Lúcia Moreira-Teixeira1, Olivier Tabone1, Christine M Graham1, Akul Singhania1, Evangelos Stavropoulos1, Paul S Redford1,2, Probir Chakravarty3, Simon L Priestnall4,5, Alejandro Suarez-Bonnet4,5, Eleanor Herbert4,5, Katrin D Mayer-Barber6, Alan Sher7, Kaori L Fonseca8,9,10,11, Jeremy Sousa8,9,10, Baltazar Cá8,9,10,11, Raman Verma12, Pranabashis Haldar12, Margarida Saraiva8,9, Anne O'Garra13,14. 1. Laboratory of Immunoregulation and Infection, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. 2. GSK R&D, Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, UK. 3. Bioinformatics Core, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. 4. Department of Pathobiology & Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK. 5. Experimental Histopathology Team, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. 6. Inflammation and Innate Immunity Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 7. Immunobiology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 8. i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. 9. IBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. 10. ICBAS - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. 11. Programa de Pós-Graduação Ciência para o Desenvolvimento (PGCD), Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (IGC), Oeiras, Portugal. 12. Department of Respiratory Sciences, National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. 13. Laboratory of Immunoregulation and Infection, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. Anne.OGarra@crick.ac.uk. 14. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. Anne.OGarra@crick.ac.uk.
Abstract
Although mouse infection models have been extensively used to study the host response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, their validity in revealing determinants of human tuberculosis (TB) resistance and disease progression has been heavily debated. Here, we show that the modular transcriptional signature in the blood of susceptible mice infected with a clinical isolate of M. tuberculosis resembles that of active human TB disease, with dominance of a type I interferon response and neutrophil activation and recruitment, together with a loss in B lymphocyte, natural killer and T cell effector responses. In addition, resistant but not susceptible strains of mice show increased lung B cell, natural killer and T cell effector responses in the lung upon infection. Notably, the blood signature of active disease shared by mice and humans is also evident in latent TB progressors before diagnosis, suggesting that these responses both predict and contribute to the pathogenesis of progressive M. tuberculosis infection.
Although mouse infection models have been extensively used to study the host response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, their validity in revealing determinants of human tuberculosis (TB) resistance and disease progression has been heavily debated. Here, we show that the modular transcriptional signature in the blood of susceptible mice infected with a clinical isolate of M. tuberculosis resembles that of active human TB disease, with dominance of a type I interferon response and neutrophil activation and recruitment, together with a loss in B lymphocyte, natural killer and T cell effector responses. In addition, resistant but not susceptible strains of mice show increased lung B cell, natural killer and T cell effector responses in the lung upon infection. Notably, the blood signature of active disease shared by mice and humans is also evident in latent TB progressors before diagnosis, suggesting that these responses both predict and contribute to the pathogenesis of progressive M. tuberculosis infection.
Tuberculosis (TB) results in over 1.3 million deaths annually[1], yet most individuals infected with
M. tuberculosis remain asymptomatic. Latent TB infection (LTBI) is
defined by an interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-release assay (IGRA) specific for
M. tuberculosis antigens, although some patients may have
subclinical disease and may progress to active TB[2]. Protective immune responses against M.
tuberculosis include CD4+ T lymphocytes and the cytokines IL-12,
IFN-γ, TNF[3-6], and IL-1[7], but these factors do not explain why most individuals
control infection, whereas a subset go on to develop active TB. A blood transcriptional
signature in active TB patients has implicated type I IFN in TB pathogenesis[8-16]. Immunological heterogeneity in the blood transcriptome of a
cohort of recent TB contacts has been observed, with a small proportion of contacts
expressing a persistent blood TB signature and subsequently progressing to active
disease (LTBI-progressors)[16],
suggesting a host response evolving towards active disease[16].How the immune response in blood[8,15] reflects that
occurring at disease sites is poorly understood, and sampling the latter in humans is
prohibitive. The mouse TB model, owing to the richness of genetic and immunological
tools available, has been invaluable in defining immune responses in the lung
influencing disease outcome after infection[4,5,17]. However, a global systematic analysis to determine
potential common pathways of protection or pathogenesis in different TB mouse models and
human disease has not been reported. A role for type I IFN in TB pathogenesis[8-16] is supported by mouse TB models[6,18] with elevated
and sustained levels of type I IFN: (i) infection of particular genetic strains of mice
with clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis
[19-23]; (ii)
infection of hosts with genetic mutations in regulators of type I IFN such as
Tpl2[24]; IL-1[7] or ISG15[25]; (iii) administration of adjuvants, e.g.
Poly(I)C[7,26]; or (iv) viral co-infection[27]. Whether it is the genetic strain of mouse or the
M. tuberculosis pathogen itself which results in an immune response
that most resembles human TB is unclear. Although the spectra of human[28] and mouse[29] TB disease do not completely overlap, comparison of
human TB with genetically diverse backgrounds of mice has established points of
similarity in their response to M. tuberculosis. Some mouse strains
recapitulate key elements of the pathogenesis of human TB disease, at the level of
induction of necrotic TB lesions in the lungs[29]. Whether the global immune response to M.
tuberculosis in susceptible mouse strains resembles that of TB in humans is
as yet unclear.Here, we report that the human blood TB type I IFN-inducible signature[16,8] is recapitulated in susceptible C3HeB/FeJ mice infected with
different strains of M. tuberculosis. Increased expression of
granulocyte-associated genes in blood from active TB patients, TB-susceptible mice and
LTBI-progressors before TB diagnosis suggested their role in early disease pathogenesis.
Conversely, under-abundance of B, NK and effector T cell-signatures in blood from human
TB patients[16], LTBI-progressors and
TB-susceptible mice and yet over-abundance in lungs of M. tuberculosis
infected C57BL/6J resistant mice reinforced their role in early disease control. The
translationally relevant knowledge dataset presented here on potential pathways of
protection and pathogenesis in human TB are easily accessible using an online ShinyApp : https://ogarra.shinyapps.io/tbtranscriptome/
Results
The peak transcriptomic response in M. tuberculosis infected
mice
To determine if a mouse blood transcriptional TB signature resembles that
of human disease, we tested the human blood modular transcriptional TB
signature[16] on RNA-Seq
data from blood of different genetic inbred strains of mice, C57BL/6J
(resistant) and C3HeB/FeJ (susceptible), infected with low and high doses of the
M. tuberculosis laboratory strain H37Rv or clinical isolate
HN878[21,22] (Supplementary Fig.1a-c;
Fig. 1, Supplementary Tables
1-3). The
human blood TB signature[16] was
first tested on microarray data from blood of H37Rv infected BALB/c mice at
different time-points post-infection, to establish the peak transcriptomic
response, where immune signatures were barely detectable at days 14 and 21
post-infection, but most significant by day 138 (Supplementary Fig. 2a;
Supplementary Table
3). Analysis of blood microarray data from an independent
study[30], showed that
the blood signature in 129S2 and C57BL/6NCrl mice was again barely detectable at
day 14 post H37Rv infection, being observed robustly by day 21, which was the
end-point of that study[30]
(Supplementary Fig.
2a). Upon testing a lung disease modular signature[31] on microarray data from lungs
of H37Rv infected BALB/c mice, we detected a peak response at day 56
post-infection, only starting to be detected by 28 days post-infection (Supplementary Fig. 2b;
Supplementary Table
4). Based on these data we tested the human blood transcriptional TB
signature[16] and lung
disease modular signature[31],
on the blood and lungs, respectively, from C57BL/6J and C3HeB/FeJ mice infected
with HN878, at days 26 to 56 post-infection (Supplementary Fig. 3a and
b; Supplementary
Tables 3 and 4). The peak response chosen was ca. 42 days post-infection, which
best showed a robust signature in blood and lungs from HN878 infected C57BL/6J
and C3HeB/FeJ mice (Supplementary Fig. 3a and b; Supplementary Tables 3 and 4; tissues from HN878
infected susceptible mice were harvested after 33-35 days post infection due to
excessive pathology).
Figure 1
Human TB blood transcriptional signature is preserved in blood of TB
susceptible mice.
Blood modules of co-expressed genes derived using WGCNA from human TB datasets in
Singhania et al. 2018[18] are shown for blood RNA-seq datasets from TB patients
from London (n=21 biologically independent samples), South Africa (n=16
biologically independent samples) (both compared to London controls; n=12
biologically independent samples) and Leicester (n=53 biologically independent
samples) (compared to Leicester controls; n=50 biologically independent samples)
(Supplementary Table
2); human blood modules were tested in blood RNA-seq datasets
obtained from different genetic strains of mice (C57BL/6J, resistant; C3HeB/FeJ,
susceptible) infected with low and high doses of M.
tuberculosis laboratory strain H37Rv or the M.
tuberculosis clinical isolate HN878 (n=4 biologically independent
samples per group for H37Rv infection and n=5 biologically independent samples
per group for HN878 infection from one experiment per M.
tuberculosis infection as depicted in Supplementary Fig. 1a),
compared to their respective uninfected controls (Supplementary Table 3).
