Laura J McPherson1,2, Vaughn Barry3, Jane Yackley4, Jennifer C Gander5, Stephen O Pastan6, Laura C Plantinga2,6, Sudeshna Paul7, Rachel E Patzer8,2,9. 1. Departments of Surgery and. 2. Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Departments of Environmental Health and. 4. Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Center for Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 7. Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and. 8. Departments of Surgery and rpatzer@emory.edu. 9. Health Services Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Access to kidney transplantation requires a referral to a transplant center for medical evaluation. Prior research suggests that the distance that a person must travel to reach a center might be a barrier to referral. We examined whether a shorter distance from patients' residence to a transplant center increased the likelihood of referral and initiating the transplant evaluation once referred. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Adults who began treatment for ESKD at any Georgia, North Carolina, or South Carolina dialysis facility from 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2015 were identified from the US Renal Data System. Referral (within 1 year of dialysis initiation) and evaluation initiation (within 6 months of referral) data were collected from all nine transplant centers located in that region. Distance was categorized as <15, 15-30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 miles from the center of a patient's residential zip code to the nearest center. We used multilevel, multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to quantify the association between distance with referral and evaluation initiation. RESULTS: Among 27,250 adult patients on incident dialysis, 9582 (35%) were referred. Among those referred, 58% initiated evaluation. Although patients who lived farther from a center were less likely to be referred, distance was not statistically significantly related to transplant referral: adjusted odds ratios of 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.22), 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.22), 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.10), and 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.03) for 15-30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 miles, respectively, compared with <15 miles (P trend =0.05). There was no statistically significant association of distance and evaluation initiation among referred patients: adjusted odds ratios of 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.33), 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.35), 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.25), and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.11) for 15-30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 miles, respectively, compared with <15 miles (P trend =0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Distance from residence to transplant center among patients undergoing long-term dialysis in the southeastern United States was not associated with increased likelihood of referral and initiating transplant center evaluation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Access to kidney transplantation requires a referral to a transplant center for medical evaluation. Prior research suggests that the distance that a person must travel to reach a center might be a barrier to referral. We examined whether a shorter distance from patients' residence to a transplant center increased the likelihood of referral and initiating the transplant evaluation once referred. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Adults who began treatment for ESKD at any Georgia, North Carolina, or South Carolina dialysis facility from 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2015 were identified from the US Renal Data System. Referral (within 1 year of dialysis initiation) and evaluation initiation (within 6 months of referral) data were collected from all nine transplant centers located in that region. Distance was categorized as <15, 15-30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 miles from the center of a patient's residential zip code to the nearest center. We used multilevel, multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to quantify the association between distance with referral and evaluation initiation. RESULTS: Among 27,250 adult patients on incident dialysis, 9582 (35%) were referred. Among those referred, 58% initiated evaluation. Although patients who lived farther from a center were less likely to be referred, distance was not statistically significantly related to transplant referral: adjusted odds ratios of 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.22), 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.22), 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.10), and 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.03) for 15-30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 miles, respectively, compared with <15 miles (P trend =0.05). There was no statistically significant association of distance and evaluation initiation among referred patients: adjusted odds ratios of 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.33), 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.35), 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.25), and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.11) for 15-30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 miles, respectively, compared with <15 miles (P trend =0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Distance from residence to transplant center among patients undergoing long-term dialysis in the southeastern United States was not associated with increased likelihood of referral and initiating transplant center evaluation.
Authors: Marcello Tonelli; Scott Klarenbach; Braden Manns; Bruce Culleton; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Stefania Bertazzon; Natasha Wiebe; John S Gill Journal: CMAJ Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Susan M Samuel; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Bethany Foster; Andrea Soo; R Todd Alexander; Marcello Tonelli Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2012-04-10
Authors: Rachel E Patzer; Laura C Plantinga; Sudeshna Paul; Jennifer Gander; Jenna Krisher; Leighann Sauls; Eric M Gibney; Laura Mulloy; Stephen O Pastan Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rachel E Patzer; Jennifer Gander; Leighann Sauls; M Ahinee Amamoo; Jenna Krisher; Laura L Mulloy; Eric Gibney; Teri Browne; Laura Plantinga; Stephen O Pastan Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Adrian M Whelan; Kirsten L Johansen; Charles E McCulloch; Dieter Adelmann; Claus U Niemann; Garrett R Roll; Salpi Siyahian; Barbara Grimes; Elaine Ku Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-09-17
Authors: Joel T Adler; Lingwei Xiang; Joel S Weissman; James R Rodrigue; Rachel E Patzer; Sushrut S Waikar; Thomas C Tsai Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-09-01
Authors: Adrian M Whelan; Kirsten L Johansen; Sandeep Brar; Charles E McCulloch; Deborah B Adey; Garrett R Roll; Barbara Grimes; Elaine Ku Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Katherine Ross-Driscoll; Jonathan Gunasti; Raymond J Lynch; Allan Massie; Dorry L Segev; Jon Snyder; David Axelrod; Rachel E Patzer Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 9.369
Authors: Christine Park; Mandisa-Maia Jones; Samantha Kaplan; Felicitas L Koller; Julius M Wilder; L Ebony Boulware; Lisa M McElroy Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2022-02-12
Authors: Daniel J Watford; Xingxing S Cheng; Jialin Han; Margaret R Stedman; Glenn M Chertow; Jane C Tan Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 2.863