Hypoxic-ischemic (HI) encephalopathy remains a major cause of perinatal mortality and chronic disability in newborns worldwide (1-6 for 1000 births). The only current clinical treatment is hypothermia, which is efficient for less than 60% of babies. Mainly considered as a waste product in the past, lactate, in addition to glucose, is increasingly admitted as a supplementary fuel for neurons and, more recently, as a signaling molecule in the brain. Our aim was to investigate the neuroprotective effect of lactate in a neonatal (seven day old) rat model of hypoxia-ischemia. Pups received intra-peritoneal injection(s) of lactate (40 μmol). Size and apparent diffusion coefficients of brain lesions were assessed by magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. Oxiblot analyses and long-term behavioral studies were also conducted. A single lactate injection induced a 30% reduction in brain lesion volume, indicating a rapid and efficient neuroprotective effect. When oxamate, a lactate dehydrogenase inhibitor, was co-injected with lactate, the neuroprotection was completely abolished, highlighting the role of lactate metabolism in this protection. After three lactate injections (one per day), pups presented the smallest brain lesion volume and a complete recovery of neurological reflexes, sensorimotor capacities and long-term memory, demonstrating that lactate administration is a promising therapy for neonatal HI insult.
Hypoxic-ischemic (HI) encephalopathy remains a major cause of perinatal mortality and chronic disability in newborns worldwide (1-6 for 1000 births). The only current clinical treatment is hypothermia, which is efficient for less than 60% of babies. Mainly considered as a waste product in the past, lactate, in addition to glucose, is increasingly admitted as a supplementary fuel for neurons and, more recently, as a signaling molecule in the brain. Our aim was to investigate the neuroprotective effect of lactate in a neonatal (seven day old) rat model of hypoxia-ischemia. Pups received intra-peritoneal injection(s) of lactate (40 μmol). Size and apparent diffusion coefficients of brain lesions were assessed by magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. Oxiblot analyses and long-term behavioral studies were also conducted. A single lactate injection induced a 30% reduction in brain lesion volume, indicating a rapid and efficient neuroprotective effect. When oxamate, a lactate dehydrogenase inhibitor, was co-injected with lactate, the neuroprotection was completely abolished, highlighting the role of lactate metabolism in this protection. After three lactate injections (one per day), pups presented the smallest brain lesion volume and a complete recovery of neurological reflexes, sensorimotor capacities and long-term memory, demonstrating that lactate administration is a promising therapy for neonatal HI insult.
Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic (HI) encephalopathy, which occurs in 1–6 out of 1000 births
in developed countries, remains a major cause of perinatal mortality and chronic
disability in newborns worldwide.[1,2] HI insult can be caused by
numerous events but independently of the origin, brain injury is ultimately due to
impaired cerebral blood flow[3] and oxygen delivery to the brain.[4] The pathophysiological consequences of an HI event are complex and
time-dependent. Several phases can be distinguished.[5] The primary energy failure is directly linked to oxygen and glucose
deprivation, which leads to a drop in ATP content and, therefore, the failure of the
sodium/potassium pump, leading to cell swelling and brain edema. When blood flow is
restored, the latent period starts, which duration varies depending on the degree of
severity of the insult.[6] Then, 6 to 48 h after the HI event, the second energy failure phase occurs,
which is more related to oxidative stress, excitotoxicity and inflammation
processes.Currently, the sole clinical treatment in use is moderate hypothermia, which has to
be initiated within the first 6 h, therefore during the latent period, which is the
optimal time window for therapy, and then continued for 72 h.[4] This treatment consists in cooling either the head or the whole body such as
the body temperature reaches between 33 and 36.5°C.[7] However, this treatment is not beneficial for more than 30% of surviving
babies and effective only for moderate HI insults (see Shah,[7] which compared 13 clinical trials for hypothermia in infants with HI
encephalopathy). Therefore, new therapeutic approaches are eagerly needed.In the brain, neurons and astrocytes display differences in metabolic profiles.
Astrocytes exhibit a high glycolytic metabolism leading to lactate production.[8] Neurons are energy-demanding cells but their glycolytic rate is restricted
due to the constitutive proteasome-dependent degradation of a key positive regulator
of glycolysis, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose 2,6-biphosphate 3
(PFKFB3).[9,10] Compared to astrocytes, neurons rely more on oxidative
metabolism, and, especially in the developing brain, they metabolize a substantial
part of glucose through the pentose phosphate pathway.[11,12]After a HI insult, despite the high energy demand of the brain, glucose
administration has no impact on brain damage,[13,14] and even a worsening effect
when injected before HI event.[15] Nevertheless, neurons could have access to other energetic substrates than
glucose to sustain their high energetic demand. After being considered as a
metabolic waste product, lactate is now regarded as an important energetic source.
Indeed, in the astrocyte to neuron lactate shuttle (ANLS) described by Pellerin and Magistretti,[16] it has been proposed that astrocytes fulfill neuronal energetic needs by
providing lactate as a fuel through their high glycolytic metabolism capacity.
