| Literature DB >> 32209993 |
Till van Gemmeren1, Ramona Schuppner1, Gerrit M Grosse1, Jessica Fering1, Maria M Gabriel1, René Huber2, Hans Worthmann1, Ralf Lichtinghagen2, Karin Weissenborn1.
Abstract
To investigate whether neutrophil granulocytes' function relates to post-stroke infections and clinical outcome after stroke, we prospectively recruited 95 patients after ischemic stroke and tested them for their microbiocidal neutrophil functions in this exploratory study. Additionally, 24 age-adjusted controls were examined regarding neutrophil function. Phagocytic capacity and the ability of the neutrophil granulocytes to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as CD11b and CD16 receptor expression profile were measured by flow cytometry at days 1, 3, 7, and 90 after symptom onset. Primary outcome was the development of an infection within the first week after stroke. Results of neutrophil functional measurements were compared between patients with and without infection as well as between all stroke patients and controls. Further risk factors for the development of infections were summarized in an infection-risk score for the purpose of multivariate statistical analysis. The ROS production in neutrophils after stimulation with formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) was reduced at baseline in patients with post-stroke infections compared to those without (p = 0.013). This difference proved to be independent from the infection-risk score in the binary logistic regression (p = 0.011). Phagocytosis and oxidative bursts were not significantly reduced in the whole stroke patient group compared to controls. Dysfunction of neutrophil granulocytes seems to play a significant role in the development of post-stroke infections. Further studies are warranted to investigate neutrophil granulocytes´ function as a potential biomarker of post-stroke infections.Entities:
Keywords: immunodepression; inflammation; neutrophils; oxidative burst; stroke
Year: 2020 PMID: 32209993 PMCID: PMC7141520 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Patient´s and control´s characteristics.
| Patients ( | Controls ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection = yes ( | Infection = no ( |
| ||
| Female (%) | 12 (44.44) | 26 (38.24) | 0.577 | 14 (58.33) |
| Age in years (IQR) | 76 (68.00–84.00) | 75.00 (64.00–82.00) | 0.255 | 75.50 (68.00–79.00) |
| Arterial hypertension (%) | 21 (77.78) | 53 (77.94) | 0.986 | 10 (41.67) |
| Smoking (%) | 6 (22.22) | 19 (27.94) | 0.568 | 5 (20.83) |
| Hyperlipoproteinemia (%) | 8 (29.63) | 16 (23.53) | 0.537 | 6 (25.00) |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 2 (7.41) | 13 (19.12) | 0.158 | 3 (12.50) |
| Atrial fibrillation (%) | 11 (40.74) | 17 (25.00) | 0.129 | 1 (4.17) |
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) (%) | 8 (30.77) | 7 (10.45) | 0.015 * | 3 (12.50) |
| Coronary heart disease (%) | 6 (22.22) | 16 (23.53) | 0.892 | 2 (8.33) |
| Renal dysfunction (%) | 5 (18.52) | 17 (25.00) | 0.499 | n.a. |
| NIHSS on admission (IQR) | 11 (7.00–17.00) | 5 (3.00–7.75) | <0.001 *** | n.a. |
| S100B in µg/L on day 3 (IQR) | 0.135 (0.096–1.410) | 0.075 (0.050–0.116) | <0.001 *** | n.a. |
| Stroke subtype | n.a. | |||
| Affected brain regions | n.a. | |||
| Mechanical thrombectomy (%) | 4 (14.81) | 6 (8.82) | 0.391 | n.a. |
| Intravenous Thrombolysis (%) | 9 (33.33) | 18 (26.47) | 0.504 | n.a. |
| CRP on admission (mg/L) (IQR) | 3.30 (1.80–7.50) | 3.10 (1.80–5.90) | 0.454 | 1.30 (0.50–3.28) |
| WBC on admission (1000/µL) (IQR) | 9.60 (8.10–11.80) | 7.30 (6.28–9.28) | 0.001 ** | 6.65 (5.68–8.05) |
| Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on admission (IQR) | 5.87 (3.21–9.31) | 2.87 (2.00–4.36) | 0.001 ** | 2.20 (1.66–3.29) |
| Infection-risk score (IQR) | 3.00 (2.00–5.50) | 1.00 (0.00–2.00) | <0.001 *** | n.a. |
| Unfavorable outcome | 17 (68.00) | 9 (14.52) | <0.001 *** | n.a. |
Patient´s and control´s characteristics and clinical findings at day 1. Given are total numbers and percentages (%), respectively, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) as well as p-values for the group comparison between patients with and without infection. Significant results are marked as * for p < 0.05, ** for p < 0.01, and *** for p < 0.001. NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, mRS: modified Rankin Scale, BMI: body mass index, WBC: white blood cell count.
Figure 1(A–C) Time course of neutrophil oxidative burst intensity, represented by the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), under different stimuli with formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), E. coli and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) for patients without infection (dot), patients with infection (triangle), and controls (black square). Given are group medians and interquartile ranges. For better comparison, the control level is plotted as a dotted line over the entire time course. Significant results in day-by-day group comparison by Mann–Whitney U testing are marked as * for p < 0.05 and ** for p < 0.01. (D) Burst intensity under different stimuli at baseline (day 1) for the two outcome groups. There were no significant differences between groups.
Figure 2(A–C) Time course of neutrophil oxidative burst intensity represented by the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) under different stimuli for all stroke patients (black bars) and control levels (white bars). (D) Time course of the percentage of bursting neutrophils after stimulation with Escherichia coli for all stroke patients (black bars) and control levels (white bars). (A–D) Given are group medians and upper interquartile ranges. Testing was performed using Mann–Whitney U for comparing burst intensity/percentage of bursting cells between all stroke patients and control levels. Significant results are marked as * for p < 0.05.
Figure 3(A–B) Group medians and interquartile ranges of the phagocytosis intensity according to the incorporated amount of E. coli per neutrophil represented by the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). (A) Time course of phagocytosis intensity for patients without infection (dot), patients with infection (triangle), and controls (black square). For better comparison, the control level is plotted as a dotted line over the entire time course. There were no significant results in day-by-day group comparison by Mann–Whitney U testing. (B) Time course for the phagocytosis intensity of neutrophils for all stroke patients (black bars) and control levels (white bars). There were no significant results between phagocytosis intensity of all stroke patients and control levels.
Figure 4(A,C) Time course of CD11b and CD16 expression levels on neutrophils for patients without infection (dot), patients with infection (triangle), and controls (black square). For better comparison the control level is plotted as a dotted line over the entire time course. There were no significant results in day-by-day group comparison by Mann–Whitney U testing. (B,D) Time course of CD11b and CD16 expression on cell surface of neutrophils for all stroke patients (black bars) and control levels (white bars). Given are group medians and upper interquartile ranges. Testing was performed using Mann–Whitney U test for comparing receptor expression on neutrophils between all stroke patients and control levels. Significant results are marked as * for p < 0.05 and *** for p < 0.001.