Literature DB >> 32203138

Safety and efficacy of talacotuzumab plus decitabine or decitabine alone in patients with acute myeloid leukemia not eligible for chemotherapy: results from a multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 study.

Pau Montesinos1,2, Gail J Roboz3, Claude-Eric Bulabois4, Marion Subklewe5, Uwe Platzbecker6, Yishai Ofran7, Cristina Papayannidis8, Agnieszka Wierzbowska9, Ho Jin Shin10, Vadim Doronin11, Stefan Deneberg12, Su-Peng Yeh13, Mehmet Ali Ozcan14, Steven Knapper15, Jorge Cortes16, Daniel A Pollyea17, Gert Ossenkoppele18, Sergio Giralt19, Hartmut Döhner20, Michael Heuser21, Liang Xiu22, Indrajeet Singh23, Fei Huang23, Julie S Larsen24, Andrew H Wei25.   

Abstract

Talacotuzumab, a humanized anti-CD123 monoclonal antibody, was evaluated in combination with decitabine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. A multicenter, phase 2/3 study was initiated to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of talacotuzumab (Part A) followed by an open-label, randomized comparison of talacotuzumab in combination with decitabine versus decitabine alone to assess achievement of complete response (CR) and overall survival (OS) in Part B. Ten patients were enrolled in Part A and 316 in Part B; the results presented here are based on a database lock on January 25, 2018. Part A confirmed the RP2D of talacotuzumab to be 9 mg/kg. In Part B, CR was achieved in 12/80 (15%) patients receiving combination therapy and in 9/82 (11%) patients receiving decitabine alone (odds ratio: 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-3.6; p = 0.44). Median (95% CI) OS was 5.36 (4.27-7.95) months for combination therapy versus 7.26 (6.47-8.64) months for decitabine alone (hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.79-1.37; p = 0.78). Combination therapy showed no improvement in efficacy versus decitabine alone, resulting in the Independent Data Monitoring Committee's recommendation of early termination of enrollment and discontinuation of talacotuzumab treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32203138      PMCID: PMC7787975          DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0773-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  18 in total

1.  Single agent talacotuzumab demonstrates limited efficacy but considerable toxicity in elderly high-risk MDS or AML patients failing hypomethylating agents.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Kubasch; Freya Schulze; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Katharina S Götze; Jan Krönke; Katja Sockel; Jan Moritz Middeke; Fatiha Chermat; Silke Gloaguen; Martin Puttrich; Carmen Weigt; Doreen William; Pierre Fenaux; Richard F Schlenk; Christian Thiede; Sebastian Stasik; Anna Mies; Lionel Adès; Uta Oelschlägel; Uwe Platzbecker
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Targeting multiple signaling pathways: the new approach to acute myeloid leukemia therapy.

Authors:  Jenna L Carter; Katie Hege; Jay Yang; Hasini A Kalpage; Yongwei Su; Holly Edwards; Maik Hüttemann; Jeffrey W Taub; Yubin Ge
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 3.  An Update on the Clinical Evaluation of Antibody-Based Therapeutics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Sangeetha Venugopal; Naval Daver; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 4.  Emerging immuno-oncology targets in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Authors:  Michael Mann; Andrew M Brunner
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Targeting the alpha subunit of IL-3 receptor (CD123) in patients with acute leukemia.

Authors:  Ibrahim Aldoss; Mary Clark; Joo Y Song; Vinod Pullarkat
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Less intensive antileukemic therapies (monotherapy and/or combination) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia who are not candidates for intensive antileukemic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Enrique Colunga-Lozano; Fernando Kenji Nampo; Arnav Agarwal; Pinkal Desai; Mark Litzow; Mikkael A Sekeres; Gordon H Guyatt; Romina Brignardello-Petersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells: Origin, Characteristics, and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Long; Upendarrao Golla; Arati Sharma; David F Claxton
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.692

Review 8.  Immunotherapy in AML: a brief review on emerging strategies.

Authors:  A Moeinafshar; S Hemmati; N Rezaei
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Structural and evolutionary exploration of the IL-3 family and its alpha subunit receptors.

Authors:  Jade Fogha; Jagadeesh Bayry; Julien Diharce; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 10.  BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs-Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML?

Authors:  Cecily Allen; Amer M Zeidan; Jan Philipp Bewersdorf
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.