Although this theory is supported by increasing evidence indicating lactate
production by astrocytes and the uptake of lactate as preferred neuronal energetic
substrate compared to glucose,[17-19] it still remains controversial.[20]In this context, the use of lactate as a supplementary fuel after a brain insult was
already tested, both in animals (stroke model) and in human (traumatic brain injury,
TBI). So even if for clinicians, and neuroradiologists in particular, lactate
accumulation is considered as a waste product of anaerobic glycolysis and a sign of
ischemia associated with severe disease states and poor outcome,[21] lactate seems to be promising for neuroprotection. Indeed, if lactate was
originally believed to be even the cause of tissue damage in ischemia, recent
experiments have shown that lactate administration after middle cerebral artery
occlusion (MCAO) in rodents induces a reduction in size of the damaged
area.[22,23] Moreover, clinical studies in traumatic brain injury (TBI)
reported a protective effect of exogenous lactate infusion.[24-28] In particular, an increase of
the amount of pyruvate and glucose as well as a decrease in glutamate levels was
observed after infusion of hypertoniclactate solution in severe TBI, suggesting
that lactate can be used as alternative fuel, while glucose would be spared to be
utilized for the regulation of other mechanisms such as reactive oxygen species
(ROS) production in this context.[25] More recently, cerebral microdialysis studies on patients after TBI showed
that labelled [3-13C]lactate is metabolized in glutamine.[27] Finally, following TBI, reduced lactate/pyruvate ratio within the first 72 h
is associated with a better outcome, suggesting that lactate utilization is
beneficial in this context.[29] All these studies were performed in adults.Neonatal brain energy metabolism differs from adults. Cerebral glucose utilization is
only 10% of the adult value during the first postnatal weeks.[30] The neonatal brain has a low capacity for glucose transport due to a low
level of glucose transporters (GLUTs). In contrast, compared to adults, it has a
higher expression of monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs),[31] which allow the use of alternative substrates to glucose, such as lactate and
ketone bodies. This substrate transport capacity is therefore adapted to the
breastfeeding diet. As in adults, glucose administration in HI newborn pigs has no effect[32] or even a deleterious effect on the size of brain damages.[33] Moreover, in newborn infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia after an HI
insult, hyperglycemia is associated with a poor outcome.[34] In parallel, lactate removal appears to produce more brain damage.[35] Although different studies assessed various pharmacological neuroprotective
strategies (see Juul and Ferriero[36] for review), to our knowledge, no exploration of the neuroprotective role of
lactate infusion was performed in neonatal HI insult.Therefore, considering the recent literature suggesting some possible therapeutic
roles of lactate, both in animal and human studies[25,37-39] and taking into account the
high capacity of the immature brain to use lactate as an energy substrate, we
proposed in the current study to evaluate the neuroprotective role of lactate in a
HI neonatal rat model.[40,41] Brain damages were evaluated as soon as 3 h after the ligation
and during the following 48 h by diffusion MRI. In order to investigate the
mechanism of this neuroprotection, pyruvate and glucose (isocaloric conditions)
injections were compared to the lactate therapy. The enzyme lactate dehydrogenase
(LDH) was also blocked with oxamate to assess the implication of lactate metabolism
in the neuroprotection.[42,43] Motor and behavioral studies were also carried out to evaluate
the long-term effect of lactate injection on cognitive functions. Our results
demonstrate that both exogenous and endogenous lactate exert a neuroprotective
effect on neonatal HI insult and open the way to clinical trials in the future, as
already ongoing in human adult TBI.[39]
Material and methods
Animals
All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the Animal
Experimentation Guidelines of the European Communities Council Directive of 24
November 1986 (86/609/EEC). Protocols met the ethical guidelines of the French
Ministry of Agriculture and Forests and the ARRIVE guidelines and were approved
by the Bordeaux ethical committee for animal research, n°C2EA-50 (authorization
n°9476). Pregnant Wistar RJ-HAN females (Janvier Laboratories, France) were
received at day-15 after fertilization and kept on a 12:12-h light:dark cycle
with food and water ad libitum.
Model of hypoxic ischemic brain injury
Neonatal Wistar rats post natal day 7 (P7) of both gender (mean body weight
17.8 ± 2.1 g, data were first analyzed with respect to sex but no sex effect was
detected) were used for the HI model.[40,41] Briefly, rats were
anaesthetized with isoflurane (4% for induction and 1.5% for maintenance) and a
midline neck incision was made under local anesthesia (lidocaine 0.5%). The left
common carotid artery was exposed and permanently ligated with a 7–0 silk
thread. After surgery (6–7 min, never exceeded 14 min in total to avoid cardiac
or respiratory arrests), animals were allowed to recover (30 min) on a heated
mattress to maintain body temperature. Pups were then placed for 2 h in a
humidified hypoxic chamber (8% oxygen in 92% nitrogen) submerged in a 36 ± 1°Cwater bath (Intensive Care Unit Warmer, Harvard Apparatus, France) to maintain a
constant thermal environment. Sham-operated pups (n = 10) were
kept separated from the dam in a heated atmosphere (33 ± 1°C). These conditions
allow to maintain body temperature at 36 ± 1°C (no difference with rectal
temperature measured when pups were with the dam). After hypoxic exposure, rat
pups were returned to their heated mattress until MRI. Acquisition of DWI was
started 180 min after the carotid artery ligation then performed at 24 h and
48 h.
Lactate, pyruvate, glucose and oxamate administration
Pups received a single intraperitoneal injection of sodium lactate (534 mmol/L,
4 μl/g pup) before (H-LI group: n = 10) or after hypoxia (HI-L
group: n = 14) or three consecutive post-HI event injections
(150 min, 24 h and 48 h post-ligation, HI-3L group: n = 10) or
the co-injection of lactate and the LDH inhibitor oxamate (HI-LO group:
n = 9) (750 mg/kg) or injection of oxamate alone (HI-O
group, n = 7, 750 mg/kg). Pups in HI-G and HI-P groups received
when leaving the hypoxic chamber a single intraperitoneal injection of glucose
(HI-G group: n = 6, 267 mmol/L, 4 μl/g pup) or sodium pyruvate
(HI-P group: n = 6, 534 mmol/L, 4 μl/g pup), respectively.
Control rats received an injection of NaCl 0.9% 150 min post-ligation (HI-C
group: n = 17). A scheme of the experimental design is
presented in Figure
1.
Figure 1.
Experimental design and groups. (a) Groups studied and chronology. (b)
Time course between carotid artery ligation, hypoxia exposure and DWI
acquisition. Nine different groups were studied; the sham group in which
pups underwent only the exposition of the left common carotid artery (no
HI insult), the HI-C group in which pups were exposed to the HI
procedure (left common carotid artery ligation + 2 h hypoxia) without
any treatment (intraperitoneal injection of physiological saline
solution), the H-LI group in which pups received a single
intraperitoneal lactate injection after the carotid artery ligation and
before entering the hypoxic chamber, the HI-L group in which pups
received a single intraperitoneal lactate injection when leaving the
hypoxic chamber (corresponding to 150 min after the carotid artery
ligation and 30 min before the DWI acquisition), the HI-G group in which
pups received a single intraperitoneal glucose injection when leaving
the hypoxic chamber,), the HI-P group in which pups received a single
intraperitoneal pyruvate injection when leaving the hypoxic chamber, the
HI-3L group in which pups received a daily post-HI injection during
three days (when leaving the hypoxic chamber, then 24 h and 48 h after
the HI insult) of lactate and the HI-LO group in which both lactate and
oxamate (LDH inhibitor) were injected to the pups. HI-O group: HI pups,
which received only oxamate.
