Literature DB >> 32205972

Can Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) Predict Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Oncological Surgery?

Geetu Bhandoria1, Jitendra D Mane2.   

Abstract

Surgeons constantly try to achieve optimal surgical outcome, number, or extent of postoperative complications being an important part of it. Oncological surgeries are conventionally more challenging and complex compared with most nononcological ones. Gawande et al. devised SAS in 2007 in Boston as a predictor tool for postoperative complications (J Am Coll Surg 204:201-208, 2007). A validation study was done by in another cohort of 100 patients; however, only 70% of them had pathologically confirmed malignancies (Ann Surg 240(2):205-213, 2004). We attempt to assess SAS as a tool to predict postoperative complications in a series of 100 gynecological oncological patients operated at tertiary care center. SAS score of 100 patients with gynecologic malignancies, undergoing surgery at a tertiary care center, was prospectively collected over 4 years. These patients were observed for development of any complications occurring up to 30 days postsurgery. The complication events were graded as per Clavien-Dindo classification (Indian J Gynecol Oncolog 15:49, 2017). The data obtained was statistically analyzed by chi-square test. Thirty complication events were recorded in these 100 patients over a period of 4 years. Majority of complication events were grade IIIa or less (22 out of 30); there was only one death on 8th postoperative day. Fifty percent of patients were with SAS score of 5 or less developed complications compared with just 22.9% in patients with a score of 6 or more. Lower SAS score might be associated with higher postoperative complications in patients undergoing gynecologic oncological surgeries. Thus, patients with lower scores may benefit from a triage to more intensive postoperative care. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavien Dindo grading; Gynecological malignancy; Postoperative complications; Surgical Apgar score

Year:  2019        PMID: 32205972      PMCID: PMC7064654          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00995-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


Introduction

Primary osteosarcoma of foot is extremely rare. In this regard, Berlin (1984) noted malignant tumours in less than 1% of the 67,000 ft lesions that he reviewed [1]. It is associated with clinical features not typical of conventional osteosarcoma. Resection and salvaging foot is technically challenging. Given its ability to provide immediate structural support and vascularity free vascularised fibular graft has become attractive reconstructive option. Indication for free vascularised fibular graft is segmental bony defects of greater than 6 to 8 cm, such seen in post-traumatic, tumour resection and post-infectious bone loss [2].

Case report

Twenty-nine-year-old female with no known comorbidities, Eastern cooperative oncology group(ECOG) score 1 came with chief complaint of foot swelling for 6 months. Patient has history of trauma later which she noted swelling. Initially evaluated at local hospital and was later referred to Dr. B. Borooah cancer institute. On examination there was around 5 × 6 cm swelling on dorsum or right foot at first metatarsal area. Blood work up was with in normal limits except for serum alkaline phosphatase (206 u/l). X-ray right food was suggestive of expansile, lytic, destructive lesion of first metatarsal. Magnetic resonance imaging of lower limb was suggestive of approximately 5 × 3 cm lobulated T2 hyperintense lesion involving the first metatarsal shaft proximally, with cortical destruction with sparing of distal metatarsal. 99mTc-methylene diphosphate (MDP) whole body scan was suggestive of increased osteoblastic activity in first right metatarsal with uptake nowhere else. Contrast-enhanced computerised tomography of chest and abdomen was normal. Core biopsy was suggestive of low-grade osteosarcoma. Doppler of bilateral lower limbs was with in normal limits (Figs. 1 and 2).
Fig. 1

X-ray image of tumour

Fig. 2

MRI image of tumour

X-ray image of tumour MRI image of tumour Patient was taken for upfront surgery, resection of tumour-bearing first metatarsal, and reconstruction with vascularised fibular graft was done.

Technique of Reconstruction

Wide excision of metatarsal tumour with surrounding soft tissue done (Fig. 3) Intra-op picture Osteotomy done through body of first cuneiform bone and distal to base of proximal phalanx. Entire metatarsal bone-bearing tumour and two joints proximal and distal removed. Vascularised fibular graft taken from opposite leg (Fig. 4) Marking for fibular graft Fibular graft interposed in this gap, fixed with external fixator with well-maintained arch (Figs. 5 and 6). Reconstruction image showing well maintained arch Post-op X-ray Microvascular anastomosis of fibular graft done, anastomosis of peroneal artery was done with dorsalis pedis artery.