Fold enrichment scores derived using QuSAGE are depicted, with red and blue
indicating modules over- or under-abundant, compared to the controls. Colour
intensity of the dots represents the degree of perturbation, indicated by the
colour scale. Size of the dots represents the relative degree of perturbation,
with the largest dot representing the highest degree of perturbation within the
plot. Only modules with fold enrichment scores with FDR p-value
< 0.05 were considered significant and depicted here (left and middle
panels). Module name indicates biological processes associated with the genes
within the module (Supplementary Table 1). C’, complement. PRR, pathogen
recognition receptor. Cell-type associated with genes within each module were
identified using the mouse cell-type-specific signatures from Singhania
et al. 2019[41] (right panel). Cell-type enrichment was calculated using a
hypergeometric test, with only FDR p-value < 0.05 considered significant
and depicted here (right panel). Colour intensity represents significance of
enrichment..
Blood transcriptional TB signature in mouse and humans
Principal component analysis (PCA) at the peak response depicted distinct
global transcriptional signatures in blood of C57BL/6J (resistant) and C3HeB/FeJ
(susceptible) mice, infected with low and high doses of H37Rv or HN878, with the
largest distance from uninfected mice observed in HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice
(Supplementary Fig.
1c). The human blood modular transcriptional TB signature[16] was recapitulated in blood of
HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice, and high dose HN878 infected C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 1; for annotation see Supplementary Table 1;
for genes see Supplementary
Tables 2 and 3). Two over-abundant (red) IFN-inducible modules (HB12 and HB23) in
blood from TB patients[16],
showed a graded increase from the C57BL/6J to the C3HeB/FeJ mice infected with
low to high dose H37Rv, further increased in C57BL/6J then C3HeB/FeJ mice
infected with low to high dose HN878 (Fig.
1). Expression levels of IFN-inducible modules (HB12 and HB23), in
blood of HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice most closely resembled the profile in
human TB (Fig. 1). Likewise, other
over-abundant modules of human TB, including Inflammasome (HB3),
Innate/hemopoietic mediators (HB5), Innate immunity/PRR/C’ (HB8) and
Myeloid/C’/Adhesion (HB14) modules, were over-abundant in the HN878
infected C3HeB/FeJ mice, and to a lesser extent in high dose HN878 infected
C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 1). Under-abundance
(blue) of the human TB modules, T cell (HB4) and B cell (HB15)[16], was recapitulated in the
blood of HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig.
1). In keeping with this, cellular deconvolution analyses[31] of blood RNA-seq data from
M. tuberculosis infected mice showed a significant decrease
in the percentages of B cell and CD4+ T cell fractions (Supplementary Fig.
1d).Cell-types associated with each module were identified by comparing
cell-type specific gene signatures using the mouse RNA-Seq dataset from ImmGen
Ultra Low Input (ULI) (ImmGen Consortium - GSE109125; http://www.immgen.org) as described[31], analysed against the mouse gene orthologues
within each human blood TB module (Fig. 1,
right panel). The cell-type specific enrichment data validated the modular
annotation for the blood T cell (HB2, HB4) modules, with enrichment for
αβ- and γδ-T cells; the NK and T cell (HB21) module,
with enrichment for αβ- and γδ-T cells and innate
lymphocytes; and the B cell (HB15) module with enrichment for B cells (Fig. 1). This approach also led to the
discovery of previously unappreciated gene signatures, most strikingly, a
dominance of granulocyte-associated genes within the Inflammasome (HB3) and
Innate immunity/PRR/C’ (HB8) modules (Fig.
1). This set of granulocyte-associated genes was highly expressed in
blood from HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice and human TB cohorts (Table 1; Supplementary Table 3
Mouse; Supplementary Table
2 Human). Increased expression of granulocyte-associated genes in
blood of HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice was reinforced by data obtained from
cellular deconvolution analyses[31](Supplementary Fig. 1d).
Table 1
Granulocyte associated genes within the Inflammasome (HB3, left) and
the Innate immunity/PRR/C’ (HB8, right) modules that are over-expressed
in the blood of TB patient cohorts from London, South Africa and Leicester,
compared to healthy controls (58 out of 87, and 53 out of 92 Granulocyte
associated genes, respectively).
(HB3)
Inflammasome***
ABCA13
DMXL2
KIF1B
NTNG2
AIF1
EVI2A
LCN2
OSM
APOBR
FAS
LILRB5
PLA2G4A
ASPRV1
FCGR3B
LPCAT2
PPP1R3D
ATP8B4
FGL2
LTF
PRTN3
CAMP
GAS7
LY96
RNASEL
CASP4
GPR141
MARCKS
S100A6
CCR1
GSN
MCEMP1
SELL
CD177
HIST1H2BC
MCTP1
SIGLEC9
CD300A
HP
MEFV
SOCS3
CKAP4
IL18RAP
MILR1
TFEC
CLEC4A
IL1B
MMP8
TLR5
CLEC4D
IRAK3
NAIP
VCAN
CLEC4E
KCNJ2
NCF1
CLEC5A
KCTD12
NOD2
(HB8) Innate
immunity/PRR/C'***
ACSL1
FUT7
MXD1
REPS2
ALOX5AP
GAB2
MYBPC3
RNF19B
ANXA3
GLIPR2
NCF2
RRAGD
AQP9
HCAR2
P2RX1
S100A11
ARL11
HRH2
P2RY13
S100A8
BCL6
IFNGR2
PADI4
S100A9
BMX
IGSF6
PGLYRP1
SIPA1L2
BST1
ITGAM
PLBD1
SLC22A4
C1RL
JAML
PPP1R3B
STEAP4
C5AR1
LITAF
PTPRJ
TIMP2
CHST15
LRG1
PYGL
TLR2
CRISPLD2
LYN
RAB31
TLR6
ENTPD1
MMP9
RALB
FOSL2
MNDA
RBM47
Host and M. tuberculosis genetic differences drive lung TB
signatures
To determine the transcriptional response at the site of infection,
RNA-Seq data was obtained from the lungs of the same C57BL/6J and C3HeB/FeJ
inbred strains of mice infected with H37Rv or HN878, used for the blood data
from Fig. 1 (Supplementary Fig. 1a).
PCA depicted distinct global transcriptional signatures for uninfected mice and
the different strains of H37Rv or HN878 infected mice, with the largest distance
from uninfected controls observed in HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Supplementary Fig. 4).
The lung transcriptional response depicted a similar but more accentuated
difference between the infected and uninfected groups than in blood (Supplementary Fig. 1c and
Supplementary Fig. 4).A lung disease modular signature[31] was tested on the lung RNA-Seq data from the different
groups of infected mice, to identify co-expressed groups of genes across the
lung (Fig. 2). The type I IFN/Ifit/Oas (L5)
module was over-abundant in the lungs of H37Rv and HN878 infected C57BL/6J and
C3HeB/FeJ mice to similar levels, as shown by Eigengene expression (Fig. 2a and b). Six modules (L10 –
L15), dominated by an over-abundance of granulocyte, macrophage and myeloid
specific genes, including modules with Myeloid/Granulocyte (L10) and IL-17
pathway/Granulocytes (L11) function, showed the highest Eigengene expression in
the HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig. 2a and
c; ShinyApp; Supplementary Table 4). Similarly, the Inflammation/IL-1
signalling/Myeloid Cells (L12), Myeloid cells/Il1b/Tnf (L13) and Myeloid
cells/Other signalling (L14) modules were also over-abundant in mouse lungs upon
M. tuberculosis infection, particularly in the lungs of
susceptible HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig.
2; Supplementary
Table 4). Strikingly, an Immunoglobulin h/k module (L25) was
over-abundant in the lungs of the C57BL/6J but only minimally in C3HeB/FeJ mice
infected with low and high doses of H37Rv, and in the lungs of low dose HN878
infected C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 2a and d;
ShinyApp; Supplementary Table 4). However, this Immunoglobulin h/k (L25)
module was not changed in the lungs of high dose HN878 infected C57BL/6J mice or
C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig. 2a and d), correlating
with these mice showing greater TB susceptibility (Supplementary Fig. 1b).
This Immunoglobulin h/k (L25) module was also highly abundant in the lungs of
BALB/c mice infected with low dose H37Rv, in keeping with its relatively
resistant phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The Ifng/Gbp/Ag presentation/C’ (L7)
and Cytotoxic/T cells/ILC/Tbx21/Eomes/B cells (L35) modules were over-abundant
in the lung across both strains of H37Rv or HN878 infected mice (Fig. 2a and e; Supplementary Fig. 3b),
and H37Rv infected BALB/c mice (Supplementary Fig. 2b), but less abundant in lungs from
HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig. 2a;
Supplementary Fig.
3b), as shown quantitatively by Eigengene profiles (Fig. 2e).