Experimental design and groups. (a) Groups studied and chronology. (b)
Time course between carotid artery ligation, hypoxia exposure and DWI
acquisition. Nine different groups were studied; the sham group in which
pups underwent only the exposition of the left common carotid artery (no
HI insult), the HI-C group in which pups were exposed to the HI
procedure (left common carotid artery ligation + 2 h hypoxia) without
any treatment (intraperitoneal injection of physiological saline
solution), the H-LI group in which pups received a single
intraperitoneal lactate injection after the carotid artery ligation and
before entering the hypoxic chamber, the HI-L group in which pups
received a single intraperitoneal lactate injection when leaving the
hypoxic chamber (corresponding to 150 min after the carotid artery
ligation and 30 min before the DWI acquisition), the HI-G group in which
pups received a single intraperitoneal glucose injection when leaving
the hypoxic chamber,), the HI-P group in which pups received a single
intraperitoneal pyruvate injection when leaving the hypoxic chamber, the
HI-3L group in which pups received a daily post-HI injection during
three days (when leaving the hypoxic chamber, then 24 h and 48 h after
the HI insult) of lactate and the HI-LO group in which both lactate and
oxamate (LDH inhibitor) were injected to the pups. HI-O group: HI pups,
which received only oxamate.
1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance
spectroscopy
After hypoxia ended (normoxia condition), four pups were injected
intraperitoneally with [3-13C] lactate (200 mg/kg,
sodium-L-lactate-3-13C, Cortecnet) and euthanized by
cerebral-focused microwaves (2 KW, 1 s, Sacron8000, Sairem) in order to prevent
post-mortem metabolism. Contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres were
dissected, weighted and extracted separately using perchloric acid. Lyophilized
samples were dissolved in 100 μL D2O containing ethylene glycol
(0.04 mol/L, peak at 63 ppm). All samples were analyzed on a Bruker 500/54
ASCEND AEON spectrometer equipped with an HRMAS probe. 1H-NMR spectra
were acquired at 4°C with 90° flip angle (measured for each sample), 8 s
relaxation delay, 5000 Hz sweep width and 32 K memory size. Residual water
signal was suppressed by homonuclear presaturation. Proton-decoupled
13C-NMR spectra were acquired overnight using 60° flip angle,
20 s relaxation delay, 25,063 Hz sweep width and 64 K memory size. Measurements
were conducted at 4°C under bi-level broadband gated proton decoupling and
D2O lock. Relevant peaks in the spectra were identified and
integrated using TopSpin 3.5pl6 software (Bruker Biospin GmbH). Proton-observed
carbon-editing (POCE) sequence was used to determine the 13C-specific
enrichment at selected metabolite carbon positions using the
(13C-1H) heteronuclear multiquanta
correlation.[44,45] The sequence enabled the successive acquisitions of a first
scan corresponding to a standard spin-echo experiment without any 13C
excitation and a second scan involving a 13C inversion pulse allowing
coherence transfer between coupled 13C and 1H nuclei.
Subtraction of two alternate scans resulted in the editing of 1H
spins coupled to 13C spins with a scalar coupling constant
JCH = 127 Hz. 13C decoupling during the acquisition collapsed the
1H-13C coupling to a single 1H resonance.
Flip angles for rectangular pulses were carefully calibrated on both
radiofrequency channels before each experiment. The relaxation delay was 8 s for
a complete longitudinal relaxation. The fractional 13C-enrichment was
calculated as the ratio of the area of a given resonance on the edited
13C-1H spectrum to its area on the spin-echo
spectrum.
Acquisition of in vivo MR images
Each pup was studied at 3 h, 24 h and 48 h after the carotid artery ligation on a
horizontal 4.7 T Biospec 47/50 system (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with
a 12-cm BGA12S gradient system (660 mT/m). For MRI, pups were anesthetized with
isoflurane (4% induction, 1.5% maintenance), and respiration was monitored by a
ventral pressure sensor. Warmed water circulating in the gradient coil system
was used to maintain body temperature. Measurements were performed with
Paravision 6.0.1 (Bruker BioSpin, Karlsruhe, Germany). T2-weighted images of the
brain were obtained using a RARE sequence, 20 slices, 0.7-mm thick, FOV
2.5 × 2.5 cm, TE 50 ms, TR 3000 ms, rare factor 8, matrix 128 × 128, total
duration 4 min 48 s. Brain lesions were assessed by magnetic resonance
diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). DWI was performed using the following
parameters: 20 axial slices of 0.7 mm, b-value 1000 s/mm2, TE 24 ms,
TR 2 s, 30 directions, Δ = 8.11 ms, δ = 2.5 ms, total duration 17 min 04 s).For the kinetic study, pups (HI-C, n = 9; HI-L,
n = 7 and HI-3L, n = 7) underwent five
successive DWI at P7 (30, 47, 64, 81 and 98 min after the end of the HI insult),
P8 and P9. Decrease in lesion size was expressed in % and normalized to the size
of the lesion measured on the first time point image.
Magnetic resonance imaging analysis
The extent of the lesion was determined on DWI Trace images. ADC maps were
computed using the Paravision 6.0.1 (Bruker BioSpin, Karlsruhe, Germany). For
each rat, region-of-interest (ROI) was manually drawn, on each slice, to
encompass the injured area and determine the global brain area to quantify the
lesion volume (in percent of total brain) and ADC values. Analyses were blindly
performed by two separate operators (intra-operator variability<1%;
inter-operator variability <5%).
Behavioral studies
Righting reflex (P8, P10, P12)[46,47]
Pups were placed in a supine position and the time required to turn over on
all four paws and touch the ground was recorded. Each pup was given three
trials and the mean time to perform the reflex was calculated.
Modified neurological severity score (P24)
Neurological functions were assessed using the mNSS,[48] which is composed of motor (muscle status), sensory (tactile and
proprioceptive), beam balance, reflexes (pinna, corneal and startle) tests.
Each rat was graded on the mNSS scale (value <1: no impairment; 1–6:
middle impairment, 7–12: moderate impairment and > 13: severe
impairment). A non-parametric test (Kruskal–Wallis) was used for statistical
analyses of these data.
Novel object recognition (P45)
The pups’ long-term memory was assessed using the novel object recognition test.[49] After a habituation period in the open field (50 cm × 50 cm, 10 min)
on day 1, pups were further allowed to freely explore two identical objects
placed in opposing corners of the arena for 10 min on the next two days. On
the last day (day 4), one of the old objects was replaced by a new and
different object. Pups were allowed to freely explore the objects for
10 min. Duration of object contacts was measured. A discrimination index
([time with new object minus time with familiar object]/[time with new
object plus time with familiar object]) was defined as the parameter for
evaluation.Behavioral studies were blindly performed by one experimenter, different from
the one who acquired MRI, and, to avoid a selection bias, pups from the same
dam were assigned to different experimental groups.
