Julia A Wolfson1, Cindy W Leung2, Ashley N Gearhardt3. 1. Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: jwolfson@umich.edu. 2. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fast food restaurants, including top burger chains, have reduced calorie content of some menu items in recent years. However, the extent to which the nutrition profile of restaurant menus is changing over time is unknown. METHODS: Data from 2,472 food items on the menus of 14 top-earning burger fast food chain restaurants in the U.S., available from 2012 to 2016, were obtained from the MenuStat project and analyzed in 2019. Nutrition Profile Index scores were estimated and used to categorize foods as healthy (≥64 of 100). Generalized linear models examined mean scores and the proportion of healthy menu items among items offered in all years (2012-2016) and items offered in 2012 only compared with items newly introduced in subsequent years. RESULTS: Overall, <20% of menu items were classified as healthy with no change from 2012 to 2016 (p=0.91). Mean Nutrition Profile Index score was relatively constant across the study period among all food items (≈50 points, p=0.58) and children's menu items (≈56 points, p=0.73). The only notable change in Nutrition Profile Index score or in proportion of healthy items was in the direction of menu items becoming less healthy. CONCLUSIONS: At large chain burger restaurants, most items were unhealthy, and the overall nutrition profile of menus remained unchanged from 2012 to 2016. Future research should examine the nutrition profile of restaurant menus in a larger, more diverse sample of restaurants over a longer timeframe and examine whether results are robust when other measures of nutritional quality are used.
INTRODUCTION: Fast food restaurants, including top burger chains, have reduced calorie content of some menu items in recent years. However, the extent to which the nutrition profile of restaurant menus is changing over time is unknown. METHODS: Data from 2,472 food items on the menus of 14 top-earning burger fast food chain restaurants in the U.S., available from 2012 to 2016, were obtained from the MenuStat project and analyzed in 2019. Nutrition Profile Index scores were estimated and used to categorize foods as healthy (≥64 of 100). Generalized linear models examined mean scores and the proportion of healthy menu items among items offered in all years (2012-2016) and items offered in 2012 only compared with items newly introduced in subsequent years. RESULTS: Overall, <20% of menu items were classified as healthy with no change from 2012 to 2016 (p=0.91). Mean Nutrition Profile Index score was relatively constant across the study period among all food items (≈50 points, p=0.58) and children's menu items (≈56 points, p=0.73). The only notable change in Nutrition Profile Index score or in proportion of healthy items was in the direction of menu items becoming less healthy. CONCLUSIONS: At large chain burger restaurants, most items were unhealthy, and the overall nutrition profile of menus remained unchanged from 2012 to 2016. Future research should examine the nutrition profile of restaurant menus in a larger, more diverse sample of restaurants over a longer timeframe and examine whether results are robust when other measures of nutritional quality are used.
Authors: Megan P Mueller; Parke Wilde; Sara C Folta; Stephanie Anzman-Frasca; Christina D Economos Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alexandra G DiFeliceantonio; Géraldine Coppin; Lionel Rigoux; Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah; Alain Dagher; Marc Tittgemeyer; Dana M Small Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Katherine W Bauer; Mary O Hearst; Alicia A Earnest; Simone A French; J Michael Oakes; Lisa J Harnack Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Jill Reedy; Lisa L Kahle; Jennifer L Harris; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati; Susan M Krebs-Smith Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Vivica Kraak; Sofia Rincón-Gallardo Patiño; Deepthi Renukuntla; Eojina Kim Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.390