Figure 2
Mouse lung disease modules tested in lungs from diverse mouse TB
models.
a, Mouse lung disease modules derived in Singhania et
al. 2019[41]
(L1-L38) tested in mouse lung TB samples from different genetic strains of mice
(C57BL/6J, resistant; C3HeB/FeJ, susceptible) infected with low and high doses
of M. tuberculosis laboratory strain H37Rv or the M.
tuberculosis clinical isolate HN878 (n=3 biologically independent
samples per group for low dose HN878 infection of C3HeB/FeJ, and n=5
biologically independent samples per group for all other groups as depicted in
Supplementary Fig.
1a), compared to their respective uninfected controls (Supplementary Table 4).
Red and blue indicate modules over- or under-abundant, compared to the controls.
Colour intensity of the dots represents the degree of perturbation, indicated by
the colour scale. Size of the dots represents the relative degree of
perturbation, with the largest dot representing the highest degree of
perturbation within the plot. Only modules with fold enrichment scores with FDR
p-value < 0.05 were considered significant and
depicted here. GCC, glucocorticoid; K-channel, potassium channel; TM,
transmembrane; Ubiq, ubiquitination. b-e, Box plots depicting the
module eigengene expression, i.e. the first principal component for all genes
within the module, are shown for uninfected (Uninf) and M.
tuberculosis infected (Low dose; High dose) C57Bl/6 and C3HeB/FeJ
mice, for modules (b) Type I IFN/Ifit/Oas (L5); (c)
IL-17 pathway/granulocytes (L11), Inflammation/IL-1 signaling/Myeloid cells
(L12), Myeloid cells/Il1b/Tnf (L13);
(d) Immunoglobulin h/k enriched (L25); (e)
Cytotoxic/T cells/ILC/Tbx21/Eomes/B cells (L35) and Ifng/Gbp/Antigen
presentation (L7).
Independent derivation and annotation yielded similar transcriptional
modules across all samples from uninfected and M. tuberculosis
infected mice, resulting in 27 modules ((ML1 – ML27), Supplementary Fig. 5;
Supplementary Tables
5 and 6).
The type I IFN/Stat2/Mx1 (ML2) and type I IFN signalling (ML21) modules were
similarly over-abundant in the lungs of H37Rv and HN878 infected C57BL/6J and
C3HeB/FeJ mice (Supplementary
Fig. 5a and b). Over-abundance of modules ML19 and ML27, enriched for
Granulocyte/Macrophage specific genes, showed highest Eigengene expression in
HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Supplementary Fig. 5a and c), confirmed by cell-type specific
enrichment analysis (Supplementary Fig. 5a). The Ifng/Gbp/Ag presentation/C’ (ML3)
and T cell/NK/ILC/APC/B cell (ML11) modules were over-abundant in lungs from
both strains of H37Rv or HN878 infected mice, although significantly less
abundant in HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice, as shown quantitatively by Eigengene
profiles (Supplementary Fig.
5a and d), and validated by cell-type specific enrichment for T
cells, DC, innate lymphocytes (ILC) and B cells (Supplementary Fig. 5a).
Thus, two complementary and independently derived modular tools revealed similar
transcriptional signatures in the lungs of M. tuberculosis
infected susceptible mice, indicating increased type I IFN and
granulocyte-associated responses and decreased IFN-γ, NK, T effector and
B cell responses (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig.
5).The over-abundance of inflammatory modules associated with granulocytes
observed using the two independent modular approaches is in keeping with the
more severe inflammation observed by H&E staining in the lungs of HN878
infected C3HeB/FeJ mice and high dose HN878 infected C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. 6).
This was accompanied by greater numbers of M. tuberculosis
bacteria observed in the lungs of these mice by ZN staining (multibacillary
infections, Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig.
6).
Figure 3
Histological analysis of mouse lungs from M. tuberculosis
infected mice.
Representative photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or
Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) stained lung sections from different genetic strains
of mice (C57BL/6J, resistant; C3HeB/FeJ, susceptible) infected with low and high
doses of M. tuberculosis laboratory strain H37Rv or the
M. tuberculosis clinical isolate HN878 (n=2 biologically
independent samples per group for H37Rv infection, HN878-infected C57BL/6J mice
low dose and HN878-infected C3HeB/FeJ mice high dose, and n=3 biologically
independent samples per group for HN878-infected C57BL/6J mice high dose and
HN878-infected C3HeB/FeJ mice low dose, from one experiment per M.
tuberculosis infection). From top to bottom, scale bar represents 2
mm, 200 μm and 100 μm for H&E staining, 20 μm for ZN
staining; arrows locate bacteria.
Degree of preservation of lung modules in human and mouse blood
It is unclear to what extent the airway transcriptional signature is
reflected in the blood during M. tuberculosis infection.
Certain immune responses across a range of experimental models of disease are
well preserved between lung and blood, some not preserved, and others only
discernible in blood with prior knowledge from the airway response[31]. To address this question in
TB, the mouse lung modular TB signature (Supplementary Fig. 5a) was tested on the RNA blood samples
from the different cohorts of human TB patients and from the different mouse TB
models (Supplementary Fig.
7a). The mouse lung modules showed significant preservation in human
and mouse blood as assessed by Zsummary scores, indicating the degree
of preservation, with scores >10 considered strongly preserved (Supplementary Fig. 7b and
c). Type I IFN associated modules (ML2 and ML21) (Supplementary Fig. 5a),
were over-abundant in human and mouse blood, being most over-abundant in HN878
infected susceptible mice (Supplementary Fig. 7a). The lung type I IFN/Stat2/Mx1 module (ML2)
was the most highly preserved module in human blood (Supplementary Fig. 7b)
and the second-most preserved module in mouse blood (Supplementary Fig. 7c)
and the type I IFN signalling module (ML21) stood out as the third-most
preserved module in both human and mouse blood (Supplementary Fig. 7b and
c). The lung Ifng/Gbp/Ag presentation/C’ module (ML3) was
weakly over-abundant in the blood of human TB patients and M.
tuberculosis infected mice (Supplementary Fig. 7a), albeit to a lesser extent, but
highly preserved in both human and mouse blood (Supplementary Fig. 7b and
c). The overall increased abundance of the Ifng/Gbp/Ag
presentation/C’ module (ML3) was largely attributable to over-expression
of genes such as GBP/Gbp genes and complement genes (Supplementary Fig. 7a;
Supplementary Tables
2 and 3, and
ShinyApp). However, the Ifng gene itself,
although upregulated in the blood of M. tuberculosis infected
resistant mice, was barely upregulated in the blood of HN878 infected
susceptible mice and IFNG was down-regulated in the blood from
TB patients (Supplementary
Tables 2 and 3, and ShinyApp). The lung Macrophage/Granulocyte modules (ML19 and
ML27) and Myeloid cell signalling module (ML10) were also over-abundant in blood
of active TB patients and most over-abundant in the blood of HN878 infected
susceptible mice (Supplementary Fig. 7a). While lung ML19 and ML10 modules were highly
preserved in both human and mouse blood, the ML27 module was only highly
preserved in mouse blood and to a much lesser extent in human (Supplementary Fig. 7b and
c). Lung modules associated with T, NK and B cells (ML11 and ML13)
were over-abundant in the lungs of all relatively resistantmice infected with
H37Rv, but to a lesser extent (ML11) or under-abundant (ML13) in HN878 infected
susceptible mouse lungs (Supplementary Fig. 5) and blood from all TB cohorts (Supplementary Fig. 7a),
ML11 being highly preserved in both human and mouse blood (Supplementary Fig. 7b and
c). These findings regarding the preservation of over or
under-abundant lung modules in the blood from human TB patients and TB
susceptible mouse models (Supplementary Fig. 7), are in keeping with the transcriptional
signatures observed on testing human blood TB modules on blood from humans and
mouse models of TB (Fig. 1).
Modular gene networks in human versus mouse TB
We further interrogated the changes in gene expression of the key
modules, HB3, HB15 and HB21, between the blood and lungs of resistant and
susceptible mice infected with the different strains of M.
tuberculosis, as compared to the human blood. To do so, we examined
the expression of top 50 “hub” genes with high intramodular
connectivity within the mouse data, on human blood from TB patients, and blood
and lungs from mice infected with M. tuberculosis (Fig. 4). In keeping with our current findings
that granulocyte specific genes are upregulated within the originally named
Inflammasome human blood TB module (HB3)[16], granulocyte-specific genes were amongst the 50
“hub” genes within that module (now
“Inflammasome/Granulocyte”) (Fig.
4). These granulocyte-specific genes include, Cd177, Elane,
Mmp8, Mpo, Ncf1, Camp, Lcn2, S100a6, Ltf (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 8a; ShinyApp), which have been associated with neutrophil
recruitment and activation[32],
were most highly differentially expressed in blood from TB patients and
M. tuberculosis infected susceptible mice. Expression of
these genes in mouse blood and lungs revealed a graded increase from the
C57BL/6J to the C3HeB/FeJ mice infected with low to high dose H37Rv, with a
further increase observed in C57BL/6J to the C3HeB/FeJ mice infected with low to
high dose HN878 (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 8a).