Protein carbonyl assay
Protein carbonyls (treated with DNPH) were detected using the Oxidized Protein
Western Blot Kit (ab178020). Samples were then separated on a 4–15% SDSpolyacrylamide gradient TGX STAIN FREE mini-gel (Biorad 4568086) at 150 V. Gels
were activated by UV with chemidoc (Biorad). Proteins were transferred
electrophoretically on 0.45 µm-nitrocellulose membranes (7 min, 2.5 A) in
Transfer buffer with Trans-Blot Turbo (Biorad). Membranes were blocked 1 h in
odyssey buffer (Eurobio 927-40003) and incubated overnight with the primary
antibody (1:3000) provided in the kit diluted in odyssey buffer. After three
washes with PBS-0.05% Tween 20 membranes were incubated for 1 h with a second
antibody (1:2500) (LYCOR) diluted in odyssey buffer. This secondary antibody was
detected by fluorescence with odyssey. Total protein was used as loading
control.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were
performed with GraphPad Prism v7 using ANOVA non-parametric test (one-way
analysis of variance, multiple comparisons followed by Fisher’s LSD test) for
lesion volumes, ADC and behavioral studies, except mNSS (Kruskal–Wallis
non-parametric test). Unpaired t-test was used to compare
oxiblots. A p < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
Results
Neuroprotection by lactate: Preventive and/or curative?
Brain sections of typical trace diffusion-weighted images (DWI) for each animal
group were obtained 3 h after the carotid artery ligation with intraperitoneal
lactate or physiological serum injection and are presented in Figure 2(a). The more
restricted extra-cellular water movements are (cytotoxic edema), the brighter
the signal is, allowing to delineate the borders of the brain lesion.
Macroscopic evaluation of brain lesions showed a decrease in lesion volumes with
lactate therapy (Figure
2(a)). This was confirmed by quantification of the lesion volumes
(Figure 2(b)). Pups
in the HI-L group showed a significantly reduced damaged area compared to the
untreated HI group (% of brain lesion normalized to the total brain volume:
30.3 ± 2.6% in HI-L group compared to 39.9 ± 2.9% in HI-C group,
n = 14 and n = 17, respectively,
statistically significant, P = 0.016). When
lactate was injected before hypoxia (H-LI group), no significant difference was
observed in lesion volumes between H-LI and HI-C groups (35.3 ± 2.8% in H-LI
group compared to 39.9 ± 2.9% in HI-C group, n = 10 and
n = 17, respectively).
Figure 2.
Evaluation of a preventive or curative effect of lactate injection on
neonate brain lesions and edema volumes 3 h after carotid artery
ligation. Lactate was intraperitoneally injected before (H-LI group) or
after (HI-L group) the brain insult. In the control group (HI-C),
physiological serum was injected when leaving the hypoxic chamber. (a)
Trace DWI of P7 brains (from HI-C, H-LI, and HI-L groups) performed at
4.7 T. Damages appeared as a hypersignal (decrease of water movement,
which reflects cytotoxic edema). (b) Quantification of lesion volume (%,
relative to total brain volume) for the different groups. (c)
Quantification of the ipsilateral ADC in cortex, hippocampus and
striatum for sham, HI-C, H-LI and HI-L groups. *
P < 0.05, **
P < 0.01, ****
P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA,
followed by Fisher’s LSD test.
Evaluation of a preventive or curative effect of lactate injection on
neonate brain lesions and edema volumes 3 h after carotid artery
ligation. Lactate was intraperitoneally injected before (H-LI group) or
after (HI-L group) the brain insult. In the control group (HI-C),
physiological serum was injected when leaving the hypoxic chamber. (a)
Trace DWI of P7 brains (from HI-C, H-LI, and HI-L groups) performed at
4.7 T. Damages appeared as a hypersignal (decrease of water movement,
which reflects cytotoxic edema). (b) Quantification of lesion volume (%,
relative to total brain volume) for the different groups. (c)
Quantification of the ipsilateral ADC in cortex, hippocampus and
striatum for sham, HI-C, H-LI and HI-L groups. *
P < 0.05, **
P < 0.01, ****
P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA,
followed by Fisher’s LSD test.From these DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated for
the cortex, the hippocampus and the striatum (Figure 2(c)). A drop in ADC values was
observed in all HI groups compared to the sham group, reflecting water diffusion
restriction due to cell swelling, a phenomenon typical of this time window
(latent period). While the HI-C and H-LI groups presented no statistical
difference in ADC values, in the HI-L group, ADC values were significantly
higher, indicating that, in addition to reducing the lesion volume, lactate
injected after the HI insult reduces the severity of cytotoxic edema. In the
present conditions, injection of lactate before ischemia did not provide any
neuroprotective effect. Therefore, for the rest of the study, we only explored
the impact of lactate injections after the HI insult, which is also more
relevant in the perspective of a clinical trial.
Neuroprotection by lactate: A metabolic or signaling effect?
The time window between lactate injection and the first MRI is quite short
(30 min). To determine the fate of lactate injected intraperitoneally, we used
[3-13C]lactate and followed the incorporation of 13C
into cerebral metabolites by ex vivo NMR spectroscopy. A
typical 13C-NMR spectrum of brain extract 30 min after i.p. injection
of [3-13C]lactate is shown in the insert Figure 3(a). 13C-specific
enrichments were measured from the 1H-NMR spectra (POCE spectra, not
shown). Results indicated that [3-13C]lactate has reached the brain,
crossed the blood–brain barrier and was detected in the healthy brain and in the
damaged area ([3-13C]lactate specific enrichment: 9.5 ± 1.0% and
8.3 ± 0.7%; respectively). [3-13C]lactate had also been metabolized
in both hemispheres since 13C was incorporated into alanine and
glutamate ([3-13C]alanine specific enrichment: 6.8 ± 0.4% and
6.9 ± 1.4%, in the healthy and hypoxic hemispheres, respectively;
[4-13C]glutamate specific enrichment: 6.0 ± 1.7% and 4.1 ± 1.0%,
respectively). 13C was also incorporated into other amino acids or
carbon positions (γ–amino butyric acid (GABA), glutamate C3, glutamine C4 and
C3) reflecting its use for cerebral oxidative metabolism through the Krebs
cycle.
