Literature DB >> 32208431

Multiple social platforms reveal actionable signals for software vulnerability awareness: A study of GitHub, Twitter and Reddit.

Prasha Shrestha1, Arun Sathanur2, Suraj Maharjan1, Emily Saldanha1, Dustin Arendt3, Svitlana Volkova1.   

Abstract

The awareness about software vulnerabilities is crucial to ensure effective cybersecurity practices, the development of high-quality software, and, ultimately, national security. This awareness can be better understood by studying the spread, structure and evolution of software vulnerability discussions across online communities. This work is the first to evaluate and contrast how discussions about software vulnerabilities spread on three social platforms-Twitter, GitHub, and Reddit. Moreover, we measure how user-level e.g., bot or not, and content-level characteristics e.g., vulnerability severity, post subjectivity, targeted operating systems as well as social network topology influence the rate of vulnerability discussion spread. To lay the groundwork, we present a novel fundamental framework for measuring information spread in multiple social platforms that identifies spread mechanisms and observables, units of information, and groups of measurements. We then contrast topologies for three social networks and analyze the effect of the network structure on the way discussions about vulnerabilities spread. We measure the scale and speed of the discussion spread to understand how far and how wide they go, how many users participate, and the duration of their spread. To demonstrate the awareness of more impactful vulnerabilities, a subset of our analysis focuses on vulnerabilities targeted during recent major cyber-attacks and those exploited by advanced persistent threat groups. One of our major findings is that most discussions start on GitHub not only before Twitter and Reddit, but even before a vulnerability is officially published. The severity of a vulnerability contributes to how much it spreads, especially on Twitter. Highly severe vulnerabilities have significantly deeper, broader and more viral discussion threads. When analyzing vulnerabilities in software products we found that different flavors of Linux received the highest discussion volume. We also observe that Twitter discussions started by humans have larger size, breadth, depth, adoption rate, lifetime, and structural virality compared to those started by bots. On Reddit, discussion threads of positive posts are larger, wider, and deeper than negative or neutral posts. We also found that all three networks have high modularity that encourages spread. However, the spread on GitHub is different from other networks, because GitHub is more dense, has stronger community structure and assortativity that enhances information diffusion. We anticipate the results of our analysis to not only increase the understanding of software vulnerability awareness but also inform the existing and new analytical frameworks for simulating information spread e.g., disinformation across multiple social environments online.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32208431      PMCID: PMC7092989          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  12 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Community structure in social and biological networks.

Authors:  M Girvan; M E J Newman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assortative mixing in networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks.

Authors:  D J Watts; S H Strogatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Optimal network modularity for information diffusion.

Authors:  Azadeh Nematzadeh; Emilio Ferrara; Alessandro Flammini; Yong-Yeol Ahn
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  The spread of true and false news online.

Authors:  Soroush Vosoughi; Deb Roy; Sinan Aral
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization.

Authors:  Robert M Bond; Christopher J Fariss; Jason J Jones; Adam D I Kramer; Cameron Marlow; Jaime E Settle; James H Fowler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Virality prediction and community structure in social networks.

Authors:  Lilian Weng; Filippo Menczer; Yong-Yeol Ahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.

Authors:  Chengcheng Shao; Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia; Onur Varol; Kai-Cheng Yang; Alessandro Flammini; Filippo Menczer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.