The 50 “hub” genes within Innate immunity/PRR/C’ module
(HB8) also showed enrichment for granulocyte-specific genes including
Mmp9, Alox5ap, Ncf2, Mxd1, S100a8 and
S100a9, also associated with neutrophil activation (Supplementary Fig. 8b),
and were most highly expressed in blood from human TB patients and blood and
lung from HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig.
4, Supplementary
Fig. 8b; ShinyApp). Increased expression of these neutrophil-specific
genes in the lungs of the TB susceptible HN878 infected mice was mirrored by the
increased numbers of neutrophils detected in the lungs of these mice by
immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5; Supplementary Fig. 6),
confirming the H&E data (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. 6).
Collectively these data support a major role for neutrophils in human TB
pathogenesis, similar to the previously reported role for neutrophils in TB
susceptible strains of mice[33-35].
Figure 4
Gene networks of specific TB modules in human blood from TB patients, and
blood and lung from M. tuberculosis infected mice.
Differential expression of genes from human blood modules
Inflammasome/Granulocytes (HB3), B cells (HB15) and NK & T cells (HB21)
depicting the top 50 “hub” network of genes with high intramodular
connectivity found within the mouse data (i.e., mouse genes most connected with
all other genes within the module), is shown for data from blood from TB
patients (Leicester cohort), and blood and lungs from mice infected with
M. tuberculosis, each against their respective controls. An
enlarged representative network showing human gene names is shown for human
blood (top) and an enlarged representative network showing mouse gene names is
shown for blood samples from C3HeB/FeJ mice infected with high dose of HN878
(bottom). Each gene is represented as a circular node with edges representing
correlation between the gene expression profiles of the two respective genes.
Colour of the node represents log2 foldchange of the gene for human blood TB
samples or mouse blood and lung samples from M. tuberculosis
infected mice compared to respective controls.
Figure 5
Histological analysis of mouse lungs from M. tuberculosis
infected mice for neutrophils, T and B cells.
Representative photomicrographs of lung sections from different genetic strains
of mice (C57Bl/6, resistant; C3HeB/FeJ, susceptible) infected with low and high
doses of M. tuberculosis laboratory strain H37Rv or the
M. tuberculosis clinical isolate HN878 (n=2 biologically
independent samples per group for H37Rv infection, HN878-infected C57BL/6J mice
low dose and HN878-infected C3HeB/FeJ mice high dose, and n=3 biologically
independent samples per group for HN878-infected C57BL/6J mice high dose and
HN878-infected C3HeB/FeJ mice low dose, from one experiment per M.
tuberculosis infection) depicting neutrophils (2B10, brown) by
immunohistochemistry or T (CD3 positive, red) and B (B220 positive, green) cells
by immunofluorescence (nuclear staining depicted in blue, DAPI). Scale bar
represents 100 μm (top) and 50 μm (bottom) for Neutrophils, 200
μm (top) and 100 μm (bottom) for T & B cells.
The 50 top “hub” genes within the human B cell module
(HB15), Cd19, Pax5, Spib, Cd79 and Cd22, were
down-regulated in the blood of human TB patients and M.
tuberculosis mice (Fig. 4;
Supplementary Fig.
8c; ShinyApp). Most of the B cell-specific top “hub”
genes were upregulated in the lungs of H37Rv infected mice, but strikingly
down-regulated in the lungs of high dose HN878 infected C57BL/6J and C3HeB/FeJ
mice (Fig. 4; Supplementary Fig. 8c;
ShinyApp). This difference in expression of B cell-specific
genes between the lungs of relatively TB resistant and susceptible mouse models,
was mirrored by differences in the numbers of B cells detected by B
cell-specific immunofluorescent staining of lungs from these mice (Fig. 5; Supplementary Fig. 6).
While vastly increased numbers of B cells were observed in the lungs of H37Rv
infected mice, with accompanying formation of B cell follicles, these were
practically absent in the lungs of C57BL/6J mice infected with high dose HN878
and HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig. 5;
Supplementary Fig.
6). These data support a possible role for B cells in protection
against M. tuberculosis infection, as has previously been
proposed[36,37].In keeping with the under-abundance of the human blood NK & T
cells module (HB21), the top 50 “hub” genes in this module were
down-regulated in the blood of patients with active TB (Fig. 4; Supplementary Fig. 8d), as previously reported[16]. Although upregulated in the
blood and lungs of H37Rv infected C57BL/6J and C3HeB/FeJ mice and HN878 infected
C57BL/6J mice, the majority of these 50 “hub” genes were
down-regulated in the blood and either minimally or not upregulated in the lungs
from HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig. 4;
Supplementary Fig.
8d). These included Tbx21, Gzma, Eomes, Cd8a, Nfatc2, Fasl,
Nkg7, Klrd1, Klrg1, Ifng and Runx3, reflecting
downregulation of effector T and NK cells in the blood of TB patients and HN878
infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig. 4; Supplementary Fig. 8d;
ShinyApp). Minimally altered gene expression was mirrored by a
decrease in CD3+ T cells in HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mouse lungs as
shown by immunofluorescence (Fig. 5; Supplementary Fig.6),
reflecting an absence of activated effector T cells required for protection
against M. tuberculosis infection[4-6].Heatmaps of the top 50 “hub” genes from the human blood TB
modules Interferon/PRR (HB12) and Interferon/C’/Myeloid (HB23)
demonstrated a large number of genes that were over-expressed in human blood
from London and Leicester TB cohorts and were similarly over-expressed in mouse
blood from HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Supplementary Fig. 9). In
contrast, many of these type I IFN-inducible genes in the HB12 module, including
Il1rn, Ifit1, Ifit2, Oas2 and Stat2, were
not upregulated, or upregulated to a lower extent, in the blood of H37Rv
infected C57BL/6J mice, as compared to HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Supplementary Fig. 9).
The majority of the top 50 “hub” genes from the Interferon/PRR
(HB12) and Interferon/C’/Myeloid (HB23) human modules were upregulated in
the lungs of all the M. tuberculosis infected mice, with the
highest expression observed in the lungs from HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice
(Supplementary Fig.
9).
Blood signatures reflect the extent of lung pathology in TB
Correlation between the whole blood TB signature and the extent of lung
radiographic burden of human disease has been reported[8]. A quantitative measure of the transcriptional
signature, determined using the molecular distance to health, showed a graded
increase in the signature across patients categorised with no disease to
minimal, moderate and advanced disease[8]. Here we show that the extent of the blood modular
signatures associated with type I IFN-inducible genes (HB12 and HB23), shown
quantitatively by Eigengene expression, positively correlated with the extent of
lung pathology assessed by the combined relative lesion burden and percentage of
tissue affected scores in the TB mouse models (Fig. 6a). The type I IFN-associated blood modular signature was
lowest in the more resistant mouse models of TB increasing with the different
levels of lung pathology, peaking in the HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig. 6a). Similarly, the level of the type I
IFN-associated blood modular signatures in human TB, here shown by Eigengene
expression, also positively correlated with the radiographic extent of lung
disease in patients with different degrees of disease (Fig. 6b). The neutrophil-associated (HB3 and HB8) blood
modular signatures, likewise, showed an increased Eigengene expression in the
blood of mice in the different TB models correlating with an increased lung
neutrophil score (Fig. 6c), and the most
severe lung lesions as assessed histopathologically (Fig. 6a). The neutrophil-associated modular blood signature
was highest in the HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice correlating with the highest
lung neutrophil score (Fig. 6c). Although
the neutrophil lung score was similarly high in the high dose HN878 infected
C57BL/6J mice, the blood neutrophil-associated modular signature remained low in
these mice (Fig. 6c). The blood
neutrophil-associated signature in human TB also positively correlated with the
radiographic extent of lung disease in TB patients (Fig. 6d), again supporting a role for neutrophils in TB
pathogenesis.
Figure 6
Quantitation of specific blood modular signatures against extent of lung
pathology in mouse models and human TB.
Box plots depicting the module Eigengene expression for human blood modules
Interferon/PRR (HB12) and Interferon/C’/Myeloid (HB23) (a,
b), Inflammasome/Granulocytes (HB3) and Innate
immunity/PRR/C’/ Granulocytes (HB8) (c, d), B
cells (HB15) and NK & T cells (HB21) (e, f),
are shown for mouse blood samples from uninfected (Uninf; n = 5 biologically
independent samples per group) and M. tuberculosis H37Rv or
HN878 infected (L, low dose; H, high dose) C57Bl/6 and C3HeB/FeJ mice (n=3
biologically independent samples per group for low dose HN878 infection of
C3HeB/FeJ, and n=5 biologically independent samples per group for all other
groups as depicted in Supplementary Fig. 1a) (a, c,
e); and for human blood samples from the London TB cohort
divided in Healthy Control (no X-ray; n=12 biologically independent samples) and
TB patients grouped according to the radiographic extent of disease as No
disease (n=21 biologically independent samples), Minimal (n=7 biologically
independent samples), Moderate (n = 6 biologically independent samples) or
Advanced (n=8, biologically independent samples, described in Berry et
al. 2010[9])
(b, d, f). Lung lesion global score
(a), neutrophil (c) and lymphocyte
(e) scores from H&E stained lung sections are also shown for
uninfected (Uninf, n=5 biologically independent samples per group) and
M. tuberculosis H37Rv or HN878 infected (L, low dose; H,
high dose) C57Bl/6 and C3HeB/FeJ mice (n=2 biologically independent samples per
group for H37Rv infection, HN878-infected C57BL/6J mice low dose and
HN878-infected C3HeB/FeJ mice high dose, and n=3 biologically independent
samples per group for HN878-infected C57BL/6J mice high dose and HN878-infected
C3HeB/FeJ mice low dose, from one experiment per M.
tuberculosis infection).