Figure 3.
Metabolic role of lactate in the neuroprotection. (a) 13C-NMR
spectrum and 13C-specific enrichments (% of
13C-enriched molecules) of brain metabolites 30 min after
[3-13C]lactate intraperitoneal injection. Results are
mean values ± SD. * P < 0.05 by
one-way ANOVA, followed by Fisher’s LSD test. Insert: Typical
13C-NMR spectrum obtained from brain extract 30 min after
i.p. injection of [3-13C]lactate. EG: ethylene glycol,
internal reference; AcetoAce C3: acetaoacetate carbon 3; Glu C4, C3 or
C2: glutamate carbon 4, 3 or 2; Gln C4, glutamine carbon 4; GABA C2:
γ-aminobutyrate carbon 2; Asp C3: aspartate carbon 3; Lact C3: lactate
carbon 3; Ala C3: alanine carbon 3. (b, c and d) Effect of oxamate, a
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) inhibitor on neonates’ brain lesions and
edema volumes 3 h after the carotid artery ligation. In the HI-L group,
lactate was intraperitoneally injected after the brain insult, while in
the HI-LO group, both lactate and oxamate (a LDH inhibitor) were
co-injected (in the HI-O group, only oxamate was injected). In the
control group (HI-C), lactate was replaced by physiological serum. (b)
Trace DWI of P7 brains (HI-C, HI-L, and HI-LO groups) obtained at 4.7 T.
(c) Quantification of lesion volume for the different groups (%,
relative to total brain volume). *
P < 0.05, ***
P < 0.001, by one-way ANOVA,
followed by Fisher’s LSD test. (d) Quantification of oxiblots in cortex
and striatum for HI-C, HI-L, and HI-LO groups (n = 3
per group). Results are mean values ± SEM. **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.001, paired
t-test.
Metabolic role of lactate in the neuroprotection. (a) 13C-NMR
spectrum and 13C-specific enrichments (% of
13C-enriched molecules) of brain metabolites 30 min after
[3-13C]lactate intraperitoneal injection. Results are
mean values ± SD. * P < 0.05 by
one-way ANOVA, followed by Fisher’s LSD test. Insert: Typical
13C-NMR spectrum obtained from brain extract 30 min after
i.p. injection of [3-13C]lactate. EG: ethylene glycol,
internal reference; AcetoAce C3: acetaoacetatecarbon 3; Glu C4, C3 or
C2: glutamatecarbon 4, 3 or 2; Gln C4, glutamine carbon 4; GABAC2:
γ-aminobutyrate carbon 2; Asp C3: aspartate carbon 3; Lact C3: lactatecarbon 3; Ala C3: alaninecarbon 3. (b, c and d) Effect of oxamate, a
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) inhibitor on neonates’ brain lesions and
edema volumes 3 h after the carotid artery ligation. In the HI-L group,
lactate was intraperitoneally injected after the brain insult, while in
the HI-LO group, both lactate and oxamate (a LDH inhibitor) were
co-injected (in the HI-O group, only oxamate was injected). In the
control group (HI-C), lactate was replaced by physiological serum. (b)
Trace DWI of P7 brains (HI-C, HI-L, and HI-LO groups) obtained at 4.7 T.
(c) Quantification of lesion volume for the different groups (%,
relative to total brain volume). *
P < 0.05, ***
P < 0.001, by one-way ANOVA,
followed by Fisher’s LSD test. (d) Quantification of oxiblots in cortex
and striatum for HI-C, HI-L, and HI-LO groups (n = 3
per group). Results are mean values ± SEM. **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.001, paired
t-test.In order to determine if the neuroprotective role of lactate was linked to its
metabolic use, the LDH inhibitor oxamate was co-injected with lactate (HI-LO
group). As control, we also performed experiments with oxamate injection alone
(HI-O group, Figure
3(c)). No statistical difference was observed between HI-C and HI-O
(39.9 ± 2.9%, n = 17 and 48.8 ± 4.8, n = 7 for
HI-C and HI-O groups, respectively) nor between HI-LO and HI-O brain lesion
volumes (48.6 ± 1.7, n = 9 and 48.8 ± 4.8,
n = 7 for HI-LO and HI-O, respectively). DWI obtained and
quantification of lesion volumes are presented (Figure 3(b) and (c), respectively). The
co-injection of oxamate completely abolished the neuroprotective effect of
lactate (lesion volumes, in percentage of total brain volume: 39.9 ± 2.9%,
30.3 ± 2.6%, and 48.6 ± 1.7% in HI-C, HI-L and HI-LO groups, respectively). The
deleterious effect of preventing the metabolic use of lactate was also evaluated
via the measurement of ROS production, which is a deleterious event concomitant
to the HI insult. Analyses of ROS production by oxiblot showed that
post-ischemia intraperitoneal injection of lactate led to a significant decrease
in ROS production compared to HI-C group; −68% in the cortex and −72% in the
striatum (Figure 3(d)).
Conversely, inhibition of lactate metabolism by oxamate prevented the reduction
in ROS production compared to the control group in the cortex and in the
striatum (moreover, no statistical difference between HI-O and HI-C groups was
observed, in both structures, data not shown).
Neuroprotection by lactate: Comparison with pyruvate and glucose
administration
Isocaloric intraperitoneal injections of pyruvate (HI-P group) or glucose (HI-G
group) were performed just after the HI insult and brain lesion volumes were
measured on DWI and compared with the HI-L group (Figure 4(a) and (b)). No statistical
difference was detected between HI-C, HI-P and HI-G groups, whereas pups in the
HI-L showed reduced lesion volumes with statistical differences with the other
groups.
Figure 4.
Comparison of glucose, pyruvate and lactate injections on neonate brain
lesions and edema volumes 3 h after carotid artery ligation. Lactate
(HI-L), pyruvate (HI-P), glucose (HI-G) or physiological serum (HI-C)
were intraperitoneally injected after the brain insult. (a) Trace DWI of
P7 brains. Damages appeared as a hypersignal (decrease of water
movement, which reflects edema). (b) Quantification of lesion volume (%,
relative to total brain volume) for the different groups. *
P < 0.05, by one-way ANOVA,
followed by Fisher’s LSD test.
