Literature DB >> 32199835

Interpatient Similarities in Cardiac Function: A Platform for Personalized Cardiovascular Medicine.

Márton Tokodi1, Sirish Shrestha2, Christopher Bianco2, Nobuyuki Kagiyama2, Grace Casaclang-Verzosa2, Jagat Narula3, Partho P Sengupta4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors applied unsupervised machine-learning techniques for integrating echocardiographic features of left ventricular (LV) structure and function into a patient similarity network that predicted major adverse cardiac event(s) (MACE) in an individual patient.
BACKGROUND: Patient similarity analysis is an evolving paradigm for precision medicine in which patients are clustered or classified based on their similarities in several clinical features.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 866 patients was used to develop a network architecture using 9 echocardiographic features of LV structure and function. The data for 468 patients from 2 prospective cohort registries were then added to test the model's generalizability.
RESULTS: The map of cross-sectional data in the retrospective cohort resulted in a looped patient network that persisted even after the addition of data from the prospective cohort registries. After subdividing the loop into 4 regions, patients in each region showed unique differences in LV function, with Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrating significant differences in MACE-related rehospitalization and death (both p < 0.001). Addition of network information to clinical risk predictors resulted in significant improvements in net reclassification, integrated discrimination, and median risk scores for predicting MACE (p < 0.05 for all). Furthermore, the network predicted the cardiac disease cycle in each of the 96 patients who had second echocardiographic evaluations. An improvement or remaining in low-risk regions was associated with lower MACE-related rehospitalization rates than worsening or remaining in high-risk regions (3% vs. 37%; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient similarity analysis integrates multiple features of cardiac function to develop a phenotypic network in which patients can be mapped to specific locations associated with specific disease stage and clinical outcomes. The use of patient similarity analysis may have relevance for automated staging of cardiac disease severity, personalized prediction of prognosis, and monitoring progression or response to therapies.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography; patient similarity; topological data analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32199835      PMCID: PMC7556337          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  27 in total

1.  Preparing for precision medicine.

Authors:  Reza Mirnezami; Jeremy Nicholson; Ara Darzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Precision medicine in cardiology.

Authors:  Elliott M Antman; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Systolic and diastolic heart failure are overlapping phenotypes within the heart failure spectrum.

Authors:  Gilles W De Keulenaer; Dirk L Brutsaert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Topology based data analysis identifies a subgroup of breast cancers with a unique mutational profile and excellent survival.

Authors:  Monica Nicolau; Arnold J Levine; Gunnar Carlsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparing LCZ696 with enalapril according to baseline risk using the MAGGIC and EMPHASIS-HF risk scores: an analysis of mortality and morbidity in PARADIGM-HF.

Authors:  Joanne Simpson; Pardeep S Jhund; Jose Silva Cardoso; Felipe Martinez; Arend Mosterd; Felix Ramires; Adel R Rizkala; Michele Senni; Iain Squire; Jianjian Gong; Martin P Lefkowitz; Victor C Shi; Akshay S Desai; Jean L Rouleau; Karl Swedberg; Michael R Zile; John J V McMurray; Milton Packer; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Towards personalized medicine: leveraging patient similarity and drug similarity analytics.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Fei Wang; Jianying Hu; Robert Sorrentino
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2014-04-07

7.  Innate and adaptive T cells in asthmatic patients: Relationship to severity and disease mechanisms.

Authors:  Timothy S C Hinks; Xiaoying Zhou; Karl J Staples; Borislav D Dimitrov; Alexander Manta; Tanya Petrossian; Pek Y Lum; Caroline G Smith; Jon A Ward; Peter H Howarth; Andrew F Walls; Stephan D Gadola; Ratko Djukanović
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence: Practical Primer for Clinical Research in Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Sirish Shrestha; Peter D Farjo; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Extracting insights from the shape of complex data using topology.

Authors:  P Y Lum; G Singh; A Lehman; T Ishkanov; M Vejdemo-Johansson; M Alagappan; J Carlsson; G Carlsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Personalized Predictive Modeling and Risk Factor Identification using Patient Similarity.

Authors:  Kenney Ng; Jimeng Sun; Jianying Hu; Fei Wang
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2015-03-25
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Karthik Seetharam; James K Min
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  Digital Health: Opportunities and Challenges to Develop the Next-Generation Technology-Enabled Models of Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Sanjeev P Bhavnani
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

3.  Automated algorithms in diastology: how to move forward?

Authors:  Mihai Strachinaru; Johan G Bosch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Electrocardiogram-Based Machine Learning Emulator Model for Predicting Novel Echocardiography-Derived Phenogroups for Cardiac Risk-Stratification: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Heenaben B Patel; Naveena Yanamala; Brijesh Patel; Sameer Raina; Peter D Farjo; Srinidhi Sunkara; Márton Tokodi; Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Echocardiography for Systolic Function Assessment.

Authors:  Zisang Zhang; Ye Zhu; Manwei Liu; Ziming Zhang; Yang Zhao; Xin Yang; Mingxing Xie; Li Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity.

Authors:  Partho P Sengupta; Sirish Shrestha; Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Yasmin Hamirani; Hemant Kulkarni; Naveena Yanamala; Rong Bing; Calvin W L Chin; Tania A Pawade; David Messika-Zeitoun; Lionel Tastet; Mylène Shen; David E Newby; Marie-Annick Clavel; Phillippe Pibarot; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-19

7.  Sex-Specific Patterns of Mortality Predictors Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Márton Tokodi; Anett Behon; Eperke Dóra Merkel; Attila Kovács; Zoltán Tősér; András Sárkány; Máté Csákvári; Bálint Károly Lakatos; Walter Richard Schwertner; Annamária Kosztin; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.