In contrast to the increased type I IFN and neutrophil-associated blood
modular signatures in TB, the blood B cell (HB15) and NK & T cell (HB21)
modular signatures showed a decrease in the blood of M.
tuberculosis infected mice showing advanced lung disease,
specifically the HN878 infected C3HeB/FeJ mice, and to a lesser extent the high
dose HN878 infected C57BL/6J mice (Fig.
6e). This decreased blood signature in advanced disease correlated with a
decrease in the lung lymphocyte score, which in the more resistant mice had
increased upon infection (Fig. 6e). In
human TB, these blood B cell (HB15) and NK & T cell (HB21) modular
signatures showed a similar decrease in the blood, inversely correlating with
the extent of lung radiographic disease (Fig.
6f).
Modular blood signatures in LTBI-progressors
We next set out to determine whether the type I IFN (HB12, HB23),
neutrophil (HB3, HB8), B cell (HB15) and NK & T cell (HB21) associated
modular signatures, determined in human active TB and susceptible mouse models
of TB, could be detected during early M. tuberculosis infection
of humans. To this end, we analysed our RNA-Seq data from the blood of recent
contacts of active TB patients who were subsequently shown to progress to active
TB (LTBI-progressors), active TB patients and healthy controls
(IGRA-ve and IGRA+ve contacts who did not progress to
TB)[16] (Fig. 7).
Figure 7
Quantitation of specific blood modular signatures in blood of healthy
controls, LTBI, LTBI-progressors and active TB patients.
Box plots depicting the module Eigengene expression for human blood modules
Interferon/PRR (HB12) and Interferon/C’/Myeloid (HB23) (a),
Inflammasome/Granulocytes (HB3) and Innate immunity/PRR/C’/ Granulocytes
(HB8) (b), B cells (HB15) and NK & T cells (HB21)
(c), are shown for human blood samples from the Leicester TB
cohort divided in Control (IGRA-ve TB contacts who remained healthy;
n=50 biologically independent samples), LTBI (IGRA+ve TB contacts who
remained healthy; n=49 biologically independent samples), LTBI_Progressor (TB
contacts who developed TB, time point just before the contact was diagnosed with
active TB; n=6 biologically independent samples) and Active_TB (patients with
active disease; n=53 biologically independent samples) (left panels) or divided
in Control – LTBI (IGRA-ve and IGRA+ve TB contacts
who remained healthy) or TB patients grouped according to the radiographic
extent of disease as Minimal, Moderate and Advanced (right panels; Supplementary Table
7).
The Interferon/PRR (HB12) and Interferon/C’/Myeloid (HB23) blood
modular signatures, shown quantitatively by Eigengene expression, were increased
in the blood of LTBI-progressors to the same level as in active TB patients, as
compared to healthy controls (Fig. 7a). As
shown for the London cohort (Fig. 6b), the
type I IFN-associated modular signatures also correlated with the radiographic
extent of lung disease in this independent cohort (Fig. 7a). Type I IFN-inducible genes in these modular signatures
included STAT1, STAT2, IRF9, OAS1, OASL, IFITM1, ISG15 and
IL1RN which were expressed at same level in the blood of
LTBI-progressors and active TB patients (Fig.
8a; ShinyApp). Again, the degree of expression of these individual
genes positively correlated with the extent of radiographic signs of disease,
being already increased in the blood of patients with minimal disease (Fig. 8a). We also observed increased
expression of these type I IFN-inducible genes (Fig. 8a) in an independent cohort of LTBI-progressors, as compared
to individuals with LTBI who remained healthy[38].
Figure 8
Quantitation of IFN, neutrophil and lymphocyte-specific gene expression in
blood of healthy controls, LTBI, LTBI-progressors and active TB
patients.
Box plots depicting the log2 expression values of selected genes from
type I IFN-associated modules HB12 and HB23 (a),
neutrophil-associated modules HB3 and HB8 (b) and NK & T
cell module HB21 (c) are shown for human blood samples from the
Leicester TB cohort divided in Control (IGRA-ve TB contacts who
remained healthy; n=50 biologically independent samples), LTBI
(IGRA+ve TB contacts who remained healthy; n=49 biologically
independent samples), LTBI_Progressor (TB contacts who developed TB, time point
just before the contact was diagnosed with active TB; n=6 biologically
independent samples) and Active_TB (patients with active disease; n=53
biologically independent samples) (left panels) or divided in Control –
LTBI (IGRA-ve and IGRA+ve TB contacts who remained
healthy) and TB patients grouped according to the radiographic extent of disease
as Minimal, Moderate and Advanced (right panels; Supplementary Table 7).
Box plots are also shown for human blood samples of LTBI (non-progressors; n=217
biologically independent samples) and LTBI_Progressor (individuals who developed
TB, time point 1 to 180 days before diagnosis; n=17 biologically independent
samples) from an independent cohort (GSE79362, Zak et al.
2016[19]) (middle
panels).
Strikingly, expression of the neutrophil-associated (HB3 and HB8)
modular signatures was also increased to high levels in the blood of
LTBI-progressors, to the same level as seen in blood of active TB patients, as
compared to healthy controls (Fig. 7b). The
extent of these neutrophil associated blood signatures positively correlated
with the radiographic signs of lung disease (Fig.
7b). Confirming the contribution of genes associated with neutrophil
activation and recruitment, CD177, NCF1, NCF2, LRG1, MMP9, S100A8,
S100A9 and ALOX5AP were upregulated in the blood
of LTBI-progressors from both cohorts, as compared to controls to a similar
level as in the blood of active TB patients, their level of expression
correlating with increased signs of radiographic lung disease (Fig. 8b). The increased expression of genes
associated with neutrophil activation and recruitment in the blood of TB
patients with minimal radiographic signs of disease and LTBI-progressors (Fig. 8b) points to an unappreciated role for
neutrophils in early disease.The expression of the B cell (HB15) and NK & T cell (HB21)
associated modular signatures was decreased in the blood of LTBI-progressors to
the same extent as in active TB (Fig. 7c),
as compared to controls, again correlating with increased radiographic signs of
disease (Fig. 7c). Expression of the NK
& T cell specific genes IFNG, EOMES, TBX21, GZMA, KLRD1,
NKG7, was similarly decreased in the blood of LTBI-progressors in
both cohorts, as compared to the healthy controls and in the blood of patients
with minimal signs of disease, although further decreased in those with advanced
signs of radiographic disease (Fig. 8c).
Since T cell and NK cell genes convey protection against M.
tuberculosis infection[4-6,39,40], their loss may contribute to progression to active
TB.Collectively our findings predict that a dominance of gene expression
associated with a type I IFN response and neutrophil activation and recruitment,
together with a loss of NK and T cell effector responses, early after infection
with M. tuberculosis, may contribute to progression to active
TB.
Discussion
Here we show that the IFN-inducible human blood TB transcriptional
signature[16] is
recapitulated in blood from M. tuberculosis HN878 infected TB
susceptible C3HeB/FeJ mice, whereas this signature is minimal in blood from
M. tuberculosis H37Rv infected resistant C57BL/6J mice.
Combining our modular signature data with cell-type specific signatures[31] we reveal an increase in
neutrophil-associated genes in the blood of TB susceptible mice and TB patients.