Comparison of glucose, pyruvate and lactate injections on neonate brain
lesions and edema volumes 3 h after carotid artery ligation. Lactate
(HI-L), pyruvate (HI-P), glucose (HI-G) or physiological serum (HI-C)
were intraperitoneally injected after the brain insult. (a) Trace DWI of
P7 brains. Damages appeared as a hypersignal (decrease of water
movement, which reflects edema). (b) Quantification of lesion volume (%,
relative to total brain volume) for the different groups. *
P < 0.05, by one-way ANOVA,
followed by Fisher’s LSD test.
Neuroprotection by lactate: Repeated injections better than a unique
dose?
Two injection patterns were compared: a single intraperitoneal injection of
lactate (HI-L group) and three daily consecutive lactate injections (HI-3L
group). Lesions were followed during three days by DWI (Figure 5(a)) and their volumes were
quantified (Figure
5(b)). No difference was observed between HI-L and HI-3L groups at P7
(post-natal seven-day-old pups) (same quantity of lactate injected in both
groups). However, as soon as the second day, the HI-3L group had significantly
lower lesion volumes compared to the other groups. After three lactate
injections, lesion volumes were the smallest in the HI-3L group (lesion volume,
in percentage of total brain volume, at P9: 1.2 ± 0.5% and 19.4 ± 3.5% in HI-3L
and HI-C group, respectively). ADC values were quantified in the lesion (if
present) in cortex, hippocampus and striatum for each group, at each time point
(Figure 5(c)). At
P9, the HI-3L group presented the best recovery of ADC values in the cortex and
the striatum.
Figure 5.
Longitudinal study of the neuroprotective effect of lactate. (a) Brain
trace DWI of P7, P8 and P9 pups of HI-C, HI-L and HI-3L groups. Images
were obtained at 4.7 T, 3 h, 24 h and 48 h after the insult. (b)
Quantification of lesion volumes (%, relative to total brain volume) and
comparison between the control group, one injection of lactate and three
injections of lactate (daily). (c) Quantification of ADC in cortical,
hippocampal and striatal lesions at P7, P8 and P9. (d) Evaluation of
lesion regression as a function of time (%, relative to original lesion
size). Results are mean values ± SD. (b)(c) *
P < 0.05, **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.001, by one-way ANOVA,
followed by Fisher’s LSD test. (c) *statisticaly significant between
HI-C and HI-L, °statisticaly significant between HI-C and HI-3L,
#statisticaly significant between HI-L and HI-3L.
Longitudinal study of the neuroprotective effect of lactate. (a) Brain
trace DWI of P7, P8 and P9 pups of HI-C, HI-L and HI-3L groups. Images
were obtained at 4.7 T, 3 h, 24 h and 48 h after the insult. (b)
Quantification of lesion volumes (%, relative to total brain volume) and
comparison between the control group, one injection of lactate and three
injections of lactate (daily). (c) Quantification of ADC in cortical,
hippocampal and striatal lesions at P7, P8 and P9. (d) Evaluation of
lesion regression as a function of time (%, relative to original lesion
size). Results are mean values ± SD. (b)(c) *
P < 0.05, **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.001, by one-way ANOVA,
followed by Fisher’s LSD test. (c) *statisticaly significant between
HI-C and HI-L, °statisticaly significant between HI-C and HI-3L,
#statisticaly significant between HI-L and HI-3L.A temporal profile of brain lesion recovery was established (Figure 5(d)). Longitudinal DWI was
performed five times during the first 100 min (P7; 30, 47, 64, 81 and 98 min
after the HI insult with lactate or physiological serum injection, in HI-L and
HI-C groups, respectively) and at P8 and P9. A nearly complete recovery was
observed in the HI-3L group.
Neuroprotection by lactate: An acute as well as a long-term effect?
Pups in the HI-3L group had the smallest lesion volumes measured by MRI during
the first 48 h after the HI insult but the impact on functional recovery and
long-term outcome was unknown. Therefore, behavioral tests at different time
points were performed. Early reflexes were analyzed to evaluate the impact of
three daily consecutive lactate injections after a HI event. The HI-C group
presented significantly poorer performances in the righting reflex, while no
difference was measured between sham and HI-3L pups (Figure 6(a)).
Figure 6.
Effect of lactate therapy on neurological reflexes as well as juvenile
somatosensory and memory capacities. (a) Performances on righting
reflexes at P8, P10 and P12. Significantly different from sham group: **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.001, significantly
different from HI-3L: # P < 0.05,
### P < 0.001. (b) Modified
neurological severity scores (mNSS) performed at P24. *
P < 0.05, ***
P < 0.001. (c) Novel object
recognition test performed at P45. Results are mean values +/_ SEM. *
P < 0.05, **
P < 0.01.
Effect of lactate therapy on neurological reflexes as well as juvenile
somatosensory and memory capacities. (a) Performances on righting
reflexes at P8, P10 and P12. Significantly different from sham group: **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.001, significantly
different from HI-3L: # P < 0.05,
### P < 0.001. (b) Modified
neurological severity scores (mNSS) performed at P24. *
P < 0.05, ***
P < 0.001. (c) Novel object
recognition test performed at P45. Results are mean values +/_ SEM. *
P < 0.05, **
P < 0.01.Sensorimotor deficits were also evaluated using the modified Neurological
Severity Scores (mNSS) (Figure
6(b)). The mNSS scores of pups in HI-C and HI-3L groups were
4.5 ± 0.8 and 1.1 ± 0.4, respectively, while the one for sham pups was
0.6 ± 0.3. No statistical difference was found between HI-3L and sham
groups.Long-term memory was tested using the novel object recognition test (Figure 6(c)). HI insult
induced a significant decrease in discrimination compared to the sham group.
Such a deleterious effect was prevented by three consecutive daily injections of
lactate (0.77 ± 0.04; 0.62 ± 0.08; 0.82 ± 0.03, for sham, HI-C and HI-3L groups,
respectively). No statistical difference was found between HI-3L and sham
groups.
