Literature DB >> 32203432

Immediate preoperative blood glucose and hemoglobin a1c levels are not predictive of postoperative infections in diabetic men undergoing penile prosthesis placement.

Mohamad M Osman1, Linda M Huynh1, Farouk M El-Khatib1, Maxwell Towe1, Huang-Wei Su1, Robert Andrianne2, Gregory Barton3, Gregory Broderick4, Arthur L Burnett5, Jeffrey D Campbell5, Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez6, Jessica Connor7, Martin Gross8, Ross Guillum6, Amy I Guise9, Georgios Hatzichristodoulou10, Gerard D Henry11, Tung-Chin Hsieh12, Lawrence C Jenkins13, Christopher Koprowski12, Kook B Lee14, Aaron Lentz3, Ricardo M Munarriz15, Daniar Osmonov16, Shu Pan15, Kevin Parikh4, Sung Hun Park14, Amir S Patel17, Paul Perito18, Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad7, Maxime Sempels2, Jay Simhan17, Run Wang6, Faysal A Yafi19.   

Abstract

Defining the risks associated with diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation remains controversial. Our study aims to assess whether preoperative hemoglobin a1c and preoperative blood glucose levels are associated with an increased risk for postoperative infection in diabetic men. We performed a retrospective review of 932 diabetic patients undergoing primary penile prosthesis implantation from 18 high-volume penile prosthesis implantation surgeons throughout the United States, Germany, Belgium, and South Korea. Preoperative hemoglobin a1c and blood glucose levels within 6 h of surgery were collected and assessed in univariate and multivariate models for correlation with postoperative infection, revision, and explantation rates. The primary outcome is postoperative infection and the secondary outcomes are postoperative revision and explantation. In all, 875 patients were included in the final analysis. There were no associations between preoperative blood glucose levels or hemoglobin a1c levels and postoperative infection rates; p = 0.220 and p = 0.598, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a history of diabetes-related complications was a significant predictor of higher revision rates (p = 0.034), but was nonsignificant for infection or explantation rates. We conclude preoperative blood glucose levels and hemoglobin a1c levels are not associated with an increased risk for postoperative infection, revision, or explantation in diabetic men undergoing penile prosthesis implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32203432     DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0261-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  11 in total

1.  Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin.

Authors:  S K Wilson; C C Carson; M A Cleves; J R Delk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Defining a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level that predicts increased risk of penile implant infection.

Authors:  Mohamad Habous; Raanan Tal; Alaa Tealab; Tarek Soliman; Mohammed Nassar; Zenhom Mekawi; Saad Mahmoud; Osama Abdelwahab; Mohamed Elkhouly; Hatem Kamr; Abdallah Remeah; Saleh Binsaleh; David Ralph; John Mulhall
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Use of glycosylated hemoglobin to identify diabetics at high risk for penile periprosthetic infections.

Authors:  J R Bishop; J W Moul; S A Sihelnik; D S Peppas; T S Gormley; D G McLeod
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Preoperative glucose as a screening tool in patients without diabetes.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Maria T Panizales; Margo S Hudson; Selwyn O Rogers; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 5.  Penile Prosthesis Surgery: Current Recommendations From the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.

Authors:  Laurence A Levine; Edgardo F Becher; Anthony J Bella; William O Brant; Tobias S Kohler; Juan Ignacio Martinez-Salamanca; Landon Trost; Allen F Morey
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Preoperative hyperglycemia and complication risk following neurosurgical intervention: A study of 918 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Matthew C Davis; John E Ziewacz; Stephen E Sullivan; Abdulrahman M El-Sayed
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-05-14

Review 7.  Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Gopal L Narang; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

8.  Diabetes Is a Risk Factor for Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Infection: Analysis of a Large Statewide Database.

Authors:  Michael J Lipsky; Ifeanyi Onyeji; Ron Golan; Ricardo Munarriz; James A Kashanian; Doron S Stember; Peter J Stahl
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.491

9.  Erectile Dysfunction: AUA Guideline.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett; Ajay Nehra; Rodney H Breau; Daniel J Culkin; Martha M Faraday; Lawrence S Hakim; Joel Heidelbaugh; Mohit Khera; Kevin T McVary; Martin M Miner; Christian J Nelson; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad; Allen D Seftel; Alan W Shindel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Diabetes and Wound Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Uzoagu A Okonkwo; Luisa A DiPietro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Carlo Bettocchi; Paulo Egydio; Chris Love; Daniar Osmonov; Sean Park; David Ralph; Zhong Cheng Xin; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 16.430

2.  The Association Between Hemoglobin A1c Levels and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Infection: Analysis of US Insurance Claims Data.

Authors:  Tony Chen; Shufeng Li; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.937

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.