Attraction and Larval Survival.

Alexander M Piper1, Kevin Farnier1, Tomas Linder2, Robert Speight3, John Paul Cunningham4.   

Abstract

Yeast-insect interactions have been well characterized in drosophilid flies, but not in tephritid fruit flies, which include many highly polyphagous pest species that attack ripening fruits. Using the Queensland fruit fly (Bactrocera tryoni) as our model tephritid species, we identified yeast species present in the gut of wild-collected larvae and found two genera, Hanseniaspora and Pichia, were the dominant isolates. In behavioural trials using adult female B. tryoni, a fruit-agar substrate inoculated with Pichia kluyveri resulted in odour emissions that increased the attraction of flies, whereas inoculation with Hanseniaspora uvarum, produced odours that strongly deterred flies, and both yeasts led to decreased oviposition. Larval development trials showed that the fruit-agar substrate inoculated with the 'deterrent odour' yeast species, H. uvarum, resulted in significantly faster larval development and a greater number of adult flies, compared to a substrate inoculated with the 'attractive odour' yeast species, P. kluyveri, and a yeast free control substrate. GC-MS analysis of volatiles emitted by H. uvarum and P. kluyveri inoculated substrates revealed significant quantitative differences in ethyl-, isoamyl-, isobutyl-, and phenethyl- acetates, which may be responsible for the yeast-specific olfactory responses of adult flies. We discuss how our seemingly counterintuitive finding that female B. tryoni flies avoid a beneficial yeast fits well with our understanding of female choice of oviposition sites, and how the contrasting behavioural effects of H. uvarum and P. kluyveri raises interesting questions regarding the role of yeast-specific volatiles as cues to insect vectors. A better understanding of yeast-tephritid interactions could assist in the future management of tephritid fruit fly pests through the formulation of new "attract and kill" lures, and the development of probiotics for mass rearing of insects in sterile insect control programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bactrocera; Hanseniaspora; Insect; Microbial; Microbiome; Odours; Olfaction; Phytobiome; Pichia; Volatiles

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836040     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-017-0877-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  32 in total

Review 1.  Globalization and fruitfly invasion and expansion: the medfly paradigm.

Authors:  A R Malacrida; L M Gomulski; M Bonizzoni; S Bertin; G Gasperi; C R Guglielmino
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Extraordinarily widespread and fantastically complex: comparative biology of endosymbiotic bacterial and fungal mutualists of insects.

Authors:  Cara M Gibson; Martha S Hunter
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Oviposition behaviour of two tephritid fruit flies, Dacus tryoni and Dacus jarvisi, as influenced by the presence of larvae in the host fruit.

Authors:  Gary P Fitt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Niche construction initiates the evolution of mutualistic interactions.

Authors:  Claudia C Buser; Richard D Newcomb; Anne C Gaskett; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Yeast: An Overlooked Component of Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae) Larval Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Ania T Deutscher; Olivia L Reynolds; Toni A Chapman
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Yeast communities of diverse Drosophila species: comparison of two symbiont groups in the same hosts.

Authors:  James Angus Chandler; Jonathan A Eisen; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Biotransformation of limonene by bacteria, fungi, yeasts, and plants.

Authors:  W A Duetz; H Bouwmeester; J B van Beilen; B Witholt
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Associations of yeasts with spotted-wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii; Diptera: Drosophilidae) in cherries and raspberries.

Authors:  Kelly A Hamby; Alejandro Hernández; Kyria Boundy-Mills; Frank G Zalom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez; José M Silla-Martínez; Toni Gabaldón
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  The yeast spore wall enables spores to survive passage through the digestive tract of Drosophila.

Authors:  Alison E Coluccio; Rachael K Rodriguez; Maurice J Kernan; Aaron M Neiman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  The gut microbiome analysis of Anastrepha obliqua reveals inter-kingdom diversity: bacteria, fungi, and archaea.

Authors:  G R Amores; G Zepeda-Ramos; L V García-Fajardo; Emilio Hernández; K Guillén-Navarro
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 2.667

2.  The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth.

Authors:  Geir K Knudsen; Hans R Norli; Marco Tasin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Live yeast in juvenile diet induces species-specific effects on Drosophila adult behaviour and fitness.

Authors:  Juliette Murgier; Claude Everaerts; Jean-Pierre Farine; Jean-François Ferveur
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Commensal microbiota modulates larval foraging behaviour, development rate and pupal production in Bactrocera tryoni.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Binh Nguyen; Shabnam T Tabrizi; Ida Lundbäck; Phillip W Taylor; Fleur Ponton; Toni A Chapman
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 5.  Tephritid-microbial interactions to enhance fruit fly performance in sterile insect technique programs.

Authors:  Ania T Deutscher; Toni A Chapman; Lucas A Shuttleworth; Markus Riegler; Olivia L Reynolds
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Near full-length 16S rRNA gene next-generation sequencing revealed Asaia as a common midgut bacterium of wild and domesticated Queensland fruit fly larvae.

Authors:  Ania T Deutscher; Catherine M Burke; Aaron E Darling; Markus Riegler; Olivia L Reynolds; Toni A Chapman
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 14.650

7.  Social and nutritional factors shape larval aggregation, foraging, and body mass in a polyphagous fly.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Binh Nguyen; Shabnam Tarahi Tabrizi; Fleur Ponton; Phillip Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fungal Microbiota of Sea Buckthorn Berries at Two Ripening Stages and Volatile Profiling of Potential Biocontrol Yeasts.

Authors:  Juliana Lukša; Iglė Vepštaitė-Monstavičė; Violeta Apšegaitė; Laima Blažytė-Čereškienė; Ramunė Stanevičienė; Živilė Strazdaitė-Žielienė; Bazilė Ravoitytė; Dominykas Aleknavičius; Vincas Būda; Raimondas Mozūraitis; Elena Servienė
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-03-23

9.  Fruit host-dependent fungal communities in the microbiome of wild Queensland fruit fly larvae.

Authors:  Rajib Majumder; Brodie Sutcliffe; Phillip W Taylor; Toni A Chapman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mutualism between Gut-Borne Yeasts and Their Host, Thaumatotibia leucotreta, and Potential Usefulness in Pest Management.

Authors:  Marcel van der Merwe; Michael D Jukes; Caroline Knox; Sean D Moore; Martin P Hill
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.769

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.