Discussion
The metabolic cooperation between neurons and astrocytes, and more precisely the
astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle (ANLS) proposed by Pellerin and Magistretti[16] more than 20 years ago, has led to a new vision of neuroenergetics. In this
shuttle, glutamate, a neurotransmitter released by neurons during brain activity, is
taken up by astrocytes and its entry stimulates the production of glycolytic
lactate, which will be transferred to neurons in which it will be used as an
energetic substrate.[16,50] While still debated,[20,51] a growing number of studies
have led to results indicating that neurons efficiently consume lactate[18,19] and that
lactate metabolism is linked to functional activity and memory.[52,53] In the brain,
monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) mediate the transport of lactate, pyruvate and
ketone bodies. These transporters are key elements in this hypothesis since
different isoforms exist, with different kinetic parameters. MCT2 is found in neurons,[54] while MCT1 is predominantly located on endothelial cells as well as on glial
cells including astrocytes, these latter expressing in addition MCT4.[55]
In vitro, it has already been reported that the transcriptional
factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α regulates the expression of MCT4, which could
play a crucial role for neuronal recovery after an ischemic episode.[56] In the context of ischemic insults, in vitro and in
vivo studies have shown that lactate is the major energy substrate for
surviving neurons, and it has been reported that lactate can protect neurons from
glutamate-induced neurotoxicity,[57,58] while administration of
glucose before an ischemic stroke led to an increase in lesion size in a rat model
of global cerebral ischemia.[15] Moreover, in hippocampal slices, after a period of oxygen deprivation,
accumulated brain lactate allows the recovery of neuronal functions upon
reoxygenation.[59,60]
In vivo, in rats undergoing a transient global cerebral ischemia,
the inhibition of monocarboxylate transporter, reducing lactate transport, increased
neuronal damages leading the authors to conclude that lactate is a critical
oxidative energy substrate in the post-ischemic rat brain.[15] Considering the aforementioned data together with the fact that the immature
brain readily metabolizes ketones as well as lactate,[30] and that MCTs are overexpressed during the entire breastfeeding
period,[61,62] led us to investigate whether lactate administration after a
neonatal HI insult could be neuroprotective.In this study, we demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of lactate in a neonatal HIrat model. We used the well-established hypoxia-ischemia model of Rice-Vannucci on
P7 pups that is commonly accepted to be equivalent to the human term newborn.[41] Ligature of the left common carotid artery followed by a hypoxic episode
systematically induced an ipsilateral brain lesion. Lactate was intraperitoneally
injected before or after the hypoxic insult. Our results clearly indicate that
lactate exerts a therapeutic rather than a preventive effect, which, from a clinical
point of view, is far more interesting, since smaller brain lesions were observed
when lactate was injected after the insult when compared to lactate injection before
hypoxia.This therapeutic effect of lactate was observed as soon as 30 min after its
administration. Therefore, we first wanted to confirm that lactate injected
intraperitoneally was able to reach the brain within this short time period. To
follow the fate of lactate, we used 13C-labeled lactate.[63] Half an hour after its intraperitoneal administration, 13C-labeled
lactate was found in the brain (on 13C-NMR spectra of brain perchloric
extracts) and it was also metabolized, both in the healthy and the ischemic
hemisphere, since 13C was incorporated into different brain metabolites.
Metabolism of [3-13C]lactate was previously investigated in another
study,[64,65] which showed, in adult rats, that [3-13C]lactate
perfused in the blood circulation crossed the blood–brain barrier and was
efficiently metabolized, almost exclusively in the neuronal compartment (metabolism
of [3-13C]lactate observed in the brain after both 1 h- or
20 min-[3-13C]lactate infusions). Therefore, lactate injected
intraperitoneally after the insult is entering the brain, essentially through the
MCTs, and is metabolized by the brain of HI pups.When lactate metabolism is blocked using oxamate, a LDH inhibitor, the
neuroprotection was completely lost, indicating that lactate consumption by brain
cells is mandatory to get a therapeutic effect. This is confirmed by the fact that
the efficacy of lactate is more important when injected after the insult, therefore
when normoxia and oxidative metabolism are restored. In this reperfusion period, the
use of lactate rather than glucose as an oxidative energetic substrate is
neuroprotective. Indeed, if lactate is replaced by glucose, no neuroprotection could
be observed. We can hypothesize that the metabolic use of lactate as an energetic
substrate (precursor) for the Krebs cycle allows to spare glucose for other
important cellular repair mechanisms, such as the pentose phosphate pathway, which
activity is crucial for the production of glutathione, a ROS scavenger.[11,66,67] This
hypothesis is strongly supported by the results obtained by oxiblots, which show
that the huge increase in protein oxidation after a HI insult is prevented by
lactate administration. Once again, the co-injection of oxamate with lactate
prevents the beneficial effect of lactate on protein oxidation, confirming the need
for lactate metabolism to obtain the effect on ROS production. In this context, it
may seem surprising to observe that pyruvate does not provide neuroprotection.
Pyruvate is efficiently transported by the same neuronal monocarboxylate transporter
than lactate. It is also metabolized similarly to lactate as the former must be
converted into pyruvate intracellularly before being used in oxidative metabolism.
The main difference between the two is the contribution of lactate to the redox
potential since the conversion of lactate to pyruvate requires the conversion of
NAD+ into NADH. The concomitant production of NADH with lactate
metabolism might be a critical factor for its neuroprotective effect.Interestingly, the neuroprotection seems not to be equivalent in all brain regions.