Genes associated with type I IFN responses and with neutrophil recruitment and
activation were increased in LTBI-progressors before diagnosis, suggesting an
unappreciated role for neutrophils in early disease. Decreased B, NK and T
cell-signatures of human active TB[8,16] were observed in the blood of
infected TB susceptible mice and LTBI-progressors, whilst upregulated upon infection
in the lungs of TB resistant mice, suggesting that their early loss contributes to
progression to active TB.Neutrophils are abundant in the lung lesions of M.
tuberculosis infected susceptible mice contributing to TB
pathogenesis[33,34] whereas lesions of infected
resistant mice contain only scattered neutrophils, instead dominated by lymphocytes
and macrophages[41]. M.
tuberculosis infected neutrophils have been detected within
inflammatory lung granulomas of patients with active TB[42,43]. We
herein reveal low levels of a neutrophil-associated signature in lungs of M.
tuberculosis infected C57BL/6J mice, which was maximally increased in
HN878 infected susceptible C3HeB/FeJ mice. This was validated by histological
analysis, although S100A9 neutrophil staining was lost due to the necrotic nature of
the lesions. This led to our discovery of increased expression of
neutrophil-associated genes within the over-abundant human TB blood modules,
originally annotated as “Inflammasome” and “Innate
immunity/PRR/C’”[16], which we now rename as
“Inflammasome/Granulocyte” and “Innate
immunity/PRR/C’/Granulocyte”. Previous studies showed no change by
flow cytometry in neutrophil numbers in the blood of active TB patients[8], suggesting that the over-abundance
of this granulocyte-associated signature of activation and recruitment may be
attributable to a subset of activated neutrophils which have circulated to the blood
from the lung. Whether these neutrophils are carriers of M.
tuberculosis to the blood in human TB, where the bacteria have been
recently shown to be detected in early disease[44], remains to be investigated. This granulocyte-associated
signature was also increased in blood from LTBI-progressors before diagnosis,
suggesting a previously unappreciated role for neutrophils in early progression to
disease.The type I IFN-associated signature widely reported in blood of active TB
patients[8-16] was also present in blood from
M. tuberculosis infected mice, with the highest levels observed
in the more susceptible models, correlating with more severe lung pathology. This
type I IFN-inducible signature resulted from the host genetic background and the
dose and strain of M. tuberculosis, possibly explaining differing
reports regarding the role of type I IFN in TB pathogenesis[18,20-22,24,45,46]. The enhanced
type I IFN-associated signature in the C3HeB/FeJ mice is in keeping with a recent
report that the B6.Sst1S congenic mice carrying the C3H “sensitive”
allele of the Sst1 locus that renders them highly susceptible to M.
tuberculosis infections[47], exhibit markedly increased type I IFN signalling which
contributes to their high TB susceptibility via induction of the IL-1 receptor
antagonist (IL-1Ra)[48]. We show
that the Il1rn gene expression is increased in mouse blood and lung
upon infection, correlating with increasing susceptibility to TB in C3HeB/FeJ mice
infected with HN878, a M. tuberculosis strain reported to enhance
type I IFN induction and TB pathogenesis[21,22]. The
IL1RN gene was highly expressed in blood from TB patients, but
also in the LTBI-progressors, along with other type I IFN-inducible genes such as
OAS1, IFITM1 and ISG15, suggesting that type I
IFN-inducible genes may contribute to early TB pathogenesis. Genes of the complement
cascade were also upregulated in the blood from LTBI-progressors, in keeping with
previous reports[15,49].Upregulation of both type I and II IFN have been reported before diagnosis
of TB patients[15]. However, we
herein report that in TB patients the IFNG gene itself is
down-regulated in the blood, alongside a number of key molecules, including
TBX21, EOMES, GZMA, GZMB, NKG7 and KLRD1, suggesting a loss of
the protective effector function of T and NK cells[5,6,39,40]. This decrease was also observed in LTBI-progressors,
suggesting that decreased expression of IFNG and other genes
associated with effector and cytotoxic functions early after M.
tuberculosis infection may contribute to disease progression. This
supports reports that IFN-γ, cytotoxic effector molecules and NK cells are
important for protection against M. tuberculosis infection in both
mouse models and human disease[5,6,39,40]. In keeping with
this, genes associated with effector and cytotoxic NK and T cell responses
(Nkg7, Klrd1, Gzma, Gzmb, Tbx21) as well as
Ifng were upregulated in the blood and lungs of M.
tuberculosis infected TB resistant C57BL/6J mice but drastically
reduced in the blood and lungs from HN878 infected susceptible C3HeB/FeJ mice,
similarly to in blood from LTBI-progressors and active TB patients. Decreased
IFNG expression in the blood of TB patients and
Ifng expression in the blood and lungs of susceptible mice
parallels the increase in neutrophils, supporting previous reports that IFN-γ
regulates neutrophil function[35]
thus limiting lung inflammation and TB exacerbation.Our findings of a decrease in the B cell-associated modular expression in
the blood of M. tuberculosis infected susceptible mice are in
keeping with reports on the reduction in abundance of total B cells in human
TB[8,40] largely driven by a reduction in circulating naive
B cells[40]. This under-abundance of
the B cell-associated module was also observed in blood from LTBI-progressors,
although maximal in TB patients and susceptible mice with advanced signs of lung
disease. Reduction in peripheral B cells could be due to preferential sequestration
of these cells at the site of infection or diminished output of B cells from the
bone marrow[36,37]. Our data support a combination of both, depending
on the extent of the disease. The top 50 interacting “hub” genes in
the B cell-associated module showed increased expression in the lungs from
M. tuberculosis infected resistant mice, but were decreased in
lungs from HN878 infected susceptible mice, as verified by histopathology. B cells
at the site of infection could be contributing to control of M.
tuberculosis infection in the resistant mice as has been
proposed[36,37].Using a combination of mouse TB models and human TB cohorts we provide data
to suggest that dominance of a type I IFN response and neutrophil activation and
recruitment, together with a loss of B cell, NK and T cell effector responses may
contribute to the pathogenesis of progressive M. tuberculosis
infection. Mouse models of TB have been employed for decades as tools for
elucidating mechanisms of host resistance and pathogenesis. While failing to
recapitulate many of the features of clinical TB and in several cases protective
vaccine responses, they have been remarkably useful in identifying both effector and
regulatory responses that have emerged to be important in human infection and
disease. The data reported here comparing the host transcriptomic responses of
M. tuberculosis infected mice and humans offer further
compelling characterization and validation of the mouse model for further
mechanistic studies and suggest a peripheral signature associated with progression
to clinical disease in TB.
Methods
Experimental animals and ethics
C57BL/6J and C3HeB/FeJ mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories
(Bar Harbour, ME) and housed under barrier conditions in the Animal Biosafety
Level 3 (ABSL3) facility at i3S, Porto, Portugal. Experiments were performed in
accordance with recommendations of the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU and
approved by Portuguese National Authority for Animal Health –
Direção Geral de Alimentação e
Veterinária. (DGAV-Ref.0421/000/000/2016). Mice were kept
with food and water ad libitum and humanely euthanized by CO2
asphyxiation. Every effort was made to minimize suffering. Age matched females
were used in experiments.
Mouse models of TB
M. tuberculosis experiments were performed under ABSL-3
conditions. M. tuberculosis H37Rv (laboratory strain) and HN878
(clinical isolate) were grown to midlog phase in Middlebrook 7H9 broth
supplemented with 10% oleic acid albumin dextrose complex (Difco), 0.05% Tween
80, and 0.5% glycerol before being quantified on 7H11 agar plates and stored in
aliquots at −80°C. Aliquots frozen at −80°C were
then thawed (6 aliquots) and quantified, to determine the concentration of the
stored inocula. Mice were infected via the aerosol route using an inhalation
exposure system (Glas-Col), calibrated to deliver from ∼100 to 1000 CFUs
to the lung. The infection dose was confirmed by determining the number of
viable bacteria in the lungs of five mice 3 days after the aerosol infection
(low dose: ~100-450 CFUs/lung; high dose: ~700-900 CFUs/lung).
Infected mice were monitored regularly for signs of illness such as wasting,
piloerection and hunching. Mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation and
blood and lung samples from each group were collected from individual mice for
RNA isolation, post M. tuberculosis infection at the known peak
of the blood transcriptomic response, or in the specific case of the susceptible
C3HeB/FeJ mice infected with HN878, when they showed signs of severe illness
(Supplementary Fig.
1a). Blood and lung samples from age matched uninfected mice were
collected at the same time and used as controls. Lung samples from additional
infected mice were collected for bacterial load determination (Supplementary Fig. 1b) or
histology (Figs. 3 and 5; Supplementary Fig. 6). Determination of lung bacterial load was
performed by plating serial dilution of the organ homogenate on Middlebrook 7H11
agar supplemented with 10% oleic acid albumin dextrose complex plus PANTA to
prevent contamination with other infections. CFUs were counted after 3 weeks of
incubation at 37°C, and the bacterial load per lung was calculated.
Histopathological analysis of lung samples
Lung tissues from M. tuberculosis infected mice were
perfused and fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin followed by 70% ethanol,
processed and embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 4 μm and stained with
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN). A single section from
each tissue was viewed and scored as a consensus by three board-certified
veterinary pathologists (S.L.P., E.H. and A.S.-B.) blinded to the groups (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Presence of M. tuberculosis bacilli detected by ZN positive
staining was scored as paucibacillary or multibacillary according to their
abundance in the tissue. A semi-quantitative scoring (0-4 points) method was
devised to assess the following histological features: inflammatory cells
(neutrophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages), necrosis, pleuritis and
fibrosis; using the following scale: 0 = not present, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 =
moderate, and 4 =marked changes. The relative lesion burden scoring (0-5 points)
was determined using the following scale: 0= no lesions, 1 = focal lesion, 2 =
multiple focal lesions, 3 = one or more focal severe lesions, 4 = multiple focal
lesions that are extensive and coalesce, and 5 = extensive lesions that occupy
the majority of the lung lobe. The percentage of tissue affected was also scored
and the lesion types graded as Type I, Type II and Type III as previously
described by Irwin et al.
