Literature DB >> 32201481

Learning partial differential equations for biological transport models from noisy spatio-temporal data.

John H Lagergren1,2, John T Nardini1,3, G Michael Lavigne1,2, Erica M Rutter1,2,4, Kevin B Flores1,2.   

Abstract

We investigate methods for learning partial differential equation (PDE) models from spatio-temporal data under biologically realistic levels and forms of noise. Recent progress in learning PDEs from data have used sparse regression to select candidate terms from a denoised set of data, including approximated partial derivatives. We analyse the performance in using previous methods to denoise data for the task of discovering the governing system of PDEs. We also develop a novel methodology that uses artificial neural networks (ANNs) to denoise data and approximate partial derivatives. We test the methodology on three PDE models for biological transport, i.e. the advection-diffusion, classical Fisher-Kolmogorov-Petrovsky-Piskunov (Fisher-KPP) and nonlinear Fisher-KPP equations. We show that the ANN methodology outperforms previous denoising methods, including finite differences and both local and global polynomial regression splines, in the ability to accurately approximate partial derivatives and learn the correct PDE model.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Keywords:  biological transport; equation learning; numerical differentiation; parameter estimation; partial differential equations; sparse regression

Year:  2020        PMID: 32201481      PMCID: PMC7069483          DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-5021            Impact factor:   2.704


  18 in total

1.  Reproducibility of scratch assays is affected by the initial degree of confluence: Experiments, modelling and model selection.

Authors:  Wang Jin; Esha T Shah; Catherine J Penington; Scott W McCue; Lisa K Chopin; Matthew J Simpson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Learning partial differential equations via data discovery and sparse optimization.

Authors:  Hayden Schaeffer
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Robust data-driven discovery of governing physical laws with error bars.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Guang Lin
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Sparse learning of stochastic dynamical equations.

Authors:  Lorenzo Boninsegna; Feliks Nüske; Cecilia Clementi
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Steven L Brunton; Joshua L Proctor; J Nathan Kutz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Modeling keratinocyte wound healing dynamics: Cell-cell adhesion promotes sustained collective migration.

Authors:  John T Nardini; Douglas A Chapnick; Xuedong Liu; David M Bortz
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Estimation of cell proliferation dynamics using CFSE data.

Authors:  H T Banks; Karyn L Sutton; W Clayton Thompson; Gennady Bocharov; Dirk Roose; Tim Schenkel; Andreas Meyerhans
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 1.758

8.  A patient-specific computational model of hypoxia-modulated radiation resistance in glioblastoma using 18F-FMISO-PET.

Authors:  Russell C Rockne; Andrew D Trister; Joshua Jacobs; Andrea J Hawkins-Daarud; Maxwell L Neal; Kristi Hendrickson; Maciej M Mrugala; Jason K Rockhill; Paul Kinahan; Kenneth A Krohn; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Patient-specific metrics of invasiveness reveal significant prognostic benefit of resection in a predictable subset of gliomas.

Authors:  Anne L Baldock; Sunyoung Ahn; Russell Rockne; Sandra Johnston; Maxwell Neal; David Corwin; Kamala Clark-Swanson; Greg Sterin; Andrew D Trister; Hani Malone; Victoria Ebiana; Adam M Sonabend; Maciej Mrugala; Jason K Rockhill; Daniel L Silbergeld; Albert Lai; Timothy Cloughesy; Guy M McKhann; Jeffrey N Bruce; Robert C Rostomily; Peter Canoll; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine Model.

Authors:  Erica M Rutter; Tracy L Stepien; Barrett J Anderies; Jonathan D Plasencia; Eric C Woolf; Adrienne C Scheck; Gregory H Turner; Qingwei Liu; David Frakes; Vikram Kodibagkar; Yang Kuang; Mark C Preul; Eric J Kostelich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  WEAK SINDY FOR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

Authors:  Daniel A Messenger; David M Bortz
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.645

2.  Detection and characterization of chemotaxis without cell tracking.

Authors:  Jack D Hywood; Gregory Rice; Sophie V Pageon; Mark N Read; Maté Biro
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Bayesian uncertainty quantification for data-driven equation learning.

Authors:  Simon Martina-Perez; Matthew J Simpson; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Learning differential equation models from stochastic agent-based model simulations.

Authors:  John T Nardini; Ruth E Baker; Matthew J Simpson; Kevin B Flores
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.118

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.