Indeed, striatal regions were first protected, as observed either on diffusion MRI
and on oxiblots. Such a regional difference, already observed during lactate
neuroprotection in a mouse model of stroke,[68] is not surprising since brain metabolism is known to differ depending on the
cerebral structure[69] as well as brain development and pathologies.[70]The use of oxamate also demonstrates that the neuroprotection offered by lactate is
linked to its metabolic use rather than to its signaling effect. Indeed, a lactate
receptor, called GPR81 or HCAR1, was recently found in the brain.[71] In adult, it was proposed that neuroprotection by lactate was due to both its
metabolic and its signaling roles.[23] Results obtained in this study indicate that the metabolic consumption of
lactate is essential to observe neuroprotection, since when the conversion of
lactate into pyruvate is blocked by oxamate, then the neuroprotective effect of
lactate is lost. Even if it did not reach statistical significance, there was a
tendency to observe bigger brain lesion volumes when oxamate was injected compared
to control animals (Figure
3(c); HI-C compared to HI-LO or HI-O, P = 0.054 and
0.068, respectively). This suggests that endogenous lactate produced during hypoxia,
and its conversion into pyruvate during the reperfusion period, is already
neuroprotective. However, we cannot exclude a role of the receptor-mediated
signaling pathway at a different time point. GPR81 is a G-protein coupled receptor,
which activation leads to a decrease in cAMP content. cAMP is known to modulate
glucose metabolism, and, in particular, to activate glycogenolysis.[72] Therefore, activation of GPR81 after lactate administration could also
decrease cAMP content, decrease the release of glucose from glycogen and, finally,
limit deleterious effect of glucose excess after a stroke.[73]MRI is a non-invasive technique that allows longitudinal studies. In addition to
anatomical images, parametric images can also be acquired. With DWI, “trace” images
reflect extracellular water diffusion restriction due to cell swelling (with also a
T2 contribution). Even if quantification of brain lesion volumes and
severity of edema by MRI is considered a gold standard in the field to determine the
efficacy of a treatment, an evaluation of functional recovery over several days and
even weeks after initiating the treatment is mandatory. In our study, the long-term
neuroprotection of lactate was monitored with different behavioral tests. Pups
subjected to HI insult presented deficits in early reflexes. A complete recovery was
observed after three consecutive daily injections of lactate. Later, the same was
observed in juvenile rats in the mNSS test. After three consecutive daily injections
of lactate, rats performed the test as well as sham pups, while non-treated rats
presented somatosensory deficits and asymmetric dysfunctions. Such deficits have
been reported in a MCAO ischemicrat model.[74] These results demonstrate that multiple lactate injections counteract the
deleterious effects of a hypoxic-ischemic event on neurological reflexes as well as
on juvenile somatosensory capacities and asymmetric functions.Previous studies have shown that white matter damages after hypoxic-ischemic injury
in preterm children correlated with late cognitive impairments.[75] Hypoxic-ischemic rodents also display short- and long-term memory
deficits.[49,76-78]
Neuroprotection by lactate of long-term memory was assessed with the novel object
recognition test. Juveniles that have received at P7, P8 and P9 a daily injection of
lactate after the HI event completely recovered. Interestingly, a role of lactate
and MCTs was recently demonstrated in memory processes.[53] The authors suggested that astrocytic glycogenolysis leads to lactate
production and release from astrocytes via MCT1 or MCT4 and uptake into neurons via
MCT2 which appears to be required for the consolidation step of long-term memory. As
expected, in our study, rats subjected to HI insult displayed long-term memory
deficits. They were, however, completely protected by multiple injections of
lactate. These data highlight a therapeutic role of lactate on hippocampal-dependent
long-term memory in a context of hypoxic-ischemic stroke.There are limitations to this study. First, the route of lactate administration is
not similar to the one that should be used in the clinic. Indeed, lactate should be
injected through a continuous blood circulation infusion, such as the one already
performed in TBI patients.[25,39] However, this was not compatible with the rat model, in which
the pups return to the dam just after the end of the MRI. Another way to
continuously administered lactate would be the use of osmotic pumps. Unfortunately,
the smallest one offered by the manufacturer (for mice) is still too big to be
implanted in 16–20 g rat pups. Second, after rodent studies and before being
translated to the clinic, a pre-clinical study on larger animals, such as pigs,
should be performed. However, if this step-by-step approach is a prerequisite to
test potential side effect(s) of a new drug, in the case of lactate, which is a
“natural” molecule, this is not really relevant. Lactate infusions are protocols
already tested in some clinical trials. For example, after TBI, hypertonicsodiumlactate is infused as soon as possible after the insult, at a rate of 30 to
40 μmol/kg body weight/min, during 3 h,[39] which corresponds to the administration of 5.4 to 7.2 mmol/kg. In our
protocol, the three consecutive daily administrations of lactate correspond to a
slightly lower dose, 2.14 mmol/kg. Thus, its direct translation to the clinic should
therefore be possible more easily.Additional preclinical evaluation of lactate administration under a hypothermia
condition will be needed before lactate therapy can be clinically investigated,
since hypothermia is the only efficient treatment currently used.[4] However, since this standard procedure does not imply injection of a chemical
product, no deleterious association with lactate is expected, which was not the case
with tissue plasminogen activator, for example, in an adult rat model of stroke.[79]Our study demonstrates for the first time the neuroprotective and curative roles of
multiple lactate injections by reducing brain damages and improving sensorimotor
deficits as well as cognitive impairments. This neuroprotection could be due to the
use of lactate as an energetic source and redox potential contributor. Indeed, blood
lactate can be taken up and metabolized by the brain, as shown by our data (using
13C-lactate injection in pups), as well as by previous studies
performed in adult animals.[64,80,81] This lactate can then be used as an energetic substrate,
preferentially by neurons, as demonstrated both in vitro[18,19] and in
vivo.[64] In addition to blood-borne lactate, lactate can be also provided by
astrocytes, through the astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle,[16] which becomes prominent during brain activation as it is driven by astrocytic
glutamate uptake. Lactate enters neurons through MCT2,[82] which expression was recently correlated with the BOLD response, a surrogate
marker of neuronal activity.[52] The use of lactate as an energetic source for neurons could then spare
glucose for its use in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), a biochemical series of
reactions that has been shown to be essential for neuronal survival through
glutathione reduction for protection against ROS.[9] In this latter study, when glycolysis was upregulated in neurons, this led to
their death, emphasizing the importance of the PPP. The neuroprotective and curative
roles of lactate injections in neonatal hypoxia-ischemia can be therefore explained
by the model summarized in Figure
7. Our data obtained using oxamate and the oxiblot technique are
consistent with such a mechanistic neuroprotective pathway and prompt for further
investigations.
Figure 7.
Mechanistic hypothesis of lactate neuroprotection on HI damages. Injected
lactate could be taken from the bloodstream by astrocytes. Then, through the
astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle, lactate could be metabolized by neurons as
an energy source to overcome the lack of glucose induced by HI insult. The
small amount of available neuronal glucose could thus be saved to integrate
the pentose phosphate pathway to maintain the Redox balance together with
the NADH provided by lactate metabolism.
Mechanistic hypothesis of lactate neuroprotection on HI damages. Injected
lactate could be taken from the bloodstream by astrocytes. Then, through the
astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle, lactate could be metabolized by neurons as
an energy source to overcome the lack of glucose induced by HI insult. The
small amount of available neuronal glucose could thus be saved to integrate
the pentose phosphate pathway to maintain the Redox balance together with
the NADH provided by lactate metabolism.
Authors: Marta Reyes-Corral; Noelia Sola-Idígora; Rocío de la Puerta; Joan Montaner; Patricia Ybot-González Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 5.923