Literature DB >> 32199790

Pregnancy intentions and contraceptive uptake after miscarriage.

Andrea H Roe1, Arden McAllister2, Mary D Sammel3, Courtney A Schreiber2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with contraceptive uptake among participants in a miscarriage management clinical trial. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of medical management regimens for miscarriage between 5 and 12 completed weeks. Pregnancy intention was measured by patient report after miscarriage diagnosis. Participants were offered contraception in accordance with standard clinical care once their miscarriage was completed. We analyzed participants as a cohort and fit a multivariable model to describe demographic characteristics and pregnancy intentions independently associated with contraceptive uptake.
RESULTS: Of 244 participants with available contraceptive outcomes, 121 (50%) stated that this pregnancy was planned, and 218 (90%) stated that they had planned to continue the pregnancy to term. Ninety-seven participants (40%) initiated contraception: 33 (14%) selected a long-acting reversible method, 44 (18%) a short-acting reversible method, and 20 (8%) condoms or emergency contraception, while 147 (60%) declined contraception after miscarriage completion. In the multivariable model, unplanned pregnancy (aRR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.45-3.13) and lack of intention to continue the pregnancy (aRR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.18-2.20) were independently associated with contraceptive uptake. Of participants who declined contraception, 85 (57%) did so in order to conceive again. Nearly one-quarter of participants who declined contraception described the index pregnancy as unplanned, but after miscarriage planned to conceive a new pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: Patients with unplanned pregnancy who miscarried were twice as likely to initiate contraception as those with planned pregnancy, however pregnancy intentions sometimes changed after miscarriage. IMPLICATIONS: Miscarriage management represents an important opportunity to clarify pregnancy goals and provide contraceptive counseling. Although unplanned pregnancy correlates with contraceptive uptake, we do not recommend using this clinically to predict contraceptive need. Future research should examine how best to measure pregnancy intention and its relationship to the experience of miscarriage.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Early pregnancy loss; Intention; Miscarriage; Planned; Spontaneous abortion

Year:  2020        PMID: 32199790      PMCID: PMC7430048          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  Measuring pregnancy intention and its relationship with contraceptive use among women undergoing therapeutic abortion.

Authors:  Catherine Schünmann; Anna Glasier
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 200 Summary: Early Pregnancy Loss.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The Misclassification of Ambivalence in Pregnancy Intentions: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gómez; Stephanie Arteaga; Elodia Villaseñor; Jennet Arcara; Bridget Freihart
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-02-14

4.  Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kristine Hopkins; Kari White; Sarah E Baum; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Family Planning and Counseling Desires of Women Who Have Experienced Miscarriage.

Authors:  Rachel Flink-Bochacki; Megan E Hamm; Sonya Borrero; Beatrice A Chen; Sharon L Achilles; Judy C Chang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Mifepristone Pretreatment for the Medical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Courtney A Schreiber; Mitchell D Creinin; Jessica Atrio; Sarita Sonalkar; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prevalence and predictors of initiation of intrauterine devices and subdermal implants immediately after surgical abortion.

Authors:  Andrea Hsu Roe; Jennifer Fortin; Elizabeth Janiak; Rie Maurer; Alisa B Goldberg
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  "It just happens": a qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Cara Nikolajski; Julia R Steinberg; Lori Freedman; Aletha Y Akers; Said Ibrahim; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Interpregnancy Interval After Pregnancy Loss and Risk of Repeat Miscarriage.

Authors:  Alexandra C Sundermann; Katherine E Hartmann; Sarah H Jones; Eric S Torstenson; Digna R Velez Edwards
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Examining intendedness among pregnancies ending in spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Rachel Flink-Bochacki; Leslie A Meyn; Beatrice A Chen; Sharon L Achilles; Judy C Chang; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.