Literature DB >> 32209745

Measuring the frequency response of the honeybee thorax.

Mark A Jankauski1.   

Abstract

Insects with asynchronous flight muscles are believed to flap at the effective fundamental frequency of their thorax-wing system. Flapping in this manner leverages the natural elasticity of the thorax to reduce the energetic requirements of flight. However, to the best of our knowledge, the fundamental frequency of the insect wing-muscle-thorax system has not been measured. Here, we measure the linear frequency response function (FRF) of honeybee Apis mellifera thoraxes about their equilibrium state in order to determine their fundamental frequencies. FRFs relate the input force to output acceleration at the insect tergum and are acquired via a mechanical vibration shaker assembly. When compressed 50 μm, the thorax fundamental frequency averaged across all subjects was about 50% higher than reported wingbeat frequencies. We suspect that the measured fundamental frequencies are higher in the experiment than during flight due to boundary conditions and posthumous muscle stiffening. Next, we compress the thorax between 100-300 μm in 50 μm intervals to assess the sensitivity of the fundamental frequency to geometric modifications. For all specimens considered, the thorax fundamental frequency increased nearly monotonically with respect to level of compression. This implies that the thorax behaves as a nonlinear hardening spring when subject to large displacements, which we confirmed via static force-displacement testing. While there is little evidence that insects utilize this non-linearity during flight, the hardening characteristic may be emulated by small resonant-type flapping wing micro air vehicles to increase flapping frequency bandwidth. Overall, methods established through this work provide a foundation for further dynamical studies on insect thoraxes moving forward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32209745     DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/ab835b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim        ISSN: 1748-3182            Impact factor:   2.956


  8 in total

1.  The hawkmoth wingbeat is not at resonance.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Ethan S Wold; James Lynch; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.812

2.  Distinct forms of resonant optimality within insect indirect flight motors.

Authors:  Arion Pons; Tsevi Beatus
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Rapid frequency modulation in a resonant system: aerial perturbation recovery in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Ryan Gemilere; Lds-Vip Fm Subteam; James Lynch; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Dimensional analysis of spring-wing systems reveals performance metrics for resonant flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  James Lynch; Jeff Gau; Simon Sponberg; Nick Gravish
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  How and why do bees buzz? Implications for buzz pollination.

Authors:  Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Carpenter bee thorax vibration and force generation inform pollen release mechanisms during floral buzzing.

Authors:  Mark Jankauski; Cailin Casey; Chelsea Heveran; M Kathryn Busby; Stephen Buchmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Stability and manoeuvrability in animal movement: lessons from biology, modelling and robotics.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener; Richard J Bomphrey; Monica A Daley; Auke J Ijspeert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Anther cones increase pollen release in buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers.

Authors:  Mario Vallejo-Marín; Carlos Eduardo Pereira Nunes; Avery Leigh Russell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.171

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.