Discussion

Osteosarcoma is one of the most common primary malignancy of bone. It is extremely rare in foot with calcaneum being most commonly involved. A review of cases at the Mayo Clinic showed that mean age was one decade older than conventional osteosarcoma and was more common in females. One explanation for older age of presentation was that osteosarcomas of small tubular bones arise secondarily to another process [3]. Vascularised bone grafts, by definition, are placed with their vascularity intact, and thus are immediately viable. Bone graft and bone graft substitutes have a number of inherent properties which allow them to initiate, stimulate, and facilitate bony healing [4, 5]. Biomechanically the fibula bears only 15% of the axial load across the ankle, allowing for its use as an autogenous bone graft with minimal biomechanical consequences on the weight bearing status of lower limb [6]. The endosteal blood supply to fibula is provided by a nutrient artery which typically enters the posterior fibular cortex at the junction of proximal one third and distal two thirds. This nutrient artery is a branch of peroneal artery. Fibula also receives additional vascularity from musculo-periosteal vessels which also emanate from peroneal artery [7]. Give the length of fibular diaphysis that may be harvested, free fibular grafts are well suited for the reconstruction of segmental defects of long bones, providing both mechanical strength and biological stimulus for healing. Based upon the fasciocutaneous arterial branches of peroneal artery, skin, fascia, and muscle may be harvested concomitantly with fibula to allow for more complex reconstruction. Apart from its advantages vascularised free fibular grafting is technically challenging. Donor site morbidity is seen in 10% of patients. Patients may also subsequently develop ankle pain, instability, and valgus deformity [8]. Preoperative planning should begin with exclusion of patients with peripheral vascular disease and deep venous thrombosis. Around 8% of population have hypoplasia or the absence of one or both of anterior and posterior tibial arteries, a condition called peronea arteria magna [9]. Absence of vessels at donor and recipient site is contraindication for this technique. With current multidisciplinary approach for osteosarcoma limb salvage has become standard of care. Reconstruction with FVFGs are technically challenging but these have a very high bony union rates and can improve regional circulation, particularly when surrounding tissues have been damaged by chemotherapy and irradiation [10].

Conclusion

Vascularised free fibular grafting though technically challenging that to its complex reconstruction in foot has shown better results and should be used whenever its feasible. It provides immediate structural support and vascularity. Careful case selection and proper surgical technique results in better outcomes.
  19 in total

1.  Vasculature of the peroneal artery: an anatomic study focused on the perforator vessels.

Authors:  Christoph Heitmann; Fahar N Khan; L Scott Levin
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 2.  The biology of bone grafting.

Authors:  Safdar N Khan; Frank P Cammisa; Harvinder S Sandhu; Ashish D Diwan; Federico P Girardi; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Vincent X Liu; Theodore J Iwashyna; Frank M Brunkhorst; Thomas D Rea; André Scherag; Gordon Rubenfeld; Jeremy M Kahn; Manu Shankar-Hari; Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Gabriel J Escobar; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  J L Vincent; R Moreno; J Takala; S Willatts; A De Mendonça; H Bruining; C K Reinhart; P M Suter; L G Thijs
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Vascularized fibular epiphyseal transfer. A clinical study.

Authors:  T M Tsai; L Ludwig; M Tonkin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Osteosarcoma of the foot: a review of 52 patients at the Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  P F Choong; A A Qureshi; F H Sim; K K Unni
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-08

7.  Surgical Apgar Score and prediction of morbidity in women undergoing hysterectomy for malignancy.

Authors:  Rachel M Clark; Malinda S Lee; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Tracilyn Hall; David M Boruta; Marcela G del Carmen; Annekathryn Goodman; John O Schorge; Whitfield B Growdon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  "Surgical Apgar Score" predicts postoperative complications after cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Israel Zighelboim; Nora Kizer; Nicholas P Taylor; Ashley S Case; Feng Gao; Premal H Thaker; Janet S Rader; L Stewart Massad; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01

10.  Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score.

Authors:  Seon Hee Park; Jung-Yun Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of Intelligent Medical Management Platform Combined with Perioperative Detailed Nursing on Cognitive Ability, Postoperative Complications, and Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Xiaodao Han; Meng Zhang; Shanshan Jiang; Chunni Hao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 2.  The International Collaboration for Research methods Development in Oncology (CReDO) workshops: shaping the future of global oncology research.

Authors:  Priya Ranganathan; Girish Chinnaswamy; Manju Sengar; Durga Gadgil; Shivakumar Thiagarajan; Balram Bhargava; Christopher M Booth; Marc Buyse; Sanjiv Chopra; Chris Frampton; Satish Gopal; Nick Grant; Mark Krailo; Ruth Langley; Prashant Mathur; Xavier Paoletti; Mahesh Parmar; Arnie Purushotham; Douglas Pyle; Preetha Rajaraman; Martin R Stockler; Richard Sullivan; Soumya Swaminathan; Ian Tannock; Edward Trimble; Rajendra A Badwe; C S Pramesh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 54.433

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.