Literature DB >> 21482760

Topology based data analysis identifies a subgroup of breast cancers with a unique mutational profile and excellent survival.

Monica Nicolau1, Arnold J Levine, Gunnar Carlsson.   

Abstract

High-throughput biological data, whether generated as sequencing, transcriptional microarrays, proteomic, or other means, continues to require analytic methods that address its high dimensional aspects. Because the computational part of data analysis ultimately identifies shape characteristics in the organization of data sets, the mathematics of shape recognition in high dimensions continues to be a crucial part of data analysis. This article introduces a method that extracts information from high-throughput microarray data and, by using topology, provides greater depth of information than current analytic techniques. The method, termed Progression Analysis of Disease (PAD), first identifies robust aspects of cluster analysis, then goes deeper to find a multitude of biologically meaningful shape characteristics in these data. Additionally, because PAD incorporates a visualization tool, it provides a simple picture or graph that can be used to further explore these data. Although PAD can be applied to a wide range of high-throughput data types, it is used here as an example to analyze breast cancer transcriptional data. This identified a unique subgroup of Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER(+)) breast cancers that express high levels of c-MYB and low levels of innate inflammatory genes. These patients exhibit 100% survival and no metastasis. No supervised step beyond distinction between tumor and healthy patients was used to identify this subtype. The group has a clear and distinct, statistically significant molecular signature, it highlights coherent biology but is invisible to cluster methods, and does not fit into the accepted classification of Luminal A/B, Normal-like subtypes of ER(+) breast cancers. We denote the group as c-MYB(+) breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482760      PMCID: PMC3084136          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1102826108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.

Authors:  V G Tusher; R Tibshirani; G Chu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Disease-specific genomic analysis: identifying the signature of pathologic biology.

Authors:  Monica Nicolau; Robert Tibshirani; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  MYB function in normal and cancer cells.

Authors:  Robert G Ramsay; Thomas J Gonda
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Mitochondrial Hep27 is a c-Myb target gene that inhibits Mdm2 and stabilizes p53.

Authors:  Chad Deisenroth; Aaron R Thorner; Takeharu Enomoto; Charles M Perou; Yanping Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression.

Authors:  Robert Tibshirani; Trevor Hastie; Balasubramanian Narasimhan; Gilbert Chu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Structural insight into RNA hairpin folding intermediates.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Xuhui Huang; Yuan Yao; Jian Sun; Gunnar Carlsson; Leonidas J Guibas; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Augustinus A M Hart; Dorien W Voskuil; George J Schreiber; Johannes L Peterse; Chris Roberts; Matthew J Marton; Mark Parrish; Douwe Atsma; Anke Witteveen; Annuska Glas; Leonie Delahaye; Tony van der Velde; Harry Bartelink; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Emiel T Rutgers; Stephen H Friend; René Bernards
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The functional loss of the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor is a common event in basal-like and luminal B breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Xiaping He; Cheng Fan; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets.

Authors:  Therese Sorlie; Robert Tibshirani; Joel Parker; Trevor Hastie; J S Marron; Andrew Nobel; Shibing Deng; Hilde Johnsen; Robert Pesich; Stephanie Geisler; Janos Demeter; Charles M Perou; Per E Lønning; Patrick O Brown; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; David Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  TP53 mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer.

Authors:  Anita Langerød; Hongjuan Zhao; Ørnulf Borgan; Jahn M Nesland; Ida R K Bukholm; Tone Ikdahl; Rolf Kåresen; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  91 in total

1.  Clique topology reveals intrinsic geometric structure in neural correlations.

Authors:  Chad Giusti; Eva Pastalkova; Carina Curto; Vladimir Itskov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The evolution of tumour phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Delineation of a conserved arrestin-biased signaling repertoire in vivo.

Authors:  Stuart Maudsley; Bronwen Martin; Diane Gesty-Palmer; Huey Cheung; Calvin Johnson; Shamit Patel; Kevin G Becker; William H Wood; Yongqing Zhang; Elin Lehrmann; Louis M Luttrell
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 4.  A review of machine learning in obesity.

Authors:  K W DeGregory; P Kuiper; T DeSilvio; J D Pleuss; R Miller; J W Roginski; C B Fisher; D Harness; S Viswanath; S B Heymsfield; I Dungan; D M Thomas
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Hierarchical structures of amorphous solids characterized by persistent homology.

Authors:  Yasuaki Hiraoka; Takenobu Nakamura; Akihiko Hirata; Emerson G Escolar; Kaname Matsue; Yasumasa Nishiura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Acridine Derivatives as Inhibitors of the IRE1α-XBP1 Pathway Are Cytotoxic to Human Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Dadi Jiang; Arvin B Tam; Muthuraman Alagappan; Michael P Hay; Aparna Gupta; Margaret M Kozak; David E Solow-Cordero; Pek Y Lum; Nicholas C Denko; Amato J Giaccia; Quynh-Thu Le; Maho Niwa; Albert C Koong
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.261

7.  Modeling and replicating statistical topology and evidence for CMB nonhomogeneity.

Authors:  Robert J Adler; Sarit Agami; Pratyush Pranav
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Informatics and machine learning to define the phenotype.

Authors:  Anna Okula Basile; Marylyn DeRiggi Ritchie
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.225

9.  A Systems Toxicology Approach for the Prediction of Kidney Toxicity and Its Mechanisms In Vitro.

Authors:  Susanne Ramm; Petar Todorov; Vidya Chandrasekaran; Anders Dohlman; Maria B Monteiro; Mira Pavkovic; Jeremy Muhlich; Harish Shankaran; William W Chen; Jerome T Mettetal; Vishal S Vaidya
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Topological Data Analysis Generates High-Resolution, Genome-wide Maps of Human Recombination.

Authors:  Pablo G Camara; Daniel I S Rosenbloom; Kevin J Emmett; Arnold J Levine; Raul Rabadan
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 10.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.