[50]. Representative images of each group were acquired on
an Olympus BX43 microscope using an Olympus SC50 camera and cellSens Entry
software (Ver. 1.18).Lung lesion global score (Fig. 6a)
was calculated by combining the relative lesion burden and the percentage of
tissue affected, scored from H&E stained lung sections (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Neutrophil and lymphocyte scores for H&E stained lung sections (Supplementary Fig. 6)
were plotted in Fig. 6c and 6e,
respectively.
Microscopy for neutrophils, T and B cells
Lung sections from M. tuberculosis infected mice were
de-waxed and re-hydrated before staining. The neutrophil staining was performed
using the automated equipment Ventana Discovery ULTRA. Sections were treated
with Protease 1 at 37°C for 8 min for antigen retrieval, incubated with
primary antibody Rat anti-mouse 2B10 (in house clone 2B10) at 37°C for 48
min, followed by OmniMap anti-Rt HRP (RUO) at room temperature
(RT) for 12 min. For T and B cell staining, sections were microwaved for 23 min
(900W) with Citrate Buffer pH6 for antigen retrieval and then incubated with
primary antibodies Rabbit monoclonal anti-CD3G (clone ab134096, Abcam) and
biotin Rat anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (clone RA3-6B2, BD) for 1h at RT. Sections were
then incubated with donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) secondary antibody Alexa
Fluor™ 555 (A-31572, Invitrogen) and Streptavidin, Alexa Fluor™
488 conjugate (s32354, Invitrogen) for 45 min at RT, followed by DAPI for 15 min
at RT and Sudan Black for 20 min at RT. Stained sections were mounted with
Tissue-Tek® Glass™ Pertex, examined and scored by two
board-certified veterinary pathologists (S.L.P. and A.S.-B). Neutrophils were
assessed semi-quantitatively (based on intensity of labelling) as follows: 0 =
none present, 1 = low numbers, 2 = moderate numbers and 3 = high numbers.
Neutrophil viability was scored as viable (which label with IHC) or necrotic by
assessing which subset dominated the stained tissue. Representative images of
each group were acquired an Olympus BX43 microscope using an Olympus SC50 camera
and cellSens Entry software (Ver. 1.18).For T and B cell quantification, slides were scanned using the objective
magnification of 20x on an Olympus VS120-L100 Slide Scanner. T and B cells were
assessed semi-quantitatively (based on positive labelling) as follows: 0 = none
present, 1 = very low numbers, 2 = low to moderate numbers, 3 = moderate to high
numbers and 4 = very high numbers. The T/B cell ratio (%/%) and presence of
follicles with germinal centres were also scored for each slide.
RNA isolation
Blood was collected in Tempus reagent (Life Technologies) at 1:2 ratio.
Total RNA was extracted using the PerfectPure RNA Blood Kit (5 PRIME). Globin
RNA was depleted from total RNA (1.5–2 μg) using the Mouse
GLOBINclear kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Lungs were collected in TRI-Reagent
(Sigma-Aldrich). Total RNA was extracted using the RiboPure™ Kit
(Ambion). All RNA was stored at −80 °C until use.
Quantity and quality of RNA samples
Quantity was verified using NanoDrop™ 1000/8000
spectrophotometers (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quality and integrity of the
total and the globin-reduced RNA were assessed with the HT RNA Assay Reagent kit
(Perkin Elmer) using a LabChip GX bioanalyser (Caliper Life Sciences/Perkin
Elmer) and assigned an RNA Quality Score (RQS) or RNA 6000 Pico kit (Agilent)
using a BioAnalyzer 2100 (Agilent) and assigned an RNA Integrity (RIN) score.
RNA with an RQS/RIN >6 was used to prepare samples for microarray or
RNA-seq.
Microarray
cRNA was prepared from 200 ng globin-reduced blood RNA or 200 ng tissue
total RNA using the Illumina TotalPrep RNA Amplification Kit (Ambion). Quality
was checked using an RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent) using a BioAnalyzer 2100
(Agilent). Biotinylated cRNA samples were randomized; 1.5 μg cRNA was
then hybridized to Mouse WG-6 v2.0 bead chips (Illumina) according to the
manufacturer’s protocols.
RNA-Seq
cDNA library preparation: for blood and tissues, total/globin-reduced
RNA (200 ng) was used to prepare cDNA libraries using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA
HT Library Preparation Kit (Illumina). For cDNA library preparation of FACS
sorted cells, total RNA (30–500 pg) was used to prepare cDNA libraries
using the NEBNext® Single Cell/Low Input RNA Library Prep Kit
NEBNext® Multiplex Oligos for Illumina® #E6609 (New England
BioLabs). Quality and integrity of the tagged libraries were initially assessed
with the HT DNA HiSens Reagent kit (Perkin Elmer) using a LabChip GX bioanalyser
(Caliper Life Sciences/Perkin Elmer). Tagged libraries were then sized and
quantitated in duplicate (Agilent TapeStation system) using D1000 ScreenTape and
reagents (Agilent). Libraries were normalized, pooled and then clustered using
the HiSeq® 3000/4000 PE Cluster Kit (Illumina). The libraries were imaged
and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencer using the HiSeq®
3000/4000 SBS kit (Illumina) at a minimum of 25 million paired-end reads (75
bp/100 bp) per sample.
Microarray data analysis
Microarray data was processed in GeneSpring GX v14.8 (Agilent
Technologies). Flags were used to filter out the probe sets that did not result
in a “present” call in at least 10% of the samples, with the
“present” lower cut-off of 0.99. Signal values were then
normalized using neqc function with default parameters from limma package (v
3.38.3) in R. This function performs background correction, quantile
normalization and log2 transformation of intensity signals. For modular fold
enrichment analysis, Illumina IDs were converted to Ensembl IDs using both the
annotation file available from Illumina and biomaRt package (2.38.0) in R. Next,
transcripts were filtered to select the 50% most variable probes across all
samples.
RNA-Seq data analysis
Raw paired-end RNA-seq data was subjected to quality control using
FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics) and MultiQC[51]. Trimmomatic[52] v0.36 was used to remove the adapters and filter raw
reads below 36 bases long, and leading and trailing bases below quality 25. The
filtered reads were aligned to the Mus musculus genome Ensembl
GRCm38 (release 86) using HISAT2[53] v2.0.4 with default settings and RF rna-strandedness,
including unpaired reads, resulting from Trimmomatic, using option -U. The
mapped and aligned reads were quantified to obtain the gene-level counts using
HtSeq[54] v0.6.1 with
default settings and reverse strandedness. Raw counts were processed using the
bioconductor package DESeq2[55]
v1.12.4 in R v3.3.1, and normalized using the DESeq method to remove the
library-specific artefacts. Variance stabilizing transformation was applied to
obtain normalized log2 gene expression values. Further quality
control was performed using principal component analysis, boxplots, histograms
and density plots. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using the Wald
test in DESeq2[55]. Genes with
log2 fold change >1 or <−1 and false
discovery rate (FDR) p-value < 0.05 corrected for
multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) method[56] were considered significant.
Log2 fold changes in mouse blood, mouse lung and human blood
datasets (Berry London, Berry South Africa and Leicester: GSE107995), using the
top 50 intra-modular genes within selected human blood modules, were represented
in heatmaps using the pheatmap package in R (Raivo Kolde (2019). pheatmap:
Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12.) (Fig.
4; Supplementary
Fig. 8 and 9). For lung module generation, and modular fold
enrichment, only protein coding genes were considered (Supplementary Fig. 5).
PCA plots were generated using prcomp function in R and plotted using ggplot2
package (H. Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.
Springer-Verlag New York, 2016.).
Cellular deconvolution
Deconvolution analysis for quantification of relative levels of distinct
cell types on a per sample basis was carried out on normalized counts using
CIBERSORT[57]. CIBERSORT
estimates the relative subsets of RNA transcripts using linear support vector
regression. Mouse cell signatures for 25 cell types were obtained using
ImmuCC[58] and grouped
into 9 representative cell types based on the application of ImmuCC cellular
deconvolution analysis to the sorted cell RNA-seq samples from the ImmGen ULI
RNA-seq dataset (ImmGen Consortium: GSE109125; http://www.immgen.org) as
previously described[31,59,60] (Supplementary Fig. 1d).
