Literature DB >> 32198569

The Impact of Preoperative CA19-9 and CEA on Outcomes of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Amika Moro1, Rittal Mehta1, Kota Sahara1,2, Diamantis I Tsilimigras1, Anghela Z Paredes1, Ayesha Farooq1, J Madison Hyer1, Itaru Endo2, Feng Shen3, Alfredo Guglielmi4, Luca Aldrighetti5, Matthew Weiss6, Todd W Bauer7, Sorin Alexandrescu8, George A Poultsides9, Shishir K Maithel10, Hugo P Marques11, Guillaume Martel12, Carlo Pulitano13, Olivier Soubrane14, Bas G Koerkamp15, Kazunari Sasaki16, Timothy M Pawlik17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to assess the impact of serum CA19-9 and CEA and their combination on survival among patients undergoing surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
METHODS: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified using a multi-institutional database. Patients were categorized into four groups based on combinations of serum CA19-9 and CEA (low vs. high). Factors associated with 1-year mortality after hepatectomy were examined.
RESULTS: Among 588 patients, 5-year OS was considerably better among patients with low CA19-9/low CEA (54.5%) compared with low CA19-9/high CEA (14.6%), high CA19-9/low CEA (10.0%), or high CA19-9/high CEA (0%) (P < 0.001). No difference in 1-year OS existed between patients who had either high CA19-9 (high CA19-9/low CEA: 70.4%) or high CEA levels (low CA19-9/high CEA: 72.5%) (P = 0.92). Although patients with the most favorable tumor marker profile (low CA19-9/low CEA) had the best 1-year survival (87.9%), 15.1% (n = 39) still died within a year of surgery. Among patients with low CA19-9/low CEA, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.64) and large size tumor (odds ratio 3.34; 95% confidence interval 1.40-8.10) were associated with 1-year mortality (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with either a high CA19-9 and/or high CEA had poor 1-year survival. High NLR and large tumor size were associated with a greater risk of 1-year mortality among patients with favorable tumor marker profile.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32198569     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08350-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  33 in total

Review 1.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  George A Poultsides; Andrew X Zhu; Michael A Choti; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Serum tumor markers enhance the predictive power of the AJCC and LCSGJ staging systems in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kazunari Sasaki; Georgios A Margonis; Nikolaos Andreatos; Qinyu Chen; Carlotta Barbon; Fabio Bagante; Matthew Weiss; Irinel Popescu; Hugo P Marques; Luca Aldrighetti; Shishir K Maithel; Carlo Pulitano; Todd W Bauer; Feng Shen; George A Poultsides; Olivier Soubrane; Guillaume Martel; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Alfredo Guglielmi; Itaru Endo; Federico N Aucejo; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement.

Authors:  Sharon M Weber; Dario Ribero; Eileen M O'Reilly; Norihiro Kokudo; Masaru Miyazaki; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  John Bridgewater; Peter R Galle; Shahid A Khan; Josep M Llovet; Joong-Won Park; Tushar Patel; Timothy M Pawlik; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  Temporal trends in liver-directed therapy of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Neda Amini; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Joseph M Herman; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Treatment and Prognosis for Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael N Mavros; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Vangelis G Alexiou; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yizhou Wang; Jun Li; Yong Xia; Renyan Gong; Kui Wang; Zhenlin Yan; Xuying Wan; Guanghua Liu; Dong Wu; Lehua Shi; Wanyee Lau; Mengchao Wu; Feng Shen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent.

Authors:  X-F Zhang; E W Beal; F Bagante; J Chakedis; M Weiss; I Popescu; H P Marques; L Aldrighetti; S K Maithel; C Pulitano; T W Bauer; F Shen; G A Poultsides; O Soubrane; G Martel; B G Koerkamp; E Itaru; T M Pawlik
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary Care of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Updates in Management.

Authors:  Kelly J Lafaro; David Cosgrove; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Ihab Kamel; Joseph M Herman; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Clinical Significance of Preoperative Serum CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 Levels in Predicting the Resectability of Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tianyi Fang; Hao Wang; Yunfu Cui; Zhidong Wang; Yufu Wang; Xuan Lin
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of Combined CA19-9 with Aspartate Aminotransferase to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Haizhou Qiu; Chang Liu; Min Huang; Shu Shen; Wentao Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Importance of Normalization of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hui Li; Yuan Feng; Chang Liu; Jiawang Li; Jiaxin Li; Hong Wu; Genshu Wang; Dewei Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Challenges and Opportunities for Treating Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nikolaos Serifis; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Daniel J Cloonan; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2021-11-02

4.  Double-Negative α-Fetoprotein and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Predict a Good Prognosis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Zhang; Yongjie Zhou; Zhenru Wu; Wei Peng; Chuan Li; Lvnan Yan; Jiayin Yang; Tianfu Wen
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 5.  Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sandra Pavicevic; Sophie Reichelt; Deniz Uluk; Isabella Lurje; Cornelius Engelmann; Dominik P Modest; Uwe Pelzer; Felix Krenzien; Nathanael Raschzok; Christian Benzing; Igor M Sauer; Sebastian Stintzing; Frank Tacke; Wenzel Schöning; Moritz Schmelzle; Johann Pratschke; Georg Lurje
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  The Impact of a Preoperative Staging System on Accurate Prediction of Prognosis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hisashi Kosaka; Masaki Ueno; Koji Komeda; Daisuke Hokuto; Hiroya Iida; Fumitoshi Hirokawa; Kosuke Matsui; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Masaki Kaibori
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Progression Patterns and Post-Progression Survival in Recurred Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients: A Novel Prognostic Nomogram Based on Multicenter Cohorts.

Authors:  Chongyu Zhao; Chaobin He; Jiawei Lu; Xin Huang; Cheng Chen; Xiaojun Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with gastric metastasis misdiagnosed as primary gastric cancer: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Qingshun Zhu; Shengyong Zhai; Enkang Ge; Lei Li; Xuguang Jiao; Jinqiu Xiong; Guangxu Zhu; Yuanyuan Xu; Jianjun Qu; Zhengjiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Tumor Burden Score Stratifies Prognosis of Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Hepatic Resection: A Retrospective, Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Hui Li; Rongqiang Liu; Haizhou Qiu; Yang Huang; Wenbin Liu; Jiaxin Li; Hong Wu; Genshu Wang; Dewei Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.