INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: This article examines the feasibility of leveraging Twitter to detect posts authored by people who use opioids (PWUO) or content related to opioid use disorder (OUD), and manually develop a multidimensional taxonomy of relevant tweets. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twitter messages were collected between June and October 2017 (n = 23 827) and evaluated using an inductive coding approach. Content was then manually classified into two axes (n = 17 420): (i) user experience regarding accessing, using, or recovery from illicit opioids; and (ii) content categories (e.g. policies, medical information, jokes/sarcasm). RESULTS: The most prevalent categories consisted of jokes or sarcastic comments pertaining to OUD, PWUOs or hypothetically using illicit opioids (63%), informational content about treatments for OUD, overdose prevention or accessing self-help groups (20%), and commentary about government opioid policy or news related to opioids (17%). Posts by PWUOs centered on identifying illicit sources for procuring opioids (i.e. online, drug dealers; 49%), symptoms and/or strategies to quell opioid withdrawal symptoms (21%), and combining illicit opioid use with other substances, such as cocaine or benzodiazepines (17%). State and public health experts infrequently posted content pertaining to OUD (1%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Twitter offers a feasible approach to identify PWUO. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of Twitter to disseminate evidence-based content and facilitate linkage to treatment and harm reduction services.
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: This article examines the feasibility of leveraging Twitter to detect posts authored by people who use opioids (PWUO) or content related to opioid use disorder (OUD), and manually develop a multidimensional taxonomy of relevant tweets. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twitter messages were collected between June and October 2017 (n = 23 827) and evaluated using an inductive coding approach. Content was then manually classified into two axes (n = 17 420): (i) user experience regarding accessing, using, or recovery from illicit opioids; and (ii) content categories (e.g. policies, medical information, jokes/sarcasm). RESULTS: The most prevalent categories consisted of jokes or sarcastic comments pertaining to OUD, PWUOs or hypothetically using illicit opioids (63%), informational content about treatments for OUD, overdose prevention or accessing self-help groups (20%), and commentary about government opioid policy or news related to opioids (17%). Posts by PWUOs centered on identifying illicit sources for procuring opioids (i.e. online, drug dealers; 49%), symptoms and/or strategies to quell opioid withdrawal symptoms (21%), and combining illicit opioid use with other substances, such as cocaine or benzodiazepines (17%). State and public health experts infrequently posted content pertaining to OUD (1%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Twitter offers a feasible approach to identify PWUO. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of Twitter to disseminate evidence-based content and facilitate linkage to treatment and harm reduction services.
Authors: Isabel De la Torre-Díez; Francisco Javier Díaz-Pernas; Míriam Antón-Rodríguez Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Lauren Sinnenberg; Alison M Buttenheim; Kevin Padrez; Christina Mancheno; Lyle Ungar; Raina M Merchant Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Babak Tofighi; Noelle Leonard; Peter Greco; Aboozar Hadavand; Michelle C Acosta; Joshua D Lee Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Carl L Hanson; Scott H Burton; Christophe Giraud-Carrier; Josh H West; Michael D Barnes; Bret Hansen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 5.428