Module generation
Human blood modules were previously determined in human TB[16]. Weighted gene co-expression
network analysis was performed to identify lung modules using the package
WGCNA[61] in R. Modules
were across all control and infected samples, using log2 RNA-seq
expression values. The lung modules were constructed using the 10,000 most
variable genes across all lung samples. A signed weighted correlation matrix
containing pairwise Pearson correlations between all the genes across all the
samples was computed using a soft threshold of β = 22 to
reach a scale-free topology. Using this adjacency matrix, the topological
overlap measure (TOM) was calculated, which measures the network
interconnectedness[62]
and is used as input to group highly correlated genes together using average
linkage hierarchical clustering. The WGCNA dynamic hybrid tree-cut
algorithm[63] was used
to detect the network modules of co-expressed genes with a minimum module size
of 20, and deep split = 1. Lung modules were numbered ML1–ML27, and human
blood modules previously found in human TB[16] were numbered HB1-HB23. An additional
“grey” module was identified in lung modules (Supplementary Table 6,
module titled NA), consisting of genes that were not co-expressed with any other
genes. These grey modules were not considered in any further analysis. To create
gene interaction networks, hub genes with the highest intramodular connectivity
and a minimum correlation of 0.75 were calculated, with a cut-off of 50 hub
genes, and exported into Cytoscape v3.4.0 for visualization.For checking either human blood modules into mouse data or mouse lung
modules into human data, human Ensembl gene ID were translated into Mouse gene
ID using BioMart to extract mouse ortholog genes (Supplementary Table
8).
Modular annotation
Lung modules were enriched for biological pathways and processed using
IPA (QIAGEN Bioinformatics), Metacore (Thomson Reuters), and a careful manual
annotation, by checking cell-type-specific enrichment and individual read
counts. Significantly enriched canonical pathways, and upstream regulators were
obtained from IPA (top 5). Modules were assigned names based on representative
biological processes from pathways and processes from all three methods (Supplementary Table 5 and
6).
Module enrichment analysis
Fold enrichment for the WGCNA modules was calculated using the
quantitative set analysis for gene expression (QuSAGE)[64] using the bioconductor package qusage v2.4.0
in R, to identify the modules of genes over- or under-abundant in a dataset,
compared to the respective control group using log2 expression
values. The qusage function was used with n.points parameter set to 2[15]. Only modules with enrichment
scores with FDR p-value < 0.05 were considered
significant, and plotted using the ggcorrplot function in R. Eigengene profiles,
which are representative expression profiles for a given module in aparticular
dataset, have been generated using the moduleEigengenes function from the WGCNA
package and have plotted using ggplot2 package.
Cell-type-specific enrichment
Cell-type enrichment analysis to identify over-represented cell types in
blood and lung modules was performed as previously described[31] using a hypergeometric test,
using the phyper function in R. p-Values were corrected for
multiple testing using the p.adjust function in R, using the BH method, to
obtain FDR corrected p-values.
Method for use of online WebApp
An online web application: https://ogarra.shinyapps.io/tbtranscriptome/ accompanies the
manuscript to visualize the findings of the study. The app is subdivided into 4
distinct pages that can be accessed through the tabs displayed on the top of the
page, with a customized sidebar for user input on each page.Tab 1: “Expression Table” allows the user to
visualize read counts, either as raw counts or log2 normalized expression
values, in either the Mouse Blood TB, Mouse Lung TB, Human Blood TB (Leicester,
London or South Africa) datasets. Each row represents a different gene, each
column a sample in the corresponding dataset. The user can download the dataset
into spreadsheet file format.Tab 2: “Average expression Table” allows the
user to visualize the average read counts by group, either as raw counts or log2
normalized expression values, in either the Mouse Blood TB, Mouse Lung TB, Human
Blood TB (Leicester, London or South Africa) datasets. Each row represents a
different gene, each column a group in the corresponding dataset. The user can
download the dataset into spreadsheet file format.Tab 3: “Gene expression” allows the user to
visualize the expression of individual genes, either as raw or log2 normalized
expression values, in either the Mouse Blood TB, Mouse Lung TB, Human Blood TB
(Leicester, London or South Africa) datasets. Each dot represents the expression
value for the chosen gene, in one sample.Tab 4: “Module profiles” allows the user to
visualize the expression profile (EigenGene from WGCNA R package), of a module
he can select, either from Human Blood TB Modules (HB1-HB23)[16], Mouse Lung TB modules
(ML1–ML27) derived de novo in this study, or Mouse Lung
Disease modules (L1-L38)[31].
Each dot represents the EigenGene value for the chosen module, in one sample. A
table below the plot displays all genes present within that module.
Authors: Katrin D Mayer-Barber; Bruno B Andrade; Sandra D Oland; Eduardo P Amaral; Daniel L Barber; Jacqueline Gonzales; Steven C Derrick; Ruiru Shi; Nathella Pavan Kumar; Wang Wei; Xing Yuan; Guolong Zhang; Ying Cai; Subash Babu; Marta Catalfamo; Andres M Salazar; Laura E Via; Clifton E Barry; Alan Sher Journal: Nature Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Matthew P R Berry; Christine M Graham; Finlay W McNab; Zhaohui Xu; Susannah A A Bloch; Tolu Oni; Katalin A Wilkinson; Romain Banchereau; Jason Skinner; Robert J Wilkinson; Charles Quinn; Derek Blankenship; Ranju Dhawan; John J Cush; Asuncion Mejias; Octavio Ramilo; Onn M Kon; Virginia Pascual; Jacques Banchereau; Damien Chaussabel; Anne O'Garra Journal: Nature Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Simon Blankley; Christine M Graham; Jacob Turner; Matthew P R Berry; Chloe I Bloom; Zhaohui Xu; Virginia Pascual; Jacques Banchereau; Damien Chaussabel; Ronan Breen; George Santis; Derek M Blankenship; Marc Lipman; Anne O'Garra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anne O'Garra; Paul S Redford; Finlay W McNab; Chloe I Bloom; Robert J Wilkinson; Matthew P R Berry Journal: Annu Rev Immunol Date: 2013 Impact factor: 28.527
Authors: Chloe I Bloom; Christine M Graham; Matthew P R Berry; Fotini Rozakeas; Paul S Redford; Yuanyuan Wang; Zhaohui Xu; Katalin A Wilkinson; Robert J Wilkinson; Yvonne Kendrick; Gilles Devouassoux; Tristan Ferry; Makoto Miyara; Diane Bouvry; Dominique Valeyre; Valeyre Dominique; Guy Gorochov; Derek Blankenship; Mitra Saadatian; Phillip Vanhems; Huw Beynon; Rama Vancheeswaran; Melissa Wickremasinghe; Damien Chaussabel; Jacques Banchereau; Virginia Pascual; Ling-Pei Ho; Marc Lipman; Anne O'Garra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Robyn M Jong; Erik Van Dis; Samuel B Berry; Xammy Nguyenla; Alexander Baltodano; Gabrielle Pastenkos; Chenling Xu; Douglas Fox; Nir Yosef; Sarah M McWhirter; Sarah A Stanley Journal: J Immunol Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Susanna S Ng; Fabian De Labastida Rivera; Juming Yan; Dillon Corvino; Indrajit Das; Ping Zhang; Rachel Kuns; Shashi Bhushan Chauhan; Jiajie Hou; Xian-Yang Li; Teija C M Frame; Benjamin A McEnroe; Eilish Moore; Jinrui Na; Jessica A Engel; Megan S F Soon; Bhawana Singh; Andrew J Kueh; Marco J Herold; Marcela Montes de Oca; Siddharth Sankar Singh; Patrick T Bunn; Amy Roman Aguilera; Mika Casey; Matthias Braun; Nazanin Ghazanfari; Shivangi Wani; Yulin Wang; Fiona H Amante; Chelsea L Edwards; Ashraful Haque; William C Dougall; Om Prakash Singh; Alan G Baxter; Michele W L Teng; Alex Loukas; Norelle L Daly; Nicole Cloonan; Mariapia A Degli-Esposti; Jude Uzonna; William R Heath; Tobias Bald; Siok-Keen Tey; Kyohei Nakamura; Geoffrey R Hill; Rajiv Kumar; Shyam Sundar; Mark J Smyth; Christian R Engwerda Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Julia di Iulio; Istvan Bartha; Roberto Spreafico; Herbert W Virgin; Amalio Telenti Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Clare M Smith; Richard E Baker; Megan K Proulx; Bibhuti B Mishra; Jarukit E Long; Sae Woong Park; Ha-Na Lee; Michael C Kiritsy; Michelle M Bellerose; Andrew J Olive; Kenan C Murphy; Kadamba Papavinasasundaram; Frederick J Boehm; Charlotte J Reames; Rachel K Meade; Brea K Hampton; Colton L Linnertz; Ginger D Shaw; Pablo Hock; Timothy A Bell; Sabine Ehrt; Dirk Schnappinger; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Martin T Ferris; Thomas R Ioerger; Christopher M Sassetti Journal: Elife Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Courtney R Plumlee; Fergal J Duffy; Benjamin H Gern; Jared L Delahaye; Sara B Cohen; Caleb R Stoltzfus; Tige R Rustad; Scott G Hansen; Michael K Axthelm; Louis J Picker; John D Aitchison; David R Sherman; Vitaly V Ganusov; Michael Y Gerner; Daniel E Zak; Kevin B Urdahl Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Fergal J Duffy; Gregory S Olson; Elizabeth S Gold; Ana Jahn; Alan Aderem; John D Aitchison; Alissa C Rothchild; Alan H Diercks; Johannes Nemeth Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 7.759